International Academy Of Cytology Research Articles

International Academy of Cytology standardized reporting of breast fine-needle aspiration cytology with cyto-histopathological correlation of breast carcinoma.

The International Academy of Cytology (IAC) has developed a standardized approach for reporting the findings of breast fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). Accordingly, there are five chief categories of breast lesions, C1 (insufficient material), C2 (benign), C3 (atypical), C4 (suspicious), and C5 (malignant). The prognostication and management of breast carcinoma can be performed readily on the basis of this classification system. The aim of this study was to classify various breast lesions into one of the above-named categories and to further grade the C5 lesions specifically using the Robinson system. The latter grades were then correlated with modified Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR) grades. This retrospective study was undertaken in the pathology department of a hospital located in the urban part of the city of Bangalore. All FNAC procedures performed on breast lumps spanning the year 2020 were included in the study. A total of 205 breast lesions was classified according to the IAC guidelines into C1 (6 cases, 2.9%), C2 (151 cases, 73.7%), C3 (13 cases, 6.3%), C4 (5 cases, 2.5%), and C5 (30 cases, 14.6%) groups. The C5 cases were further graded using Robinson's system. The latter showed a significant correlation with the SBR system (concordance=83.3%, Spearman correlation=0.746, Kendall's tau-b=0.736, kappa=0.661, standard error=0.095, p≤.001). A standardized approach for FNAC reporting of breast lesions, as advocated for by the IAC, improves the quality and clarity of the reports and assures diagnostic reproducibility on a global scale. Further, the cytological grading of C5 lesions provides reliable cyto-prognostic scores that can help assess a tumor's aggressiveness and predict its histological grade.

Milan System Categorization and Reporting of Salivary Gland Tumors: A Literature Review

Abstract Salivary gland tumors (SGTs) are uncommon and represent about 6% of all head and neck tumors and 0.3% of all malignant tumors worldwide. The reporting system of SGTs before 2018 was individualized and may be problematic and confusing for some pathologists and clinicians. In 2018, the Milan Categorizing System for Salivary Gland Tumors (MSRSGC) was developed by an international consortium of experts and endorsed by the American Society of Cytopathology and the International Academy of Cytology; the aim was to standardize the reporting terminology to replace the conventional, descriptive interpretation for salivary gland fine needle aspirations for better communication between clinicians and between institutions. This review aims to stand on the extent of the MSRSGC in resolving the conflicts among pathologists and clinicians and highlight the problems that have been reported through studying the published literature. Since its development, the MSRSGC has provided to some extent a unified reporting system that elevated the communications among pathologists and clinicians. In addition, the MSRSGC has provided information about the risk of neoplasia (RON), risk of malignancy, and line of management for each category; however, most discussions have shown that some cases in the intermediate group are still indicating conflicts in its diagnosis and reporting, especially those of SGTs of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP) with distinct cellular features, such as basaloid, oncocytic, and squamoid features and a need to be recategorized individually, and the strength of the system in the category toward diagnostic feature of malignancy.

Cytomorphological spectrum of breast fine needle aspiration cytology using the International Academy of Cytology Yokohama System and evaluation of associated risk of malignancy–A retrospective study in a tertiary care cente

BackgroundFine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of the breast is a well-established technique that aids in the preoperative identification and differentiation between nonneoplastic and neoplastic breast lesions. Breast lesions can be efficiently categorized into different cytological groups using the International Academy of Cytology (IAC) Yokohama System. The aim of this study was to classify breast lesions based on the proposed Yokohama system of reporting breast cytology and identify the need for a unified system of reporting breast lesions.Materials and methodsThis retrospective descriptive study was performed in the Department of Pathology, Government Medical College, Datia, M.P. from January 2019 to June 2023. A total of 762 FNAC slides reported during this period were retrieved, re-examined and reclassified according to the IAC Yokohama System. Histopathological diagnoses were also retrieved and correlated with the cytological findings wherever available.ResultsIn the present study, a total of 762 smears of breast fine needle aspirations were included and categorized using the IAC Yokohama System. There were 3.8% cases (29/762) in the C1 category (insufficient), 71.6% cases (545/762) in the C2 category (benign), 6.3% cases (48/762) in the C3 category (atypical), 3.1% cases (24/762) in the C4 category (suspicious for malignancy) and 15.2% (116/762) cases in the C5 category (malignant).ConclusionFNAC is a reliable diagnostic technique for the evaluation and management of breast lesions prior to surgery. Implementing the IAC Yokohama System for reporting breast cytopathology enhances the accuracy of diagnosing breast lesions, reduces missed diagnoses, and offers reliable estimates of risk of malignancy. Adopting the Yokohama system is a crucial first step in boosting the overall effectiveness of breast cytology reporting among clinicians and pathologists, which will ultimately lead to improved communication and patient care.

Abstract PO5-27-11: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIAGNOSTICS MADE BY FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION (FNA) BIOPSY VERSUS TRU-CUT FOR BREAST PATHOLOGY IN A ONE STOP CLINIC PROGRAM IN MEDELLIN, COLOMBIA

Abstract Breast cancer is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among women in Colombia due to non-communicable chronic diseases. This has prompted health insurance companies to develop innovative initiatives to mitigate these negative outcomes. Since September 2018, Ayudas Diagnósticas SURA, in alliance with the Gustave Roussy Hospital and General Electric Healthcare has promoted a “One-stop clinic” program called: “TIEMPO PARA TI”. One of the primary challenges was to demonstrate that breast cytology, based on the Yokohama guidelines approved by The International Academy of Cytology has a high sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy. The Yokohama system for classifying breast cytology is comprised of five categories: C1 not satisfactory, C2 benign, C3 atypical, C4 malignancy suspected, and C5 malignant. From September 2018 to December 2022, consecutive patients referred for breast biopsy and suspected of having breast cancer underwent triple assessment of breast tumor and were included in this retrospective study. Descriptive analysis was made using STATA v17 software to compare fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy versus Tru-cut. A total of 14,501 patients were included, 14.398 FNA and 14.401 trucut biopsies were performed. The comparative analysis showed a 99% concordance between categories 2, which correspond to benign lesions and 96.7% between categories 5, which correspond to malignant lesions. Our findings demonstrate that a well-executed FNA biopsy is not inferior to a trucut biopsy, as revealed by the Yokohama system, and offers significant advantages, such as cost-effectiveness and prompt diagnosis. Both techniques should be used with caution, considering their advantages and disadvantages. Citation Format: Sara Gil, Carlos Agudelo, Jorge Castaño, Melissa Naranjo, Clara Piedrahita, Daniel Wilches, Kelly Corredor. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIAGNOSTICS MADE BY FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION (FNA) BIOPSY VERSUS TRU-CUT FOR BREAST PATHOLOGY IN A ONE STOP CLINIC PROGRAM IN MEDELLIN, COLOMBIA [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-27-11.

The current state of digital cytology and artificial intelligence (AI): global survey results from the American Society of Cytopathology Digital Cytology Task Force

The integration of whole slide imaging (WSI) and artificial intelligence (AI) with digital cytology has been growing gradually. Therefore, there is a need to evaluate the current state of digital cytology. This study aimed to determine the current landscape of digital cytology via a survey conducted as part of the American Society of Cytopathology (ASC) Digital Cytology White Paper Task Force. A survey with 43 questions pertaining to the current practices and experiences of WSI and AI in both surgical pathology and cytology was created. The survey was sent to members of the ASC, the International Academy of Cytology (IAC), and the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC). Responses were recorded and analyzed. In total, 327 individuals participated in the survey, spanning a diverse array of practice settings, roles, and experiences around the globe. The majority of responses indicated there was routine scanning of surgical pathology slides (n = 134; 61%) with fewer respondents scanning cytology slides (n = 150; 46%). The primary challenge for surgical WSI is the need for faster scanning and cost minimization, whereas image quality is the top issue for cytology WSI. AI tools are not widely utilized, with only 16% of participants using AI for surgical pathology samples and 13% for cytology practice. Utilization of digital pathology is limited in cytology laboratories as compared to surgical pathology. However, as more laboratories are willing to implement digital cytology in the near future, the establishment of practical clinical guidelines is needed.

RAPID ON-SITE EVALUATION AND MICRONUCLEUS SCORING IN BREAST LESIONS FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION CYTOPATHOLOGY BY NEW IAC YOKOHAMA SYSTEM OF REPORTING

Objective: The objective of the study is to report all fine needle aspiration cytopathology (FNAC) cases of lump breast as per New Yokohama classification 2016, to highlight the importance of rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE) in breast cytology at the time of FNAC, and to assess the relationship between micronucleus (MN) scoring and various breast lesions in cytology. Methods: The study was conducted on 70 patients with breast lumps in the Department of Pathology in Government Medical College, Patiala, and comprised evaluation of ROSE and MN scoring in breast FNAC by the use of New Yokohama system of reporting. Results: On ROSE, 11 out of 70 patients were categorized under category I according to the Yokohama system of reporting and on the same sitting with repeat FNAC after performing the ROSE; nine cases were upgraded for cytological reporting and two remained in category I. According to as per the International Academy of Cytology (IAC) Yokohama system of reporting (2016) cases were categorized as category I – 2 (2.9%), category II – 46 (65.7%), category III – 7 (10.1%), category IV – 5 (7.1%), and category V – 10 (14.2%). In MN scoring, MN with the highest score of 14–17/1000 epithelial cells was in category V (malignant), and the lowest score was 0–1/1000 epithelial cells in category II (benign). Conclusion: ROSE is an easy, safe, and cost-effective method. IAC Yokohama system for reporting (2016) provides a comprehensive way of categorizing various breast lesions on FNAC with clinical correlation. MN score is a good biomarker in differentiating benign, atypical, and malignant breast lesions.

A comparative study of breast lesions using the IAC Yokohama System for reporting breast cytopathology against histopathological biopsy

Abstract Background: Breast lumps pose a significant health concern globally, contributing to both illness and death. The International Academy of Cytology (IAC) Yokohama system has established a uniform method for reporting breast cytology, categorizing it into five groups: inadequate, benign, atypical, suspicious, and malignant. Aims and Objectives: This study primarily aimed to evaluate breast lesions using the IAC Yokohama System and compare the results with those of corresponding histopathological biopsies. Additionally, the study aimed to analyze the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy of breast fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and determine the risk of malignancy associated with each category. Materials and Methods: In this study, 92 cases were analyzed and categorized according to the IAC Yokohama System. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, diagnostic accuracy, and risk of malignancy were determined based on histopathological diagnosis, which was considered the reference standard. Results: Among the 92 breast FNACs, the risk of malignancy for the categories insufficient, benign, atypical, suspicious, and malignant were 0%, 0%, 18.75%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. The highest sensitivity (100%) was achieved when considering atypical, suspicious, and malignant cases as positive results. The specificity was highest (100%) when only malignant or both malignant and suspicious cases were considered positive results. The highest diagnostic accuracy (95.65%) was observed when including malignant and suspicious cases as positive results. Conclusion: Implementing the IAC Yokohama System for reporting breast cytopathology through structured reporting will enhance the quality, clarity, and reproducibility of reports among pathologists and clinicians, which would result in enhanced patient care and management.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology for Breast Lump by Yokohama System for Reporting and Its Correlation with Histomorphology

Abstract Background: The International Academy of Cytology (IAC). Yokohama System has created a standardized method of describing breast cytology by grouping them into five categories: inadequate, benign, atypical, suspicious, and malignant. To validate the likelihood of cancer in the various categories, several investigations have been undertaken at various institutions as a mandate. Aim: The main objective of the research is to identify the accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) for breast lumps by the Yokohama system for reporting and its correlation with histopathology. Methodology: The present study was a retrospective research performed over 8 months. Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FANCs) for breast lumps are performed by the Yokohama system. Whenever accessible, histopathological diagnoses were also retrieved. Statistical Analysis Used: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were estimated using a histological diagnosis as the gold standard concerning each of the five categories. Results: Out of 200 cases, 106 had histopathological concordance. Five categories: insufficient, benign, atypical, suspicious, and malignant of the IAC Yokohama system were 1.00%, 62.50%, 4.50%, 1.50%, and 30.50%, Category 1 (1%), Category 2 (62.5%), Category 3 (4.5%), Category 4 (1.5%), and Category 5 (30.5%). When malignant, suspicious, and unusual cases were taken into account as positive test findings, the highest level of sensitivity (90.60%) was attained. The maximum specificity (100%) was seen when only malignant patients were taken into account as positive test findings, but the highest diagnostic accuracy (96.22%) was shown when the malignant and suspect categories were taken into account as positive test results. Conclusion: FNAC using the Yokohama system for reporting is an accurate diagnostic tool for breast lumps. The system provides a standardized framework for reporting FNAC findings, and studies have reported high sensitivity and specificity rates for diagnosing breast lumps using FNAC. Therefore, FNAC can be used in conjunction with histomorphology to ensure accurate diagnosis and appropriate management of breast lumps.

FNAC as preoperative diagnostic tool for neoplastic and non-neoplastic breast lesions with special reference to IAC standardised reporting in Coastal population - A teaching hospital experience

Breast cancer is steadily increasing worldwide. This study is based on application of recently proposed International Academy of cytology (IAC) Yokohama categorisation system of Breast cytology from C1 to C5. (C1-Insufficient material, C2-Benign, C3- Atypical, C4-Suspicious & C5-Malignant). We aim to categorize the breast lesions based on the above-mentioned categorization scheme (IAC, Yokohama 2016) along with histopathological correlation (wherever possible). This was a retrospective observational study conducted from January 2018 to December 2021 in the Department of Pathology of a tertiary care hospital involving coastal population. Ethical clearance was taken from institutional reviw committee. All patients with palpable breast lumps who had undergone FNAC were included in the study. Patient details and data were collected from the case records maintained in Department of Pathology. All quantitative parameters were described through descriptive statistics. Total scores were computed for all the risk factors. Sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value, Negative Predictive Value calculated. Risk of malignancy(ROM) was calculated for each category. A total 200 patients, with age group ranging from 17 - 67 years with breast lesions were included in the study. C1 lesions were found in 5 cases, C2 in 152 cases, C3 in 11 cases, C4 in 4 cases, and C5 in 28 cases. Cytohistological correlation obtained in 94 cases with concordance noted in 89 cases and discordance in 5 cases. Breast FNAC cytology categorization according to IAC Yokohama system increases accuracy of diagnosis and helps clinician in appropriate patient management.

The World Health Organization Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology.

The World Health Organization (WHO) Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology (WHO System) is the product of a joint venture between the World Health Organization, the International Academy of Cytology, and the International Agency for Research on Cancer. The WHO System revises the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytology (PSC System) and replaces the 6-tiered system with a 7-tiered system. To explain the WHO System and the differences with the PSC System. The WHO System and the PSC System of Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology. The diagnostic categories of the WHO System are "Insufficient/Inadequate/Nondiagnostic"; "Benign (Negative for Malignancy"'; "Atypical"; "Pancreaticobiliary Neoplasm, Low Risk/Low Grade (PaN-Low)"; "Pancreatic Neoplasm, High Risk/High Grade (PaN-High)"; "Suspicious for Malignancy"; and "Malignant." In the WHO System, the "benign" category includes both nonneoplastic and neoplastic lesions, so the "Neoplastic: Benign" category of the PSC system has been eliminated. Low-grade malignancies, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs), and solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) classified as "Neoplastic: Other" in the PSC System are classified as "Malignant" in the WHO System, leaving in the "Neoplasm" category intraductal lesions, which are divided into 2 new diagnostic categories: "Pancreaticobiliary Neoplasm (PaN)-Low Risk/Grade" and "PaN-High Risk/Grade." As with the PSC System, the WHO System advocates close correlation with imaging and encourages incorporation of ancillary testing into the final diagnosis, such as biochemical (carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA] and amylase) and molecular testing. The WHO System includes risk of malignancy per category, and reporting and diagnostic management options that recognize the variations in resources of low- and middle-income countries.

A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY IN AN INDIAN TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL ON BREAST LESION CLASSIFICATION BY THE IAC YOKOHAMA SYSTEM USING FNAC

Objective: The International Academy of Cytology (IAC) Yokohama system was used to categorize breast lesions as the major goal of this investigation. Methods: Between January 2022 and March 2023, this study on breast fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) was carried out at a tertiary care facility in north India. This System of reporting breast cytopathology was used to classify a total of 100 patients. Histopathology correlation was available in 40 cases; Malignancy risk, sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic precision were assessed. Results: Breast FNAC cytology was divided into five groups using the new IAC Yokohama system and discovered C1: Insufficient material (6%), C2: Benign type (72%), C3: Atypical type (05%), C4: Suspicious type of malignancy (06%), C5: Malignancy (11%). When histopathological reports were available, FNACs were connected with them. The likelihood of cancer, the precision, sensitivity, and specificity of the diagnosis were all calculated. Conclusion: The IAC Yokohama System for reporting breast cytopathology governs how breast FNAC are categorized, which offers an excellent method for reporting breast cytopathology with a uniform method of reporting and clear definition of each category as well as clear communication between pathologists and clinicians regarding the risk of malignancy and subsequent management.

Cytological Evaluation of Fine Needle Aspiration of Breast Lesions Using IAC Yokohama Classification System for Reporting Breast Cytopathology

Introduction: Breast cancer is rapidly emerging as the leading cause of cancer in Indian women. Cytopathology and histopathology services are required to tackle this growing burden. The use of International Academy of Cytology (IAC) Yokohama Reporting System of breast cytology by classifying them into five categories insufficient, benign, atypical, suspicious and malignant. (IAC) Yokohama Reporting System offers structured protocols, are expected to improve breast cytopathology reporting. Objective : The main objectives of our study were to classify breast fine needle aspirates according to the IAC Yokohama system and assess the risk of malignancy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy. Methodology: All breast FNAs done in the above period were retrieved and classified into five categories according to the Yokohama system. Histopathological diagnosis was also retrieved wherever available. Results: The new “International Academy of Cytology (IAC) Yokohama system” was used to categorize 205 patients into five categories based on the cytologic diagnosis. That C1: insucient material (7.8%), C2: benign (64.3%), C3: atypical (7.3%), C4: suspicious of malignancy (7.8%), and C5: malignant (12.6%). Risk of malignancy (ROM) was calculated which was 100% in Yokohama category I, IV and V. In category II ROM was 00% and in category III ROM was 55.5%. FNAC correlation with histopathology was significant (P Value=<0.01 & Chi square value 40.7). Conclusion: The IAC Yokohama system is an excellent system for accurately diagnosing breast fine needle aspirate. Keywords: Histopathology, International Academy of Cytology Yokohama System, Fine­ Needle Aspiration Biopsy Cytopathology

The International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology-An Updated Review.

The International System (TIS) for reporting serous fluid cytopathology was published in December 2020 as a joint project by the International Academy of Cytology and the American Society of Cytopathology. The purpose was to standardize the diagnostic criteria and nomenclature used in reporting serous fluid samples, thereby improving the reproducibility of reports and improving communication between pathologists and clinicians. TIS defines a five-tier system consisting of nondiagnostic, negative for malignancy, atypia of uncertain significance, suspicious for malignancy and malignant categories. This review provides an updated summary of the reporting system, risk of malignancy, potential diagnostic pitfalls, and a practical diagnostic approach to serous fluid specimens.

A review of the directly sampled endometrial cytology on LBC samples: Classification, microscopic criteria and beyond.

The Yokohama System for Reporting Endometrial Cytology (TYS) has been proposed by an expert meeting under the auspices of the International Academy of Cytology (IAC) in May 2016 at the IAC in Yokohama. Since its introduction, the TYS has been receiving worldwide acceptance, and this review aims to assess its global impact. The adoption of endometrial cytology as a diagnostic procedure has been hampered in the past by difficulties arising in interpreting the cellular findings due to a number of factors (such as excess blood, cellular overlapping and the complex physiology of endometrium). Recently, the use of liquid-based cytology (LBC), with its ability to remove blood and mucus and to distribute cells uniformly in a thin layer on the slide, has provided an opportunity to re-evaluate the role of endometrial cytology. LBC is a useful tool in the cytologic diagnosis and follow-up of endometrial abnormalities, which remains complementary to the emerging molecular diagnostic cytopathology. The study of LBC from endometrial cytology could be challenging since it is affected by numerous look-alikes and diagnostic pitfalls. This review discusses these various entities and takes into consideration the ancillary techniques that may be useful in the diagnostic procedure. In conclusion, our review of the published data suggests that the TYS is a valid classification scheme that has been widely accepted by cytopathologists globally, is highly reproducible and makes a valuable contribution to clinical therapeutic management. At present, molecular cytopathology is a rapidly evolving field of modern cytopathology, which underlines the effective interplay between genomics and cytology. This review aims to provide a comprehensive review of the drawbacks of endometrial cytopathology, particularly in terms of endometrial cancer diagnosis and molecular testing.

Application of the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (ISRSFC) in reporting serous effusion: A retrospective study.

In order to develop uniform diagnostic standards and reporting terminology, the International Academy of Cytology and the American Society of Cytopathology have recommended the establishment of the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (ISRSFC). ISRSFC has 5 diagnostic categories: non-diagnostic (ND), negative for malignancy (NFM), atypia of unknown significance (AUS), suspicious for malignancy (SFM), and malignant (MAL). So far, very few studies have evaluated the risk of malignancy (ROM) and performance characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy) of different categories. The purpose of this study was to reclassify serous effusions based on the ISRSFC and to assess their ROM and performance characteristics. All serous effusions from January 2017 to December 2022 were categorized according to the ISRSFC. Using histopathological diagnosis as the gold standard, the ROM and performance characteristics were calculated for each group. Finally, a total of 2103 serous effusion specimens were analyzed. After reclassification, 9 (0.4%) cases were classified as ND, 547 (26%) as NFM, 94 (4.5%) as AUS, 386 (18.4%) as SFM, and 1067 (50.7%) as MAL. The ROMs for ND, NFM, AUS, SFM and MAL were calculated to be 50%, 24.9%, 36.8%, 89.0%, and 100%, respectively. As an easy-to-grasp reporting system, ISRSFC provides a consistent standard for better communication between physicians and pathologists.

A brief review of the WHO reporting system for lung cytopathology.

The International Academy of Cytology has joined with the International Agency for Research on Cancer to bring together a group of experts in lung cytopathology to develop a WHO Reporting System for Lung Cytopathology (WHO System). This System aims to improve and standardize the reporting of cytopathology, facilitate communication between cytopathologists and clinicians, and improve patient care. The WHO System describes 5 categories for reporting lung cytopathology: 'Insufficient/Inadequate/Nondiagnostic', 'Benign', 'Atypical', 'Suspicious for malignancy', and 'Malignant', each one with a clear descriptive term, a definition, a risk of malignancy, and a suggested management algorithm. The key diagnostic cytopathologic features of each of the lesions within each category have been established by consensus through an Expert Editorial Board, who are also the authors of this review and selected for each reporting system and chosen based on their expertise in the field and/or diversity of geographical representation. Many other co-authors from around the world also contributed. The assignment of writing and editing responsibilities used the same model as that used for the WHO Classification of Tumours (https://whobluebooks.iarc.fr/about/faq/). The WHO System provides the best practice application of ancillary testing, including immunocytochemistry and molecular pathology, and guides in sampling and processing techniques to optimize the handling and preparation of specimens. The WHO System was created by the authors to be applicable globally and is based on cytomorphology with possibilities for additional diagnostic management of the patient. The authors are aware that local medical and pathology resources would differ, especially in low- and middle-income countries. The WHO Tumour Classification for Thoracic Tumors, Fifth Edition, is directly accessible through the online WHO System.

A brief review of the WHO reporting system for pancreaticobiliary cytopathology.

The World Health Organization (WHO), the International Academy of Cytology, and the International Agency for Research on Cancer have developed an approach to standardized reporting of pancreaticobiliary cytopathology. The WHO Reporting System for Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology (WHO System) revises the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytology published in 2015 and replaces the 6 PSC categories with 7 categories: "Insufficient/Inadequate/Nondiagnostic"; "Benign/Negative for malignancy"; "Atypical"; "Pancreaticobiliary neoplasm, low risk/grade (PaN-low)"; "Pancreatic neoplasm, high risk/grade (PaN-High)"; "Suspicious for malignancy"; and "Malignant". In the PSC system, there is a single category for "Neoplastic" lesions that includes 2 groups, 1 for benign neoplasms and 1 named "Neoplastic-other", dominated by premalignant intraductal neoplasms primarily intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and low-grade malignant neoplasms (pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNET) and solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPN). In the WHO System, benign neoplasms with virtually no risk of malignancy are included in the "Benign" category and low-grade malignancies (PanNET and SPN) are included in the "Malignant" category, as per the 5th edition of the WHO Classification of Digestive System Tumors, while the non-invasive pre-malignant lesions of the ducts are divided by the cytomorphological grade of the epithelium into PaN-low and PaN-high with distinctly different risks of malignancy. Within each category, key diagnostic cytopathologic features and the ancillary studies for diagnostic and prognostic evaluation, as well as the implications of diagnosis for patient care and management, are outlined. Reporting and diagnostic management options recognize the variations in the availability of diagnostic and prognostic ancillary testing modalities in low- and middle-income countries.

Validation of the IAC Yokohama system for reporting breast fine-needle aspiration cytology categorization of breast lesions in Vindhya region population

Background: In 2016, International academy of cytology (IAC) has established a standardized approach for reporting breast fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) by categorizing the lesions in five tier system from C1 to C5 to standardize reporting, which will enhance Breast fine-needle aspiration biopsy cytology performance, interpretation, and reporting. Aims and Objectives: The aim of the study was to categorize FNAC cases according to The IAC Yokohama System and evaluate the diagnostic ability of FNAC. Materials and Methods: The current prospective analytical study was carried out in the Department of Pathology, Shyam Shah Medical College, Rewa, Madhya Pradesh, for a period of 15 months from January 2021 to March 2022 (15 months). A total of 100 cases were included in the study based on inclusion criteria. The results were analyzed based on cytological reporting and P value calculated. Results: Among the 100 cases studied highest number of cases were from the age group of 21–30 years with 29% (n=29). The most common breast laterality affected was left with 69% of affected cases. The maximum number of cases, 69% (n=69) of the total, were found to be categorized under the category C2 (benign) which was followed by Category C5 (Malignant) seen in 13% (n=13). About 9% (n=9) of the total cases were categorized as suspicious of malignancy (C4). Atypical Lesion (C3) and Unsatisfactory Lesions (C1) were categorized in 5% (n=5) and 4% (n=4) of the total cases, respectively. Conclusion: FNAC is a minimally invasive, quick, and efficient pre-operative diagnostic tool that can also be used for postoperative breast lump follow-up to prevent recurrences. FNAC using IAC Yokohama system is a rapid and effective method for the primary categorization of palpable breast lumps and provides better clarity to the clinicians in the management of the patient and can reduce unnecessary surgeries.

Assessing the accuracy of the International Academy of Cytology Yokohama System for reporting breast fine needle aspiration biopsy cytology at a Vietnamese oncology centre.

Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB), accompanied by classification systems for cytology, can offer a cheap and convenient option for the diagnosis of breast cancer in women with suspicious breast lumps. In this study, we aimed to assess the accuracy of the International Academy of Cytology (IAC) Yokohama system in a Vietnamese oncology centre. A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted from November 2021 to April 2022 at Vietnam National Cancer Hospital. We included patients with full hospital records regarding breast lesions for which FNAB was indicated. A total of 803 patients' FNAB specimens were assessed according to the IAC Yokohama system. The basic characteristics were summarised using the appropriate summary measurements. The risk of malignancy (ROM) was calculated for each classification category. The median age was 42.7 years (range: 14-85). The mean size of the lesions was 17.9 mm (range: 4-123 mm). We had 215 histopathological reports. The most common benign and malignant diagnoses were fibroadenoma and invasive carcinoma, respectively. The ROM for categories II, III, IV, and V was calculated as 3.4%, 37.5%, 95%, and 99.2% respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 96.4%, 97.2%, 98.5%, and 93.2%, respectively. The IAC Yokohama system offers a good option with which to predict underlying breast pathology using a simple and cheap procedure. However, pathologists require continuous training to ensure accurate interpretation of the slides.

CYTOHISTOLOGICAL SPECTRUM OF BREAST LESIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE IAC YOKOHAMA SYSTEM FOR REPORTING BREAST FINE ASPIRATION CYTOLOGY-A TWO YEAR TERTIARY CARE CENTER EXPERIENCE

ntroduction: The new International Academy of Cytology (IAC) Yokohama System for Reporting Breast FNABC, supported by IAC and developed by an International “Breast Group”, was proposed to establish a comprehensive structured approach so as to standardize the diagnostic approach and improve reproducibility. To categorize the breast FNAB samples ac Aim: cording to this new system of Reporting and to assess various statistical parameters including Risk of Malignancy. Breast FNAB Materials And Method: specimens obtained in the cytology section of the Department of Pathology, AMCH were reported using the newly proposed IAC Yokohama System. The statistical parameters were calculated taking Histopathology as the Gold Standard. A total of 280 Cases with breast l Results And Observation esions were included, of which 16 of the Cases were categorized as Inadequate, 152 as benign, 5 as atypical, 16 as suspicious for malignancy and 91 as malignant. The ROM for each category was obtained. Considering Malignant and Suspicious for Malignancy cases as true positives, the Sensitivity was 95.05%, Specicity 98.46%, PPV 97.96%, NPV 96.24% and Diagnostic Accuracy 96.97%. The IAC Yokohama system for Reportin Conclusion g Breast FNAB cytology effectively straties breast lesions thus providing guidance to both cytopathologists and clinicians leading to better patient care