International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference Research Articles

Adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III colon cancer: the role of the \u201cbudding and TILs-(tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes) combination\u201d as tumor-host antagonists

PurposeTo analyze the influence of adjuvant chemotherapy on the combination of tumor budding and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in stage II and III colon cancer and to elucidate its potential value for adjuvant treatment decisions.Methods306 patients with stage II and 205 patients with stage III colon cancer diagnosed between 2005 and 2016 who had undergone surgery in a curative setting were enrolled. Budding and TILs were assessed according to the criteria of the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) and the criteria of the International TILs Working Group (ITWG). Combinations of budding and TILs were analyzed, and the influence of adjuvant chemotherapy was assessed.ResultsIn stage II colon cancer, stratification into the four budding/TILs groups showed no significant differences in overall survival (OS) between the chemotherapy and the surgery-alone group, not even in cases with high-risk features. In stage III colon cancer, patients with low budding/high TILs benefited significantly from chemotherapy (p=0.005). Patients with high budding/low TILs as well as high budding/high TILs showed a trend to benefit from adjuvant treatment. However, no chemotherapy benefit was seen for the low budding/low TIL group.ConclusionsThe budding/TIL combination identified subgroups in stage II and III colon cancer with and without benefit from adjuvant treatment. The results this study suggest that the combination of budding and TILs as tumor-host antagonists might be an additional helpful tool in adjuvant treatment decisions in stage II and III colon cancer.

Increasing tumor budding in cholangiocarcinoma is associated with decreased disease-specific survival

Tumor budding (TB) has been shown to be an adverse prognostic factor in several gastrointestinal malignancies, most notably colorectal carcinoma (CRC). TB has undergone some evaluation in Eastern cohorts of cholangiocarcinoma (CC), and we undertook this study to evaluate whether TB in CC was linked to other clinicopathologic factors or to outcome in a Western cohort. We evaluated 112 cases of CC for age, sex, margin status, location, size, grade, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), perineural invasion (PNI), subtype (large or small duct), staging parameters, recurrence-free survival, disease-specific survival (DSS), and TB. Budding was scored using International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference recommendations for CRC: The highest tumor bud count at the invasive tumor front in a 0.785mm2 area was recorded and stratified into Bd1 (0-4 buds), Bd2 (5-9 buds), and Bd3 (≥10 buds). Our cohort included 54 (48%) extrahepatic CCs and 58 (52%) intrahepatic CCs. TB was more commonly seen in the settings of higher-grade lesions, males, extrahepatic CC, PNI, LVI, and positive resection margin (all P≤0.021). In multivariate analysis, worse DSS was correlated with budding score Bd2/Bd3 (hazard ratio [HR] 2.6687, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.585-5.217, P=0.001) and with nodal disease (HR 2.876, 95% CI 1.585-5.217, P=0.001). TB is associated with higher-grade disease in CC, and increased TB is associated with poor disease-specific survival. Our findings support the notion that TB may serve as useful information for clinicians with respect to patient prognosis in CC, as in CRC.

Improving tumor budding reporting in colorectal cancer: a Delphi consensus study

Tumor budding is a long-established independent adverse prognostic marker in colorectal cancer, yet methods for its assessment have varied widely. In an effort to standardize its reporting, a group of experts met in Bern, Switzerland, in 2016 to reach consensus on a single, international, evidence-based method for tumor budding assessment and reporting (International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference [ITBCC]). Tumor budding assessment using the ITBCC criteria has been validated in large cohorts of cancer patients and incorporated into several international colorectal cancer pathology and clinical guidelines. With the wider reporting of tumor budding, new issues have emerged that require further clarification. To better inform researchers and health-care professionals on these issues, an international group of experts in gastrointestinal pathology participated in a modified Delphi process to generate consensus and highlight areas requiring further research. This effort serves to re-affirm the importance of tumor budding in colorectal cancer and support its continued use in routine clinical practice.

Tumor Microenvironmental Prognostic Risk in Primary Operable Small Intestinal Adenocarcinoma.

The tumor microenvironment (TME) has become an important area of investigation with respect to improving prognosis in malignancies. Here we evaluated TME prognostic risk in small intestinal adenocarcinomas based on histologic assessment of tumor budding at the peritumoral-invasive front (pTB) and stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs). pTB and sTILs were analyzed in 230 surgically resected small intestinal adenocarcinomas, as recommended by the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) and the International TILs Working Group (ITWG). On the basis of high levels of pTB count (≥10) and sTIL density (≥20%), we combined pTB and sTIL to produce a collective TME-based prognostic risk index: low-risk (pTBLow/sTILHigh; n=39, 17.0%), intermediate-risk (pTBLow/sTILLow or pTBHigh/sTILHigh; n=99, 43.0%), and high-risk groups (pTBHigh/sTILLow; n=92, 40.0%). TME risk index provided better prognostic stratification than the individual pTB and sTIL (14.9 vs. 6.7 vs. 10.3). Tumors with higher TME prognostic risk were associated with an infiltrative growth pattern and nonintestinal immunophenotype (both P=0.001), pancreatic invasion (P=0.010), lymphovascular (P<0.001) or perineural invasion (P=0.006), higher T-category (P<0.001), N-category (P=0.004), and stage grouping (P=0.002), and KRAS mutation (P=0.008). In multivariate analysis, higher TME prognostic risk index (P<0.001), distal tumor location and nonintestinal immunophenotype (both P=0.001), higher N-category (P<0.001), and microsatellite stable (P=0.015) were worse-independent prognosticators. TME prognostic risk index consistently stratified patient survival regardless of tumor location (P<0.001 in proximal; P=0.002 in distal), stages (P<0.001 in lower stages I to II; P=0.028 in stage III), and DNA mismatch repair gene status (P<0.001 in microsatellite stable; P=0.001 in microsatellite instability). TME risk index is a powerful prognostic predictor for risk stratification of patients with small intestinal adenocarcinoma.

Prognostic value of tumor budding in gallbladder cancer: application of the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference scoring system.

Tumor budding (TB), a histopathological manifestation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition, is an important step in cancer invasion and metastasis development. TB has been considered a strong prognostic indicator in colorectal cancer. The International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) scoring system is the standardized method used for patient outcome prediction in several human tumors. We investigated the clinicopathological implications and applicability of TB measured using the ITBCC scoring system in gallbladder cancer (GBC). The TB grades assigned to the 78 GBC patients were as follows: Bd1 (low TB), 41 (52.6%) patients; Bd2 (intermediate TB), 22 (28.2%) patients; and Bd3 (high TB), 15 (19.2%) patients. A higher TB grade correlated with a poorer histological differentiation (P< 0.000), higher pT category (P< 0.000), the involvement of surgical resection margin (P= 0.005), presence of nodal metastasis (P< 0.000), lymphatic and venous invasion (P< 0.000), and perineural invasion (P= 0.004). Univariate Cox regression analysis revealed that a poor histological grade, high pT category, lymphatic invasion, perineural invasion, and intermediate to high TB grades were associated with worse 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival. TB was not significantly associated with death or recurrence risk in multivariate Cox analysis. The interobserver agreement of TB grading was substantial. This study is the first to apply the ITBCC scoring system and suggest the prognostic value of TB in GBC.

Prognostic impact of tumor budding in endometrial carcinoma within distinct molecular subgroups

Tumor budding is a robust prognostic parameter in several tumor entities but is rarely investigated in endometrial carcinoma. We applied the recently standardized counting method from the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference for colorectal cancer (ITBCC) on a cohort of 255 endometrial carcinomas with known molecular profiles according to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) subgroups. Our investigation aims to clarify the potential prognostic role of tumor budding in endometrial carcinoma in contrast to other known prognostic factors, including molecular factors. In addition, the microcystic elongated and fragmented (MELF) pattern and tumor budding were compared with respect to their potential as markers for epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT). Tumor budding was found in n = 67 (26.3%) tumors, with a very low mean of 0.7 buds per ×20 HE field. Tumor budding was significantly associated with depth of invasion, nodal status, lymphatic invasion (each p < 0.001), grading (p = 0.004), and vascular invasion (p = 0.01). Tumor budding showed moderate inter-observer-variability with prognostic stratification irrespective of the observer (κ-value = 0.448). In multivariate analysis, tumor budding served as a significant independent prognosticator for worse outcomes in overall and recurrence-free survival (HR 2.376 and 2.736, p < 0.001), but not when the TCGA subgroups entered into the analysis. In consequence, dependency had to be clarified in the subgroup analysis for Polymerase E mutated (POLEmut), mismatch repair deficient (MMRdef), nonspecific mutation profile (NSMP), and P53 aberrant (P53abn) endometrial carcinomas. A particular impact was identified in the intermediate prognostic groups of NSMP and MMRdef carcinomas. Tumor budding outperformed the MELF pattern in single and combined prognostic information. In conclusion, the presence of tumor budding alone is a promising, robust, and easy-to-apply prognostic parameter in endometrial carcinoma. In a morpho-molecular approach, it exerts its prognostic potential in the most clinically relevant subgroups of endometrial carcinoma and serves as a good biomarker for EMT.

Taking tumour budding to the next frontier - a post International Tumour Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) 2016 review.

Tumour budding in colorectal cancer, defined as single tumour cells or small clusters containing four or fewer tumour cells, is a robust and independent biomarker of aggressive tumour biology. On the basis of published data in the literature, the evidence is certainly in favour of reporting tumour budding in routine practice. One important aspect of implementing tumour budding has been to establish a standardised and evidence-based scoring method, as was recommended by the International Tumour Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) in 2016. Further developments have aimed at establishing methods for automated tumour budding assessment. A digital approach to scoring tumour buds has great potential to assist in performing an objective budding count but, like the manual consensus method, must be validated and standardised. The aim of the present review is to present general considerations behind the ITBCC scoring method, and a broad overview of the current situation and challenges regarding automated tumour budding detection methods.

Reproducibility of tumor budding assessment in pancreatic cancer based on a multicenter interobserver study

Tumor budding has been reported to be an independent prognostic factor in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Its use in daily diagnostics would improve the prognostic stratification of patients. We performed a multicenter interobserver study to test various budding assessment methods for their reproducibility. Two serial sections of 50 resected, treatment-naïve PDACs were stained for Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) and pancytokeratin. Tumor budding was scored by independent observers at five participating centers in Switzerland, Germany, and Canada. Pathologists assessed tumor budding on a digital platform comparing H&E with pancytokeratin staining in 10 high-power fields (10HPF) and one HPF hotspot (1HPF). Additionally, tumor budding was assessed in one H&E hotspot at × 20 magnification, as suggested by the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC). Correlation coefficients for bud counts between centers ranged from r = 0.58648 to r = 0.78641 for H&E and from r = 0.69288 to r = 0.81764 for pancytokeratin. The highest interobserver agreement across all centers was observed for pancytokeratin 10HPFs (ICC = 0.6). ICC values were 0.49, 0.48, 0.41, and 0.4 for H&E in 1HPF hotspot, H&E in 10HPFs, pancytokeratin in 1HPF, and H&E in one hotspot at ×20, respectively (ITBCC method). This interobserver study reveals a range between moderately poor to moderate agreement levels between pathologists for the different tumor budding assessment methods in PDAC. Acceptable levels of agreement were reached with the pancytokeratin 10HPF method, which can thus be recommended for the assessment of tumor budding in PDAC resection specimens. To improve the levels of interobserver agreement, the implementation of machine learning applications should be considered.

The prognostic influence of tumour budding in Western patients with stage II colorectal cancer.

Background:Tumour budding (TB) refers to loss of tumour cohesiveness and is defined as isolated cells or a cell cluster of up to four tumour cells at the microscopic analysis. The International Tumour Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) in 2016 proposed a scoring system to standardise the pathology evaluation of TB in colorectal cancer (CRC) as high (H), intermediate (I) and low (L) TB.Objective:To evaluate the recurrence-free survival (RFS) of stage II CRC patients as per the ITBCC 2016 classification and associations between TB and clinical pathological features.Methods:Cases of stage II CRC undergoing surgery with available tumour tissue underwent central pathology review for TB. Prognostic factors, retrospectively retrieved from electronic medical charts, were evaluated in univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses for RFS (primary end point).Results:Among 137 patients included, L-TB was observed in 107 (78.1%), I-TB in 21 (15.3%) and H-TB in 9 (6.6%). In a median follow-up of 69 months, the median RFS was 134 months, with 14 patients (10.2%) presenting with tumour recurrence: 10 (9.3%) with L-TB, 2 (9.5%) with I-TB and 2 (22.2%) with H-TB. Perineural invasion was more commonly seen in the H-TB group. In multivariate analysis, TB (H and I versus L; HR = 2.6; p = 0.059) and not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 3.7; p = 0.020) were independently associated with RFS. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated longer RFS (HR = 3.7; p = 0.022).Conclusion:In this series of Western patients, TB grade was associated with perineural invasion and increased risk of disease relapse.

Tumor budding (TB) in Colorectal Cancer (CRC), The Best Slide To Count On!

Abstract Introduction/Objective TB is a strong prognosticator in CRC. The international TB consensus conference (ITBCC, 2016) proposed a “hot spot” approach for TB grading. We aimed to identify the characteristics of sections with the highest TB grade utilizing ITBCC’s method. Methods Resected CRC cases, excluding treated cases, were retrieved. All tumor sections were examined. Section TB grade(sTB) was noted. The highest sTB was deemed the final TB grade(fTB) of each case. The following categories were assessed: 1) maximum T stage; 2) presence of benign mucosa; 3) presence of a precursor lesion; 4) highest tumor volume; 5) presence of lymphovascular invasion(LVI). In cases where a given category was demonstrated in &amp;gt;1 section, the section with the highest sTB was used. High risk features (HFR) included T4, &amp;lt;12 lymph nodes, positive margin, high grade tumor, perineural invasion and LVI. Pearson’s correlation was performed to compare two groups using a p-value of &amp;lt;0.05. Results 147 cases were examined. fTB was 1=25.2%, 2=40.8% and 3=34%. 63 tumors involved the left colon and 62 had nodal disease. Of 119 cases with known MMR status 44 were MMR deficient. sTB was uniform across the categories in 101(68.7%) and uneven in 46(32.3%) cases. 12(24.5%) of 49 stage II CRC without HRF showed uneven sTB, with 2 showing 2-tier discrepancy (sTB1, fTB3). sTB was highest for category 3 (94.1%, P&amp;lt;.001), followed by category 2 (91.8%, P&amp;lt;.001), and lowest for category 1 (82.3%, P&amp;lt;.001), which remained true after subgrouping by MMR status and tumor location. Conclusion While about 70% of cases showed uniform TB grading across categories, choosing the slide(s) with a precursor lesion or benign mucosa increases the probability of correctly grading TB. Given the management implication, it may be prudent to scan all tumor slides in stage II CRC without HRF to avoid under-grading of TB.

Interobserver Variability in the Assessment of Tumor Budding in pT 3/4 Colon Cancer: Improvement by Supporting Immunohistochemistry?

The prognostic significance of tumor budding in colon cancer is unequivocally documented, and the recommendations of the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) are currently the accepted basis for its assessment. Up to now, it is unknown whether the general use of a supporting cytokeratin immunohistochemistry can improve the interobserver variability and prognostic significance. Six investigators with different levels of experience reassessed 229 cases of colon carcinoma (pT3/4, N+/−, M0) with a supporting cytokeratin immunohistochemistry. The results were compared to previous assessments, which have been performed only on H & E. Bd3 was significantly associated with the occurrence of distant metastases according to the assessments of three out of six investigators (p < 0.05). Only one single investigator reached significant results concerning the cancer specific survival (p = 0.01). The pairwise kappa values range between a poor and moderate level of agreement (range 0.17–0.45; median 0.21). In conclusion, the results show no superiority of the use of an additional cytokeratin immunohistochemistry compared to the conventional analysis on sole H & E slides. Therefore, the general supporting use of a cytokeratin immunohistochemical staining seems to be inadvisable in colon cancer in consideration of necessary resources and costs.

Tumour budding in solid cancers

Tumour budding is an emerging prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer (CRC) and other solid cancers. Tumour buds are usually defined as isolated single cancer cells or clusters of up to four cancer cells located at the invasive tumour front. The prognostic value of tumour budding is now supported by a large body of evidence, whereas the utility of this phenotype as a predictive biomarker remains under investigation. The application of tumour budding indices in clinical practice requires a standardized scoring system that can be tailored to specific tumour types and clinical scenarios. In the context of CRC, tumour budding can be assessed according to the method agreed at the International Tumour Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) in 2016. Using the ITBCC scoring system, tumour budding is an independent predictor of lymph node metastasis in patients with pT1 CRC and of unfavourable survival in patients with stage II colon cancer. Regardless of the clinical scenario or tumour type, the assertion that 'the more tumour buds, the worse the clinical outcome' applies. In this Review, we provide an overview of tumour budding in solid cancers, highlighting the molecular and biological aspects of this phenomenon, including its associations with epithelial-mesenchymal transition and features of the tumour microenvironment. We also describe the available evidence demonstrating the value of tumourbudding as a biomarker across various solid cancers.

Tumour budding, poorly differentiated clusters, and T-cell response in colorectal cancer.

BackgroundTumour budding and poorly differentiated clusters (PDC) represent forms of tumour invasion. We hypothesised that T-cell densities (reflecting adaptive anti-tumour immunity) might be inversely associated with tumour budding and PDC in colorectal carcinoma.MethodsUtilising 915 colon and rectal carcinomas in two U.S.-wide prospective cohort studies, and multiplex immunofluorescence combined with machine learning algorithms, we assessed CD3, CD4, CD8, CD45RO (PTPRC), and FOXP3 co-expression patterns in lymphocytes. Tumour budding and PDC at invasive fronts were quantified by digital pathology and image analysis using the International tumour Budding Consensus Conference criteria. Using covariate data of 4,420 incident colorectal cancer cases, inverse probability weighting (IPW) was integrated with multivariable logistic regression analysis that assessed the association of T-cell subset densities with tumour budding and PDC while adjusting for selection bias due to tissue availability and potential confounders, including microsatellite instability status.FindingsTumour budding counts were inversely associated with density of CD3+CD8+ [lowest vs. highest: multivariable odds ratio (OR), 0.50; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.35–0.70; Ptrend < 0.001] and CD3+CD8+CD45RO+ cells (lowest vs. highest: multivariable OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.31–0.63; Ptrend < 0.001) in tumour epithelial region. Tumour budding levels were associated with higher colorectal cancer-specific mortality (multivariable hazard ratio, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.57–2.89; Ptrend < 0.001) in Cox regression analysis. There were no significant associations of PDC with T-cell subsets.InterpretationTumour epithelial naïve and memory cytotoxic T cell densities are inversely associated with tumour budding at invasive fronts, suggesting that cytotoxic anti-tumour immunity suppresses tumour microinvasion.

Prognostic and predictive values of tumour budding in stage IV colorectal cancer.

BackgroundTumour budding is an important prognostic feature in early‐stage colorectal cancer, but its prognostic significance in metastatic disease has not been fully investigated.MethodsPatients with stage IV disease who had primary colorectal tumour resection without previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy from January 2000 to December 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. Budding was evaluated at the primary site and graded according to the criteria of the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) (BD1, low; BD2, intermediate; BD3, high). Patients were categorized by metastatic (M1a, M1b) and resectional (R0/R1, R2/unresected) status. Subgroups were compared for overall (OS) and recurrence‐free (RFS) survival in R0/R1 subgroups; R2/unresected patients were evaluated for the rate of tumour progression, based on change in tumour size from baseline.ResultsOf 371 patients observed during the study, 362 were analysed. Patients with BD3 had a lower 5‐year OS rate than those with BD1 + BD2 (18·4 versus 40·5 per cent; P < 0·001). Survival analyses according to metastatic and resection status also showed that BD3 was associated with shorter OS than BD1 + BD2. In multivariable analysis, BD3 (hazard ratio (HR) 1·51, 95 per cent c.i. 1·11 to 2·10; P = 0·009), T4 status (HR 1·39) and R2/unresected status (HR 3·50) were associated with decreased OS. In the R0/R1 subgroup, the 2‐year RFS rate was similar for BD3 and BD1 + BD2 according to metastatic status. There was no significant difference between BD3 and BD1 + BD2 for change in tumour size in the R2/unresected subgroup (P = 0·094). Of 141 patients with initially unresectable metastases who had chemotherapy, 35 achieved conversion from unresectable to resectable status. The conversion rate was significantly higher for BD1 + BD2 than for BD3 (36 versus 18 per cent; P = 0·016).ConclusionStage IV colorectal cancer with high‐grade tumour budding according to ITBCC criteria correlates with poor prognosis.

Pattern and Significance of Tumour Budding in Colorectal Carcinomas Using ITBCC Guidelines: a Low Resource Setting Practice Observation.

To determine the pattern and significance of tumour budding among colorectal carcinoma (CRC) Nigerian patients using the 2016 International Tumour Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) guidelines. H&E-stained slides of resected CRC at the University College Hospital and a private laboratory, both in Ibadan, Nigeria, from January 2008 to December 2017 were reviewed. Patient age, gender, tumour size and location were obtained from the surgical pathology records. Tumours were graded and staged according to the 2010 WHO and the 2017 UICC protocols, respectively. Tumour budding was determined at × 20 objective lens magnification with a 20-mm eyepiece field number diameter. Descriptive, Mann-Whitney U and chi-square test statistics were applied using SPSS 20; p < 0.05 was considered significant. Ninety-six cases were included in this study. Fifty-one (53.1%) showed tumour budding. Tumour bud count was low (0-4) in 66 (68.8%), intermediate (5-9) in 12 (12.5%) and high (≥ 10) in 18 (18.8%) tumours. Four tumours had pT1 stage, 35 pT2, 37 pT3 and 20 pT4. Forty-three (44.8%) tumours were lymph node-positive, and 10 (10.4%) had metastasis. Patients' age and tumour size distribution were similar in the tumour budding and non-budding groups (52.4 ± 17.1/58.5 ± 13.9years and 6.6 ± 2.9/6.6 ± 2.8cm, respectively). There was significant association between tumour budding and tumour grade (p < 0.008), pT stage (p < 0.000), lymphovascular permeation (p < 0.000), perineural invasion (p < 0.003) and nodal status (p < 0.034), but not with gender (p = 0.588), metastasis (p = 0.327) and TNM group-stage (p = 0.062). Tumour budding frequency is high among our CRC patients and is associated with poorer prognostic factors.

Evaluation of Tumor Budding in Predicting Survival for Gastric Carcinoma Patients in Vietnam.

Background:Tumor budding (Bd) has been demonstrated to be a promising prognostic factor in many carcinomas and in gastric cancer. It may represent an optimal additional parameter that is helpful for risk stratification in gastric adenocarcinoma. Hence, the present research was designed to predict the survival outcomes of gastric cancer in Vietnam, applying the tumor budding criteria of the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) 2016.Methods:The present study was conducted on 109 gastric cancer patients who underwent surgery but did not receive neo-adjuvant chemotherapy from 2012 to 2015. The patients’ clinicopathological features were recorded. Bd was evaluated according to the 2016 ITBCC criteria and classified as Bd1 (0–4 buds), Bd2 (5–9 buds), and Bd3 (≥10 buds) grades, in addition to being categorized into 2 main Bd groups: low (<10 buds) and high (≥10 buds) Bd. Kaplan–Meier and log-rank models were applied to analyze survival proportions.Results:Of all the patients, 22.9% were classified as Bd1, 31.2% as Bd2, and 45.9% as Bd3 grades. Furthermore, 54.1% patients were categorized into the low and 45.9% into the high Bd groups. Patients with Bd1 and Bd2 grades (the low Bd group) exhibited the best prognosis, with 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of 85.7%, 90.8%, and90.3%, respectively. Patients with Bd3 grade (the high Bd group exhibited the worst prognosis, and none of them lived for 5 years (p < 0.001). Similar to OS rates, disease-free survival (DFS) rates markedly reduced from the Bd1 to Bd3 grade: Bd1, 95.0%; Bd2, 84.7%; and Bd3, 0% (p < 0.001).Conclusion:Patients with different gastric cancer Bd grades exhibited significantly different OS and DFS rates. The present study findings suggest that the ITBCC criteria can be used to stratify Bd for the treatment and prognosis of gastric cancer patients in Vietnam.

Tumour budding is a predictor of lymph node metastasis in colorectal carcinoma

Context: Tumour budding score (TBS) implies poor prognosis in colorectal cancer (CRC). A higher score is associated with a higher rate of lymph node metastasis. Therefore, it influences the treatment modality in Stage 2 and pT1 CRC. The International Tumour Budding consensus conference (ITBCC) proposed use of x20 objective for scoring which is not frequently available in Indian Laboratories. Tata Memorial Centre (TMC) has proposed score groups for x40 objective which could be more feasible for reporting in India. Aims: To establish the significance of reporting tumour budding routinely in CRC and assess the reproducibility of TMC proposed score groups for x40 objective. Methods: 4 Hematoxylin and Eosin stained sections from the tumour were studied in 32 CRC cases. TBS was defined as the single worst field with highest number of Tumour buds using the x40 objective and scored as low=0 to 1, intermediate=2 to 4 and high= more than equal to 5. TBS was compared with nodal metastasis. Results: TBS was low in 23 cases, intermediate in 6 cases and high in 3 cases. All 3 cases with high TBS showed nodal metastasis with 2 cases (66%) having nodal stage N2b. All 6 cases with intermediate TBS score also showed nodal metastasis. Of the 23 low TBS cases, 7 showed nodal metastasis with 5 cases having nodal stage N1a. Conclusions: TBS using x40 objective is a reproducible method and is associated with higher risk of lymph node metastasis. It should be incorporated in routine reporting of all CRC cases.

High-grade intratumoral tumor budding is a predictor for lymphovascular invasion and adverse outcome in stage II colorectal cancer.

Evaluation of tumor budding in colorectal cancer (CRC) may help to predict the tumors' metastatic potential and patients with an aggressive tumor, although not yet metastasized at time of surgery might benefit from adjuvant therapy. The degree of intratumoral tumor budding (ITB) was classified as low, intermediate, and high grade according to the recommendations of the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) 2016 on H&E and pankeratin-stained TMA sections from 1262 CRC, no special type (NST), including 655 stage II CRC and was correlated to clinicopathological data and overall survival. Results show that higher ITB rates are significantly linked to higher tumor grade and stage, positive nodal status, lymphovascular invasion (P< 0.0001 each), absence of peritumoral lymphocytes, infiltrating type invasive tumor margin, left-sided cancer localization, and mismatch-repair proficient cancers (P<0.05 each). In a cohort of 655 stage II CRC, ITB was associated with lymphovascular invasion (P= 0.0459) and adverse clinical outcome (P< 0.0001). In a multivariate analysis including tumor stage, tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion, ITB, and tumor localization, only low tumor stage (P= 0.0022) and absence of lymphovascular invasion (P= 0.0043) showed independent prognostic significance. In conclusion, our findings argue towards a clinical utility of ITB as a prognostic biomarker in stage II colorectal cancer to define patients who might benefit from adjuvant therapy. ITB might be used as additional or surrogate marker in CRC in which peritumoral tumor budding is difficult to assess.

Validation of the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) 2016 recommendation in squamous cell carcinoma of the lung-a single-center analysis of 354 cases.

There are no universally accepted grading systems in pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma (pSQCC). Recently, tumor budding, cell nest size, and spread through airspaces (STAS) have been proposed as grading scheme candidates. Tumor budding is a well-established independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. The International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) provided consensus on scoring in 2016, albeit for colorectal cancers. Here, we aimed to validate the ITBCC method in pSQCC and evaluate additional proposed grading parameters. We analyzed a fully clinico-pathologically annotated Western single-center cohort of 354 consecutive primary resected pSQCC (resected 2000-2013). Patients with SQCC of other organs were excluded to reliably exclude lung metastases. We assessed conventional grading, keratinization, STAS, and tumor budding according to ITBCC recommendations, and correlated them with clinico-pathological parameters and survival. Tumor budding was low (0-4 buds/0.785 mm2) in 41%, intermediate (5-9 buds/0.785 mm2) in 30%, and high (≥10 buds/0.785 mm2) in 29% of cases (mean bud count = 7.45 (H&E), min = 0, max = 84). Cell nests of 1, 2-4, 5-15, >15 cells were present in 68%, 20%, 5%, 7%, respectively. We detected STAS in 33% of cases, desmoplasia in 68%. Tumor budding assessed as continuous and categorized variables was highly concordant between hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and pancytokeratin (AE1/AE3) stained slides (P < 0.001) and significantly associated with tumor size, UICC/AJCC pT, pN, stage (all P < 0.001) and presence of mediastinal lymph node metastases (H&E: P = 0.028). Tumor budding was a significant prognostic parameter for overall, disease-specific, and progression-free survival (PFS) (all P < 0.001). ITBCC tumor budding categories were independent prognostic factors for overall survival (HR = 1.581; 95% CI 1.186-2.108; P = 0.002), disease-specific survival (HR = 1.710; 95% CI 1.111-2.632; P = 0.015), and PFS (HR = 1.457; 95% CI 1.123-1.890; P = 0.005). STAS or conventional tumor grade had no prognostic value. In conclusion, we confirm tumor budding as an independent prognostic marker in pSQCC and validate the ITBCC 2016 scoring recommendations in pSQCC.

Prognostic significance of tumour budding assessed in gastric carcinoma according to the criteria of the International Tumour Budding Consensus Conference.

In this study, we aimed to independently evaluate the utility and prognostic value of tumour budding (TB) according to the International Tumour Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) criteria in a large and a well-characterised European gastric cancer (GC) cohort. In 456 consecutive, surgically treated GCs, TB was assessed according to the ITBCC criteria and scored as Bd0 (no buds), Bd1 (one to four buds), Bd2 (five to nine buds) or Bd3 (≥10 buds). Cases with TB present were divided into low- (Bd1/Bd2) and high-budding (Bd3) groups. The TB score was analysed in relation to the clinicopathological parameters, overall survival (OS) and tumour-specific survival (TSS); 115 (25.2%) cases had no, 104 (22.8%) had low and 237 (52.0%) had high TB. The TB score correlated significantly with sex, Laurén phenotype, pT-, pN- and M categories, histological grade, R status; and lymph node ratio, lymphatic invasion, perineural invasion and HER2-, MET- and MSI status. In both total and intestinal-type early invasive GC (n=57 and n=41, respectively), significant associations between the presence and extent of TB and presence of lymph node metastasis were detected. Significant differences in OS and TSS between the TB groups were found; however, TB did not retain significance in multivariate models. Our data show that the ITBCC criteria can be applied to GC. The data correlated significantly with the diverse clinicopathological characteristics, including patient outcome, and can help to standardise diagnostics and research into special histological features of malignant tumours in general and GC in particular.