Intervention Group Research Articles

Short-Term Impact of Digital Mental Health Interventions on Psychological Well-Being and Blood Sugar Control in Type 2 Diabetes Patients in Riyadh

Background: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) management is complicated by psychological factors, yet mental health interventions are not routinely integrated into diabetes care. This study investigated the impact of a digital mental health intervention on psychological well-being and glycemic control in T2D patients. Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted with 120 T2D patients divided into intervention (n = 60) and control (n = 60) groups. The intervention group received a one-month digital mental health intervention alongside standard care. Psychological well-being (PHQ-9, GAD-7, and DDS) and glycemic control (HbA1c) were assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Results: The intervention group showed significant improvements in HbA1c levels (−0.5%, p = 0.032), PHQ-9 (−3.1, p = 0.001), GAD-7 (−2.8, p = 0.006), and DDS (−7.7, p = 0.012) scores compared to the control group. Strong correlations were observed between psychological improvements and HbA1c reductions. Higher engagement with the digital platform was associated with greater improvements in both psychological and glycemic outcomes. Conclusions: Integrating digital mental health interventions into T2D care can significantly improve both psychological well-being and glycemic control. These findings support a more holistic approach to diabetes management that addresses both mental and physical health aspects.

The importance of combined use of spacing and testing effects for complex skills training: A quasi-experimental study

Introduction A major challenge is retention of complex clinical skills. Spacing training and testing have been demonstrated to increase knowledge and skill retention but the combination has not been previously investigated in complex clinical skills. The aim of our study was to compare the effectiveness of combined spacing and testing for Basic Life Support (BLS) and Advance Life Support (ALS) simulation training in one group (intervention group), with combined spacing and testing, and another group (control) that received simulation training in a single-session simulation training without testing. Methods A quasi-experimental study. Results Thirteen nursing students were in the intervention group and 18 in the control group. After three months, there was no significant reduction in retention of BLS knowledge (p > 0.05) or BLS skills (p < 0.05) in the intervention group, but there was a significant reduction in both (p < 0.05) in the control group. We found no significant reduction in retention of ALS knowledge in the control group (p > 0.05), but there was a significant reduction in the intervention group (p < 0.05). There was no significant decay of ALS skills in both groups (p < 0.05). Discussion This is the first study to demonstrate that combined spacing and testing could be highly effective for complex skills simulation training to increase retention after three months.

Nephrology intervention to avoid acute kidney injury in patients awaiting cardiac surgery: randomized clinical trial

IntroductionCardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (CSA-AKI) is a well-known complication that increases morbidity and mortality rates. The objective of this study was to reduce CSA-AKI through nephrologist intervention in patients awaiting cardiac surgery.MethodsWe performed a single center, open-label, randomized clinical trial including 380 patients who underwent scheduled cardiac surgery at the Hospital de Bellvitge between July 2015 and October 2019. A total of 184 patients were evaluated by the same Nephrologist one month before the surgery to minimize the risk factors for AKI. In addition to assessments at the outpatient clinic, we also collected clinical data during hospitalization and during the first year.ResultsDespite the intervention, no differences were observed between the groups in the incidence of CSA-AKI (intervention group 26.37% vs. standard of care 25.13%, p=0.874), mortality (3.91% vs. 3.59%, p=0.999), length of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay (10 days [7.00;15.0] for both groups, p=0.347), or renal function after one year of follow-up (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by CKD-EPI: 74.5 ml/min (standard deviation 20.6) vs 76.7 (20.8) ml/min, respectively, p=0.364). A reduction in the need for blood transfusion was observed in the intervention group, although the difference was not statistically significant (37.22% vs. 45.03%, p =0.155).ConclusionIn this clinical trial, nephrologist intervention in the entire population on the cardiac surgery waiting list did not show a nephroprotective benefit.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, identifier (NCT02643745).

The impact of Benson's relaxation technique on the quality of life of operating room nurses in hospitals southwest Iran: a randomized controlled trial.

In clinical settings, continuous changes lead to increased professional stress, affecting the quality of life of nurses. Some complementary interventions may influence the improvement of the quality of life. This study aimed to determine the effect of Benson's relaxation technique on the operating room nurses' quality of life. In this clinical trial, 180 operating room nurses were randomly allocated to two groups: intervention (Benson's relaxation technique) and control (routine activity). The study was conducted from December 2021 to March 2022 in hospitals affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Benson's relaxation technique was performed twice daily by the intervention group for 8 weeks. Quality of life was measured before and after the intervention using the SF-36 questionnaire. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 21 software, with a significance level set at a P < 0.05. After the intervention, the results showed that Benson's relaxation technique led to an increase in the quality of life in the intervention group (P < 0.0001). In terms of quality-of-life dimensions, significant improvements were observed in the intervention group in the domains of physical problems (P < 0.05), emotional problems (P < 0.05), general health (P < 0.05), pain (P < 0.0001), and social functioning (P < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found in the dimensions of physical functioning, energy, and emotional well-being. Benson's relaxation technique can serve as a complementary method to improve various dimensions of the operating room nurses' quality of life. IRCT20211002052650N1 with the Clinical Trial Registry (26.10.2022).

The Impact of Telemonitoring and Telehealth Coaching on Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales in Overweight and Obese Individuals: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

(1) Background: The literature has demonstrated several pathways that link obesity with stress. Thus, new approaches to weight management programs must also integrate health coaching and telemonitoring for overall health and wellbeing. This study aimed to measure stress, anxiety, and depression scales (DASS-21) in overweight and obese participants who joined a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) and the association between changes in DASS-21 scores and changes in anthropometric measures. (2) Methods: Fifty participants were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial and divided into two groups: the intervention group, which received a hypocaloric diet remotely, weekly telemonitoring, and monthly telehealth coaching, and the control group, which only followed a hypocaloric diet without any support. The Arabic version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21) was used. (3) Results: The data reveal that participants from the intervention group exhibited a significant decrease in the anxiety scale after 3 months compared with the control group. In addition, the correlations between depression, anxiety, stress, and all anthropometric measures in the intervention group showed a moderately significant positive correlation between changes in waist circumference and depression. (4) Conclusions: The findings confirm that integrating health coaching and telemonitoring can improve wellbeing and weight loss.

Internet-based treatment for provoked vulvodynia: factors associated with treatment outcomes

Abstract Introduction Previous research has indicated that internet-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) can reduce pain during intercourse and increase pain acceptance in individuals with provoked vulvodynia, but the factors associated with treatment outcomes remain unknown. Aim This study aimed to investigate factors associated with changes in pain acceptance following an internet treatment based on ACT. Methods This exploratory study used data from the EMBLA study, a multicenter randomized controlled trial that investigated the effects of internet-based ACT for provoked vulvodynia. The examined factors included sociodemographics, medical history, pain and sexual behavior, and psychosocial characteristics. Linear regression analysis was employed to assess the association of these factors with pain acceptance, including interaction effects. Results were adjusted for multiple testing using Bonferroni correction. Outcomes The outcome measure was pain acceptance assessed on the scale Chronic Pain Questionnaire–Revised, which comprises two sub-scales: activity engagement and pain willingness. Results Before adjustment, greater improvement in overall pain acceptance and the subscale activity engagement was seen participants in the intervention group who had a history of physical violence or sexual assault. Increased time spent on the treatment platform per week was also associated with greater improvement in pain acceptance. Participants who reported gastrointestinal problems before the internet-based treatment showed better treatment outcomes in activity engagement. Previous contact with a psychologist or counselor was associated with less improvement in activity engagement. The intervention was less effective on the subscale pain willingness with increased age and for those reporting urinary problems. No associations remained statistically significant after adjustment for multiple testing. Clinical implications Previous exposure to violence and sexual assault, concomitant gastrointestinal or urinary problems, and adherence to treatment should be further investigated in larger studies on factors associated with treatment outcomes after internet treatment based on ACT, especially regarding pain. Strengths and limitations This was a novel and exploratory study and provides information for researchers in future investigations of how individual characteristics may influence treatment outcomes. A range of variables were explored in the models, underscoring the importance of future studies to strengthen the findings. One limitation concerns the sample size, which was fairly small considering the nature of the study. Conclusion After correcting for multiple testing, no factors were found to be statistically associated with changes in pain acceptance after the treatment.

The Impact of Sira Vedha (Phlebotomy) at the Right Elbow Joint in the Treatment of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease - A Research Report

ABSTRACT Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) affects 9%–53% of the Indian population. No Indian studies have examined Sira Vedha (phlebotomy) for NAFLD, although it has been studied for other conditions. Sushruta recommended Sira Vedha at the right elbow joint for liver diseases, but clinical evidence for its efficacy in NAFLD is lacking. This clinical trial aimed to generate evidence for Sira Vedha in NAFLD patients. One hundred eleven patients with Grade I/II NAFLD were randomly assigned to either a control group (diet and exercise) or an intervention group (Sira Vedha, diet, and exercise). Blood samples were collected for lipid profile and liver function tests before and after treatment. Results showed significant improvements in SGOT, SGPT, cholesterol, HDL, and triglyceride levels in the intervention group compared to the control group, supporting the efficacy of Sira Vedha in NAFLD treatment. This study highlights the need for clinical evidence to confirm traditional Ayurvedic practices.

Effect of Oral Function Training on Swallowing Function in Community-Dwelling Older Individuals

Background: Dry mouth, masticatory discomfort, and swallowing in older individuals are important factors affecting overall health. To improve their quality of life, efforts are required to improve their oral function. Therefore, this study implemented a training program evaluating oral function to confirm improvements in swallowing. Methods: The study was conducted for approximately 4 months, from Jul to Oct 2023. Participants aged 65 yr or older were selected from welfare facilities in the metropolitan region, with 24 participants in both the intervention and control groups. Results: As a result of a study conducted on oral function training program, the intervention group exhibited significant improvements in the simulated swallowing flow rate (P &lt;0.05), bite force (P &lt;0.001), and tongue pressure (P &lt;0.001). Conclusion: The oral function training program effectively improved simulated swallowing flow rate, bite force, and tongue pressure. Consequently, there is an opportunity to implement oral function training programs at accessible welfare centers for older individuals in the community.

Systemic antimicrobials as an adjunct in the management of periodontitis - which drug is best?

This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis that assesses systemic antimicrobials: azithromycin (AZT) and amoxicillin/metronidazole (AMX/MTZ), as adjuvants to subgingival instrumentation in the treatment of periodontitis. The aim is to establish if one antimicrobial is superior as an adjuvant therapy in the management of periodontal disease. This systematic review and meta-analysis included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials, and prospective and retrospective human studies. Participants had to be adults (≥18 years of age) with a diagnosis of periodontitis in the categories: chronic/aggressive, stages II/III, grades B/C. All participants completed full mouth subgingival instrumentation (SI) with the use of adjunct systemic antimicrobial therapy: the intervention group: AZT and the control group: AMX/MTZ. A total of 779 studies were retrieved from the data search; following the application of selection criteria and independent review duplicated by two authors, seven studies were eligible for review. Two studies were subsequently excluded due to insufficient information. Therefore five studies were included in the review, all were self-funded and four were conducted in recognised universities. The primary outcome measure was probing pocket depth changes at 1-12 months. Secondary outcome measures were: the number of residual sites with pocket depths ≥5 mm, clinical attachment levels, bleeding on probing, plaque indices (at 1-12 months), and occurrence of adverse events. Review Manager Software (The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark) was used to conduct meta-analysis. Heterogeneity between studies was expected, therefore the random-effects model was utilised to pool results from multiple studies. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed by I2 and Cochrane's test for heterogeneity. The certainty of evidence was assessed and a summary of GRADE criteria: risk of bias, inconsistency, imprecision, indirectness and publication bias. Bias was graded for the five studies included in this meta-analysis and systematic review. Two studies were low risk, two were moderate risk and one was high risk. The study rated high for risk of bias was due to an incomplete description of blinding. Three of the studies were rated low bias for outcome measurement as they reported blinding of data assessors. No studies had deviations from the intended interventions and all outcomes were detected; therefore, all studies were rated as low bias for these domains. All five of the studies demonstrated changing in probing pocket depths at 1-3 months, however, the intervention and control cohorts showed no significant difference. One study showed a statistically significant difference in probing pocket depths at 12 months, in favour of AZT. This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates no statistically significant difference between the two cohorts: AZT and AMX/MTZ for mean changes in clinical attachment level, probing pocket depths or bleeding on probing at 1-3 months; when used as an adjunct to mechanical intervention in the treatment of periodontitis. It was recorded, evidence of low to moderate certainty, that for the AZT cohort: fewer adverse events were evident and fewer sites with residual probing pocket depths of ≥5 mm at 1-3 months were recorded. Based on this systematic review and meta-analysis, there is no statistically significant superior drug therapy, comparing the use of AZT versus AMX/MTZ as an adjunct in the treatment of periodontists. However, evidence of low to moderate certainty demonstrates fewer adverse events and fewer sites with residual pocket depths ≥5 mm at 1-3 months in the AZT cohort, compared to the AMX/MTZ cohort. A greater number of clinical trials and a stronger evidence base in the future will allow for authentication of current findings.

HPB SO71 - Meta-Anaylsis of Early Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography versus conservative management for gallstone pancreatitis

Abstract Background Acute pancreatitis is one of the most common gastrointestinal causes of hospital admission. The most common cause is transient blockage of the bile or pancreatic duct (or both) by gallstones. Most of the time, pancreatitis responds to conservative management (CM) comprising intravenous fluid hydration and analgesia. ERCP +/_endoscopic sphincterotomy in acute gallstone pancreatitis has been advocated in the past to decrease the number of complications of this condition. However, the role and timing of this procedure are still contentious and an ongoing debate. Method The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of early urgent ERCP versus conservative management in biliary pancreatitis but not cholangitis. An online search of Medline, Embase, Science citation index, PubMed and Cochrane database of systematic reviews published between 1988 and 2022 was carried out for relevant studies. Statistical analysis was done using Revman 5.4 and Odds ratio with a 95% Confidence interval was used for outcome estimation. There was 14 studies included in the final study consisting a total of 1756 patients with 877 patients in ERCP group while 879 in CM group. Results With random effects model, data showed no significant reduction in mortality in ERCP group as compared to the CM group (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.30-1.16; p=0.13). However there were overall more local or systemic complications (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.36-0.71; p&amp;lt;0.002) in the CM group as compared to ERCP group. No statistically significant difference found amongst groups when comparing complications as renal failure(OR-0.99, 95% CI-0.41-2.41, p=0.98), cardiac failure (OR-0.77 95% CI 0.35-1.69, p=0.51) or biliary sepsis (OR-0.56 95%CI 0.15-2.10, p=0.39) but there was more incidence of pseudocyst in CM group patients(OR-0.47, 95% CI 0.25-0.87, p=0.02). Conclusion The above study did show that the mortality rate was not significantly higher in the CM group as compared to the ERCP group however the early ERCP was beneficial in reducing overall complications in the interventional group. Based on this fact, ERCP considered early in the management of acute pancreatitis despite of still being debatable in practice can be considered in severe pancreatitis cases and further high powered randomized controlled trials can be carried out to assess this point.

AHP SO07 - Dietetic Outpatient Service to Patients undergoing Oesophagogastric (OG) Surgery for Cancer

Abstract Background Nutrition is a modifiable risk factor impacting surgical outcomes in OG cancer. Its key role influencing health related quality of life is emerging with improved survivorship. Guidelines depicting optimal timing and type of dietetic intervention for this patient group are unclear. In order to best direct dietetic care, optimise timing of nutritional interventions and understand demand for service it is important to reflect on current provision. This audit aimed to describe the dietetic outpatient service to patients undergoing OG Surgery for cancer in a national centre for treatment of oesophageal cancer. Method A retrospective review of dietetic records and statistics. Patients who underwent oesophagectomy (O), gastrectomy (G) or subtotal gastrectomy (STG) for cancer between May 2022- May 2023 were included. Results 63 patients were included: 38 O, 17 TG, 8 STG. 11 were seen by the dietitian at first visit to OG Clinic (9 O, 1 TG, 1 STG) – 6 had an elective feeding tube (FT) inserted for neoadjuvant treatment (5 O, 1 STG). 83% attended a surgical pre-assessment dietetic appointment (36 O, 14 TG, 2 STG). 86% were reviewed within 1 month post O or TG, 75% post STG. 258 dietetic interventions occurred in the first year post-op (median 3.5, range 0-14). 64% in the first 3 months(m) post op, 16% at 3-6m, 10% at 6-9m, 10% at 9-12m. Conclusion In this high nutritional risk group only 18% are assessed by a dietitian at first visit to UGI MDT clinic. There is a successful pathway for immediate peri-operative dietetic care in patients post O and TG. The pathway for STG is less well established. Dietetic interventions are concentrated in the first 3 months after surgery. There is no established protocol to support longer term nutritional needs into survivorship. To inform practice a measure of patient experience and needs would be useful, to explore best delivery format and access routes to future services.

Immediate effect of sunlight exposure through blue glass on blood pressure in hypertensive patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Hypertension affects approximately 1.28 billion adults worldwide, driving the search for integrative therapeutic approaches alongside conventional treatments. While chromotherapy, particularly blue light exposure, has historical roots in traditional medicine and its specific impact on blood pressure regulation remains understudied. So, the present study aims to investigate the immediate impact of exposure to blue glass through sunlight on blood pressure in hypertensive individuals. This randomized controlled trial was carried out with a sample of 60 hypertensive patients, who were divided into two groups: a study group that received blue glass exposure for 20 min and a control group that received exposure to colourless glass. The primary outcome measures were systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, and oxygen saturation levels. The results of the study revealed statistically significant differences in systolic blood pressure (p=0.006) and pulse rate (p=0.005) after the intervention in the study group and no such changes were noted in the control group. The findings of this study suggest that blue glass exposure has a significant impact on reducing blood pressure and pulse rate in hypertensive patients, indicating its potential use as a integrative treatment in the management of hypertension.

Effect of virtual education on health responsibility of overweight students during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The global prevalence of obesity is increasing not only in adults but also in children and adolescents. In addition to the role of genetic and biological factors, policies such as the need for quarantine during the coronavirus epidemic and the family's behavioral and socioeconomic status in causing obesity cannot be ignored. The current research aimed to investigate the effect of virtual education programs on the health responsibility of overweight students during the outbreak of the Coronavirus. This was a semi-experimental study with a pre-test-post-test design and a randomized control group, which was conducted in three stages)pre-intervention, intervention, and post-intervention) during 2021-22 in Tehran Province, Iran. The samples were 60 adolescent girls aged 12-18 with a body mass index higher than 25 and placed in two test and control groups through random cluster sampling. Data was collected using the demographic information profile and the 12-item health responsibility questionnaire from HPLPII. The intervention was implemented as 6 virtual training sessions of 1.5h for the test group. After 1.5 months, BMI was measured and a post-test was done. SPSS version 22 software was used for data analysis. There was no significant change in the BMI of students after the intervention in the control group (p = 0.476), but it decreased significantly in the test group (p < 0.001). Before the intervention, there was no statistically significant difference between the average score of health responsibility in the test group (54.63 ) and the control group (53.03 6.79) (P= 0.370). After the intervention, the mean difference between the test group (62.56) and the control group (55.10) was statistically significant (P< 0.001). Before the intervention, about 70% of the students in both the test and control groups were at a relatively favorable health responsibility level. After the study, the number of students in the test group who were placed at a completely favorable level was almost twice as before, and a statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups(P = 0.035). The results of the present study showed that virtual education during the outbreak of COVID-19 has led to an increase in the responsibility for the health of overweight and obese students (in terms of improving health behaviors, increasing the hours of physical activity, and modifying the eating pattern) and reducing the body mass index of students.

Symptom Screening for Hospitalized Pediatric Patients With Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Pediatric patients with cancer experience severely bothersome symptoms during treatment. It was hypothesized that symptom screening and provision of symptom reports to the health care team would reduce symptom burden in pediatric patients with cancer. To determine if daily symptom screening and provision of symptom reports to the health care team was associated with lower total symptom burden as measured by the Symptom Screening in Pediatrics Tool (SSPedi) compared to usual care among pediatric patients with cancer admitted to a hospital or seen in a clinic daily for at least 5 days. This randomized clinical trial enrolled participants from July 2018 to September 2023 from 8 Canadian tertiary care centers that diagnose and treat pediatric patients with cancer. Patients aged 8 to 18 years with cancer expected to be in a hospital or clinic daily for at least 5 consecutive days were eligible for inclusion. Participants were randomized to intervention (n = 176) vs control (n = 169) groups. Data were analyzed from November 2023 to December 2023. Intervention participants completed the SSPedi once daily for 5 days. Printed symptom reports were provided daily to the health care team, and email alerts were distributed for severely bothersome symptoms. Control participants received usual care. The primary outcome was self-reported total SSPedi score on day 5. Secondary outcomes were individual SSPedi symptoms, pain, quality of life, symptom documentation, and intervention provision. The primary analysis compared the day 5 total SSPedi scores between randomized groups using a multiple linear regression model. For the secondary analysis comparing individual SSPedi symptom scores, the odds ratio for the intervention was estimated using a proportional odds model. Pain and quality of life were analyzed using the same approach as the primary outcome. Fisher exact test was used to compare symptom documentation, any intervention, and symptom-specific intervention between groups. A total of 345 participants were enrolled; median (range) participant age was 13.8 (8.0-18.8) years, and 150 participants (43.5%) were female. Day 5 SSPedi score was significantly better with symptom screening compared to usual care (adjusted mean difference, -2.5; 95% CI, -3.8 to -1.2). Symptom screening reduced the odds of higher individual symptom scores; 8 of 15 symptom reductions were statistically significant. There were no significant differences in pain or quality of life scores between groups. Five symptoms were documented or treated significantly more often with symptom screening than usual care. In this randomized clinical trial, among pediatric patients with cancer admitted to a hospital or seen in a clinic daily for at least 5 days, symptom screening with SSPedi improved total symptom scores compared to usual care. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03593525.

Religiously Integrated Forgiveness Therapy: A Psychotherapeutic Tool for Depression and Pain Among Pakistani Patients with Chronic Widespread Pain.

Individuals experiencing chronic widespread musculoskeletal pain (CWP) frequently have comorbid depression. The presence of depression and pain-related outcomes in these patients are found to be positively correlated with inability to forgive or let go of interpersonal hurts and maltreatments. So for these patients, the current study aimed to apply a religiously integrated forgiveness intervention and to find out its efficacy in lessening depression and pain. The first part of research consisted of developing a religiously integrated forgiveness intervention by incorporating Islamic principles in Enright's process model of forgiveness. The other half was a randomized-control design where Depression Subscale of Depression Anxiety Stress Scale Urdu version as reported by Zafar (Urdu translations of the DASS, 2014) and Heartland Forgiveness Scale Urdu version (Butt in Interdiscip J Contemp Res Bus 4:769-792, 2012) were applied on a total of 272 adults (122 male and 150 female). After screening, 60 individuals (18 males and 39 females) were selected on the basis of high and low score on depression and forgiveness scales, respectively. Their ages ranged from 26 to 45years. Selected individuals were randomly assigned to be a part of either treatment or control group. Religiously integrated forgiveness therapy (RIFT) was applied on 30 individuals in comparison to the 30 participants from control group. Results indicated that in comparison with control group, from pretest to posttest participants in forgiveness intervention group scored lower on depression as well as pain and scored higher on forgiveness (p>.001). It was found that the religiously integrated model of forgiveness therapy was efficacious in enhancing forgiveness and in reducing depression among individuals with chronic widespread musculoskeletal pain.

Collaborative Care to Improve Quality of Life for Anxiety and Depression in Posttraumatic Epilepsy (CoCarePTE): Protocol for a Randomized Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Trial.

Anxiety and depression in people with epilepsy are common and associated with poor outcomes; yet, they often go untreated due to poor mental health specialist access. Collaborative care is an integrated care model with a strong evidence base in primary care and medical settings, but it has not been evaluated in neurology clinics. Evaluating implementation outcomes when translating evidence-based interventions to new clinical settings to inform future scaling and incorporation into real-world practice is important. The Collaborative Care for Posttraumatic Epilepsy (CoCarePTE) trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness (improvement in emotional quality of life) and implementation of a collaborative care intervention for people with anxiety or depressive symptoms and posttraumatic epilepsy. CoCarePTE is a 2-site, randomized, single-blind, hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial that will randomize 60 adults to receive either neurology-based collaborative care or usual care. Adults receiving neurological care at participating centers with anxiety or depressive symptoms and a history of at least mild traumatic brain injury before epilepsy onset will be enrolled. The collaborative care intervention is a 24-week stepped-care model with video or telephone calls every 2 weeks by a care manager for measurement-based anxiety and depression care, seizure care monitoring, and brief therapy intervention delivery. This is supplemented by antidepressant prescribing recommendations by psychiatrists for neurologists via case conferences and care manager-facilitated team communication. In step 2 of the intervention, individuals with <50% symptom reduction by 10 weeks will receive an added 8-session remote cognitive behavioral therapy program. The study is powered to detect a moderate improvement in emotional quality of life. As a hybrid type 1 trial, effectiveness is the primary focus, with the primary outcome being a change in emotional quality of life at 6 months in the intervention group compared to control. Secondary effectiveness outcomes are 6-month changes in depression, anxiety, and overall quality of life. Implementation outcomes, including fidelity, acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness, are evaluated before implementation and at 3 months. The primary effectiveness analysis will compare changes in emotional quality of life scores from baseline to 6 months between the intervention and control arms using multiple linear regression modeling, adjusting for study site and using an intent-to-treat approach. Enrollment commenced in 2023, with modifications in the inclusion and exclusion made after the first 6 enrollees due to slow recruitment. Enrollment is expected to continue at least into early 2025. The CoCarePTE trial is novel in its use of a hybrid effectiveness-implementation design to evaluate an evidence-based mental health intervention in epilepsy, and by incorporating seizure care into a collaborative care model. If a significant improvement in emotional quality of life is found in the intervention group compared to usual care, this would support next step scaling or clinical implementation. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05353452; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05353452. DERR1-10.2196/59329.

Efficacy of Interventions Intended to Increase Lung Cancer Screening Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Few eligible patients in the United States participate in lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). What is the efficacy of interventions to increase LCS participation? We performed a systematic review following a prespecified protocol registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021283984). In June/July of 2021, we searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and Epistemonikos from 1946 to October 2021 to identify studies evaluating interventions to increase LCS participation. Thirteen of 2761 studies met inclusion criteria for data extraction. Of these, six had results available (five RCTs and one prospective observational study). The studies had predominantly White and non-Hispanic participants. An intention-to-treat analysis was used to calculate each study's relative risk (RR) to increase LCS. Effect sizes were pooled using a random-effects model with a subgroup analysis for multi- versus single-step interventions. Risk of bias was evaluated with the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2) and risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I). Overall, the proportion of screening LDCTs performed did not improve in the intervention group relative to the comparator group (RR [95% CI] of 1.30 [0.74, 2.29]), and meta-analysis indicated high heterogeneity of studies (I2 = 91%). Subgroup analysis suggests that interventions targeting multiple barriers may increase LCS participation (RR [95% CI] for multistep vs single-step; 2.68 [1.77, 4.05] vs 0.99 [0.89, 1.10], P < 0.01). Quality assessment revealed that three of five RCTs showed some concerns or high risk of bias. Evidence on efficacy of interventions to increase LCS participation is limited due to a small number of prospective studies performed in non-diverse populations with critical risk of bias. Further, overall, studied interventions did not improve lung cancer screening participation, though interventions targeting multiple barriers may have some benefit.

OGC SO08 - Optimising Analgesia in Sub-total Oesophagectomy: A Dose of Success

Abstract Background Sub-total oesophagectomy (STO) is a complex and major surgery with significant associated burdens for our patients. Our centre in North-East England completes 70-80 STOs annually. In the peri-operative period, good analgesia management and delivery is key. Analgesia strategy has evolved across the UK over the past decade, influenced by multi-modal analgesia, progressing surgical approaches towards minimally invasive operations alongside the ongoing drive for enhanced recovery programmes endorsing early mobilisation. Surgical approach in our patient cohort now comprises a combination of Open-Open, combined Open-Minimally invasive and entirely minimally invasive techniques. Our analgesia strategy combines single shot intrathecal diamorphine and regional anaesthesia. Method We engaged our multi-professional (Acute Pain Specialist Nurses, Anaesthesia Consultants and Surgical Consultants) team in a PDSA cycle. A guidance analgesia package was agreed after review of retrospective cases. This package was delivered to our baseline group of 10 patients. We used subjective patient reported abdominal and thorax pain scores on a 0-10 scale, recorded by our pain team each day for post-operative days 1-5. Following analysis, we implemented a single change to Intrathecal diamorphine dosing - changing from uniform delivery of 1000micrograms intrathecal diamorphine to a dose calculated on Ideal Body Weight of 15-20micrograms/kg up to 1500micrograms maximum dose Results Our baseline group of 10 patients all received 1000micrograms of intrathecal diamorphine - mean dose 15.9mcg/kg. Our intervention group of 12 patients received doses based upon their ideal body weight - mean dose 18.9mcg/kg. Overall, there was a trend of reduced pain scores following our intervention. Thoracic reported overall pain scores were significantly lower (p=0.04) following the intervention. No significant difference was demonstrated specifically in the first 24 or 48hours in overall, abdominal or thoracic pain scores. Importantly, there were no reported adverse events related to our higher dosing regime and no recorded side effects such as pruritis or nausea. Conclusion There is little evidence with regards the use of higher dose intrathecal diamorphine in the literature. The sample sizes in our groups are small but overall reduction in patient reported pain scores appear to be associated with use of the higher dose of intrathecal diamorphine, based upon ideal body weight and importantly without any adverse effect. Continued evolution of our analgesia strategies is essential alongside that of surgical techniques. The next iterations of our guidance and PDSA cycle will consider our regional techniques to identify if further advances can be made.

A quasi-experimental study on couple-based exercise program improving cardiac rehabilitation exercise compliance in post-PCI patients.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) helps treat coronary artery disease but only provides short-term relief and doesn't stop disease progression. Exercise rehabilitation can improve outcomes for patients after PCI and lower the risk of death and new heart problems, but many patients struggle to stick with their exercise routines. Spouses play a crucial role in supporting patients and helping them stay committed to their rehabilitation. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a couple-based exercise program in improving exercise adherence among post-PCI patients. This study used a quasi-experimental design, 70 dyads were recruited for a 12-week investigation. Participants were divided into an intervention group to receive the Couple-Based exercise program and a control ensemble for conventional exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation. The primary parameter under examination was exercise adherence. Secondary endpoints encompass exercise self-efficacy, the 6-minute walk test, the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire, and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale. Data were harvested at baseline and post-intervention (12 weeks). Following a three-month monitoring period, noticeable differences were observed in the Couples exercise group compared to the control group in the realms of exercise adherence, exercise self-efficacy, the 6-minute walk test, and anxiety-depression indices (P < 0.05). A couple-based exercise program developed based on a developmental-contextual framework improves exercise adherence and exercise self-efficacy, enhances cardiac function and exercise capacity, and improves anxiety and depression in post-coronary arteriography patients. This approach is likely to be an effective way to improve rehabilitation outcomes, leading to the broader goal of improving patient prognosis and reducing adverse cardiovascular events. The study's registration was recorded with the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (12/04/2022, registration number ChiCTR2200058600).

The impact of an emercency form on the place of death of palliative care patients

Apilot study conducted by our research group in 2019 showed that adecision made in advance about the transfer of palliative care patients documented within the emergency information was associated with the actual place of death, thus realizing the patient's wishes regarding the place of death. There were also details on how the scope, duration, and frequency of home visits by mobile palliative care teams should be designed in order to fulfill patients' wishes regarding the place of death. Systematic reviews point to adiscrepancy between preferred and actual places of death and alack of prospective studies and data to support patients and their caregivers.The current observational study lasted one year, included all mobile palliative care teams for adults working in Styria and collected data from atotal of 1425 patients (52.6% men). The median age at the time of death was 78.1 years (IQR = 17.4). 76.9% of the sample were cancer patients. Other diseases included cardiovascular (6.3%), neurological (4.1%) and respiratory diseases (2.3%).The emergency information used in this study was an optimized version of the emergency information used in the 2019 pilot, based on input from all palliative care teams who participated in 2019.Atotal of 109 patients (7.6%) of the entire sample took part in the intervention (emergency information). Of these, 85individuals (78.9% of the intervention group) indicated apreference for on-side treatment, i.e., without transfer. Only 8patients (7.3%) indicated apreference for transfer and 16 (14.7%) did not indicate apreference. Of the 85patients who did not wish to be transferred, 75 (88.2%) died at home, i.e., in around 9out of 10cases the patient's wishes were complied with. In contrast, of the 8people who requested transfer, only 3 (37.5%) died at home, i.e., the majority (5or 62.5%) died in hospital or apalliative care unit, indicating that the patient's wishes were complied with in the majority of cases.The preference expressed in the emergency information for on-site treatment and against transfer was associated with amore than five times higher odds (p < 0.001) of actually dying at home. The preference expressed in the emergency information increased the probability of dying at home from 63% in the control group to 89% in the intervention group.There was also asignificant difference according to the number of medical contacts, i.e. patients who took part in the intervention and did not wish to be transferred had twice as many contacts with physicians (p = 0.031).The results of the logistic regression model also suggested an influence of age, disease and intensity of care by physicians on the odds of dying at home: Older people and the minority of palliative care patients who did not suffer from cancer had higher odds of dying at home than those with cancer. While there was no correlation between the duration of care and the total number of care contacts, the odds of dying at home increased with the number of medical contacts (+7% per contact).