The ability of the weather research and forecasting model coupled with chemistry (WRF-Chem) to represent atmospheric processes relies on the accuracy of the input information and the configuration of the model itself. In this study, WRF-Chem was used to test the sensitivity of O3, CO, PM10 and PM2.5 predictions to lateral chemical boundary conditions (LCBCs), domain configuration, nesting options, and chemical mechanisms. Simulations were conducted over the Andean city of Manizales, Colombia, which is characterized by complex topography. Modeled values of air quality and meteorological variables were compared with surface measurements. The results show that CO is not sensitive to changes in LCBCs, domain configurations, or chemical mechanisms, suggesting that CO variations are primarily associated with local emission patterns. However, CO estimations are negatively affected by a 2-way nesting approach due to interpolation errors during the feedback processes. Likewise, PM10 and PM2.5 are not sensitive to changes in LCBCs or domain configurations. In contrast, O3 estimates show a strong sensitivity to LCBCs. The use of the CAM-Chem LCBCs enhances the model performance compared to the default WRF-Chem LCBCs. Likewise, the use of a 1:5 nesting ratio reduces prediction errors and computational effort, in comparison with simulations run with a 1:3 nesting ratio. Finally, the carbon bond mechanisms Z version enhances the representation of O3 dynamics owing to a more efficient O3–NO titration. This study can guide the WRF-Chem setup for future air quality simulations over areas with complex topography, where modeling is challenging owing to the disruption of long-scale circulation.
Read full abstract