The space sector has emerged as a lucrative market for both states and private entities, driven by unprecedented technological advancements. Private actors have become significant players in this field; however, their role is not adequately reflected in the existing legal frameworks for resolving disputes under international space law, which remain state-centric. This research addresses the gap by examining the procedures for resolving space-related disputes involving states and private entities. Using descriptive, analytical, and comparative methodologies, the study explores national and international conflict resolution mechanisms in space law. It reviews key agreements and initiatives such as the Outer Space Treaty, the Liability Convention, and Dubai’s Court of Space. The research highlights the advantages and limitations of various dispute resolution methods, including those offered by international law and arbitration forums, with a focus on Dubai’s Court of Space as a new and innovative platform. The study concludes that the rapid expansion of the space sector necessitates the development of inclusive and effective mechanisms for resolving disputes. Current frameworks are inadequate for addressing the complexities of modern space activities, often excluding private entities. Dubai’s Court of Space offers specialized expertise, transparency, and the ability to set global precedents, making it a promising solution for future disputes.
Read full abstract