Reviewed by: Dance on its Own Terms: Histories and Methodologies ed. by Melanie Bales and Karen Eliot Ariel Nereson DANCE ON ITS OWN TERMS: HISTORIES AND METHODOLOGIES. Edited by Melanie Bales and Karen Eliot. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013; pp. 456. Since the mid-1990s, dance studies has integrated with other disciplines, including performance studies, visual studies, cultural studies, and others. The 1997 volume Meaning in Motion: New Cultural Studies of Dance set a standard for this kind of interdisciplinary work, and others—Moving History/Dancing Cultures: A Dance History Reader (2001) and The Routledge Dance Studies Reader (2010)—have sprung up in response to the field’s increased visibility in academia. In their new collection, editors Melanie Bales and Karen Eliot aim to re-center dance studies onto dance itself: onto movement and its phenomenal and material qualities. They argue that dance studies’ interdisciplinary forays, while rich and provocative, have compromised the study of dance on its own terms: “[i]n their eagerness to adopt theoretical language from other disciplines, dance scholars have lost fluency in their own language” (4). This language emphasizes familiarity with particular schools of movement analysis and notation, allowing for scholarship that springs from dancing itself rather than beginning with external concerns about the body as a site or sign. Dance on Its Own Terms provides great depth in terms of modeling strong, dance-centered scholarship, but represents a fairly narrow range of dance itself. The editors divide the volume’s sixteen chapters into three sections that emphasize, respectively, spectatorship and reconstruction, physical/kinesthetic dance histories of particular figures, and methods of dance notation. Section 1 begins with Karen Eliot’s analysis of canon formation in British ballet circa World War II, including her timely reminder that “the mechanics and politics of canon formation … do not operate uniformly across the disciplines” (13). Ann Dils’s reflective chapter on restaging the challenging Jean Cocteau/Darius Milhaud farce Le Boeuf sur le Toit (1920) for a contemporary college audience provides a clear analysis of race and gender issues within the work, and also a model for imagining our pedagogical practices alongside our artistic ones. Deborah Friedes Galili offers the highly useful notion culture of reconstruction, terminology that frames her investigation of the “institutional structures and artistic and scholarly discourses” that determine reconstruction practices across geographies (67). Betsy Cooper convincingly demonstrates that the Production Code Administration’s censorship assessments about the “decency” of a dance in Golden Age Hollywood films were linked to a high art/popular entertainment binary that reified balletic movement, even if those choreographies [End Page 586] technically violated the code. Harmony Bench reads Beyoncé’s viral “Single Ladies” choreography (2008) as a negotiation of gender and sexuality within internet culture, offering an exemplary integration of a dance-centered perspective (movement analysis of the choreography itself and its lineage) with contemporary theoretical concerns (kinesthetic transfer through digital media). In section 2, Catherine Turocy’s strong essay on how dancers (and scholars) in the present might enter into the spatial world of Baroque dance includes an invaluable series of exercises for readers and dancers that demonstrates the Baroque understanding of space, physicality, and aesthetics. Bales’s own excellent chapter in this section, a comparative movement analysis across three different interpretations of pas de deux (Marius Petipa, George Balanchine, and William Forsythe), connects movement itself across the three dances and to disciplinary questions in dance criticism and history in rich and compelling ways. Carrie Gaiser Casey examines the shape of maternal relationships between Anna Pavlova and her ballerinas through a feminist lens, arguing that we acknowledge the contradictions inherent in these relationships “as an integral part of dancer experience” (226). Geraldine Morris carefully parses the collaborative strands of Frederick Ashton’s 1937 ballet A Wedding Bouquet (music by Gerald Berners, text by Gertrude Stein) to argue for an integrated analysis of movement, music, and literature. In her Laban-based analysis of Anna Sokolow’s 1945 solo Kaddish, Hannah Kosstrin performs vital recovery work, tracing the evolution and adaptation of the choreography through several dancers, including Sokolow herself. Finally, Jessica Zeller focuses on the uniquely American pedagogy of ballerina Rochelle Zide-Booth to provide a useful overview...