Intrafractional Errors Research Articles

An infrared interactive patient position guidance and acquisition control system for use during radiotherapy treatment

AbstractBackgroundThe control of patient position, posture and respiratory movements during radiotherapy is important for effective and specific treatment of malignancy. We have developed an infrared (IR) interactive patient position guidance and acquisition control system for clinical use, comprising IR cameras, IR markers and dedicated software.Materials and methodsWe evaluated the system with ten healthy volunteers and ten experienced operators. IR markers were placed on the body surface. Their positions were calculated using vectors of three translational and three rotational parameters, and the intrafractional error for each marker was acquired with and without respiratory motion. The inclusion of multiple positioning markers allowed for real-time visualisation of the patient posture, with feedback on misalignment and required postural adjustments.ResultsThe positioning time was 73 seconds (with a minimum period of 39 seconds), which was significantly shorter than for conventional line alignment. A comparison of positioning reproducibility between conventional line alignment and this system was <3·5 mm and was not patient dependent or operator dependent. An intrafractional error of displacement of up to 10·0 mm was found in the right iliac crest.ConclusionsThis IR interactive system was shown to be high utility and suitable for monitoring patient position, posture and respiratory movements during radiotherapy.

A Proposal for the Absorbed Dose to Water Dosimetry for Flattening Filter-free Beams.

Flattening filter-free (FFF) beams generated by linear accelerators have been widely adopted in many hospitals recently for radiation therapy. FFF technology can provide higher dose rates so that shortening of the treatment time and less intra-fraction motion error are expected.In Japan, the current way of determining absorbed dose to water for FFF beams is to follow the Standard Dosimetry 12 protocol which was developed for flattened beams. Since it has been reported that the flattened beams and FFF beams have different beam properties, it is necessary to evaluate the usefulness of Standard Dosimetry 12 protocol for FFF beam dosimetry.This report reviews physical and dosimetric properties of FFF beams especially in terms of the effect on absorbed dose to water dosimetry using an ionization chamber. From the review, it became evident that the absorbed dose to water is underestimated by volume averaging effect of the ionization chamber. On the other hand, the absorbed dose to water is overestimated by using the beam-quality specifier TPR20,10 to predict the restricted mass collision stopping power ratio for FFF beams. Therefore, an alternative method was proposed for absorbed dose to water dosimetry of FFF beams based on Standard Dosimetry 12.

Effects of multiple breath hold reproducibility on treatment localization and dosimetric accuracy in radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer with voluntary deep inspiration breath hold technique

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of breath hold reproducibility on positional and dosimetric errors in radiotherapy of patients with left-sided breast cancer (LSBC) treated with voluntary deep inspiration breath hold (vDIBH) technique. Clinical data from 2 groups of patients with LSBC were retrospectively investigated: (1) those irradiated for the whole breast only (WB group, n = 20) using typically from 3 to 5 breath holds per treatment session and (2) those irradiated simultaneously also for supraclavicular lymph nodes (WB + SLN group, n = 27) using from 7 to 9 breath holds per fraction. Setup and field images (n = 1365) from tangential breast fields, and anterior and posterior lymph node fields were analyzed to obtain total, inter-, and intrafractional residual positional errors of the chest wall and clavicle. The dosimetric effect of intrafractional positional errors was investigated at the abutment level of breast and lymph node fields. The total systematic setup error in the longitudinal (superior-inferior [SI]) direction was 1.4 and 1.9 mm (1 standard deviation, p = 0.049) for the WB and WB + SLN groups, respectively, whereas in the anterior/lateral direction, the error was 1.2 mm for both groups. In the SI direction, the systematic intrafractional error was also larger in the WB + SLN group (1.9 vs 1.1 mm, p = 0.003). The latter positional errors correlated moderately (ρ = 0.51) with the number of breath holds. Mean intrafractional errors of at least 2 mm were observed for 38% of the patients in the WB + SLN group. These errors resulted in a dosimetric error from 8.3% to 10.1% (1 cc). The total localization errors and needed setup margins were wider for the WB + SLN group, due to increased amount of breath holds in treatment session. Mean intrafraction movements ≥ 2 mm were shown to occur with this patient group in the SI direction, requiring intrafractional positional monitoring and corrective actions in daily practice.

Positional Accuracy of Treating Multiple Versus Single Vertebral Metastases With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy.

The aim of this study is to determine whether stereotactic body radiotherapy for multiple vertebral metastases treated with a single isocenter results in greater intrafraction errors than stereotactic body radiotherapy for single vertebral metastases and to determine whether the currently used spinal cord planning organ at risk volume and planning target volume margins are appropriate. Intrafraction errors were assessed for 65 stereotactic body radiotherapy treatments for vertebral metastases. Cone beam computed tomography images were acquired before, during, and after treatment for each fraction. Residual translational and rotational errors in patient positioning were recorded and planning organ at risk volume and planning target volume margins were calculated in each direction using this information. The mean translational residual errors were smaller for single (0.4 (0.4) mm) than for multiple vertebral metastases (0.5 (0.7) mm; P = .0019). The mean rotational residual errors were similar for single (0.3° (0.3°) and multiple vertebral metastases (0.3° (0.3°); P = .862). The maximum calculated planning organ at risk volume margin in any direction was 0.83 mm for single and 1.22 for multiple vertebral metastases. The maximum calculated planning target volume margin in any direction was 1.4 mm for single and 1.9 mm for multiple vertebral metastases. Intrafraction errors were small for both single and multiple vertebral metastases, indicating that our strategy for patient immobilization and repositioning is robust. Calculated planning organ at risk volume and planning target volume margins were smaller than our clinically employed margins, indicating that our clinical margins are appropriate.

Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: setup reproducibility with novel arms-down immobilization.

A clinical evaluation of the intrafraction and interfraction setup accuracy of a novel thermoplastic mould immobilization device and patient position in early-stage lung cancer being treated with stereotactic radiotherapy at the Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK. 35 patients were immobilized in a novel, arms-down position, with a four-point Klarity™ (Klarity Medical Products, Ohio, US) clear thermoplastic mould fixed to a SinMed (CIVCO Medical solutions, lowa, US) head and neck board. A knee support was also used for patient comfort and support. Pre- and post-treatment kilovoltage cone beam CT (CBCT) images were fused with the planning CT scan to determine intra- and interfraction motion. A total of 175 CBCT scans were analysed in the longitudinal, vertical and lateral directions. The mean intrafraction errors were 0.05 ± 0.77 mm (lateral), 0.44 ± 1.2 mm (superior-inferior) and -1.44 ± 1.35 mm (anteroposterior), respectively. Mean composite three-dimensional displacement vector was 2.14 ± 1.2 mm. Interfraction errors were -0.66 ± 2.35 mm (lateral), -0.13 ± 3.11 mm (superior-inferior) and 0.00 ± 2.94 mm (anteroposterior), with three-dimensional vector 4.08 ± 2.73 mm. Setup accuracy for lung image-guided stereotactic ablative radiotherapy using a unique immobilization device, where patients have arms by their sides, has been shown to be safe and favourably comparable to other published setup data where more complex and cumbersome devices were utilised. There was no arm toxicity reported and low arm doses. Advances in knowledge: We report on the accuracy of a novel patient immobilization device.

The Feasibility and Efficiency of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy-Based Breath Control Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Liver Tumors.

There are strong evidences showing the promising oncologic results of stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver tumors. This study aims to investigate the feasibility, plan quality, and delivery efficiency of image-guided volumetric modulated arc therapy-based voluntary deep exhale breath-holding technique in the stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver tumors. Treatment was planned using volumetric modulated arc therapy with 2 modified partial arc and replanned using intensity modulated radiation therapy technique for comparison. Dosimetric parameters were calculated for plan quality assessment. Quality assurance studies included both point and multiple planar dose verifications. Daily cone beam computed tomography imaging was used to measure and correct positional errors for target volumes and critical structures immediately prior to and during treatment delivery. Total monitor units and delivery times were also evaluated. No significant dosimetric difference was found between volumetric-modulated arc therapy and conventional intensity modulated radiation therapy plans. Both techniques were able to minimize doses to organs at risk including normal liver, kidneys, spinal cord, and stomach. However, the average monitor units with volumetric-modulated arc therapy were significantly lower (29.2%) than those with intensity modulated radiation therapy (P = .012). The average beam-on time in volumetric-modulated arc therapy plans was 22.2% shorter than that in intensity modulated radiation therapy plans. In conclusion, it is feasible to utilize volumetric modulated arc therapy in the treatment planning of stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver tumors under breath control mode. In comparison to conventional intensity modulated radiation therapy plans, volumetric modulated arc therapy plans are of high efficiency with less monitor units, shorter beam-on time, tolerable intrafractional errors as well as better dosimetrics, meriting further investigations, and clinical evaluations.

SU‐F‐J‐130: Margin Determination for Hypofractionated Partial Breast Irradiation

Purpose:To determine the Planning Target Volume (PTV) margin for Hypofractionated Partial Breast Irradiation (HPBI) using the van Herk formalism (M=2.5∑+0.7σ). HPBI is a novel technique intended to provide local control in breast cancer patients not eligible for surgical resection, using 40 Gy in 5 fractions prescribed to the gross disease.Methods:Setup uncertainties were quantified through retrospective analysis of cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) data sets, collected prior to (prefraction) and after (postfraction) treatment delivery. During simulation and treatment, patients were immobilized using a wing board and an evacuated bag. Prefraction CBCT was rigidly registered to planning 4‐dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) using the chest wall and tumor, and translational couch shifts were applied as needed. This clinical workflow was faithfully reproduced in Pinnacle (Philips Medical Systems) to yield residual setup and intrafractional error through translational shifts and rigid registrations (ribs and sternum) of prefraction CBCT to 4DCT and postfraction CBCT to prefraction CBCT, respectively. All ten patients included in this investigation were medically inoperable; the median age was 84 (range, 52–100) years.Results:Systematic (and random) setup uncertainties (in mm) detected for the left‐right, craniocaudal and anteroposterior directions were 0.4 (1.5), 0.8 (1.8) and 0.4 (1.0); net uncertainty was determined to be 0.7 (1.5). Rotations >2° in any axis occurred on 8/72 (11.1%) registrations.Conclusion:Preliminary results suggest a non‐uniform setup margin (in mm) of 2.2, 3.3 and 1.7 for the left‐right, craniocaudal and anteroposterior directions is required for HPBI, given its immobilization techniques and online setup verification protocol. This investigation is ongoing, though published results from similar studies are consistent with the above findings. Determination of margins in breast radiotherapy is a paradigm shift, but a necessary step in moving towards hypofractionated regiments, which may ultimately redefine the standard of care for this select patient population.

The Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Image Guided Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery: Initial Clinical Evaluation

The present study used cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to measure the inter- and intrafraction uncertainties for intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) using the Leksell Gamma Knife (GK). Using a novel CBCT system adapted to the GK radiosurgery treatment unit, CBCT images were acquired immediately before and after treatment for each treatment session within the context of a research ethics board-approved prospective clinical trial. Patients were immobilized in the Leksell coordinate frame (LCF) for both volumetric CBCT imaging and GK-SRS delivery. The relative displacement of the patient's skull to the stereotactic reference (interfraction motion) was measured for each CBCT scan. Differences between the pre- and post-treatment CBCT scans were used to determine the intrafraction motion. We analyzed 20 pre- and 17 post-treatment CBCT scans in 20 LCF patients treated with SRS. The mean translational pretreatment setup error ± standard deviation in the left-right, anteroposterior, and craniocaudal directions was -0.19±0.32, 0.06±0.27, and -0.23±0.2mm, with a maximum of -0.74, -0.53, and -0.68mm, respectively. After an average time between the pre- and post-treatment CBCT scans of 82minutes (range 27-170), the mean intrafraction error±standard deviation for the LCF was -0.03±0.05, -0.03±0.18, and -0.03±0.12mm in the left-right, anteroposterior, and craniocaudual direction, respectively. Using CBCT on a prototype image guided GK Perfexion unit, we were able to measure the inter- and intrafraction positional changes for GK-SRS using the invasive frame. In the era of image guided radiation therapy, the use of CBCT image guidance for both frame- and non-frame-based immobilization systems could serve as a useful quality assurance tool. Our preliminary measurements can guide the application of achievable thresholds for inter- and intrafraction discrepancy when moving to a frameless approach.

Dynamic tumor-tracking radiotherapy with real-time monitoring for liver tumors using a gimbal mounted linac

PurposeDynamic tumor-tracking stereotactic body radiotherapy (DTT-SBRT) for liver tumors with real-time monitoring was carried out using a gimbal-mounted linear accelerator and the efficacy of the system was determined. In addition, four-dimensional (4D) dose distribution, tumor-tracking accuracy, and tumor-marker positional variations were evaluated. Materials and methodsA fiducial marker was implanted near the tumor prior to treatment planning. The prescription dose at the isocenter was 48–60Gy, delivered in four or eight fractions. The 4D dose distributions were calculated with a Monte Carlo method and compared to the static SBRT plan. The intrafractional errors between the predicted target positions and the actual target positions were calculated. ResultsEleven lesions from ten patients were treated successfully. DTT-SBRT allowed an average 16% reduction in the mean liver dose compared to static SBRT, without altering the target dose. The average 95th percentiles of the intrafractional prediction errors were 1.1, 2.3, and 1.7mm in the left–right, cranio-caudal, and anterior–posterior directions, respectively. After a median follow-up of 11months, the local control rate was 90%. ConclusionsOur early experience demonstrated the dose reductions in normal tissues and high accuracy in tumor tracking, with good local control using DTT-SBRT with real-time monitoring in the treatment of liver tumors.

Adaptive optimization by 6 DOF robotic couch in prostate volumetric IMRT treatment: rototranslational shift and dosimetric consequences.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the magnitude and dosimetric relevance of translational and rotational shifts on IGRT prostate volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using Protura six degrees of freedom (DOF) Robotic Patient Positioning System. Patients with cT3aN0M0 prostate cancer, treated with VMAT simultaneous integrated boost (VMAT‐SIB), were enrolled. PTV2 was obtained adding 0.7 cm margin to seminal vesicles base (CTV2), while PTV1 adding to prostate (CTV1) 0.7 cm margin in all directions, except 1.2 cm, as caudal margin. A daily CBCT was acquired before dose delivery. The translational and rotational displacements were corrected through Protura Robotic Couch, collected and applied to the simulation CT to obtain a translated CT (tCT) and a rototranslated CT (rtCT) on which we recalculated the initial treatment plan (TP). We analyzed the correlation between dosimetric coverage, organs at risk (OAR) sparing, and translational or rotational displacements. The dosimetric impact of a rototranslational correction was calculated. From October 2012 to September 2013, a total of 263 CBCT scans from 12 patients were collected. Translational shifts were <5mm in 81% of patients and the rotational shifts were <2∘ in 93% of patient scans. The dosimetric analysis was performed on 172 CBCT scans and calculating 344 VMAT‐TP. Two significant linear correlations were observed between yaw and the V20 femoral heads and between pitch rotation and V50 rectum (p<0.001); rototranslational correction seems to impact more on PTV2 than on PTV1, especially when margins are reduced. Rotational errors are of dosimetric significance in sparing OAR and in target coverage. This is relevant for femoral heads and rectum because of major distance from isocenter, and for seminal vesicles because of irregular shape. No correlation was observed between translational and rotational errors. A study considering the intrafractional error and the deformable registration is ongoing.PACS number: 87.55.de

Inter- and Intrafraction Target Motion in Highly Focused Single Vocal Cord Irradiation of T1a Larynx Cancer Patients

The purpose of this study was to verify clinical target volume--planning target volume (CTV-PTV) margins in single vocal cord irradiation (SVCI) of T1a larynx tumors and characterize inter- and intrafraction target motion. For 42 patients, a single vocal cord was irradiated using intensity modulated radiation therapy at a total dose of 58.1 Gy (16 fractions × 3.63 Gy). A daily cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan was performed to online correct the setup of the thyroid cartilage after patient positioning with in-room lasers (interfraction motion correction). To monitor intrafraction motion, CBCT scans were also acquired just after patient repositioning and after dose delivery. A mixed online-offline setup correction protocol ("O2 protocol") was designed to compensate for both inter- and intrafraction motion. Observed interfraction, systematic (Σ), and random (σ) setup errors in left-right (LR), craniocaudal (CC), and anteroposterior (AP) directions were 0.9, 2.0, and 1.1 mm and 1.0, 1.6, and 1.0 mm, respectively. After correction of these errors, the following intrafraction movements derived from the CBCT acquired after dose delivery were: Σ = 0.4, 1.3, and 0.7 mm, and σ = 0.8, 1.4, and 0.8 mm. More than half of the patients showed a systematic non-zero intrafraction shift in target position, (ie, the mean intrafraction displacement over the treatment fractions was statistically significantly different from zero; P<.05). With the applied CTV-PTV margins (for most patients 3, 5, and 3 mm in LR, CC, and AP directions, respectively), the minimum CTV dose, estimated from the target displacements observed in the last CBCT, was at least 94% of the prescribed dose for all patients and more than 98% for most patients (37 of 42). The proposed O2 protocol could effectively reduce the systematic intrafraction errors observed after dose delivery to almost zero (Σ = 0.1, 0.2, 0.2 mm). With adequate image guidance and CTV-PTV margins in LR, CC, and AP directions of 3, 5, and 3 mm, respectively, excellent target coverage in SVCI could be ensured.

Positioning accuracy during VMAT of gynecologic malignancies and the resulting dosimetric impact by a 6-degree-of-freedom couch in combination with daily kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography.

BackgroundTo improve the delivery of radiotherapy in gynecologic malignancies and to minimize the irradiation of unaffected tissues by using daily kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography (kV-CBCT) to reduce setup errors.MethodsThirteen patients with gynecologic cancers were treated with postoperative volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). All patients had a planning CT scan and daily CBCT during treatment. Automatic bone anatomy matching was used to determine initial inter-fraction positioning error. Positional correction on a six-degrees-of-freedom (6DoF) couch was followed by a second scan to calculate the residual inter-fraction error, and a post-treatment scan assessed intra-fraction motion. The margins of the planning target volume (MPTV) were calculated from these setup variations and the effect of margin size on normal tissue sparing was evaluated.ResultsIn total, 573 CBCT scans were acquired. Mean absolute pre-/post-correction errors were obtained in all six planes. With 6DoF couch correction, the MPTV accounting for intra-fraction errors was reduced by 3.8–5.6 mm. This permitted a reduction in the maximum dose to the small intestine, bladder and femoral head (P = 0.001, 0.035 and 0.032, respectively), the average dose to the rectum, small intestine, bladder and pelvic marrow (P = 0.003, 0.000, 0.001 and 0.000, respectively) and markedly reduced irradiated normal tissue volumes.ConclusionsA 6DoF couch in combination with daily kV-CBCT can considerably improve positioning accuracy during VMAT treatment in gynecologic malignancies, reducing the MPTV. The reduced margin size permits improved normal tissue sparing and a smaller total irradiated volume.

Inter- and intrafractional setup errors and baseline shifts of fiducial markers in patients with liver tumors receiving free-breathing postoperative radiation analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography.

This study was to evaluate the interfractional and intrafractional setup errors and baseline shifts of golden fiducial markers in patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy (RT) using cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) in order to calculate PTV margins for patients with liver cancer. Twelve patients with liver tumors underwent postoperative RT. CBCT images were acquired before and after the treatment. Off‐line vertebral body match and fiducial marker match were used, respectively. The results of vertebral body match represented the setup errors of the patients, while the results of fiducial marker match represented the absolute position errors of the target volume. Baseline shifts of the target volume were calculated as the absolute target position errors minus setup errors. A total of 12 patients with 214 acquisitions of CBCTs were analyzed. Both Σ and σ of setup errors and baseline shifts in left–right (L/R), superior–inferior (S/I), and anterior–posterior(A/P) directions were calculated, including interfractional and intrafractional uncertainties. Planning target volume (PTV) margins were calculated according to margin=2.5Σ+0.7σ. Margins of 1.8 mm, 3.8 mm, and 1.4 mm in L/R, S/I, and A/P directions are needed to compensate intrafractional errors when daily online CBCT correction is used. When CBCT correction with no action level (NAL) protocol is used, PTV margin should be 2.6 mm, 5.9 mm, and 2.6 mm in L/R, S/I, and A/P directions. Margins of 5.5 mm, 14.6 mm, and 7.2 mm were needed to compensate the baseline shifts when electronic portal imaging devices (EPID) or CBCT with bone match is used for online correction of setup error.PACS number: 87.55.‐x

A prospective analysis of inter- and intrafractional errors to calculate CTV to PTV margins in head and neck patients.

To evaluate an institute-specific CTV-PTV margin for head and neck (HN) patients according to a 3-mm action level protocol. Twenty-three HN patients were prospectively analysed. Patients were immobilized with a thermoplastic mask. Inter- and intrafractional set-up errors (in the three dimensions) were assessed from portal images (PI) registration. Digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) were compared with two orthogonal PI by matching bone anatomy landmarks. The isocenter was verified during the first five consecutive days of treatment: if the mean error detected was greater than 2 mm the isocenter position was corrected for the rest of the treatment. Isocenter was checked weekly thereafter. Set-up images were obtained before and after treatment administration on 10, 20 and 30 fractions to quantify the intrafractional displacement. For the set-up errors, systematic (Σ), random (σ), overall standard deviations, and the overall mean displacement (M), were determined. CTV to PTV margin was calculated considering both inter- and intrafractional errors. A total of 396 portal images was analysed in 23 patients. Systematic interfractional (Σ(inter)) set-up errors ranged between 0.77 and 1.42 mm in the three directions, whereas the random (σ (inter)) errors were around 1-1.31 mm. Systematic intrafractional (Σ(intra)) errors ranged between 0.65 and 1.11 mm, whereas the random (σ (intra)) errors were around 1.13-1.16 mm. A verification protocol (3-mm action level) provided by EPIDs improves the set-up accuracy. Intrafractional error is not negligible and contributes to create a larger CTV-PTV margin. The appropriate CTV-PTV margin for our institute is between 3 and 4.5 mm considering both inter- and intrafractional errors.

Intrafractional tracking accuracy in infrared marker-based hybrid dynamic tumour-tracking irradiation with a gimballed linac

PurposeTo verify the intrafractional tracking accuracy in infrared (IR) marker-based hybrid dynamic tumour tracking irradiation (“IR Tracking”) with the Vero4DRT. Materials and methodsThe gimballed X-ray head tracks a moving target by predicting its future position from displacements of IR markers in real-time. Ten lung cancer patients who underwent IR Tracking were enrolled. The 95th percentiles of intrafractional mechanical (iEM95), prediction (iEP95), and overall targeting errors (iET95) were calculated from orthogonal fluoroscopy images acquired during tracking irradiation and from the synchronously acquired log files. ResultsAveraged intrafractional errors were (left–right, cranio-caudal [CC], anterior–posterior [AP])=(0.1mm, 0.4mm, 0.1mm) for iEM95, (1.2mm, 2.7mm, 2.1mm) for iEP95, and (1.3mm, 2.4mm, 1.4mm) for iET95. By correcting systematic prediction errors in the previous field, the iEP95 was reduced significantly, by an average of 0.4mm in the CC (p<0.05) and by 0.3mm in the AP (p<0.01) directions. ConclusionsPrediction errors were the primary cause of overall targeting errors, whereas mechanical errors were negligible. Furthermore, improvement of the prediction accuracy could be achieved by correcting systematic prediction errors in the previous field.

Construction of a patient observation system using KINECTTM

Improvement in the positional accuracy of irradiation is expected by capturing patient motion (intra-fractional error) during irradiation. The present study reports the construction of a patient observation system using Microsoft® KINECTTM. By tracking movement, we made it possible to add a depth component to the acquired position coordinates and to display three-axis (X, Y, and Z) movement. Moreover, the developed system can be displayed in a graph which is constructed from the coordinate position at each time interval. Using the developed system, an observer can easily visualize patient movement. When the body phantom was moved a known distance in the X, Y, and Z directions, good coincidence was shown with each axis. We built a patient observation system which captures a patient's motion using KINECTTM.

PO-0866: A novel protocol for CBCT-based correction of inter- and intra-fraction setup errors

PO-0866: A novel protocol for CBCT-based correction of inter- and intra-fraction setup errors

The analysis of clinical application of home-made immobilization device in SBRT

Objective To evaluate the effect of home-made immobilization device with KV-CBCT in lung-SBRT and investigate its clinical use value.Methods Choosing 10 lung tumor patients (half centre type tumor;half peripheral type) random analysis the interfractional and intrafractional setup errors in the SBRT process by this fixed device with KV-CBCT.The concrete method is using Varian's KV-CBCT scans the patients before and after the SBRT each time,then make the registration between the reconstructed 3 d image and the planned CT image (both based on bone landmark),we then obtain the average setup errors in LR,AP and SI directions.Simultaneously,this research make contrastive analysis of setup errors among this fixed device and other fixed devices such as vacuum pad,phantom in body IMRT.All data make one-factor analysis of variance by SSPS 17.0.Results All the setup errors data was gaussian distribution,the centre type interfraction was at (0.01 ±0.32) cm (LR),(-0.08 ±0.38) cm (AP),(0.14 ±0.36) cm (SI) of the cross section,peripheral type interfraction was at (0.01 ± 0.32) cm (LR),(-0.08 ± 0.38) cm (AP),(0.14 ± 0.36) cm (SI) of the cross section (P =0.001).We found out that the average of lung tumor's setup error at all three directions have no significant difference-the largest was the AP directions (P =0.003),the second was the SI direction (P =0.003) and the smallest was the LR direction (P =0.001).The central type has no significant difference at three directions.Compare to the other fixed device,the average setup errors of our device are (0.09 ± 0.33) cm (LR),(-0.10 ± 0.44) cm (SI),(0.17 ±0.35) cm (AP) better than the report at present paper.As the interfraction setup error was small enough by using this fixed device while it has beyond the system algorithm,the registration software of system shows (0.0 ± 0.0 cm).Conclusions The range of lung tumor motion can be cut down obviously and enhance each placement accuracy,repeatability,on SBRT with home-made immobilization device. Key words: Setup error; Stereotactic body radiation therapy; Immobilization device

Predictive uncertainty in infrared marker‐based dynamic tumor tracking with Vero4DRTa)

To quantify the predictive uncertainty in infrared (IR)-marker-based dynamic tumor tracking irradiation (IR Tracking) with Vero4DRT (MHI-TM2000) for lung cancer using logfiles. A total of 110 logfiles for 10 patients with lung cancer who underwent IR Tracking were analyzed. Before beam delivery, external IR markers and implanted gold markers were monitored for 40 s with the IR camera every 16.7 ms and with an orthogonal kV x-ray imaging subsystem every 80 or 160 ms. A predictive model [four-dimensional (4D) model] was then created to correlate the positions of the IR markers (PIR) with the three-dimensional (3D) positions of the tumor indicated by the implanted gold markers (Pdetect). The sequence of these processes was defined as 4D modeling. During beam delivery, the 4D model predicted the future 3D target positions (Ppredict) from the PIR in real-time, and the gimbaled x-ray head then tracked the target continuously. In clinical practice, the authors updated the 4D model at least once during each treatment session to improve its predictive accuracy. This study evaluated the predictive errors in 4D modeling (E4DM) and those resulting from the baseline drift of PIR and Pdetect during a treatment session (EBD). E4DM was defined as the difference between Ppredict and Pdetect in 4D modeling, and EBD was defined as the mean difference between Ppredict calculated from PIR in updated 4D modeling using (a) a 4D model created from training data before the model update and (b) an updated 4D model created from new training data. The mean E4DM was 0.0 mm with the exception of one logfile. Standard deviations of E4DM ranged from 0.1 to 1.0, 0.1 to 1.6, and 0.2 to 1.3 mm in the left-right (LR), anterior-posterior (AP), and superior-inferior (SI) directions, respectively. The median elapsed time before updating the 4D model was 13 (range, 2-33) min, and the median frequency of 4D modeling was twice (range, 2-3 times) per treatment session. EBD ranged from -1.0 to 1.0, -2.1 to 3.3, and -2.0 to 3.5 mm in the LR, AP, and SI directions, respectively. EBD was highly correlated with BDdetect in the LR (R = -0.83) and AP directions (R = -0.88), but not in the SI direction (R = -0.40). Meanwhile, EBD was highly correlated with BDIR in the SI direction (R = -0.67), but not in the LR (R = 0.15) or AP (R = -0.11) direction. If the 4D model was not updated in the presence of intrafractional baseline drift, the predicted target position deviated from the detected target position systematically. Application of IR Tracking substantially reduced the geometric error caused by respiratory motion; however, an intrafractional error due to baseline drift of >3 mm was occasionally observed. To compensate for EBD, the authors recommend checking the target and IR marker positions constantly and updating the 4D model several times during a treatment session.

Evaluation of inter-fraction and intra-fraction errors during volumetric modulated arc therapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients

BackgroundThis prospective study was conducted to evaluate inter- and intra-fraction errors in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients undergoing volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and to thus obtain planning target volume (PTV) margins to effectively guide treatment in the future.MethodsFifteen NPC patients scheduled to undergo VMAT were prospectively enrolled in the study. For each patient, three CBCT scans were obtained; one after daily conventional positioning, one after online correction with 2 mm tolerance and one after 1 week of VMAT delivery. The scans were registered to the planning CT to determine the inter- and intra-fraction errors. Patient positioning errors were analyzed for time trends over the course of radiotherapy. PTV margins were calculated from the systematic (Σ) and random (σ) errors.ResultsThe average absolute values of the pre-correction, post-correction and intra-fraction errors (in order) were 1.1, 0.6 and 0.4 mm in the medial–lateral (ML) direction, 1.2, 0.7 and 0.5 mm in the superior–inferior (SI) direction and 1.1, 0.7 and 0.5 mm in the anterior–posterior (AP) direction. The corresponding Σ were 1.0–1.4 mm, 0.4–0.5 mm and 0.2–0.4 mm, while the corresponding σ were 0.7–0.8 mm, 0.6–0.7 mm and 0.5–0.6 mm. With time, gradual increases in both the inter- and intra-fraction three-dimensional displacements were observed (P = 0.019 and P = 0.044, respectively). The total PTV margins accounting for pre-correction and intra-fraction errors were 3.4–4.1 mm and those accounting for post-correction and intra-fraction errors were 1.7–2.2 mm.ConclusionsCBCT is an effective modality to evaluate and improve the accuracy of VMAT in NPC patients. Inter- and intra-fraction three-dimensional displacements increased as a function of time during the course of radiotherapy. In our institution, we recommend a PTV margin of 5 mm for NPC patients undergoing VMAT without CBCT and 3 mm for those treated with rigorous daily CBCT scans.