The behaviour that opposing groups adopt is not simply reactive. They are based on memories of past events, as well as on expectation of what will happen in the future. To put it simply, through memory, past, present and future are linked, outlining the relationships of individuals belonging to post-conflict societies, regardless of being victims, perpetrators or bystanders, and, mostly importantly, regardless of having lived or not during the violent conflict. Based on the idea of the transmission of memory through generations, the present paper calls attention for the spaces that memories occupy within reconciliation processes of post-conflict societies. Particularly, it connects internal violent conflict to memory in order to understand the grand debate between “forgetting and remembering” with regard to amnesty laws. Therefore, considering memory a key element in reconciliation processes, this presentation focuses on amnesty laws, as a mechanism of reconciliation, and questions how the political choice for this mechanism has shaped civil war memories, influencing the reconciliation processes of post-conflict societies. In particular, it aims to contribute to the debate about whether or not amnesty facilitates the oblivion of civil war memories. The case of Mozambique serves to illustrate the present paper.