Interphase Chromatin Structure Research Articles

Genome folding principles uncovered in condensin-depleted mitotic chromosomes.

During mitosis, condensin activity is thought to interfere with interphase chromatin structures. To investigate genome folding principles in the absence of chromatin loop extrusion, we codepleted condensin I and condensin II, which triggered mitotic chromosome compartmentalization in ways similar to that in interphase. However, two distinct euchromatic compartments, indistinguishable in interphase, emerged upon condensin loss with different interaction preferences and dependencies on H3K27ac. Constitutive heterochromatin gradually self-aggregated and cocompartmentalized with facultative heterochromatin, contrasting with their separation during interphase. Notably, some cis-regulatory element contacts became apparent even in the absence of CTCF/cohesin-mediated structures. Heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) proteins, which are thought to partition constitutive heterochromatin, were absent from mitotic chromosomes, suggesting, surprisingly, that constitutive heterochromatin can self-aggregate without HP1. Indeed, in cells traversing from M to G1 phase in the combined absence of HP1α, HP1β and HP1γ, constitutive heterochromatin compartments are normally re-established. In sum, condensin-deficient mitotic chromosomes illuminate forces of genome compartmentalization not identified in interphase cells.

Effective modeling of the chromatin structure by coarse-grained methods

The interphase chromatin structure is extremely complex, precise and dynamic. Experimental methods can only show the frequency of interaction of the various parts of the chromatin. Therefore, it is extremely important to develop theoretical methods to predict the chromatin structure. In this publication, we implemented an extended version of the SBS model described by Barbieri et al. and created the ChroMC program that is easy to use and freely available (https://github.com/regulomics/chroMC) to other users. We also describe the necessary factors for the effective modeling of the chromatin structure in Drosophila melanogaster. We compared results of chromatin structure predictions using two methods: Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamic. Our simulations suggest that incorporating black, non-reactive chromatin is necessary for successful prediction of chromatin structure, while the loop extrusion model with a long range attraction potential or Lennard-Jones (with local attraction force) as well as using Hi-C data as input are not essential for the basic structure reconstruction. We also proposed a new way to calculate the similarity of the properties of contact maps including the calculation of local similarity. Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma

RASER-FISH: non-denaturing fluorescence in situ hybridization for preservation of three-dimensional interphase chromatin structure.

DNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has been a central technique in advancing our understanding of how chromatin is organized within the nucleus. With the increasing resolution offered by super-resolution microscopy, the optimal maintenance of chromatin structure within the nucleus is essential for accuracy in measurements and interpretation of data. However, standard 3D-FISH requires potentially destructive heat denaturation in the presence of chaotropic agents such as formamide to allow access to the DNA strands for labeled FISH probes. To avoid the need to heat-denature, we developed Resolution After Single-strand Exonuclease Resection (RASER)-FISH, which uses exonuclease digestion to generate single-stranded target DNA for efficient probe binding over a 2 d process. Furthermore, RASER-FISH is easily combined with immunostaining of nuclear proteins or the detection of RNAs. Here, we provide detailed procedures for RASER-FISH in mammalian cultured cells to detect single loci, chromatin tracks and topologically associating domains with conventional and super-resolution 3D structured illumination microscopy. Moreover, we provide a validation and characterization of our method, demonstrating excellent preservation of chromatin structure and nuclear integrity, together with improved hybridization efficiency, compared with classic 3D-FISH protocols.

Super-resolution visualization and modeling of human chromosomal regions reveals cohesin-dependent loop structures

BackgroundThe 3D organization of the chromatin fiber in cell nuclei plays a key role in the regulation of gene expression. Genome-wide techniques to score DNA-DNA contacts, such as Hi-C, reveal the partitioning of chromosomes into epigenetically defined active and repressed compartments and smaller “topologically associated” domains. These domains are often associated with chromatin loops, which largely disappear upon removal of cohesin. Because most Hi-C implementations average contact frequencies over millions of cells and do not provide direct spatial information, it remains unclear whether and how frequently chromatin domains and loops exist in single cells.ResultsWe combine 3D single-molecule localization microscopy with a low-cost fluorescence labeling strategy that does not denature the DNA, to visualize large portions of single human chromosomes in situ at high resolution. In parallel, we develop multi-scale, whole nucleus polymer simulations, that predict chromatin structures at scales ranging from 5 kb up to entire chromosomes. We image chromosomes in G1 and M phase and examine the effect of cohesin on interphase chromatin structure. Depletion of cohesin leads to increased prevalence of loose chromatin stretches, increased gyration radii, and reduced smoothness of imaged chromatin regions. By comparison to model predictions, we estimate that 6–25 or more purely cohesin-dependent chromatin loops coexist per megabase of DNA in single cells, suggesting that the vast majority of the genome is enclosed in loops.ConclusionOur results provide new constraints on chromatin structure and showcase an affordable non-invasive approach to study genome organization in single cells.

Kinetic mechanisms of crumpled globule formation.

A homopolymer chain with beads forming pairwise reversible bonds is a well-known model in polymer physics. We studied the kinetics of homopolymer chain collapse, which was induced by pairwise reversible bond formation. We compared the kinetic mechanism of this coil-globule transition with the mechanism of collapse in a poor solvent. We discovered that if collapse of a spatially confined chain is induced by formation of long-living pairwise reversible bonds, the transient structures do not resemble classical pearl-necklace conformations formed during collapse in a poor solvent. However, both types of collapse lead to formation of a metastable state of a crumpled globule, which is one of the well-known models of interphase chromatin structure in different organisms. Moreover, we found that the stability and dynamics of this state can be controlled by the fraction of reversible bonds and bond lifetime.

RNA: Nuclear Glue for Folding the Genome.

A significant amount of RNA is present in the nucleus of mammalian cells but only a small proportion of it is destined for the cytoplasm and subsequent translation, leaving much RNA to associate with chromatin. Historically, nuclear RNA was thought to interact with proteins to form a filamentous nuclear matrix, but this idea became less popular as more dynamic models of chromatin behaviour became more prevalent. Using new molecular and imaging approaches it is becoming clear that RNA should be considered an integral component of nuclear organisation; it is transcriptionally responsive and interacts with abundant nuclear RNA-binding proteins. We suggest that these protein/RNA structures form a dynamic nuclear mesh that can regulate interphase chromatin structure.

Study of mitotic chromatin supports a model of bookmarking by histone modifications and reveals nucleosome deposition patterns.

Mitosis encompasses key molecular changes including chromatin condensation, nuclear envelope breakdown, and reduced transcription levels. Immediately after mitosis, the interphase chromatin structure is reestablished and transcription resumes. The reestablishment of the interphase chromatin is probably achieved by “bookmarking,” i.e., the retention of at least partial information during mitosis. To gain a deeper understanding of the contribution of histone modifications to the mitotic bookmarking process, we merged proteomics, immunofluorescence, and ChIP-seq approaches. We focused on key histone modifications and employed HeLa-S3 cells as a model system. Generally, in spite of the general hypoacetylation observed during mitosis, we observed a global concordance between the genomic organization of histone modifications in interphase and mitosis, suggesting that the epigenomic landscape may serve as a component of the mitotic bookmarking process. Next, we investigated the nucleosome that enters nucleosome depleted regions (NDRs) during mitosis. We observed that in ∼60% of the NDRs, the entering nucleosome is distinct from the surrounding highly acetylated nucleosomes and appears to have either low levels of acetylation or high levels of phosphorylation in adjacent residues (since adjacent phosphorylation may interfere with the ability to detect acetylation). Inhibition of histone deacetylases (HDACs) by the small molecule TSA reverts this pattern, suggesting that these nucleosomes are specifically deacetylated during mitosis. Altogether, by merging multiple approaches, our study provides evidence to support a model where histone modifications may play a role in mitotic bookmarking and uncovers new insights into the deposition of nucleosomes during mitosis.

ChromEMT: Visualizing 3D chromatin structure and compaction in interphase and mitotic cells.

The chromatin structure of DNA determines genome compaction and activity in the nucleus. On the basis of in vitro structures and electron microscopy (EM) studies, the hierarchical model is that 11-nanometer DNA-nucleosome polymers fold into 30- and subsequently into 120- and 300- to 700-nanometer fibers and mitotic chromosomes. To visualize chromatin in situ, we identified a fluorescent dye that stains DNA with an osmiophilic polymer and selectively enhances its contrast in EM. Using ChromEMT (ChromEM tomography), we reveal the ultrastructure and three-dimensional (3D) organization of individual chromatin polymers, megabase domains, and mitotic chromosomes. We show that chromatin is a disordered 5- to 24-nanometer-diameter curvilinear chain that is packed together at different 3D concentration distributions in interphase and mitosis. Chromatin chains have many different particle arrangements and bend at various lengths to achieve structural compaction and high packing densities.

SAF-A Regulates Interphase Chromosome Structure through Oligomerization with Chromatin-Associated RNAs

SummaryHigher eukaryotic chromosomes are organized into topologically constrained functional domains; however, the molecular mechanisms required to sustain these complex interphase chromatin structures are unknown. A stable matrix underpinning nuclear organization was hypothesized, but the idea was abandoned as more dynamic models of chromatin behavior became prevalent. Here, we report that scaffold attachment factor A (SAF-A), originally identified as a structural nuclear protein, interacts with chromatin-associated RNAs (caRNAs) via its RGG domain to regulate human interphase chromatin structures in a transcription-dependent manner. Mechanistically, this is dependent on SAF-A’s AAA+ ATPase domain, which mediates cycles of protein oligomerization with caRNAs, in response to ATP binding and hydrolysis. SAF-A oligomerization decompacts large-scale chromatin structure while SAF-A loss or monomerization promotes aberrant chromosome folding and accumulation of genome damage. Our results show that SAF-A and caRNAs form a dynamic, transcriptionally responsive chromatin mesh that organizes large-scale chromosome structures and protects the genome from instability.

Structure and Functions of Linker Histones.

Linker histones such as variants H1, H5, and other similar proteins play an important role in regulation of chromatin structure and dynamics. However, interactions of linker histones with DNA and proteins, as well as specific functions of their different variants, are poorly studied. This is because they acquire tertiary structure only when interacting with a nucleosome, and because of limitations of currently available methods. However, deeper investigation of linker histones and their interactions with other proteins will address a number of important questions- from structure of compacted chromatin to regulation of early embryogenesis. In this review, structures of histone H1 variants and its interaction with chromatin DNA are considered. A possible functional significance of different H1 variants, a role of these proteins in maintaining interphase chromatin structure, and interactions of linker histones with other cellular proteins are also discussed.

Reversing chromatin accessibility differences that distinguish homologous mitotic metaphase chromosomes.

BackgroundChromatin-modifying reagents that alter histone associating proteins, DNA conformation or its sequence are well established strategies for studying chromatin structure in interphase (G1, S, G2). Little is known about how these compounds act during metaphase. We assessed the effects of these reagents at genomic loci that show reproducible, non-random differences in accessibility to chromatin that distinguish homologous targets by single copy DNA probe fluorescence in situ hybridization (scFISH). By super-resolution 3-D structured illumination microscopy (3D-SIM) and other criteria, the differences correspond to ‘differential accessibility’ (DA) to these chromosomal regions. At these chromosomal loci, DA of the same homologous chromosome is stable and epigenetic hallmarks of less accessible interphase chromatin are present.ResultsTo understand the basis for DA, we investigate the impact of epigenetic modifiers on these allelic differences in chromatin accessibility between metaphase homologs in lymphoblastoid cell lines. Allelic differences in metaphase chromosome accessibility represent a stable chromatin mark on mitotic metaphase chromosomes. Inhibition of the topoisomerase IIα-DNA cleavage complex reversed DA. Inter-homolog probe fluorescence intensity ratios between chromosomes treated with ICRF-193 were significantly lower than untreated controls. 3D-SIM demonstrated that differences in hybridized probe volume and depth between allelic targets were equalized by this treatment. By contrast, DA was impervious to chromosome decondensation treatments targeting histone modifying enzymes, cytosine methylation, as well as in cells with regulatory defects in chromatid cohesion. These data altogether suggest that DA is a reflection of allelic differences in metaphase chromosome compaction, dictated by the localized catenation state of the chromosome, rather than by other epigenetic marks.ConclusionsInhibition of the topoisomerase IIα-DNA cleavage complex mitigated DA by decreasing DNA superhelicity and axial metaphase chromosome condensation. This has potential implications for the mechanism of preservation of cellular phenotypes that enables the same chromatin structure to be correctly reestablished in progeny cells of the same tissue or individual.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13039-015-0159-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Antibiotics delay in vitro human stem cell regrowth

Stem cell line from human limbal area was established to study in vitro cell growth and response to the toxic effects of antibiotics used in ophthalmology in terms of cell migration rates and structure of interphase chromatin. Recovery from cellular damages caused by ophthalmologic antibiotics was mimicked by an in vitro scratch model and followed by time-lapse microscopy, scanning electronmicroscopy and chromatin image analysis. Experiments revealed that broad spectrum antibiotics, chloramphenicol (0.5–1.0mg/ml) and rifampicin (0.1–0.2mg/ml), corresponding to concentrations in common clinical practice, slowed down the regeneration process. Results show that nuclei of naturally occurring limbal cells contain the same intermediates of chromatin condensation as seen in mammalian tumor cells and follow the common pathway of chromosome condensation. These intermediates included decondensed veil-like chromatin, fibrillary chromatin, supercoiled ribbon, chromatin bodies, early linear forms and metaphase chromosomes. Upon chloramphenicol and rifampicin treatment characteristic distorsions took place in the intermediates of chromosome condensation. Damaging effects in limbal stem cells in the presence of chloramphenicol or rifampicin indicate that ophthalmologic treatment with antibiotics should be used cautiously.

Chromatin structure revealed by X-ray scattering analysis and computational modeling

It remains unclear how the 2m of human genomic DNA is organized in each cell. The textbook model has long assumed that the 11-nm-diameter nucleosome fiber (beads-on-a-string), in which DNA is wrapped around core histones, is folded into a 30-nm chromatin fiber. One of the classical models assumes that the 30-nm chromatin fiber is further folded helically to form a larger fiber. Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) is a powerful method for investigating the bulk structure of interphase chromatin and mitotic chromosomes. SAXS can detect periodic structures in biological materials in solution. In our SAXS results, no structural feature larger than 11nm was detected. Combining this with a computational analysis of “in silico condensed chromatin” made it possible to understand more about the X-ray scattering profiles and suggested that the chromatin in interphase nuclei and mitotic chromosomes essentially consists of irregularly folded nucleosome fibers lacking the 30-nm chromatin structure. In this article, we describe the experimental details of our SAXS and modeling systems. We also discuss other methods for investigating the chromatin structure in cells.

Smc5/6-mediated regulation of replication progression contributes to chromosome assembly during mitosis in human cells

The structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) proteins constitute the core of critical complexes involved in structural organization of chromosomes. In yeast, the Smc5/6 complex is known to mediate repair of DNA breaks and replication of repetitive genomic regions, including ribosomal DNA loci and telomeres. In mammalian cells, which have diverse genome structure and scale from yeast, the Smc5/6 complex has also been implicated in DNA damage response, but its further function in unchallenged conditions remains elusive. In this study, we addressed the behavior and function of Smc5/6 during the cell cycle. Chromatin fractionation, immunofluorescence, and live-cell imaging analyses indicated that Smc5/6 associates with chromatin during interphase but largely dissociates from chromosomes when they condense in mitosis. Depletion of Smc5 and Smc6 resulted in aberrant mitotic chromosome phenotypes that were accompanied by the abnormal distribution of topoisomerase IIα (topo IIα) and condensins and by chromosome segregation errors. Importantly, interphase chromatin structure indicated by the premature chromosome condensation assay suggested that Smc5/6 is required for the on-time progression of DNA replication and subsequent binding of topo IIα on replicated chromatids. These results indicate an essential role of the Smc5/6 complex in processing DNA replication, which becomes indispensable for proper sister chromatid assembly in mitosis.

Interphase Chromosome Structures of Human Cells

Major intermediates of chromosome condensation in erythroleukemia K562 cells are presented. Interphase chromatin structures became visible after reversal of permeabilization. Large-scale chromatin structures and the development of individual interphase chromosomes were observed by fluorescence microscopy. In the linear arrangement the following major intermediates of K562 chromatin condensation could be distinguished: (1) the most decondensed chromatin veil, (2) chromatin ribbon, (3) chromatin funnel, a new intermediate regarded as the earliest visible form of interphase chromosomes, (4) chromatin body, (5) 300 nm chromatin fiber, (6) u, v, or s forms of chromosomes, and (7) linear chromosomes. The observations made in nuclei of K562 cells conform to the model of helical coil chromosome condensation.

Some unsolved problems and unresolved issues in radiation cytogenetics: A review and new data on roles of homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining

New data and historical evidence from our own and other laboratories are summarized and discussed bearing on several issues relating to mechanisms and processes involved in the formation of chromosomal aberrations following exposure to ionizing radiations. Specifically addressed are: (1) the lesions and processes affecting the appearance of chromatid-type and/or chromosome-type aberrations after radiation, (2) DNA double strand break rejoining processes and the restitution of breaks vs. the formation of exchanges, (3) the role of homologous recombinational repair in protecting cells from induction of chromatid-type aberrations after irradiation of late S/G2 cells, (4) the role of interphase chromatin structure and nuclear organization in aberration induction, (5) cellular responses for aberration induction in relation to their tissue context, and (6) approaches to the detection of aberrations previously known as “cryptic”.

Chromatin is wonderful stuff

Chromatin molecules have properties that set them aside from all other biomacromolecules in the cell. (i) Chromosomes, which are single chromatin molecules, are the largest macromolecules in eukaryotic cells. (ii) Chromatin molecules carry the cell's genetic and epigenetic information and all control elements that regulate and, importantly, orchestrate expression of tenths of thousands of genes. (iii) Chromatin fibers are extremely highly folded inside the cell nucleus. Moreover, chromatin folding varies considerably from cell to cell, even in otherwise identical cells. Despite this, chromatin can be accurately duplicated and faithfully separated over the two daughter cells during cell division. (iv) The highly folded chromatin fiber acts as a scaffold that spatially organizes processes inside the nucleus, such as transcription and replication. This chromatin-based compartmentalization of the nucleus is a key element in the regulation of genome function. (v) Chromatin-associated processes often are single molecule processes in which proteins that freely diffuse inside the nucleus have to find and assemble on unique sequence elements, e.g. a specific promoter, of the chromatin fiber. (vi) The structure of chromatin shows remarkable plasticity. Depending on regulatory signals its chemical structure changes continuously (e.g. due to histone modifications), its protein composition alters (e.g. incorporation of variant histones and the assembly and disassembly of transcription complexes) and folding inside the nucleus may change dramatically (e.g. depending on epigenetic changes and changes in transcriptional activity). These properties all contribute to and probably are essential for proper functioning of the eukaryotic genome. Research aiming to understand chromatin properties and unravel underlying physical principles and molecular mechanisms is hampered by the fact that we have no tools to directly visualize and analyze the chromatin fiber inside the cell. Also, chromatin structure in part depends on weak interactions that are lost upon opening the cell, making biochemical approaches difficult. To unravel chromatin-related enigmas we have to rely on combining a broad range of strategies and techniques. This special issue addresses a number of important aspects of chromatin research that are not yet encountered often in the main stream scientific literature. In the first paper Van Holde and Zlatanova [1] discuss our present understanding of what probably is a basic folding state of chromatin, the 30 nm fiber. One way to unravel principles of chromatin folding is the development of predictive computational models, which define precise questions that can be addressed experimentally. Langowski and Heermann [2] present a sample of this by modeling the nucleosomal fiber and analyzing its properties, such as flexibility as a function of linker histone H1 binding. Hancock [3] discusses an often overlooked aspect of biological organization in general and chromatin structure in particular: macromolecular crowding. It is made highly plausible that crowding phenomena are a key element in defining chromatin structure in vivo. The paper of Fakan and Van Driel [4] discusses an intriguing aspect of spatial organization of our genome. Transcription and replication occur exclusively at the surface of compact subchromosomal chromatin domains, which poses major constrains to the way the chromatin fiber is folded inside the interphase nucleus. Dorman et al. [5] E.R. Dorman, A.M. Bushey and V.G. Corces, The role of insulator elements in large-scale chromatin structure in interphase, Sem Cell Dev Biol 18 (2007), pp. 682-690. Article | PDF (1131 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (17)[5] summarize our understanding of the role of insulator elements in the genome in the spatial organization of the chromatin fiber. Insulator sequences may constitute a major class of chromatin-chromatin interactions. Sexton et al. [6] describe another important type of interchromatin interactions: transcription factories. In this type of structures transcriptionally active genes from different part of the chromatin fiber and from different chromosomes come together in the interphase nucleus, imposing further constrains on the large-scale folding pattern. Chuang and Belmont [7] address the issue of directed movement of parts of the chromatin fiber in relation to compartmentalization of the interphase nucleus. Finally, Goetze et al. [8] discuss various aspects of the large-scale organization of the chromatin fiber in mammalian cells. Together, these papers give a good overview of the different ways structure-function relationships of the chromatin fiber are addressed and summarize the main questions that we have to deal with in the forthcoming years.

The role of insulator elements in large-scale chromatin structure in interphase

Insulator elements can be classified as enhancer-blocking or barrier insulators depending on whether they interfere with enhancer-promoter interactions or act as barriers against the spreading of heterochromatin. The former class may exert its function at least in part by attaching the chromatin fiber to a nuclear substrate such as the nuclear matrix, resulting in the formation of chromatin loops. The latter class functions by recruiting histone-modifying enzymes, although some barrier insulators have also been shown to create chromatin loops. These loops may correspond to functional nuclear domains containing clusters of co-expressed genes. Thus, insulators may determine specific patterns of nuclear organization that are important in establishing specific programs of gene expression during cell differentiation and development.

The role of transcription factories in large-scale structure and dynamics of interphase chromatin

The genome is spatially organized inside nuclei, with chromosomes and genes occupying preferential positions relative to each other and to various nuclear landmarks. What drives this organization is unclear, but recent findings suggest there are extensive intra- and inter-chromosomal communications between various genomic regions that appear to play important roles in genome function. Here we review transcription factories, distinct sub-nuclear foci where nascent transcription occurs. We argue that the spatially restricted, limited number of transcription sites compels transcribed regions of the genome to dynamically self-organize into tissue-specific conformations, thus playing a major role in the three-dimensional interphase organization of the genome.

Supranucleosomal Organization of Chromatin Fibers in Nuclei ofDrosophilaS2 Cells

Earlier, the interphase chromatin structures could not be visualized due to the stickiness of the nuclear material. We have reduced stickiness by the reversal of permeabilization allowing the isolation and microscopic imaging of interphase chromatin structures. By using a high resolution of synchronization, collecting 36 elutriation fractions, we show that major intermediates of chromatin condensation include: (a) decondensed veillike chromatin at the unset of the S phase (2.0-2.2 C-value), (b) polarization of veiled chromatin (2.2-2.6 C), (c) fibrous chromatin (2.6-3.0 C), chromatin bodies (3.0-3.3 C), early precondensed chromosomes (3.3-3.6). The compaction of Drosophila chromosomes did not reach that of the mammalian cells in the final stage of condensation (3.6-4.0 C). Drosophila chromosomes consist of smaller units called rodlets. Results demonstrate that nucleosomal chromatin ("beads on string") does not form a solenoid structure; rather, the topological arrangement consists of meandering and plectonemic loops.