Interprofessional Team Members Research Articles

Collecting sociodemographic data in primary care: Qualitative interviews in community health centers.

Many primary care organizations do not routinely collect sociodemographic data (SDD) such as race, gender, or income despite the importance of this data in addressing health disparities. To understand the experiences of primary care providers and staff in collecting SDD. A qualitative interview study with 33 primary care and interprofessional team members from eight Ontario Community Health Centres (CHCs). Semi-structured virtual interviews and content analysis of interview transcripts. Participants reported using both formal methods of SDD collection, and informal methods of SDD collection that were more organic, varied, and conducted over time. Participants discussed sometimes feeling uncomfortable collecting this data formally, as well as associated burden and limited resources to support collection. Client-provider rapport was noted as facilitating data collection and participants suggested more training, streamlined data collection, and better communication about purpose and use of data. SDD can be collected informally or formally but there are limitations to informally collected data and barriers to the adoption of formal processes.

Strengthening healthcare providers’ leadership capabilities, interprofessional collaboration, and systems thinking: a conceptualization of the Clinical Scholars program impact

BackgroundHealthcare provider leadership programs represent an intervention opportunity to support advancement of the national system of care and an evaluation of their program impacts is needed. Between 2016 and 2023, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) funded Clinical Scholars (CS), a three-year equity-centered leadership training program for US healthcare providers. CS recruited participants (referred to as Fellows) in cohorts and engaged them as members of interprofessional teams to transform their careers and the health of their communities. The aim of this study was to evaluate Fellows’ perspectives on the success of CS, specifically the program elements and their importance for community well-being and sustainability.MethodsWe used the mixed methods group concept mapping (GCM) approach to evaluate Fellows’ perspectives on program success. First, we conducted the qualitative phases of brainstorming, sorting, and rating with Fellows. Secondly, we conducted the quantitative phases using multi-dimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis and integrated the sorting and rating information from each Fellow to develop a series of concept maps. Finally, we conducted the interpretation phase to synthesize findings. Fellows (N = 177) across five cohorts were invited to participate in the study.ResultsFifty-seven Fellows (32%) completed one or more GCM phases. A conceptual map emerged, consisting of seven thematic clusters, which showed that program value could be attributed to the following elements: “Resources”, “Wicked Problem Impact Project (WPIP) Support”, “Curriculum”, “Thinking Bigger”, “Leadership Training”, “Networking”, and “Teamwork.” The pattern match showed that all seven clusters were highly rated by Fellows across the Community Well-being Impact and Sustainability domains.ConclusionStudy findings support the value of the RWJF-CS program strategy of long-term investment in the development of healthcare leaders with applied skills in interprofessional collaboration who will be prepared to continue addressing complex, multi-faceted challenges in the system of care.

Implementing and Evaluating a Pilot Interprofessional Training Program to Engage Health Care Teams in Cost of Care Conversations.

This study evaluated the impact of Financial and Insurance Navigation Assistance-Training - a pilot interprofessional training program to facilitate cost of care (CoC) conversations and address health-harming social determinants of health in a pediatric hematology-oncology clinic. A pre-post study design was used to evaluate the impact of Financial and Insurance Navigation Assistance-Training on an interprofessional health care team's (clinicians, social workers, financial navigator, and legal advocates) knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to CoC conversations and screening, referring, and collaborating with interprofessional team members. Data were collected via surveys administered at baseline/pretraining, immediate post-training, and 12-month post-training. Most health care team members (n= 21) reported improvement in their knowledge of available financial (66.7%) and legal resources (86.7%) and ability to address social needs (93.3%), financial needs (93.3%), and facilitate CoC conversations with patients and caregivers (66.7%). Improvements in attitudes and behaviors toward engaging in CoC conversations, screenings, and referrals were relatively improved as a result of the training. However, there was a lower positive rate for actual behaviors around routine screening and initiating discussions on out-of-pocket costs, suggesting a need to address barriers. Study findings highlight the importance of interprofessional education in helping health care teams address social determinants of health through effective CoC conversations.

EXaminaTion of cRitical cAre PHArmacist pRoductivity MetricS (EXTRA‐PHARMS): The clinical pharmacist's perspective

AbstractBackgroundCritical care pharmacists are well‐established, valuable members of the intensive care unit interprofessional team with unique skills to perform comprehensive medication management in complex critically ill patients. However, standardized and consequential productivity metrics for critical care pharmacists have not been established.ObjectiveTo characterize the utilization and perception of contemporary critical care pharmacy productivity metrics utilized among individual institutions.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsAn electronic survey was distributed to critical care pharmacist members of the Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology Section and the American College of Clinical Pharmacy Critical Care Practice and Research Network.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe survey included 23 questions to assess institution demographics, individual respondent demographics, institution practices, and individual respondent perceptions about the value of critical care pharmacist productivity metrics.ResultsA total of 204 critical care pharmacists, largely from the United States, responded to the survey between July and November 2022. Institutional metrics captured by more than 50% of the respondents' institutions included order verification rate/number of orders verified (60%), number of clinical interventions (57%), and intravenous to enteral product interchanges (52%). Of these metrics, critical care pharmacists only agreed with the value of the number of clinical interventions, were indifferent to the value of intravenous to oral product interchanges, and disagreed with the value of order verification rate/number of orders verified.ConclusionsSignificant discrepancies exist between institutional productivity metric practices and their perceived value and utility among critical care pharmacists.

A Qualitative Study of Patient and Interprofessional Healthcare Team Member Experiences of Bedside Interdisciplinary Rounds at a VA: Language, Teamwork, and Trust.

Patient and interprofessional healthcare team member experiences of bedside interdisciplinary rounds (BIDR) are generally positive. Overall, there is large heterogeneity in existingBIDR frameworks, and best practices have not been defined. Understand patients' and interprofessional healthcare team members' experiences of BIDR. Academic VA Medical Center (VAMC) with daily structured BIDR. Inpatients, nurses, pharmacists, and care coordinators who participated in BIDR. We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with study participants about their experiences with BIDR between January and June 2020. All interviews were recorded and professionally transcribed. We used thematic analysis to identify key themes. We interviewed 14 inpatients and 18 interprofessional healthcare team members, including nurses, pharmacists, and care coordinators. Patients participating in BIDR reported positive perceptions of being included in the discussion of their healthcare plans and increased trust in providers; patient discomfort resulted from physician use of technical language and frombeing presented with unclear, vague careplans. Interdisciplinary healthcare team members participating in BIDR reported an increased understanding, respect, and trust for other team members and improved patient care; challenges were posed by lack of supportive structural elements to interprofessional workflow and prolonged physician presentations. BIDR can build trust between patients andhealthcare providers and within the interprofessional team by creating a setting where teamwork interactions can be observed. Based on our findings, we recommend trust-building practices for BIDR, which include sharing BIDR goals with patients, using patient-centered language, creating structures for interprofessional inclusion, defining team roles, using standardized communication, and addressing interprofessional inputs in real time.

Using simulation scenarios and a debriefing structure to promote feedback skills among interprofessional team members in clinical practice

BackgroundTeam reflexivity and peer feedback in daily clinical work can improve patient safety. However, teams do not always engage in reflection after patient care. A reason could be that team members may lack skills in engaging in team reflection. This study explores the use of interprofessional team-based simulations to encourage and equip teams for reflective conversations in the real-world clinical practice.MethodsThis was a prospective, explorative study of team members’ perceptions of the use of in situ simulation-based scenarios with critically ill patient cases to train team-based reflections and peer feedback. The study took place in two neurological wards. Prior to the intervention, a 1-day observation in each ward and semi-structured short interviews with physicians and nurses were conducted.ResultsA total of 94 staff members, 57 nurses, 8 nurse assistants and 29 physicians participated in the in situ simulation scenarios. All team members showed appreciation of the safe learning environment. The authors found that the simulations and the debriefing structure provided an opportunity for training of team reflexivity and feedback. The team members evaluated the simulation-based training very positively, and their initial reaction indicated that they found peer feedback useful for the individual and the team. This approach allowed them to reflect on their own clinical practice.ConclusionThe simulation-based training scenarios and the debriefing structure promoted team members’ team reflexivity and peer feedback skills. The method is feasible and could be used in other specialties and situations.The team members’ reactions to feedback were positive, and based on their reflections, there is a potential to increase both individual and team skills as well as improve patient treatment.

Best Practices for Supporting Social–Emotional Development in Children With Developmental Language Disorder and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Purpose: Children with developmental language disorder (DLD) and/or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are at an elevated risk of social–emotional difficulties, including low self-esteem and anxiety, related to school achievement and peer interactions. This clinical focus article provides best practice guidelines, shaped by a neurodiversity-affirming lens, to support children's social–emotional development. Method: The guidelines were developed through interprofessional discussions among the authors, which included three communication specialists and two mental health specialists, and supported by review of the scholarly literature on neurodiversity, DLD, and ADHD, with a focus on first-person perspectives of children and adults with these conditions and their parents and teachers. Results: The practice guidelines include recommendations for the interprofessional assessment of DLD and/or ADHD and suggestions for neurodiversity-affirming supports to promote acceptance of students with DLD and/or ADHD by teachers and peers. Intervention recommendations for social communication skills, self-regulation supports, and self-advocacy are described. A hypothetical case study is provided to illustrate implementation of the recommended practices. Conclusions: First-person and family perspectives studies provide compelling evidence that having DLD and/or ADHD, coupled with the negative reactions of others to children's differences related to these conditions, have adverse effects on children's social–emotional development. Speech-language pathologists and their interprofessional team members have an important role to play in preventing these effects by providing social–emotional supports for children with DLD and/or ADHD.

Registered Dietitian Nutritionists’ Attitudes Toward Interprofessional Health Care Teams: A Cross-Sectional Survey

BackgroundRegistered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) are important members of interprofessional health care teams; yet, there is limited research of RDN perspectives of interprofessional teams. ObjectiveTo examine associations between the characteristics of RDNs and their attitudes of team-based care (TBC). DesignA cross-sectional electronic Qualtrics survey encompassing demographic questions, the Attitudes Toward Interdisciplinary Health Care Teams (ATIHCT) scale, and additional interprofessional-related items was distributed to RDNs during January 2020. Participants/settingA total of 5018 RDNs from various regions/specialties in the United States were recruited primarily via direct email from a random list of RDNs obtained through the Commission on Dietetic Registration. The final sample was N = 616; 12.3% of RDNs and 88.1% of RDNs who initiated the survey. Main outcome measuresATIHCT subscale scores, which measure attitudes regarding efficiency of TBC and service quality of TBC. Statistical analyses performedMultiple linear regression modeled area of specialty, time with RDN credential, location, sex, frequency of TBC, and how valued the RDN perceived him or herself to be as independent variables, with ATIHCT subscales as outcome variables. Data were subjected to confirmatory factor analysis to determine appropriate use of the ATIHCT scale in the sample. ResultsFoodservice (β = –1.48; P = .004) and sports nutrition RDNs (β = –2.58; P = .014) had lower scores for attitudes regarding efficiency of TBC (subscale 1) than clinical RDNs. Greater perceived value of the RDN was associated with higher scores for attitudes regarding efficiency (β = .66; P < .001). Greater perceived value of the RDN (β = .13; P = .03) was associated with higher scores for attitudes regarding service quality of TBC (subscale 2). ConclusionsSpecialty and perceived RDN value are associated with more favorable interprofessional attitudes among RDNs. To support positive attitudes regarding interprofessional collaboration, efforts should be honed to foster appreciation and clarity of the RDN’s role in TBC.

Addressing challenges in diagnosis and management of rare disease through interprofessional education

Rare diseases represent a significant public health challenge due to their complexity and lack of resources. One way to improve care for patients with rare disease is to educate healthcare professionals on the diverse and unique needs of patients with rare disorders. An interprofessional education (IPE) event was created for healthcare students based on the Interprofessional Education Collaborative’s ‘IPE Core Competencies', mainly targeting two specific competencies: (1) interprofessional communication and (2) teams and teamwork. The IPE event included direct instruction, case-based learning, and narrative medicine components using the rare disease nephropathic cystinosis as a model of a rare complex disorder. Pre- and post-event survey data were collected to assess the participants' knowledge acquisition and perceived confidence in caring for patients with a rare disease as part of an interprofessional healthcare team and included open-ended questions regarding qualities of an interprofessional team member, and key takeaways from the event. Enrollment included 163 graduate-level healthcare students from nine different disciplines. The survey data showed improved understanding of the importance of rare disease research (p < 0.001), ability to identify supportive resources for patients (p < 0.001), confidence in being part of an interprofessional team caring for a patient with rare disease (p < 0.001) and value of education about rare disease (p = 0.009). When asked to describe features of effective interprofessional teams, common traits included strong communication skills, empathy, compassion, understanding, collaboration, and respect. This work demonstrates that utilizing an interprofessional model in educating health professional students about rare diseases successfully enhanced learners’ confidence in their ability to be part of an interprofessional team caring for patients and families impacted by rare disease, and given the total prevalence of rare diseases, may have a significant impact on healthcare as a whole.

The scholarly and practice profile of respiratory therapists in Canada: A cross-sectional survey.

Respiratory therapists (RTs) are expected to provide high-quality care for patients with chronic and acute cardiopulmonary conditions across the lifespan by staying abreast of emerging scientific evidence and effectively integrating it into clinical practice. This integration of evidence is encompassed within the competency of scholarly practice. However, there is currently a limited understanding of RTs' scholarly practice. Furthermore, despite RTs' widespread presence in the Canadian healthcare system, comprehensive studies describing the profiles of RTs are lacking. This study aimed to describe the demographic characteristics, scholarly and practice profiles of the respiratory therapy profession in Canada. A cross-sectional survey was distributed via the national professional association and regulatory bodies. The survey contained seven sections with 52 items. We calculated means and standard deviations, or medians and interquartile ranges for continuous variables and frequencies and proportions for categorical variables. Open-ended questions were analyzed using summative content analysis. We analyzed data from 832 participants (6.8% response rate) from Ontario (17.8%), Québec (15.7%), and Alberta (13.3%), and across other provinces. Nearly 40% had completed an undergraduate degree beyond their respiratory therapy diploma. Few participants had authored or co-authored peer-reviewed publications. RTs reported reading approximately 2.2 peer-reviewed publications monthly. Most participants agreed on the importance of critical reflection in practice (93.1%) and that having a supportive work environment was vital. Almost three-quarters of participants (73.4%) reported that they believe that RTs are valued members of interprofessional teams, and 78% agreed that understanding research enables them to engage in patient advocacy. This survey provides a portrait of the practice and scholarly profile of the respiratory therapy profession in Canada. While the profession shows potential for growth, concerns persist regarding limited engagement in activities related to scholarly practice. Addressing these challenges and nurturing a culture of scholarly practice are likely necessary to support the development of scholarly practice in the profession. Creating supportive environments, providing access to resources, and encouraging professional development activities may advance the scholarly practice of RTs. Future national surveys could employ random sampling strategies to achieve a more representative sample of the profession.

Leadership and Followership Dynamics in Interprofessional Health Care Teams: Attending Physician Perspectives.

Effective interprofessional health care team (IHT) members collaborate to reduce medical errors, use resources effectively, and improve patient outcomes, making interprofessional collaboration imperative. Because physicians are often designated as the positional leaders of IHTs, understanding their perspectives on collaboration within IHTs could help to mitigate the disconnects between what is suggested in theory and what is happening in practice. This study aimed to explore leader-follower dynamics within medical teams that are commonly working in clinical care contexts. Using a constructivist approach, the authors conducted 12 individual, semistructured interviews from November 2022 to September 2023 with attending physicians who have led IHTs in perioperative (i.e., preoperative clinic, operating room, postoperative and recovery unit) or emergency department settings. The transcripts were analyzed from December 2022 to December 2023 using inductive thematic analysis. Three themes explained the physician perceptions of IHT leadership-followership dynamics: (1) physicians are comfortable sharing leadership intraprofessionally, (2) the clinical culture and environment constrain interprofessional followership and shared leadership, and (3) hierarchical models hold true even while active followers are appreciated, when appropriate. The data in this study suggest that, in perioperative and emergency department settings, shared leadership largely may not occur interprofessionally but occurs intraprofessionally. Participants suggested that the clinical culture and environment (i.e., legal concerns, hierarchical assumption, patient care ownership responsibilities) constrained interprofessional followership and shared leadership. On the basis of the study's findings and how they align with previous research, future research into interprofessional collaboration and followership roles should focus on what factors enable and constrain active followership and shared leadership. Such collaboration can only be achieved when active followership and shared leadership are allowed and promoted. These findings and others suggest that not all contexts are enabling such types of interprofessional collaboration due to legal concerns, hierarchical traditions, and patient ownership considerations.

Hospital personnel perspectives on factors influencing acute care patient outcomes: a qualitative approach to model refinement

BackgroundHealth systems have long been interested in the best practices for staffing in the acute care setting. Studies on staffing often focus on registered nurses and nurse-to-patient staffing ratios. There were fewer studies on the relationship between interprofessional team members or contextual factors such as hospital and community characteristics and patient outcomes. This qualitative study aimed to refine an explanatory model by soliciting hospital personnel feedback on staffing and patient outcomes.MethodsWe conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis to understand hospital personnel’s perspectives and experiences of factors that affect acute care inpatient outcomes. Interviews were conducted in 2022 with 38 hospital personnel representing 19 hospitals across Washington state in the United States of America.ResultsFindings support a model of characteristics impacting patient outcomes to include the complex and interconnected relationships between community, hospital, patient, and staffing characteristics. Within the model, patient characteristics were positioned into hospital characteristics, and in turn these were positioned within community characteristics to highlight the importance of setting and context when evaluating outcomes. Together, these factors influenced both staff characteristics and patient outcomes, but these two categories also share a direct relationship.ConclusionFindings can be applied to hospitals and health systems in a variety of contexts to examine how external factors such as community resource availability impact care delivery. Future research should expand on this work with specific attention to how staffing changes and interprofessional team composition can improve patient outcomes.

Identifying research priorities and essential elements of palliative care services for people facing malignant brain tumors: A participatory co-design approach.

Primary malignant brain tumors (ie, brain cancer) impact the quality of life (QoL) for patients and care partners in disease-specific ways involving cognition and communication. Palliative care (PC) addresses patient/care partner QoL, but it is not known how PC may address the unique needs of brain cancer patients. The purpose of this project was to identify brain cancer PC research priorities using participatory co-design methods. Participatory co-design included the formation of a longitudinal, collaborative advisory group, engagement frameworks, design-thinking processes, and social media-based engagement over a 1-year period. Community-identified brain cancer QoL needs and research priorities were mapped to proposed "essential elements" of brain cancer PC services. We engaged an estimated 500 patients, care partners, healthcare professionals, and others with an interest in QoL and PC services for people with malignant brain tumors. Research priorities included testing the early introduction of PC services designed to address the unique QoL needs of brain cancer patients and care partners. Essential elements of brain cancer PC include: (1) addressing brain cancer patients' unique range of QoL needs and concerns, which change over time, (2) tailoring existing services and approaches to patient needs and concerns, (3) enhancing the involvement of interprofessional care team members, and (4) optimizing timing for PC services. This was the first participatory research effort exploring brain cancer patient and care partner QoL needs and PC services. The brain tumor community calls for research testing PC service models for patients that incorporate the "essential elements" of palliative care.

Impact of Collaborative Leadership, Workplace Social Capital, and Interprofessional Collaboration Practice on Patient Safety Climate.

Patient safety climate is an important factor in promoting patient safety for healthcare organizations. This study investigated the relationship between collaborative leadership and patient safety climate, the mediation effect of workplace social capital, or interprofessional collaboration practice. A web-based cross-sectional questionnaire survey was administered between May 2021 and May 2022, to employees of three acute care hospitals in Japan. The relationship between variables was verified by structural equation modeling. A total of 1,276 staff members participated in the study. Collaborative leadership affected the workplace social capital (β = .734) and interprofessional collaboration (β = .561), which were positively associated with patient safety climate (β = .403 and .405, respectively), verifying the mediating relationship of workplace social capital and interprofessional collaboration between collaborative leadership and patient safety climate. Collaborative leadership enhances the reciprocity and interprofessional practices of the healthcare team. The interaction among interprofessional team members fosters a patient safety climate. The results of this survey suggest that the development of collaborative leadership, which encourages interprofessional collaboration and fosters workplace social capital, is inherently crucial for cultivating a patient safety climate.

Pilot Process Evaluation of the Supporting Older Adults at Risk Model: A RE-AIM Approach.

Despite evidence supporting transitional care models, hospitals report challenges implementing and sustaining them. The Discharge to Assess (D2A) Model is an innovative solution to this problem but required translation from a national health system context to an U.S.-based context. We translated the central tenets of the D2A model to establish the Supporting Older Adults at Risk (SOAR) Model, which unfolds in three phases: Prepare, Transition, and Support. The purpose of this project was to conduct a process evaluation of the SOAR Model in practice using the RE-AIM Framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance). Forty patients completed all SOAR Model components for a Reach of 21%. Patients averaged 80 years of age, 53% were female, and 64% Black/AA. SOAR significantly improved discharge before noon, time to first home visit, and use of the in-house pharmacy. SOAR also improved length of hospital stay, emergency department visits, and readmissions. Twenty-one of the 26 Implementation measures unfolded with 75% or greater fidelity. Sixteen of the 24 Adoption measures unfolded with 75% or greater fidelity. COVID-19 limited Maintenance. Given the model unfolds across settings over time, requiring adoption from interprofessional team members, patients, and families, future work should focus on improving reach and adoption.

Bias in team decision-making for advanced heart failure therapies: model application

ABSTRACT Bias in advanced heart failure therapy allocation results in inequitable outcomes for minoritized populations. The purpose of this study was to examine how bias is introduced during group decision-making with an interprofessional team using Breathett’s Model of Heart Failure Decision-Making. This was a secondary qualitative descriptive analysis from a study focused on bias in advanced heart failure therapy allocation. Team meetings were recorded and transcribed from four heart failure centers. Breathett’s Model was applied both deductively and inductively to transcripts (n = 12). Bias was identified during discussions about patient characteristics, clinical fragility, and prior clinical decision-making. Some patients were labeled as “good citizens” or as adherent/non-adherent while others benefited from strong advocacy from interprofessional team members. Social determinants of health also impacted therapy allocation. Interprofessional collaboration with advanced heart failure therapy allocation may be enhanced with the inclusion of patient advocates and limit of clinical decision-making using subjective data.

Behavioral Health Access and Workforce Competence for Integrated Care: Highlighting Interprofessional Initiatives from Two North Carolina Social Work Programs.

Effective team-based care is necessary for implementation of the integrated care models recommended to improve behavioral health access. Many models rely on social work-ers who are trained to deliver behavioral health care as an interprofessional team member. In this article, we highlight two social work programs utilizing interprofessional educa-tion to enhance team-based care competence.

Fostering Psychological Safety: Building Team-Based Care Communication Skills.

As health systems continue to advance integrated models of care, communication remains a central facet of how interprofessional team members can concurrently address physical health, behavioral health, and social needs.

An Analysis of Workplace-Based Assessments for Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency: Does Type of Clinical Assessor Influence Level of Supervision Ratings?

The authors describe use of the workplace-based assessment (WBA) coactivity scale according to entrustable professional activities (EPAs) and assessor type to examine how diverse assessors rate medical students using WBAs. A WBA data collection system was launched at Oregon Health and Science University to visualize learner competency in various clinical settings to foster EPA assessment. WBA data from January 14 to June 18, 2021, for medical students (all years) were analyzed. The outcome variable was level of supervisor involvement in each EPA, and the independent variable was assessor type. A total of 7,809 WBAs were included. Most fourth-, third-, and second-year students were assessed by residents or fellows (755 [49.5%], 1,686 [48.5%], and 918 [49.9%], respectively) and first-year students by attending physicians (803 [83.0%]; P < .001). Attendings were least likely to use the highest rating of 4 (1 was available just in case; 2,148 [56.7%] vs 2,368 [67.7%] for residents; P < .001). Learners more commonly sought WBAs from attendings for EPA 2 (prioritize differential diagnosis), EPA 5 (document clinical encounter), EPA 6 (provide oral presentation), EPA 7 (form clinical questions and retrieve evidence-based medicine), and EPA 12 (perform general procedures of a physician). Residents and fellows were more likely to assess students on EPA 3 (recommend and interpret diagnostic and screening tests), EPA 4 (enter and discuss orders and prescriptions), EPA 8 (give and receive patient handover for transitions in care), EPA 9 (collaborate as member of interprofessional team), EPA 10 (recognize and manage patient in need of urgent care), and EPA 11 (obtain informed consent). Learners preferentially sought resident versus attending supervisors for different EPA assessments. Future research should investigate why learners seek different assessors more frequently for various EPAs and if assessor type variability in WBA levels holds true across institutions.

Patient Education Practices and Preferences of Radiation Oncologists and Interprofessional Radiation Therapy Care Teams: A Mixed-Methods Study Exploring Strategies for Effective Patient Education Delivery

Purpose/ObjectivesPatients’ understanding of radiotherapy (RT) and data regarding optimal approaches to patient education (PE) within radiation oncology (RO) are limited. We aimed to evaluate PE practices of radiation oncologists and interprofessional RT care team members to inform recommendations for delivering inclusive and accessible PE. Materials/MethodsAn anonymous survey was administered to all Radiation Oncology Education Collaborative Study Group (ROECSG) members (10/5/22-11/23/22). Respondent demographics, individual practices/preferences, and institutional practices were collected. Qualitative items explored strategies, challenges, and desired resources for PE. Descriptive statistics summarized survey responses. Fisher's exact test compared PE practices by respondent role and PE timing. Thematic analysis was used for qualitative responses. Results113 ROECSG members completed the survey (28.2% response rate); RO attendings comprised 68.1% of respondents. Most practiced in an academic setting (85.8%) in North America (80.5%). Institution-specific materials were the most common PE resource used by radiation oncologists (67.6%). Almost half (40.2%) reported that their PE practices differed based on clinical encounter type, with paper handouts commonly used for in-person and multimedia for telehealth visits. Only 57.7% reported access to non-English PE materials. PE practices amongst radiation oncologists differed according to RT clinical workflow timing (consultation vs simulation vs first RT, respectively): one-on-one teaching: 88.5% vs 49.4% vs 56.3%, p<0.01 and paper handouts: 69.0% vs 28.7% vs 16.1%, p<0.01. Identified challenges for PE delivery included limited time, administrative barriers to the development or implementation of new materials or practices, and a lack of customized resources for tailored PE. Effective strategies for PE included utilization of visual diagrams, multimedia, and innovative education techniques to personalize PE delivery/resources for a diverse patient population, as well as fostering interprofessional collaboration to reinforce educational content. ConclusionsRadiation oncologists and interprofessional RO team members engage in PE, with most utilizing institution-specific materials often available only in English. PE practices differ according to clinical encounter type and RT workflow timing. Increased adoption of multimedia materials and partnerships with patients to tailor PE resources are needed to foster high-quality, patient-centered PE delivery.