International Scientific Association For Probiotics And Prebiotics Research Articles

The Prebiotic Diet: Other Dietary Molecules Implicated in Gut Microbiota Health

In 2016, the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) provided a new definition of a prebiotic as “a substrate that is selectively utilized by host microorganisms conferring a health benefit” [...]

An Update on Prebiotics and on Their Health Effects

Prebiotic compounds were originally defined as “a nondigestible food ingredient that beneficially affects the host by selectively stimulating the growth and/or activity of one or a limited number of bacteria in the colon, and thus improves host health”; however, a significant modulation of the definition was carried out in the consensus panel of The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP), and the last definition states that “prebiotics are substrates that are selectively utilized by host microorganisms conferring a health benefit”. Health effects of prebiotics compounds attracted the interest of researchers, food companies and Regulatory Agencies, as inferred by the number of articles on Scopus for the keywords “prebiotic” and “health effects”, that is ca. 2000, for the period January 2021–January 2024. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to contribute to the debate on these topics by offering an overview of existing knowledge and advances in this field. A literature search was performed for the period 2012–2023 and after the selection of the most relevant items, the attention was focused on seven conditions for which at least 8–10 different studies were found, namely colorectal cancer, neurological or psychiatric conditions, intestinal diseases, obesity, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and immune system disorders. In addition, the analysis of the most recent articles through the software VosViewer version 1.6.20 pointed out the existence of five clusters or macro-categories, namely: (i) pathologies; (ii) metabolic condvitions; (iii) structure and use in food; (iv) immunomodulation; (v) effect on gut microbiota.

PROBIOTIC BIFIDOBACTERIUM AND A NEW GENERATION POSTBIOTIC: ALGINIC ACID

According to International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus (2019),Postbiotics are defined as a preparation of inanimate microorganisms and/or their components that confers a health benefit on the host. Postbiotic Alginic acid, also called algin, is a naturally occurring, edible exopolysaccharide found in brown algae. Alginic acid and its Na/Ca salt form of Alginate show the capability in water-binding, water-retention water, and immense swelling and gelation, which could act as a protective barrier via promoting biofilm formation on the bacterial cell surfaces. Alginic acid is a potent inducer of Th1 pathway.We aimed to analyze the Postbiotic alginate formed by the human intestinal beneficial bacteria, bifidobacteria,by degrading sodium alginate.

PROBIOTIC BIFIDOBACTERIUM AND A NEW GENERATION POSTBIOTIC: ALGINIC ACID

Abstract AIMS OF THE STUDY According to International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus (2019),Postbiotics are defined as a preparation of inanimate microorganisms and/or their components that confers a health benefit on the host. Postbiotic Alginic acid, also called algin, is a naturally occurring, edible exopolysaccharide found in brown algae. Alginic acid and its Na/Ca salt form of Alginate show the capability in water-binding, water-retention water, and immense swelling and gelation, which could act as a protective barrier via promoting biofilm formation on the bacterial cell surfaces. Alginic acid is a potent inducer of Th1 pathway.We aimed to analyze the Postbiotic alginate formed by the human intestinal beneficial bacteria, bifidobacteria,by degrading sodium alginate. METHODS In these study, which were designed in Yildiz Technical University / Istanbul, Biohybrid films were produced by using both Bifidobacterium animalis subsp.lactis BB-12 probiotic strain and Bifidobacterium infantis in combination with sodium alginate (SA), which demonstrates biocompatibility and facilitated gelation properties in aeorobic atmospheric condition were considered as bifidobacterial surfactan source. RESULTS In biohybrid biofilm study(1), based on the spectroscopic and mechanical analysis, it was found that mechanical strength increased in films produced by adding Bifidobacterium infantis in SA while this increase was relatively lower as compared to those containing Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 as crosslinking ratio increases. Besides, bacteria contained in bio-hybrid films increased the percentage of amorphous zone of SA in SA/bacteria films, which reduced the crystallinity ratio. This indicated that crystalline chains contained in the structure of SA are degraded by probiotic bifidobacteria(Fig.1) CONCLUSIONS This is the first study that Biohybrid biosurfactan that contains Bifidobacterium infantis, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 and SA structures coated medical/nonmedical devices and sets can be a pioneering approach to reduce carbon emissions, as well as to prevent secondary infections and increase device protection. Also, It paved the way for the postbiotic use of alginic acid/Alginate by probiotic Bifidobacteria.

584. Prospective Observational Cohort Study of Serological Responses to COVID-19 Vaccines in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients at a Single Institution

Abstract Background Pediatric kidney transplant recipients (PKTR) are at risk of poor outcomes from COVID-19. Data on serologic responses to COVID-19 vaccines in PKTR remain sparse. We characterized the magnitude, breadth, and longevity of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binding antibody responses in PKTR. Methods This single institution, prospective observational study enrolled PKTR presenting to a transplant clinic for routine care who had received or were eligible to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Demographic data, history of prior COVID-19, and vaccination details were collected. Plasma samples obtained from standard-of-care residual specimens were analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 spike variant IgG using the MesoScale Discovery V-PLEX platform, which quantitatively measures antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike wild-type (Wuhan-hu-1), Alpha (B.1.1.7), Beta (B.1.351), Delta (B.1.617.2), Gamma (P.1), and Omicron (B.1.1.529; BA.1) variants. Vaccine time points with > 5 samples available were analyzed. Geometric mean titers (GMTs) were calculated and log-transformed titers were compared using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc comparisons test. Results 61 PKTR enrolled (Table1); 47 (77%) received at least 1 dose of COVID-19 vaccine in transplant clinic. 47 (77%) PKTR had at least one sample available for analysis, but serial specimens were lacking for many. By 6 months post-dose 2 of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination, spike (Wuhan-hu-1) IgG titers had waned to pre-vaccination levels (GMT 24 vs 47 binding antibody units (BAU)/mL, P=0.988). Administration of a 3rd dose of mRNA vaccine significantly boosted IgG antibodies (GMT 492 BAU/mL, P=0.007), and titers were maintained at 3 months (GMT 656 BAU/mL, P=0.001) but gradually waned by 6 months (GMT 223 BAU/mL, P=0.070). Administration of a 4th dose elicited a non-significant increase in titers (GMT 905 BAU/mL, P=0.870). Binding IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 variant spike proteins post-vaccination were not significantly different from Wuhan spike. Conclusion In this cohort of PKTR, a 3rd dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine significantly boosted broadly cross-reactive binding IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 spike variants, including Omicron. Decreasing titers at 6 months post-dose 3 raise concern for waning protective immunity and support 4th dose vaccination. Disclosures Evan J. Anderson, MD, GSK: Advisor/Consultant|GSK: Grant/Research Support|Janssen: Advisor/Consultant|Janssen: Grant/Research Support|Kentucky Bioprocessing, Inc: Data Safety Monitoring Board|MedImmune: Grant/Research Support|Medscape: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Micron: Grant/Research Support|NIH: Funding from NIH to conduct clinical trials of Moderna and Janssen COVID-19 vaccines|PaxVax: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Regeneron: Grant/Research Support|Sanofi Pasteur: Advisor/Consultant|Sanofi Pasteur: Grant/Research Support|Sanofi Pasteur: Data Adjudication and Data Safety Monitoring Boards|WCG and ACI Clinical: Data Adjudication Board Andi L. Shane, MD, MPH, MSc, International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP): Honoraria Christina A. Rostad, MD, BioFire Inc, GSK, MedImmune, Micron, Merck, Novavax, PaxVax, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi-Pasteur.: Grant/Research Support|Meissa Vaccines, Inc.: Co-inventor of RSV vaccine technology licensed to Meissa Vaccines, Inc.|NIH (Funding from NIH to conduct clinical trials of Moderna and Janssen COVID-19 vaccines): Grant/Research Support.

1666. Sources and Preventability of Hospital-onset Bacteremia and Fungemia in the United States: Evaluation of a Potential Healthcare Quality Measure

Abstract Background Hospital-onset bacteremia and fungemia (HOB) is being proposed as a potential healthcare quality measure due to its clinical significance, objectivity, and ease of detection. However, information is lacking on sources of HOB and the proportion and types of cases considered preventable. Methods We evaluated sources and potential preventability of HOB cases at 12 hospitals using retrospective chart review. HOB was defined as a positive blood culture >= day 4 (admission date=day 1) for one or more organisms. Stratified sampling of cases by commensal and noncommensal organisms was used. Infectious disease physicians determined the source of HOB and rated preventability from 1-6 (1=definitely preventable to 6=definitely not preventable) using a previously validated guide. Ratings of 1–3 were collectively considered potentially preventable and 4–6 likely not preventable. Results We evaluated sources and potential preventability of HOB cases at 12 hospitals using retrospective chart review. HOB was defined as a positive blood culture >= day 4 (admission date=day 1) for one or more organisms. Stratified sampling of cases by commensal and noncommensal organisms was used. Infectious disease physicians determined the source of HOB and rated preventability from 1–6 (1=definitely preventable to 6=definitely not preventable) using a previously validated guide. Ratings of 1–3 were collectively considered potentially preventable and 4–6 likely not preventable. Conclusion Gastrointestinal and endovascular sources account for a large majority of noncommensal HOB cases. A high proportion of noncommensal HOB cases are likely not preventable. The presence of non-preventable events should be considered when using HOB as a quality measure. Approaches to identifying the subset of preventable noncommensal HOB events should be explored. Disclosures Scott Fridkin, MD, Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Andi L. Shane, MD, MPH, MSc, International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP): travel and lodging to attend international meeting to deliver a presentation, June 2022 Aaron Milstone, MD, Merck: Grant/Research Support Rajeshwari Nair, MBBS, PhD, Vertex Pharmaceuticals: Salary.

The Concept of Postbiotics.

The scientific community has proposed terms such as non-viable probiotics, paraprobiotics, ghostbiotics, heat-inactivated probiotics or, most commonly, postbiotics, to refer to inanimate microorganisms and/or their components that confer health benefits. This article addresses the various characteristics of different definitions of ‘postbiotics’ that have emerged over past years. In 2021, the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) defined a postbiotic as “a preparation of inanimate microorganisms and/or their components that confers a health benefit on the host”. This definition of postbiotic requires that the whole or components of inactivated microbes be present, with or without metabolic end products. The definition proposed by ISAPP is comprehensive enough to allow the development of postbiotics from different microorganisms, to be applied in different body sites, encouraging innovation in a promising area for any regulatory category and for companion or production animals, and plant or human health. From a technological perspective, probiotic products may contain inanimate microorganisms, which have the potential to impart a health benefit. However, their contribution to health in most cases has not been established, even if at least one probiotic has been shown to confer the same health benefit by live or inanimate cells.

Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids as Prebiotics: Innovation or Confirmation?

The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP), in its last consensus statement about prebiotics, defined polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) as “candidate prebiotics” due to a lack of complete scientific evidence. Previous studies have demonstrated the ability of microbiota to metabolize PUFAs, although the role of the resulting metabolites in the host is less known. Recent partial evidence shows that these metabolites can have important health effects in the host, reinforcing the concept of the prebiotic action of PUFAs, despite the data being mostly related to omega-6 linoleic acid and to lactobacilli taxon. However, considering that the symbionts in our gut benefit from the nutritional molecules that we include in our diet, and that bacteria, like all living organisms, cannot benefit from a single nutritional molecule, the concept of the “correct prebiotic diet” should be the new frontier in the field of gut microbiota research.

IFST Winning Articles

IFST Winning Articles

The case in favour of probiotics before, during and after pregnancy: insights from the first 1,500 days.

Successful human reproduction requires microbial homeostasis in the female reproductive tract, and colonisation of the newborn with beneficial microbes. In order to prevent several complications associated with dysbiosis, the administration of probiotics is more often being considered. The objective of the enclosed review was to examine the rationale for probiotic utility before and during pregnancy and in the early phase of infant life. The conclusions emerged from a panel of researchers who met during the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) workshop held in Washington, DC, USA in 2015. The group concluded based upon the current literature, that a case can be made for the use of a specific sets of probiotic organisms during the first 1,500 days of life, with the goal of a healthy pregnancy to term, and a healthy start to life with lowered risk of infections and inflammatory events. The key to successfully translating these recommendations to practice is that products be made available and affordable to women in developed and developing countries.

Human gut microbiota and its relationship to health and disease

Probiotics are live microorganisms that confer a health benefit on the host when administered in appropriate amounts. Over 700 randomized, controlled, human studies have been conducted with probiotics thus far, with the results providing strong support for the use of probiotics in the clinical prevention or treatment of gastrointestinal tract disorders and metabolic syndrome. The present review is based on webinar presentations that were developed by the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) in partnership with the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) and the North American branch of the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI North America). The presentations provided gastroenterologists and researchers with fundamental and current scientific information on the influence of gut microbiota on human health and disease, as well as clinical intervention strategies and practical guidelines for the use of probiotics and prebiotics.

New scientific paradigms for probiotics and prebiotics.

The inaugural meeting of the International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) was held May 3 to May 5 2002 in London, Ontario, Canada. A group of 63 academic and industrial scientists from around the world convened to discuss current issues in the science of probiotics and prebiotics. ISAPP is a non-profit organization comprised of international scientists whose intent is to strongly support and improve the levels of scientific integrity and due diligence associated with the study, use, and application of probiotics and prebiotics. In addition, ISAPP values its role in facilitating communication with the public and healthcare providers and among scientists in related fields on all topics pertinent to probiotics and prebiotics. It is anticipated that such efforts will lead to development of approaches and products that are optimally designed for the improvement of human and animal health and well being. This article is a summary of the discussions, conclusions, and recommendations made by 8 working groups convened during the first ISAPP workshop focusing on the topics of: definitions, intestinal flora, extra-intestinal sites, immune function, intestinal disease, cancer, genetics and genomics, and second generation prebiotics.