many studies comparing outcome (prevalence), process (screening and treatment of malnutrition) and structure indicators of nutritional care in different countries, using the same methodology. Therefore we conducted a study in Germany (G) and the Netherlands (NL). Methods: A cross-sectional international prevalence study was performed in 151 nursing homes (NL n = 5848, G n = 4923). A standardized questionnaire (3 levels) was used: at institutional and ward level structure indicators of nutritional care were assessed, whereas at patient level demographic data, care dependency and nutritional screening and treatment interventions for malnutrition were measured. Malnutrition was measured by assessing BMI, undesired weight loss and nutritional intake. Results: Dutch residents were older, more often male, more care dependent, and have a lower BMI than German residents. Dutch residents were more at risk of malnutrition (NL = 31.7% and G = 29.1%, p = 0.03), but no significant difference was found in the prevalence of malnutrition between both countries. About half of the malnourished residents received a nutritional intervention. Structure indicators at institutional level were more often fulfilled in the NL, only education was given more often in G. Besides having a specialized person in malnutrition, all other indicators on ward level were more often fulfilled in G. Conclusion: Malnutrition is a problem in more than a quarter of nursing home residents in each of the countries. Despite the fact that nutritional screening is rather frequently performed, nutritional interventions are provided only in about 50% of the malnourished patients. Structure indicators at ward level are more fulfilled in G, whereas at institutional level they are more fulfilled in NL.