Abstract

BackgroundChromatin-modifying reagents that alter histone associating proteins, DNA conformation or its sequence are well established strategies for studying chromatin structure in interphase (G1, S, G2). Little is known about how these compounds act during metaphase. We assessed the effects of these reagents at genomic loci that show reproducible, non-random differences in accessibility to chromatin that distinguish homologous targets by single copy DNA probe fluorescence in situ hybridization (scFISH). By super-resolution 3-D structured illumination microscopy (3D-SIM) and other criteria, the differences correspond to ‘differential accessibility’ (DA) to these chromosomal regions. At these chromosomal loci, DA of the same homologous chromosome is stable and epigenetic hallmarks of less accessible interphase chromatin are present.ResultsTo understand the basis for DA, we investigate the impact of epigenetic modifiers on these allelic differences in chromatin accessibility between metaphase homologs in lymphoblastoid cell lines. Allelic differences in metaphase chromosome accessibility represent a stable chromatin mark on mitotic metaphase chromosomes. Inhibition of the topoisomerase IIα-DNA cleavage complex reversed DA. Inter-homolog probe fluorescence intensity ratios between chromosomes treated with ICRF-193 were significantly lower than untreated controls. 3D-SIM demonstrated that differences in hybridized probe volume and depth between allelic targets were equalized by this treatment. By contrast, DA was impervious to chromosome decondensation treatments targeting histone modifying enzymes, cytosine methylation, as well as in cells with regulatory defects in chromatid cohesion. These data altogether suggest that DA is a reflection of allelic differences in metaphase chromosome compaction, dictated by the localized catenation state of the chromosome, rather than by other epigenetic marks.ConclusionsInhibition of the topoisomerase IIα-DNA cleavage complex mitigated DA by decreasing DNA superhelicity and axial metaphase chromosome condensation. This has potential implications for the mechanism of preservation of cellular phenotypes that enables the same chromatin structure to be correctly reestablished in progeny cells of the same tissue or individual.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13039-015-0159-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Chromatin-modifying reagents that alter histone associating proteins, DNA conformation or its sequence are well established strategies for studying chromatin structure in interphase (G1, S, G2)

  • In this study, we investigated epigenetic modifications responsible for allelic differences in chromatin accessibility reported between homologous mitotic metaphase chromosomes [13]

  • In conclusion, we show that differential accessibility’ (DA) is a stable structural mark of metaphase chromosomes that was not influenced by inhibitors of histone-modification, cytosine methylation or cohesin mutations that alter chromosome accessibility during interphase

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Chromatin-modifying reagents that alter histone associating proteins, DNA conformation or its sequence are well established strategies for studying chromatin structure in interphase (G1, S, G2). By super-resolution 3-D structured illumination microscopy (3D-SIM) and other criteria, the differences correspond to ‘differential accessibility’ (DA) to these chromosomal regions At these chromosomal loci, DA of the same homologous chromosome is stable and epigenetic hallmarks of less accessible interphase chromatin are present. Large-scale chromatin reorganization from interphase to metaphase is driven by mitotic-specific condensation factors [1, 2] Speaking, this is thought to include histone proteins undergoing post translational modifications and interaction of histone tails with neighboring nucleosomes [1]. Our interest in chromatin accessibility arose out of an observation that short, locusspecific, single copy DNA probes detect differences in DNA compaction between homologs at ~10 % of allelic loci on mitotic metaphase chromosomes [11,12,13] This is referred to as differential accessibility (or DA) to specific, condensed chromosomal targets. This led to the suggestion that DA represents an intergenerational mechanism of storing epigenetic information in mitotic metaphase chromosomes between parent and daughter cells [13]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call