G Protein-coupled Receptors Internalization Research Articles

C-Src-mediated phosphorylation of AP-2 reveals a general mechanism for receptors internalizing through the clathrin pathway

Clathrin-mediated endocytosis is a complex process regulated at many different levels. We showed previously that activation of the angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT1R), which belongs to the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family, leads to c-Src-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation of β2-adaptin, a subunit of the clathrin adaptor AP-2. The phosphorylation of β2-adaptin on tyrosine residue 737 (Y737) negatively regulates its interaction with βarrestin, another important clathrin adaptor for GPCR internalization. Here we sought to determine whether AP-2 phosphorylation represents a general mechanism for different receptors internalizing through the clathrin pathway. Using a specifically designed antibody against the phosphorylated form of Y737 on β2-adaptin, we demonstrate that this residue is phosphorylated by AT1R in different cell types like HEK293, COS-7 and vascular smooth muscle cells. Using RNA interference approaches, we reveal that this agonist-mediated event is both βarrestin- and c-Src-dependent, and that it occurs at the plasma membrane in clathrin-coated vesicles (CCVs). We further show that this is not only a common event employed by other GPCRs like the β2-adrenergic, vasopressin V2, bradykinin type 2, platelet-activating factor and endothelin A receptors but that the epidermal growth factor receptor is capable of eliciting the phosphorylation of AP-2 in CCVs. Our results imply that tyrosine phosphorylation of Y737 on β2-adaptin is a common regulatory mechanism employed by different receptors undergoing clathrin-dependent endocytosis, and suggest a wider function for this event than originally anticipated.

Multiplexed Assays by High-Content Imaging for Assessment of GPCR Activity

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) participate in many disease pathways and represent the largest family of therapeutic targets. Thus, great investments are made to discover drugs modulating GPCR-mediated events. Among functional assays for screening GPCRs, the Transfluor imaging assay is based on redistribution of cytosolic beta-arrestin to an activated GPCR and has become widely used in high-content screening. However, assessing Transfluor alone has limitations: relying on a single mechanistic step of beta-arrestin redistribution during GPCR activation, providing no information on the stimulated GPCR's intracellular fate, and using only a single fluorescent color (green fluorescent protein). Taking full advantage of high-content imaging to screen approximately 2000 compounds, the authors multiplexed the Transfluor assay with an immunofluorescence-based quantification of GPCR internalization. This approach identified and classified 377 compounds interfering with agonist-induced activation of the Transfluor assay, receptor internalization, or both. In addition, a subset of compounds was analyzed for their performance across imaging, cell-based calcium release (fluorometric imaging plate reader [FLIPR]), and biochemical receptor binding assays (scintillation proximity assay). This indicated that the imaging assays have even better predictive power for direct inhibition of receptor binding than the FLIPR assay. In conclusion, compounds inducing unique responses can suggest novel mechanisms of action and be used as tools to study GPCR activation and internalization.

Agonist induced receptor internalization of neuropeptide Y receptor subtypes depends on third intracellular loop and C-terminus

Agonist stimulation of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) results in the redistribution of the receptor from the cell surface into intracellular compartments through the process of endocytosis. Monitoring ligand-mediated internalization of GPCRs in living cells has become experimentally accessible by applying fluorescent reagents and fluorescence microscopy. By using cell lines that transiently, stably or endogenously express the human Y receptor (hYR) subtypes hY 1R, hY 2R, hY 4R and hY 5R and differently fluorescently tagged receptor proteins we were able to unravel further details concerning the internalization behavior of this multi-receptor/multi-ligand system. For the first time we could show that also the hY 2R is internalized with a rate which is comparable to the hY 1R and the hY 4R. In contrast, the hY 5R was internalized much slower and the rate remained unaffected by co-expression with other hYR subtypes. Furthermore receptor subtype co-expressing cells and selectively binding peptides revealed a receptor subtype selective internalization. By using novel hY 5/hY 2 receptor chimera the receptor subtype dependent differences in hY receptor internalization could be identified on a molecular level.

G Protein–Coupled Receptor Sorting to Endosomes and Lysosomes

The heptahelical G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) belong to the largest family of cell surface signaling receptors encoded in the human genome. GPCRs signal to diverse extracellular stimuli and control a vast number of physiological responses, making this receptor class the target of nearly half the drugs currently in use. In addition to rapid desensitization, receptor trafficking is crucial for the temporal and spatial control of GPCR signaling. Sorting signals present in the intracytosolic domains of GPCRs regulate trafficking through the endosomal-lysosomal system. GPCR internalization is mediated by serine and threonine phosphorylation and arrestin binding. Short, linear peptide sequences including tyrosine- and dileucine-based motifs, and PDZ ligands that are recognized by distinct endocytic adaptor proteins also mediate internalization and endosomal sorting of GPCRs. We present new data from bioinformatic searches that reveal the presence of these types of sorting signals in the cytoplasmic tails of many known GPCRs. Several recent studies also indicate that the covalent modification of GPCRs with ubiquitin serves as a signal for internalization and lysosomal sorting, expanding the diversity of mechanisms that control trafficking of mammalian GPCRs.

A β-arrestin 2 Signaling Complex Mediates Lithium Action on Behavior

Besides their role in desensitization, beta-arrestin 1 and 2 promote the formation of signaling complexes allowing G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) to signal independently from G proteins. Here we show that lithium, a pharmacological agent used for the management of psychiatric disorders such as bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and depression, regulates Akt/glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) signaling and related behaviors in mice by disrupting a signaling complex composed of Akt, beta-arrestin 2, and protein phosphatase 2A. When administered to beta-arrestin 2 knockout mice, lithium fails to affect Akt/GSK3 signaling and induce behavioral changes associated with GSK3 inhibition as it does in normal animals. These results point toward a pharmacological approach to modulating GPCR function that affects the formation of beta-arrestin-mediated signaling complexes.

Arrestin-2 Interacts with the Ubiquitin-Protein Isopeptide Ligase Atrophin-interacting Protein 4 and Mediates Endosomal Sorting of the Chemokine Receptor CXCR4

The chemokine receptor CXCR4 is rapidly targeted for lysosomal degradation by the E3 ubiquitin ligase atrophin-interacting protein 4 (AIP4). Although it is known that AIP4 mediates ubiquitination and degradation of CXCR4 and that perturbations in these events contribute to disease, the mechanisms mediating AIP4-dependent regulation of CXCR4 degradation remain poorly understood. Here we show that AIP4 directly interacts with the amino-terminal half of nonvisual arrestin-2 via its WW domains. We show that depletion of arrestin-2 by small interfering RNA blocks agonist-promoted degradation of CXCR4 by preventing CXCR4 trafficking from early endosomes to lysosomes. Surprisingly, CXCR4 internalization and ubiquitination remain intact, suggesting that the interaction between arrestin-2 and AIP4 is not required for ubiquitination of the receptor at the plasma membrane but perhaps for a later post-internalization event. Accordingly, we show that activation of CXCR4 promotes the interaction between AIP4 and arrestin-2 that is consistent with a time when AIP4 co-localizes with arrestin-2 on endocytic vesicles. Taken together, our data suggest that the AIP4.arrestin-2 complex functions on endosomes to regulate sorting of CXCR4 into the degradative pathway.

A novel enzyme complementation‐based assay for monitoring G‐protein‐coupled receptor internalization

G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling is involved in a wide range of physiological processes and diseases, and around one-half of currently used drugs target GPCRs. Assays for the signaling of GPCRs have suffered from drawbacks, including low signal-to-noise, temporally transient signals, and difficulty in applying a single assay to a wide range of GPCRs. We have developed a set of assays for G-protein-coupled receptor signaling based on beta-galactosidase enzyme complementation in live mammalian cells. We previously described an assay for GPCR activation by monitoring the binding of beta-arrestin to the receptor. Here we describe a second assay that monitors the internalization of GPCRs to endosomes, an event that follows receptor activation and is critical in desensitizing and resensitizing the receptor. We show that both assays display high signal-to-noise ratios with low variability and are quantitative for a wide range of GPCRs. EC50s obtained with these assays closely match results reported in the literature. Finally, we show that these assays are readily adapted to high-throughput chemical screens. Thus, these two assays for monitoring G-protein-coupled receptor activation and internalization should prove valuable in basic biological studies as well as in high-throughput screens.

Ubiquitination differentially regulates clathrin-dependent internalization of protease-activated receptor-1

Protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR1), a G protein–coupled receptor (GPCR) for thrombin, is irreversibly activated by proteolysis. Consequently, PAR1 trafficking is critical for the fidelity of thrombin signaling. PAR1 displays constitutive and agonist-induced internalization, which are clathrin and dynamin dependent but are independent of arrestins. The clathrin adaptor AP2 (adaptor protein complex-2) is critical for constitutive but not for activated PAR1 internalization. In this study, we show that ubiquitination negatively regulates PAR1 constitutive internalization and specifies a distinct clathrin adaptor requirement for activated receptor internalization. PAR1 is basally ubiquitinated and deubiquitinated after activation. A PAR1 lysineless mutant signaled normally but was not ubiquitinated. Constitutive internalization of ubiquitin (Ub)-deficient PAR1 was markedly increased and inhibited by the fusion of Ub to the cytoplasmic tail. Ub-deficient PAR1 constitutive internalization was AP2 dependent like the wild-type receptor. However, unlike wild-type PAR1, AP2 was required for the internalization of activated Ub-deficient receptor, suggesting that the internalization of ubiquitinated PAR1 requires different endocytic machinery. These studies reveal a novel function for ubiquitination in the regulation of GPCR internalization.

Regulation of G protein‐coupled receptor trafficking

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediate cellular responses to diverse extracellular stimuli to play a vital role in the control of physiology and behaviour. GPCR trafficking is of fundamental importance for the regulation of GPCRs signaling. In this mini review, we will discuss some of the recent findings on the mechanisms that regulate GPCR trafficking, which include (i) large dense-core vesicle (LDCV)-associated GPCR delivery which could be a general cell biological mechanism for rapid modulation of membrane receptors in response to certain stimuli; (ii) lateral diffusion of GPCRs in the plasma membrane for rapid change of the number of neurotransmitter receptors during synaptic plasticity and (iii) constitutive internalization of GPCRs, that contributes to receptor resensitization and distribution, including axonal polarization.

Clathrin‐Dependent Mechanisms of G Protein‐coupled Receptor Endocytosis

The heptahelical G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family includes approximately 900 members and is the largest family of signaling receptors encoded in the mammalian genome. G protein-coupled receptors elicit cellular responses to diverse extracellular stimuli at the plasma membrane and some internalized receptors continue to signal from intracellular compartments. In addition to rapid desensitization, receptor trafficking is critical for regulation of the temporal and spatial aspects of GPCR signaling. Indeed, GPCR internalization functions to control signal termination and propagation as well as receptor resensitization. Our knowledge of the mechanisms that regulate mammalian GPCR endocytosis is based predominantly on arrestin regulation of receptors through a clathrin- and dynamin-dependent pathway. However, multiple clathrin adaptors, which recognize distinct endocytic signals, are now known to function in clathrin-mediated endocytosis of diverse cargo. Given the vast number and diversity of GPCRs, the complexity of clathrin-mediated endocytosis and the discovery of multiple clathrin adaptors, a single universal mechanism controlling endocytosis of all mammalian GPCRs is unlikely. Indeed, several recent studies now suggest that endocytosis of different GPCRs is regulated by distinct mechanisms and clathrin adaptors. In this review, we discuss the diverse mechanisms that regulate clathrin-dependent GPCR endocytosis.

Arrestin-2 Regulates Akt Activation by G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Platelets.

Arrestins have been shown to play important roles in G Protein-Coupled Receptor (GPCR) function in many cells, but their roles in platelets remain uncharacterized. While the classical role of arrestins is considered to be the internalization and desensitization of GPCRs, more recent studies suggest that arrestins can serve as scaffolds to recruit phosphatidyl inositol-3 kinases (PI3K)s to Gq-coupled receptors and promote PI3K-dependent signaling. Thrombin stimulates the PI3K-dependent activation of Akt in platelets in a Gq-dependent manner. Therefore, we sought to determine whether arrestins are involved in the PI3K-dependent activation of Akt in platelets. Comparative immunoblots show that of the two non-visual mammalian arrestins, only one, arrestin-2 (β-arrestin-1), is expressed in human and mouse platelets. Immunoprecipitation of arrestin-2 or p85-PI3K from platelet lysates demonstrated that arrestin-2 associates with the p85 subunit of PI3Ka/b in thrombin or ADP-stimulated platelets, but not resting cells. The association can be inhibited by inhibitors of the P2Y12 receptor for ADP, but not by P2Y1 inhibitors. p85-arrestin association is also blocked by inhibitors of src family kinases, as is Akt phosphorylation. To determine whether src family members were part of the p85-arrestin complexes, immunoblots were re-probed with antibodies to src, lyn and fyn. The results show that Lyn is incorporated into thrombin-stimulated arrestin complexes in a P2Y12-dependent manner. To determine whether arrestin-2 is important for Akt phosphorylation in platelets, megakaryocytes differentiated in culture from mouse embryonic stem cells were used as models of platelet signaling, since these cells are amenable to genetic manipulation. Arrestin-2 was inhibited in the cultured megakaryocytes using a siRNA approach, then cells were stimulated with thrombin and Akt phosphorylation was assessed by immunoblotting. Arrestin-2 expression in the cultured megakaryocytes treated with arrestin-2 specific siRNA was suppressed by an average of 53% compared to cells treated with scrambled siRNA, while thrombin-stimulated Akt phosphorylation was suppressed by 98% compared to scrambled siRNA-treated control cells (n=3 experiments, difference is significant, p=.01, unpaired student's t-test). In conclusion, the results show that arrestin-2, lyn and PI3Kform a tri-molecular complex following stimulation of platelets with ADP or thrombin. Formation of arrestin complexes at activated receptor sites is important for the localized recruitment and src-dependent activation of p85-PI3K, thus promoting activation of Akt by G protein-coupled receptors.

Negative regulation of protease-activated receptor 1-induced Src kinase activity by the association of phosphocaveolin-1 with Csk

Protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1), a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) for thrombin, has been correlated with cell proliferation. PAR1 is activated by the irreversibly proteolytic cleavage, internalized via clathrin-coated pits, and then sorted to lysosomes for degradation. Caveolae play important roles in both signaling transduction and internalization of several GPCRs. However, the role of caveolae in cellular signaling and trafficking of PAR1 is still unclear. In this study, we show that PAR1 was partially localized in caveolae. Disruption of caveolae by cholesterol depletion did not inhibit PAR1 internalization, indicating that internalization of PAR1 was not via caveolae. Of interest, activation of PAR1 resulted in the phosphorylation of caveolin-1, a principal component of caveolae, on tyrosine 14 by a Gi-linked Src kinase pathway and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. Analysis of immunoprecipitates from cells stimulated by PAR1 showed that phosphocaveolin-1 but not caveolin-1 with mutation at tyrosine 14 could bind to Csk. In addition, phosphocaveolin-1 could not bind to CskS109C mutant with the defective SH2 domain. These results indicated that phosphocaveolin-1 was associated with the SH2 domain of Csk in response to PAR1 activation. The association further resulted in a rapid decrease in Src kinase activity. Thus, PAR1-induced Src activation is negatively regulated by recruiting Csk through phosphocaveolin-1. Our results also reveal that phosphocaveolin-1 represents a novel effector of PAR1 to downregulate Src kinase activity. The downregulation of PAR1-induced Src activation mediated by phosphocaveolin-1 provides an additional mechanism for the termination of PAR1 signaling at its downstream molecules.

G‐protein‐coupled receptor dephosphorylation at the cell surface

Agonist-induced desensitization of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) usually involves phosphorylation of the receptor by G-protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) or second messenger-dependent protein kinases such as PKC and PKA. Phosphorylation by GRKs promotes arrestin binding to the receptor, which not only uncouples receptor and G protein but also targets the receptor to clathrin-coated pits for internalization. The internalized GPCR is either trafficked to lysosomes for degradation or alternatively is dephosphorylated by phosphatase enzymes in an acidic endosomal compartment before being recycled to the membrane for further rounds of agonist stimulation. These GPCR regulatory pathways were identified largely as a result of the seminal studies by the Lefkowitz laboratory in the U.S.A. (reviewed in Lefkowitz, 2004), and have reached the status of dogma in the field of GPCR biology. However, some new studies, including one in this issue of the British Journal of Pharmacology (Iyer et al., 2005), suggest that the role of internalization in GPCR dephosphorylation is less clear than previously thought. This work is particularly elegant because the authors have developed antibodies to detect β2-adrenoceptor phosphorylation by PKA at Ser262 in the receptor's third intracellular loop and by GRKs at Ser355,356 in the COOH-terminus (Tran et al., 2004). They show that when internalization of the phosphorylated β2-adrenoceptor is blocked, either by expression of a dominant-negative mutant form of dynamin or with hypertonic sucrose, the receptor still undergoes dephosphorylation of both PKA and GRK sites. Indeed, the rate of dephosphorylation of the receptor is the same whether or not the receptor is able to internalize. Furthermore, they show that the β2-adrenoceptor still undergoes dephosphorylation following selective phosphorylation of PKA site Ser262 subsequent to the addition of a very low concentration of isoprenaline (300 pM), which does not induce receptor internalization. These results show conclusively that the β2-adrenoceptor does not have to internalize in order to become dephosphorylated (Figure 1). Does this apply to other GPCRs? Apparently it does; a recent study (Gardiner et al., 2001) shows that the agonist-phosphorylated Gs-coupled D1 dopamine receptor undergoes the same rate of dephosphorylation whether or not it is able to undergo internalization. Furthermore, a very recent study shows that the agonist-activated Gq-coupled thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptor is rapidly dephosphorylated at the cell membrane in mouse embryo fibroblast cells from arrestin-knockout animals where these receptors are unable to undergo significant internalization (Jones & Hinkle, 2005). Figure 1 Dephosphorylation of β2-adrenoceptors. (a) In response to prolonged agonist treatment (isoprenaline; ISOP), the receptor at the cell membrane is phosphorylated by PKA and GRK, and arrestins bind to the receptor. (b) In the classical view, receptor ... How to reconcile these recent findings with the earlier results (Yu et al., 1993; Pippig et al., 1995; Krueger et al., 1997)? Iyer et al. (2005) suggest that the interpretation of earlier studies on the β2-adrenoceptor is made difficult because the 32P labelling technique reflects a combination of PKA and GRK phosphorylation of the receptor. This may be particularly relevant since the kinetics and agonist concentration dependence of PKA and GRK phosphorylation of the β2-adrenoceptor are different (Tran et al., 2004). However, although most of the data provided by Iyer et al. (2005) indicates that the β2-adrenoceptor undergoes dephosphorylation at the cell surface, they do report some experimental conditions (longer agonist treatment time in the presence of hypertonic sucrose) where dephosphorylation is inhibited. Thus, the experimental conditions used (e.g. agonist concentration, length of agonist treatment, presence of antagonist in the wash buffer, use of 32P labelling versus phosphosite-specifc antibodies) may explain some of the differences. In all likelihood, the β2-adrenoceptor is able to undergo dephosphorylation both at the cell membrane and intracellularly in endosomes. Important questions remain. For example, the work of Iyer et al. (2005) does not explain why inhibitors of internalization can block resensitization, as shown in the earlier studies (Yu et al., 1993; Pippig et al., 1995). Furthermore, do GPCRs that undergo dephosphorylation at the cell surface resensitize immediately, and does this provide for more rapid resensitization following agonist-induced desensitization than for an internalized receptor? Is the role of GPCR internalization more concerned with the activation of alternative signalling pathways, or with downregulation, than with dephosphorylation? Finally, what determines the activity and localization of phosphatase enzymes at the plasma membrane? One possibility here may be the family of A-kinase-anchoring proteins, which associate with at least some GPCRs and which, by acting as a scaffold protein, can localize both kinase and phosphatase enzymes to the vicinity of the receptor in the cell membrane (Fraser et al., 2000; Lin et al., 2000). In summary, Iyer et al. (2005) show that the β2-adrenoceptor can undergo dephosphorylation without having to undergo internalization. The functional consequences of this interesting finding for GPCR signalling remain to be explored in detail.

β‐Arrestin1 and β‐arrestin2 are differentially required for phosphorylation‐dependent and ‐independent internalization of δ‐opioid receptors

Beta-arrestins are key negative regulators and scaffolds of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signalling. Beta-arrestin1 and beta-arrestin2 preferentially bind to the phosphorylated GPCRs in response to agonist stimulation, resulting in receptor internalization and desensitization. The critical roles of GPCR kinases (GRKs)-catalyzed receptor phosphorylation and interaction of beta-arrestins with the phosphorylated receptor in receptor internalization are well established. However, emerging evidence suggests that an agonist-stimulated internalization mechanism that is independent of receptor phosphorylation may also be employed in some cases, although the molecular mechanism for the phosphorylation-independent GPCR internalization is not clear. The current study investigated the role of receptor phosphorylation and the involvement of different beta-arrestin subtypes in agonist-induced delta-opioid receptor (DOR) internalization in HEK293 cells. Results from flow cytometry, fluorescence microscopy, and surface biotin labelling experiments showed that elimination of agonist-induced DOR phosphorylation by mutation GRK binding or phosphorylation sites only partially blocked agonist-induced receptor internalization, indicating the presence of an agonist-induced, GRK-independent mechanism for DOR internalization. Fluorescence and co-immunoprecipitation studies indicated that both the wild-type DOR and the phosphorylation-deficient mutant receptor could bind and recruit beta-arrestin1 and beta-arrestin2 to the plasma membrane in an agonist-stimulated manner. Furthermore, internalization of both the wild-type and phosphorylation-deficient receptors was increased by overexpression of either type of beta-arrestins and blocked by dominant-negative mutants of beta-arrestin-mediated internalization, demonstrating that both phosphorylation-dependent and -independent internalization require beta-arrestin. Moreover, double-stranded RNA-mediated interference experiments showed that either beta-arrestin1 or beta-arrestin2 subtype-specific RNAi only partially inhibited agonist-induced internalization of the wild-type DOR. However, agonist-induced internalization of the phosphorylation-deficient DOR was not affected by beta-arrestin1-specific RNAi but was blocked by RNAi against beta-arrestin2 subtype. These data indicate that endogenous beta-arrestin1 functions exclusively in the phosphorylation-dependent receptor internalization, whereas endogenous beta-arrestin2, but not beta-arrestin1, is required for the phosphorylation-independent receptor internalization. These results thus provide the first evidence of different requirement for beta-arrestin isoforms in the agonist induced phosphorylation-dependent and -independent GPCR internalization.

Unconventional Homologous Internalization of the Angiotensin II Type-1 Receptor Induced by G-Protein–Independent Signals

Internalization of a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) is essential to the desensitization, endocytosis, and signal transduction of the receptor. It has been the general view that conventional homologous internalization of a GPCR requires activation of the G-protein(s) coupled to the receptor. However, whether and how GPCR-mediated G-protein-independent signals trigger receptor internalization remains unknown, although G-protein-independent internalization has been reported. Here we show that an angiotensin II (Ang II) type-1 (AT1) receptor mutant incapable of activating any G-protein still undergoes normal internalization. Substitution of Asp125 with Ala and Arg126 with Leu at the highly conserved DRY motif of the AT1 receptor disabled the ability of the receptor to activate G-proteins, as shown by various Ang II binding studies, GDP-GTP exchange, and inositol phosphate production assays. Surprisingly, the mutant internalized normally in the presence of Ang II and transactivated the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Similar to the wild-type receptor, overexpression of a dominant-negative K220R mutant GRK2 diminished the internalization of D125A-R126L but not the transactivation of EGFR. These data indicate that G-protein-independent specific signals may also trigger homologous internalizations of the AT1 receptor through beta-arrestin-dependent and -independent pathways, suggesting a possible mechanism for G-protein-independent activation of G-protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs). This may represent a general mechanism for triggering GPCR internalization.

Secretory Phospholipases A2 Induce Neurite Outgrowth in PC12 Cells through Lysophosphatidylcholine Generation and Activation of G2A Receptor

We previously demonstrated that secretory phospholipase A2 (sPLA2) and lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) exhibit neurotrophin-like neuritogenic activity in the rat pheochromocytoma cell line PC12. In this study, we further analyzed the mechanism whereby sPLA2 displays neurite-inducing activity. Exogenously added mammalian group X sPLA2 (sPLA2-X), but not group IB and IIA sPLA2s, induced neuritogenesis, which correlated with the ability of sPLA2-X to liberate LPC into the culture media. In accordance, blocking the effect of LPC by supplementation of bovine serum albumin or phospholipase B attenuated neuritogenesis by sPLA2 or LPC. Overproduction or suppression of G2A, a G-protein-coupled receptor involved in LPC signaling, resulted in the enhancement or reduction of neuritogenesis induced by sPLA2 treatment. These results indicate that the neuritogenic effect of sPLA2 is mediated by generation of LPC and subsequent activation of G2A.

Consequences of lipid raft association on G-protein-coupled receptor function.

GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors) play key roles in many cellular processes, and malfunction may lead to a range of pathologies, including psychiatric and neurological disorders. It is therefore not surprising that this group of receptors supplies a majority of the targets for pharmaceutical drug development. Despite their importance, the mechanisms that regulate their function and signalling still remain only partially understood. Recently, it has become evident that a subset of GPCRs is not homogeneously distributed in the plasma membrane, but localizes instead to specific membrane microdomains known as lipid rafts. Lipid rafts are characterized by their enrichment in cholesterol and sphingolipids, and have been suggested to serve as platforms for a range of cellular signalling complexes. In the present review, we will be discussing the effects of the lipid raft environment on trafficking, signalling and internalization of raft-associated GPCRs.

The Chemoattractant Receptors FPR and C5aR: Same Functions – Different Fates

The Chemoattractant Receptors FPR and C5aR: Same Functions – Different Fates

Novel roles for arrestins in the post-endocytic trafficking of G protein-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest family of transmembrane signaling molecules in the human genome. As such, they interact with numerous intracellular molecules, which can act either to propagate or curtail signaling from the receptor. Their primary mode of cellular activation occurs through heterotrimeric G proteins, which in turn can activate a wide spectrum of effector molecules, including phosphodiesterases, phospholipases, adenylyl cyclases and ion channels. Active GPCRs are also the target of G protein-coupled receptor kinases, which phosphorylate the receptors culminating in the binding of the protein arrestin. This results in rapid desensitization through inhibition of G protein binding, as well as novel mechanisms of cellular activation that involve the scaffolding of cellular kinases to GPCR-arrestin complexes. Arrestins can also serve to mediate the internalization of certain GPCRs, a process which plays an important role in regulating cellular activity both by mediating long-term desensitization through down regulation (degradation) of receptors and by recycling desensitized receptors back to the cell surface to initiate additional rounds of signaling. The mechanisms that regulate the subsequent intracellular trafficking of GPCRs following internalization are largely unknown. Recently however, it has become clear that the pattern of receptor phosphorylation and subsequent binding of arrestin play a critical role in the intracellular trafficking of internalized receptors, thereby dictating the ultimate fate of the receptor. In addition, arrestins have now been shown to be required for the recycling of GPCRs that are capable of internalizing through arrestin-independent mechanisms. This review will summarize recent advances in our understanding of the roles of arrestins in post-endocytic GPCR trafficking.

A Tyrosine-based Sorting Signal Regulates Intracellular Trafficking of Protease-activated Receptor-1: MULTIPLE REGULATORY MECHANISMS FOR AGONIST-INDUCED G PROTEIN-COUPLED RECEPTOR INTERNALIZATION

Protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR1), a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) for thrombin, is irreversibly proteolytically activated, internalized, and then sorted to lysosomes and degraded. Internalization and lysosomal sorting of activated PAR1 is critical for termination of receptor signaling. We previously demonstrated that activated PAR1 is rapidly phosphorylated and internalized via a clathrin- and dynamin-dependent pathway that is independent of arrestins. Toward understanding the mechanisms responsible for activated PAR1 internalization through clathrin-coated pits we examined the function of a highly conserved tyrosine-based motif, YXXL, localized in the cytoplasmic carboxyl tail of the receptor. A mutant PAR1 in which tyrosine 383 and leucine 386 were replaced with alanines (Y383A/L386A) was significantly impaired in agonist-triggered internalization and degradation compared with wild-type receptor. In contrast, constitutive internalization, and recycling of unactivated PAR1 Y383A/L386A mutant was not affected, suggesting that tonic cycling of the mutant receptor remained intact. Strikingly, a PAR1 C387Z truncation mutant in which the YXXL motif was exposed at the C terminus constitutively internalized and degraded in an agonist-independent manner, whereas C387Z truncation mutant in which the critical tyrosine and leucine were mutated to alanine (C387Z-Y383A/L386A) failed to internalize. Inhibition of PAR1 C387Z mutant constitutive internalization with dominant-negative K44A dynamin blocked agonist-independent degradation of the mutant receptor. Together these findings strongly suggest that internalization of activated PAR1 is controlled by multiple regulatory mechanisms involving phosphorylation and a highly conserved tyrosine-based motif, YXXL. This study is the first to describe a function for a tyrosine-based motif, YXX, in GPCR internalization and reveal novel complexities in the regulation of GPCR trafficking.