Interprofessional Care Research Articles

Risk factors predicting clinical oncology pharmacists’ medication modifications.

54 Background: Pharmacists provide an important role in oncology practice, especially as the use of oral anticancer agents (OAAs) has increased. A program supporting the integration of clinical oncology pharmacists into community practices, Pharmacists Optimizing Oncology Care Excellence in Michigan (POEM), is examining their roles and impact. The purpose of this study was to identify patient characteristics that were associated with medication modification interventions from clinical oncology pharmacists. These results will provide insight into how pharmacists support patient care as well as how to focus pharmacists’ care when their time may be limited. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective analysis was conducted with data from October 2020 – April 2023 documenting clinical care provided to patients taking OAA(s) and receiving a patient-focused intervention. POEM pharmacists received support in the development of collaborative practice agreements, billing, and clinical oncology education. Data included patient demographics, and encounter and intervention characteristics. First, we predicted medication modification interventions including each OAA in machine learning Regression Tree analyses. Second, we used zero-inflated Poisson regression to quantify predictors of receipt of medication modification interventions. We examined cross-tabulations for age and rurality and medication modifications. Results: In these analyses, 1836 met study inclusion, and 1029 medication modifications were made for 623 patients. In Tree analyses, Group 1 was patients receiving trametinib (n=1 patient) and cabozantinib (n=2), and Group 2 was patients receiving alpelisib (n=28 patients) and osimertinib/palbociclib (n=1). Groups 1 and 2 were associated with statistically significantly more medication modifications (predicted value was 6.7 and 3.8, respectively). Age (65-69 and >80) and rurality (rural/small town and micropolitan) were statistically significant predictors of receiving a medication modification as well as the number of medication modifications. For example, individuals residing in rural/small towns compared to metropolitan were less likely to have no medication modifications (-0.668 SE 0.22, p=0.003). They were also more likely to have greater numbers of medication modifications (0.545 SE 0.10, p<0.001). Age (Χ2=10.2, 3df, 0=0.017) and rurality (X2=78.81, 6df, p<0.001) were statistically significantly associated with more medication modifications. Conclusions: Individuals who took alpelisib, were older, and living in more rural communities were more likely to receive medication modifications from clinical oncology pharmacists. Developing sustainable models for interprofessional pharmacist care in community oncology practices appear to be an important strategy to address disparities in care, particularly for patients from rural areas.

Communication Openings: A Novel Approach for Serious Illness Communication in Homecare.

Serious illness communication in homecare about hospice and/or palliative care transitions is lacking due to clinical culture. The purpose of the current study was to understand communication openings using COMFORT™, a palliative care communication model used to train nurses. Qualitative, focus group interviews with 31 homecare nurses were conducted. Data were transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed using NVivo software, followed by hand-sorting. Four themes for communication openings for initiating discussions about potential hospice and/or palliative care transitions were identified: Organizational Openings (homecare appropriateness, eligibility requirements, and staffing); Patient Openings (patient physical decline, psychosocial changes, safety concerns, and denying/stopping care); Caregiver Openings (caregiver physical changes and patient readiness); and Nurse Openings (need for hospice, checking for prognosis understanding, increasing interprofessional care needs, and providing end-of-life care). This study extends the concept of communication openings in the COMFORT model. Further development of communication openings as part of COMFORT communication is needed in educational and intervention research. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 49(11), 33-41.].

Optimizing Interprofessional Simulation with Intentional Pre-Briefing and Debriefing.

The use of simulation and interprofessional education (IPE) has been shown to enhance healthcare student and provider confidence, strengthen teamwork, and improve patient outcomes. Although debriefing has been widely practiced and studied, the value of intentional pre-briefing has been recently recognized. At the University of the Incarnate Word (UIW), Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) and Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) students engaged in a simulation with multiple acute care scenarios. The goal of this activity was to foster competence and confidence in coordinating care for patients with complex medical conditions while functioning as integral members of a team. Faculty members recognized an opportunity to practice interprofessional care coordination behaviors through this simulation. The activity was intentionally structured with three key components: (1) thorough advanced preparation, (2) a well-organized pre-briefing session encompassing pre-simulation orientation, and (3) a structured debrief that encouraged reflection on patient care prioritization. The simulation addressed the activity goals and provided students with opportunities for growth in the Interprofessional Education Collaborative (IPEC) core competencies.

Ethics, Abortion Access, and Emergency Care Post-Dobbs: The Gray Areas.

Clinical management of emergency pregnancy care, such as ectopic pregnancy or heavy bleeding with pregnancy of unknown location, includes upholding legal and ethical standards. For health care providers unwilling to provide evidence-based life-saving abortion care due to personal beliefs, clear guidance dictates disclosure of these limitations to the patient and colleagues, followed by immediate referral for appropriate care. However, this decision-making pathway may not be engaged due to a variety of factors: providers' beliefs preclude adherence to referral responsibilities, political discourse confuses patients as to their options and rights, and a constantly changing state and national legal landscape leads providers to question their ability to practice to their full scope of clinical care. Although this disruption of evidence-based standard of care existed pre-Dobbs, the moral disorder is now heightened. This Clinical Rounds highlights a patient vignette describing the risks of abortion restrictions for patients and providers alike, particularly when an individual provider's concerns for violating institutional guidelines sets a precedent for nursing response and forecloses on collaborative input or ethics consultation. The history of physician-only abortion exceptionalism and exclusion of nurses and midwives despite a significant history of nurses and midwives in abortion care grounds an argument for focusing on the impact of unethical and substandard care on the interprofessional care team leading to moral distress and negative patient outcomes. Patient-centered models of care, such as frameworks common in nursing and midwifery, offer opportunities to consider how all providers practicing to their full scope in interprofessional and collaborative ways, such as in emergency rooms and labor departments, might mitigate obstructions to abortion care that risk pregnant people's lives.

A Quality Improvement Initiative to Bridge Gaps in Treatment and Interprofessional Care of CKD

A Quality Improvement Initiative to Bridge Gaps in Treatment and Interprofessional Care of CKD

Coordination of family’s care in an evidence-based nurse home visiting program

ABSTRACT Interprofessional care coordination within evidence-based prevention programs like Nurse-Family Partnership® (NFP) is necessary to meet family needs and maximize program impact. This study aimed to describe the coordination of families’ care in the NFP home visiting context. We used an adapted grounded theory approach and purposively sampled seven NFP sites. We conducted telephone interviews with 95 participants: 51 NFP staff (54%), 39 healthcare providers (41%), and 5 social service providers (5%). All interviews were recorded, transcribed, validated, and analyzed in NVivo11. Many community providers in all sites described their knowledge of the characteristics of the NFP intervention, including the strength of its evidence to achieve outcomes. Care coordination was dynamic and changed over time based on client needs and staff willingness to work together. Effective care coordination in the NFP context from the provider perspective is driven by shared knowledge, integrated systems, mission alignment, and individual champions who value the program.

Impact of Standardized Multidisciplinary Critical Care Training on Confidence with Critical Illness and Attitudes Towards Interprofessional Education and Multidisciplinary Care.

The Fundamental Critical Care Support Course (FCCS) is a standardized multidisciplinary program designed to educate participants on the basics of identification and management of patients with critical illness. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of FCCS participation on confidence in the assessment and management of critically ill patients and attitudes towards multidisciplinary education and interprofessional care in a multidisciplinary group of participants. Participants enrolled in the FCCS course from May 2018 to November 2019 were solicited to participate in a series of surveys evaluating their course experience and confidence in critical care. Attitudes towards multidisciplinary education and interprofessional care were evaluated using the Student Perceptions of Interprofessional Clinical Education-Revised Instrument version 2 (SPICE-R2) tool. A prospective pre- and post-design with a self-report survey including retrospective pre-training assessment and a 3-month follow-up was conducted. Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statics and non-parametric methods. 321 (97.9%) of the course participants enrolled in the study and completed the confidence survey and SPICE-R2 tool pre-course. Nurses (113, 35.4%) and physicians (110, 34.4%) made up the largest groups of participants, although physician assistants and paramedics were also well represented. Confidence in recognition and management of critical illness significantly improved across all studied domains after course completion, with the mean total confidence score improving from 32.96 pre-course to 41.10 post-course, P < 0.001. Attitudes towards multidisciplinary education and interprofessional care also improved (mean score 41.37 pre-course vs 42.71 post-course, P < 0.001), although pre-course numbers were higher than expected which limited the significance to only certain domains. In a multidisciplinary group, completion of FCCS training led to increased confidence in all aspects of critical illness measured. A modest increase in attitudes regarding multidisciplinary education and interprofessional care was also demonstrated. Further study is needed to assess whether this increased confidence translates to improvements in patient care and outcomes.

Implementing a primary care simulation to improve interprofessional competencies

Learners from six health professions programs (athletic training, nursing, optometry, osteopathic medicine, pharmacy, and physical therapy) participated in a telehealth primary care simulation. The learners’ purpose of the simulated visit was to evaluate and manage a patient experiencing complications of type 2 diabetes, including vision changes, frequent falls, and a foot wound. ObjectivesThe objectives of the activity were to: 1) assess changes in perceived interprofessional abilities in the areas of communication, collaboration, roles and responsibilities, patient/family-centered care, conflict management and resolution, and team functioning, and 2) assess learner perceptions regarding the value of the interprofessional primary care simulation. ActivityLearners were divided into teams with 1–2 learners from each program (8–9 total learners per team) and each team interacted face-to-face in small individual classrooms. Trained faculty served as simulation facilitators in each classroom. Each team conducted a two-phase videoconference encounter with a trained standardized patient and family member. Between the two phases, each team conducted an interprofessional care planning session. Learner evaluation of the exercise used two validated tools, the revised Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey (ICCAS-R), and the modified Simulation Effectiveness Tool (SET-M) to inform the faculty. FindingsPaired t-test values on all 20 items of the ICCAS-R indicated statistically significant results (p < .001), and SET-M results indicated that over 88 % of learners strongly agreed or somewhat agreed with questions pertaining to their satisfaction with the activity. Findings from this activity can be used by other educational institutions to develop a primary care simulation based on the health professions available, thus enhancing interprofessional learning opportunities and overcoming a common barrier of limited clinical sites for interprofessional practice.

Comfort and Coordination among Interprofessional Care Providers Involved in Intubations in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

Successful execution of invasive procedures in acute care settings, including tracheal intubation, requires careful coordination of an interprofessional team. The stress inherent to the intensive care unit (ICU) environment may threaten the optimal communication and planning necessary for the safe execution of this complex procedure. The objective of this study is to characterize the perceptions of interprofessional team members surrounding tracheal intubations in the pediatric ICU (PICU). This is a single-center survey-based study of staff involved in the intubation of pediatric patients admitted to a tertiary level academic PICU. Physicians, nurses, and respiratory therapists (RT) involved in tracheal intubations were queried via standardized, discipline-specific electronic surveys regarding their involvement in procedural planning and overall awareness of and comfort with the intubation plan. Qualitative variables were assessed by both Likert scales and free-text comments that were grouped and analyzed thematically. One hundred and eleven intubation encounters were included during the study time period, of which 93 (84%) had survey responses from at least 2 professional teams. Among those included in the analysis, the survey was completed 244 times by members of the PICU teams including 86 responses from physicians, 76 from nurses, and 82 from RTs. Survey response rates were >80% from each provider team. There were significant differences in interprofessional team comfort with nurses feeling less well informed and comfortable with the intubation plan and process compared to physicians and RTs (p < 0.001 for both). Qualitative themes including clear communication, adequate planning and preparation prior to procedure initiation, and clear definition of roles emerged among both affirmative and constructive comments. Exploration of provider perceptions and emergence of constructive themes expose opportunities for teamwork improvement strategies involving intubations in the PICU. The use of a preintubation checklist may improve organization and communication amongst team members, increase provider morale, decrease team stress levels, and, ultimately, may improve patient outcomes during this high stakes, coordinated event.

Development of a Preventive Health Screening Procedure Enabling Supportive Service Planning for Home-Dwelling Older Adults (PORI75): Protocol for an Action Research Study.

In Finland, at least 1 in 4 residents will be >75 years of age in 2030. The national aging policy has emphasized the need to improve supportive services to enable older people to live in their own homes for as long as possible. This study aimed to develop a preventive health screening procedure for home-dwelling older adults aged 75 years to enable the use of clinical patient data for purposes of strategic planning of supportive services in primary care. The action research method was applied to develop the health screening procedure with selected validated health measures in cooperation with the local practicing interprofessional health care teams from 10 primary care centers in the Social Security Center of Pori, Western Finland (99,485 residents, n=11,938, 12% of them >75 years). The selection of evidence-based validated health measures was based on the national guide to screen factors increasing fall risk and the national functioning measures database. The cut-off points of the selected health measures and laboratory tests were determined in consecutive consensus meetings with the local primary care physicians, with decisions based on internationally validated measures, national current care guidelines, and local policies in clinical practice. The health screening procedure for 75-year-old residents comprised 30 measures divided into three categories: (1) validated self-assessments (9 measures), (2) nurse-conducted screenings (14 measures), and (3) laboratory tests (7 measures). The procedure development process comprised the following steps: (1) inventory and selection of the validated health measures and laboratory tests, (2) training of practical nurses to perform screenings for the segment of 75-year-old residents and to guide them to possible further medical actions, (3) creation of research data from clinical patient data for secondary use purposes, (4) secondary data analysis, and (5) consensus meeting after the pilot test of the health screening procedure for 75-year-old residents procedure in 2019 based on the experiences of health care professionals and collected research data. The developed preventive health screening procedure for 75-year-old residents enables the use of clinical patient data for purposes of strategic planning of supportive services in primary care if the potential bias by a low participation rate is controlled. DERR1-10.2196/48753.

Stakeholder Perspectives on Interprofessional Primary Care for Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities in Ontario, Canada.

Access to high-quality primary care has been identified as a pressing need for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). Interprofessional primary care teams offer comprehensive and coordinated approaches to primary care delivery and are well-positioned to address the needs of adults with IDD. The overall aim of this article is to describe the current provision of interprofessional primary care for adults with IDD from the perspectives of patients, caregivers, and health providers. Results provide important insights into the current state of practice and highlight a critical need for further work in the field to develop processes to engage in team-based care and demonstrate the value of the approach for this population.

Interprofessional education: a necessity in Alzheimer's dementia care-a pilot study.

Interprofessional collaboration is seen as an indispensable prerequisite for high-quality health services and patient care, especially for complex diseases such as dementia. Thus, the current project aimed to extend interprofessional and competency-based education in the field of dementia care to the previously understudied therapy professions of nutrition, speech-language pathology, and physiotherapy. A three-day workshop was designed to provide specific learning objectives related to patient-centered dementia care, as well as competences for interprofessional collaboration. Teaching and learning approaches included case-based learning in simulated interprofessional case-conferences and peer-teaching. A total of 42 students (n = 20 nutrition therapy and counseling, n = 8 speech-language pathology, n = 14 physiotherapy), ranging from first to seventh semester, finished the whole workshop and were considered in data analysis. Changes in self-perceived attitudes toward interprofessional collaboration and education were measured by the German version of the UWE-IP. An in-house questionnaire was developed to evaluate knowledge and skills in the field of dementia, dementia management and interprofessional collaboration. Participation in the workshop led to significant improvements in the total scores of the UWE-IP-D and the in-house questionnaire, as well as their respective subscales. Moderate to large effect sizes were achieved. All professions improved significantly in both questionnaires with large effect sizes. Significant differences between professions were found in the UWE-IP-D total score between students of speech-language pathology and physiotherapy in the posttest. Students of nutrition therapy and counseling revealed a significant lower level of self-perceived knowledge and skills in the in-house questionnaire pre- and post-testing. The pilot-study confirms the effectiveness of interprofessional education to promote generic and interprofessional dementia care competencies and to develop positive attitudes toward interprofessional learning and collaboration in the therapy professions, thus increasing professional diversity in interprofessional education research. Differences between professions were confounded by heterogenous semester numbers and participation conditions. To achieve a curricular implementation, interprofessional education should be expanded to include a larger group of participants belonging to different professions, start early in the study program, and be evaluated over the long term.

Promoting interprofessional education in surgery: development and evaluation of a clinical curriculum

PurposeInterprofessional collaboration is essential in surgery, but health professions students have limited opportunities for interprofessional education (IPE) during training in authentic patient-care settings. This report describes the development and evaluation of a clinical interprofessional elective in otolaryngology for medical (MD) and nurse practitioner (NP) students.MethodsMD and NP students were paired together on an inpatient otolaryngology consult service for one- or two-week rotations designed to promote interprofessional learning objectives. Students worked with different professions essential to the care of patients with voice, airway, and swallowing conditions, including surgeons, advanced practice providers, speech-language pathologists, nurses, and respiratory therapists. Students completed written daily reflections about their experiences and pre- and post-rotation surveys to assess comfort with course learning objectives. Paired t-tests and Cohen’s d effect sizes were used to compare pre/post responses, and thematic analysis was used to analyze all narrative data.ResultsFourteen students (8 MD, 6 NP) students completed the rotation. All participants reported significant improvements on all learning objectives (p < 0.05) with large effect sizes (Cohen’s d range: 1.2–2.9), including their understanding of the responsibilities of each interprofessional team member. Participants described three overarching themes that characterized their learning experiences and supported the learning objectives: appreciation for interprofessional patient care, benefits of learning with an interprofessional peer, and clinician role modeling of effective interprofessional communication.ConclusionsIPE can be successfully integrated into a clinical surgical rotation and enhance students’ understanding of the benefits of and strategies for effective interprofessional collaboration. The elective can serve as a model for IPE rotations in other surgical subspecialties and be extended to include students across the continuum of health professions education.

Fall Assessment and Monitoring in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Practical Evidence-Based Review for Clinicians.

Falls occur in more than half of all people with multiple sclerosis (MS) but tend to be underdiagnosed and underreported in clinical encounters. This narrative review aims to summarize evidence-based approaches for evaluating fall risk and proven treatment strategies to reduce falling in people with MS to improve care for people with MS and to enhance interprofessional care coordination between treating neurologic and physical therapy (PT) teams. Screening not just for falls but for near-falls as well because fear of falling can improve fall assessment and identify patients who may benefit from fall prevention interventions. A number of barriers, including time constraints during visits and the fallacy that falling is inevitable in MS, can limit clinician awareness about patient falls and delay timely referral to PT. Consultation with physical therapists for individualized fall prevention treatment can reduce risk of falling. Interventional studies have also shown that PT-guided exercise programs improve balance confidence in people with MS. However, people with MS are often under-referred to PT by treating clinicians. A clinical approach is provided to summarize practical, accessible, evidence-based, low-burden measurements and interventions likely to improve ascertainment of patients at risk of falling and optimize timely PT referral and treatment.

Enhancing Diabetes Care And Preventing Foot Ulcers In Indigenous Communities: Two Examples Of A Holistic Approach In The Province of Quebec

This is a review of a session at the virtual Limb Preservation Symposia that recognizes a dual initiative undertaken to address diabetes management and prevent diabetic foot ulcers within Indigenous communities in the Province of Quebec (Canada). It highlights two intertwined projects: "Culturally Adapted Diabetes Management and Interprofessional Care" and "Preventing Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Pilot Project." Both initiatives underscore the importance of culturally adapted care, patient engagement, and collaborative approaches in addressing diabetes management and preventing diabetic foot ulcers within Indigenous communities.

Twelve tips for designing, implementing and sustaining interprofessional training units on hospital wards

Dedicated Interprofessional Training Units (ITUs) in hospital wards are one way to prepare healthcare students for Interprofessional patient-centered care. Based on theoretical foundations, research, and our lived experiences of successes as well as failures, we propose 12 tips on how to prepare, implement, and sustain a dedicated ITU, combining the Grol & Wensing model for planning change with the Self-determination Theory of motivation. Start with a steering group, with a dedicated project leader, to translate awareness of the need for an ITU into wider awareness and motivation among stakeholders, with the ITU being a solution to authentic problems. Create shared ownership by jointly formulating feasible educational goals and starting with a pilot to provide opportunities for change. Motivate all stakeholders by stimulating their autonomy, interprofessional competence as well as relatedness to each other, in line with the Self-determination Theory. Confirm the value of the ITU at all stages and embed the ITU in the organizational strategy.

Impact on diabetes outcomes and team skills of integrating dietetic services into interprofessional education and teamwork in primary care.

Diabetes is a complex disease requiring daily self-management of diet and activity, yet many patients do not receive recommended self-management education, medical nutrition therapy, or team-based care that includes registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs). Such service deficits contribute to challenges in meeting combined diabetes care goals. We evaluated the impact of adding RDN-supervised dietetic interns to an established primary care interprofessional education/teamwork model on patients' clinical outcomes and health professions students' team skills. Electronic health records were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the impact of interprofessional care teams including dietetic practitioners on patient outcomes and compare these changes to outcomes achieved with the previous model without such participation. Pre-test/post-test surveys were used to evaluate health professions students' self-reported changes in team skills. Patient outcomes for glycemic control, systolic blood pressure, triglycerides, and depression improved significantly, and emergency department visits decreased by 79% after interprofessional care. Average hemoglobin A1c levels decreased from 11.6% to 8.3% (p < .001), an additional 1.1% reduction over previous results, following incorporation of dietetic practitioners. Students reported increased team skills after interprofessional care participation. Health professions and dietetic program faculty should collaborate to develop interprofessional best practice primary care models for patients with diabetes.

Generating Team-Based Strategies to Reduce Health Inequity in Cancer Care.

Despite increased emphases on reducing racial disparities in the U.S. health care system, interprofessional care teams may inadvertently perpetuate health disparities through lack of awareness or experience in supporting individualized, patient-centered goals of care. Racial disparities can lead to health inequity. Persistent health disparity gaps exist among Black patients with multiple myeloma (MM) when compared with non-Black patients. Black patients experience a two-fold increase in MM risk and earlier age of onset compared with non-Black patients. Black patients are also less likely to receive timely access to some therapies, undergo autologous stem cell transplant, or enroll in clinical trials. This article describes a large-scale, equity-focused implementation science initiative aimed at identifying and overcoming racial disparities and health inequity among patients with MM through quality improvement goals identified by each of the interprofessional cancer care teams. Interprofessional cancer care teams in two large oncology systems as well as four community clinics were engaged in this study along with their patients with MM. Geographic areas included the following: Chicago, IL; Washington, DC; Charlotte, NC; Columbus, OH; Denver, CO; and Indianapolis, IN. Interprofessional teams included hematologists/oncologists, primary care physicians, nurse practitioners/physician assistants, and case managers/nurse navigators. Teams collectively examined and compared their own beliefs and attitudes about their patients' goals for MM treatment and management versus those of their patients to uncover and address discordances. Medical records from the clinics were audited to evaluate disparities in treatment and practice at the point of care. Live, team-based audit-feedback sessions were implemented among teams to examine data sets, as well as utilize the data to address interprofessional factors that could enhance more equitable care. Data from comparative surveys between patients and interprofessional team members revealed significant discordances that enabled health care teams to recognize gaps and identify ways to improve patient-centered care, such as shared decision-making. Through audit-feedback sessions, interprofessional teams were able to collaboratively meet and discuss methods to improve access to care coordination services and other strategies aimed at alleviating disparities. Baseline chart audits revealed and confirmed disparities of care including patient/disease characteristics, treatment history, clinical practice metrics, and patient-centered measures. Follow-up chart audits conducted 6 months later measured changes in documented practice behavior. Action plans developed by the interprofessional teams as a result of this study intend to address sustainable reductions in health disparities among patients with MM to improve health equity and overall care. This implementation science initiative and data results have several implications for case managers caring for diverse patients with MM in both large health systems and smaller community practices. Results punctuate the importance of identifying and supporting diverse patients' individualized goals and preferences in their care journey to mitigate health inequity and maximize health outcomes. The value of working collaboratively as an interprofessional team is evident in the study results, as is the role of the case manager in appropriate resource allocation to mitigate health disparities. Lessons learned from this initiative may also be applied to other case management settings where complex care delivery and interprofessional teams are at work.

Interprofessional Team Collaboration for Routine and Emergent Mental Health Concerns Among Collegiate Student-Athletes: A Case Series from the Association for Athletic Training Education Research Network.

Collegiate student-athletes experience an increasing number of mental health concerns. To help address these concerns and provide high-quality health care for student-athletes, institutions of higher education are being encouraged to create interprofessional health care teams that are specifically dedicated to managing mental health. We interviewed 3 interprofessional health care teams who collaborate to manage routine and emergency mental health conditions in collegiate student-athletes. Teams represented all 3 National Collegiate Athletics Association (NCAA) divisions and included athletic trainers, clinical psychologists, psychiatrists, dietitians and nutritionists, social workers, nurses, and physician assistants (associates). The interprofessional teams indicated that the existing NCAA recommendations helped to solidify members and roles of the mental health care team; however, they all believed their teams would benefit from more counselors and psychiatrists. Teams had different mechanisms for referral and accessing mental health resources on their campuses, which may make on-the-job training for new members of the team an organizational necessity.

Interprofessional Education in Diabetes Care—Findings from an Integrated Review

Diabetes is a leading non-communicable disease with a huge and predictably increasing burden on individuals, societies and governments. Interprofessional education (IPE) aims to enhance healthcare providers’ competence and patient care by providing well-organised, coordinated interprofessional care (IPC) within teams of healthcare professionals of different disciplines. Interprofessional practices are crucial in diabetes care. However, evidence on the effect of diabetes-specific IPE on diabetes outcomes is limited. This study aims to survey and report recent findings on the impact of interprofessional approaches on the outcomes of diabetes management. A systematic search of PubMed and Google Scholar from 2008 was adopted to identify relevant studies. After screening for relevance, the studies used in this review were thematically analysed, and two main categories of the findings were isolated: the impact of IPE and IPC on enhanced care provision and on improved diabetes self-management. The results indicate that healthcare professionals and students and people with diabetes benefit from IPE/IPC to improve diabetes outcomes and quality of care. However, improving diabetes care is achieved when inhibitors are addressed to incorporate IPE in health professions curricula and to support IPC in clinical settings.