We read with interest the article by Morrison et al. [1] about military ballistic thoracoabdominal injuries from a British Military Hospital in Afghanistan. In their series of 27 patients, many required surgical exploration either at presentation or after further investigation with CT. The study prompted us to review retrospectively our experience during a similar period. The medical records and CT scans of 21 soldiers transferred from Afghanistan military field hospitals to The Royal Centre for Defense Medicine Selly Oak Hospital and Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom, between July 2006 and October 2008 for thoracic injuries were examined. The mean age of the soldiers was 29 years (standard deviation (SD), 2.7), and 11 (52%) were intubated upon arrival with a further 4 subsequently requiring intubation. Three intubated soldiers were related to presence of flail chest from trauma. Sixteen soldiers suffered from blast injuries and three from bullet injuries (only one penetrated the intrathoracic cavity). Eleven had pneumothoraces that required intercostal drainage. Seven patients had shrapnel injuries (Fig. 1), and five patients had formal chest wall wound debridement. None required surgical intervention to the lungs. One patient required sternotomy for intramyocardial shrapnel removal in nonemergent setting (Fig. 2). The mean (±SD) Injury Severity Scale Score for the patients was 6 (±5). Conservative management was adopted for the remaining cases. Mean hospital stay was 32 days, and there was no mortality at 9 months follow-up. As expected, there is a clear contrast in the severity of injuries and management strategies between soldiers treated at military field hospital and those stable enough to be transferred back to United Kingdom. Interestingly, thoracotomy was not required for any of our patients, whereas it was performed and therapeutic in select cases at the frontline hospital. Previous series on military injury reported emergency thoracotomy was necessary in 12–15% of cases of thoracic trauma, indicated usually in those with cardiovascular collapse from uncontrolled intrathoracic hemorrhage [2]. It is well accepted that those patients with penetrating injury arriving to medical centers with signs of life or those who had prehospital time of less than or equal to 30 min do best in emergency thoracotomies [2, 3]. Furthermore, the procedure is almost universally unsuccessful in patients of class 1 (no signs of life) or class 2 (agonal; with pulseless electrical activity) in advanced trauma life support/early management of severe trauma (ATLS/EMST) terms [2]. The cohort of patients who arrived at our centre clearly fell outside of these categories, having already had initial assessment and appropriate emergency resuscitation at field hospitals. Our patient group, similar to that described by Rosenblatt et al. [2] consisted of those who initially survived the thoracic injury after primary treatment—surgical or conservative—and were successfully transferred to specialist trauma C. S. H. Ng (&) M. J. Underwood Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong SAR, China e-mail: calvinng@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk
Read full abstract