Internal Medicine Training Research Articles

Confidence and Utilization are Poorly Associated with Point-of-Care Ultrasound Competency among Internal Medicine Trainees.

Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) is the utilization of bedside ultrasound by clinicians. Its portable and rapid diagnostic capabilities make it an excellent tool for deployment and mobile military settings. However, formal and uniform POCUS training is lacking. Furthermore, the evaluation of these curricula often relies on confidence assessment. Our objective was to assess the relationships between confidence, frequency of utilization, and image interpretation knowledge among our Internal Medicine residents before and after the implementation of a formal curriculum. In November 2020, we implemented a longitudinal, flipped-classroom, academic half-day curriculum, conducting a prospective before-after cohort evaluation of its implementation. The POCUS curriculum was implemented as a longitudinal, asynchronous, flipped-classroom activity with workshop sessions during one academic half-day per month. We measured confidence via a Likert scale and utilization frequency via a five-point scale. Six multiple-choice questions (MCQ) with ultrasound videos assessed image interpretation competency. The image interpretation score was reported as percent correct. We related confidence and utilization to the image interpretation score. Ninety-nine residents were eligible for participation. Fifty-four (55%) completed a pre-curriculum assessment and 45 (45%) completed a post-curriculum assessment. Average image interpretation scores were 41% pre-curriculum and 51% post-curriculum (P =0.02). Pre-curriculum residents were on average unconfident (mean=2.56), and post-curriculum residents were on average confident (mean=3.62). Pre-curriculum residents used POCUS occasionally (mean=2.02, count 13 (24%) never utilizing). Post-curriculum residents used POCUS occasionally (mean=2.42, count 4 (9%) never utilizing). Pre- and post-curriculum confidence were not significantly associated with image interpretation scores (pre-curriculum: r=-0.10, P =0.50; post-curriculum: r=0.24, P =0.11). Pre- and post-curriculum utilization were not significantly associated with image interpretation scores (pre-curriculum: r=0.15, P =0.28; post-curriculum: r=0.02, P =0.90). The number of curriculum sessions attended was significantly associated with higher image interpretation scores (r=0.30, P =0.003). Our study suggests that POCUS confidence and informal utilization do not correlate with image interpretation knowledge on MCQs among Internal Medicine residents. These findings support assessing direct measures of knowledge, rather than confidence, as an endpoint in evaluating POCUS curricula among Internal Medicine residents.

A88Designing a Multidisciplinary Chest Drain Course

In 2008 the National Patient Safety Agency reported 12 patient deaths directly related to chest drain insertion over a 3-year period. Since then there have been calls from publications highlighting the need for better education for clinicians [1]. Simulation has been shown to improve chest drain insertion technique [2], and multi-disciplinary simulation can encourage teamwork and communication skills [3]. Given that this procedure is an essential requirement for anaesthetic, intensive care, emergency medicine and internal medicine trainees, we decided to introduce a multi-disciplinary simulation course for the insertion of chest drains. A basic needs analysis was carried out with stakeholders. Initially the course was designed to run for half a day, with a maximum of 12 candidates and a minimum of 3 faculty. A course timetable, course manual, equipment list and pre- and post-course feedback questionnaires were created. The course begins with a lecture, followed by three simulation-based workshops, which the candidates rotate between. These cover seldinger and surgical chest drain insertion, and the basics of chest ultrasound, using ultrasoundable chest drain manikins. Feedback from the first course in July 2022 suggested that there should be a designated faculty team leader and healthy volunteers for the ultrasound workshop. We implemented this feedback and ran the course again in December 2022. Candidates were asked to rate their post course confidence at performing the procedure, with a score ranging between 1 and 7 (each number was assigned a qualitative value with 1 being unable to perform the procedure and 7 being extremely confident in performing the procedure). After the first course, the average score was 5 points. After the second, the average increased to 5.5. The course ran for a third time in April 2023, during which the duration of the workshops was increased and a lecture on aftercare was added. The average post course confidence score was 5.7. All candidates felt that the session fully met the learning objectives and would recommend the course to others. After implementing changes to our course including assigning a faculty team leader, recruiting healthy volunteers, increasing the time spent in workshops and adding a session on aftercare, there has been an improvement in the candidates’ average post course confidence at performing chest drains and qualitative candidate feedback was positive. We would recommend our course structure to others designing a chest drain course. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.

A42A palliative care skills study day is an effective way of meeting palliative care registrar curriculum Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPs) requirements

The new Speciality Training curriculum for Palliative Medicine from August 2022 identifies key procedural skills that, for the first time, can be performed in a simulation (SIM) skills lab to demonstrate proficiency [1]. These include tracheostomy care, managing non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and the management of indwelling ascitic drains. These skills can be difficult to acquire in non-hospital settings like hospices and in the community. A bespoke, pilot palliative care skills day was organized to assess the suitability for theory, skills training and subsequent opportunity to demonstrate proficiency by sign off against curriculum competencies. A total of 11 palliative care trainees from the Northern Deanery attended a pilot SIM study day in March 2023. Three parallel workshops were planned – tracheostomy care, the insertion and management of ascitic drains and managing NIV. Each workshop was delivered by local experts in the area (non- palliative care professionals) with experience of teaching and training other professionals. assessing internal medicine trainees. Trainers were briefed on learning outcomes prior to the session by two palliative care consultants, and the clinical context of each session was set within relevant palliative care environments for e.g. the care of a patient in a hospice, in the community or in a hospital. Trainee confidence was assessed before and after SIM training with the use of 10-point Likert scales and free text comments. Overall self-reported trainee confidence and competence scores increased for all three workshops (Paracentesis 7 to 8.8 out of 10, NIV 4.5 to 8.6, tracheostomy care 3.8 to 8.9). All trainees agreed it was an effective and educational way of addressing curriculum objectives; and agreed it should be a rolling programme offered regionally. Trainees commented on the positive learning environment, the small group sizes, the benefit of being taught by experts and having the opportunity to be assessed for curriculum requirements. Trainees who had previously achieved competencies commented on the benefit of refreshing skills. One area for development identified was the lack of standardization on DOPs forms about the level of proficiency required. This will be fed back to the regional training committee for the future. Trainees identified further clinical skills that could be addressed in a skills lab and hence, a second skills day will be organized. SIM training is an effective tool for delivering training around procedural skills for palliative care registrars. It also brings opportunity to demonstrate proficiency in specific practical skills. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.

A92Sustained Quality in Simulation Training – ‘Step-Up’ to IMT3

Following the introduction of the ‘IMT3’ year as part of Internal Medicine Training in 2019, a ‘Step-Up’ simulation day was developed in 2021. Positive feedback from candidates reflected its usefulness in preparing to work as a medical registrar [1]. The scenarios were conducted with the subsequent cohort of IMT3 doctors and feedback assessed for sustained quality of training. Simulation is recognized as an important tool in medical education [2]. It is now specified by the Royal College of Physicians that trainees participate in simulation inclusive of human factors and scenario training [3]. The ‘Step-Up’ simulation day continues to consist of four progressive, high-fidelity scenarios that replicate a day in the life of a medical registrar. Each scenario occurs in the simulation lab for individual candidates, with peers observing via video-link in the debrief room. Each scenario requires the candidate to perform a medical assessment of an acutely unwell patient, facilitated by use of the computerized manikin (SimMan Essential), whilst simultaneously tackling difficult conversations with a live actor and managing interruptions from a bleep. Participants also had the opportunity to lead simulated cardiac arrests with peers forming the cardiac arrest team. Debrief and teaching continued to be provided by a qualified simulation facilitator alongside a specialist registrar or consultant. Feedback provision was moved to an online format and accessed via a QR code to be more environmentally conscious and to readily allow analysis and storage for future comparison. In order to assess sustained quality, the same five aspects of the day were assessed by participants on a ten-point Likert scale: relevance, pitch, clarity, usefulness and overall quality. Scores of 1 reflected strong disagreement and 10 of strong agreement. Free text feedback allowed candidates to suggest topics for future sessions or identify valuable learning points. Thirteen IMT3 or equivalent doctors participated in this round of ‘Step-Up’ simulation with 100% feedback rate. As in previous rounds median and modal scores were 10 in all 5 domains, ranging from 7 to 10. Free text feedback recorded multiple requests for further simulation sessions. ‘Step-Up’ simulation was demonstrated previously to be a useful tool in progression to IMT3. Overall quality and usefulness were sustained year-on-year and simulated challenging discussions were highly valued by participants. Therefore, this programme will continue for future cohorts, with ongoing monitoring of sustained quality and development of new scenarios to provide increased frequency of simulation training. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.

Equity M&M - Adaptation of the Morbidity and Mortality Conference to Analyze and Confront Structural Inequity in Internal Medicine.

At morbidity and mortality (M&M) conferences, medical teams review cases for medical education and system improvement. Adverse outcomes are often driven by social inequity, but processes to analyze such outcomes are lacking. Adapt quality improvement and patient safety (QIPS) tools in the M&M format to systematically analyze adverse patient outcomes rooted in social and structural determinants of health (SSDH). One-hour conferences conducted in health systems in Seattle, WA, and Dallas, TX. Equity M&M conferences were held 11 times, each with approximately 45 participants comprised of internal medicine trainees, faculty, and non-medical staff. Conferences included a case narrative and counternarrative highlighting SSDH, an equity-framed root cause analysis, and potential interventions. Conferences were received well across both institutions. Following conferences, most respondents reported increased identification of opportunities for action towards equity (88.5%) and confidence in discussing equity issues with colleagues (92.3%). Equity M&M conferences are a structured tool for deconstructing and confronting structural inequity that leads to adverse patient outcomes. Evaluations demonstrate educational impact on participants. Anecdotal examples suggest institutional impact. Other health systems could adopt this model for similar advocacy and system improvement.

Chief resident behaviors that lead to effective morning reports, a multisite qualitative study

BackgroundMorning report is a fundamental component of internal medicine training and often represents the most significant teaching responsibility of Chief Residents. We sought to define Chief Resident behaviors essential to leading a successful morning report.MethodsIn 2016, we conducted a multi-site qualitative study using key informant interviews of morning report stakeholders. 49 residents, Chief Residents, and faculty from 4 Internal Medicine programs participated. Interviews were analyzed and coded by 3 authors using inductive reasoning and thematic analysis. A preliminary code structure was developed and expanded in an iterative process concurrent with data collection until thematic sufficiency was reached and a final structure was established. This final structure was used to recode all transcripts.ResultsWe identified four themes of Chief Resident behaviors that lead to a successful morning report: report preparation, delivery skills, pedagogical approaches, and faculty participation. Preparation domains include thoughtful case selection, learning objective development, content editing, and report organization. Delivery domains include effective presentation skills, appropriate utilization of technology, and time management. Pedagogical approach domains include learner facilitation techniques that encourage clinical reasoning while nurturing a safe learning environment, as well as innovative teaching strategies. Moderating the involvement of faculty was identified as the final key to morning report effectiveness. Specific behavior examples are provided.ConclusionConsideration of content preparation, delivery, pedagogical approaches, and moderation of faculty participation are key components to Chief Resident-led morning reports. Results from this study could be used to enhance faculty development for Chief Residents.

Assessments Used for Summative Purposes during Internal Medicine Specialist Training: A Rapid Review

Assessments used for summative purposes of patient-facing clinical competency in specialist internal medicine training are high-stakes, both to doctors in training, as it is a prerequisite for qualification, as well as their community of prospective patients. A rapid review of the literature evaluated methods of assessments used for summative purposes of patient-facing clinical competency during specialist internal medicine training in Australia. Four online databases identified literature published since the year 2000 that reported on summative assessment in specialist medical training. Two reviewers screened and selected eligible studies and extracted data, with a focus on evidence of support for the criteria for good assessment as set out in the 2010 Ottawa Consensus framework for good assessment. Ten eligible studies were included. Four studied the mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX), two the Royal Australasian College of Physicians short case exam, three a variety of Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) or summative entrustment and progression review processes, and one a novel clinical observation tool. The mini-CEX assessment demonstrated the most evidence in support of the Ottawa criteria. There was a paucity of published evidence regarding the best form of summative assessment of patient-facing clinical competency in specialist internal medicine training.

An evaluation of clinical fellow programmes in an acute teaching hospital trust.

Clinical fellows support the hospital workforce while gaining experience in different specialities, research, leadership and teaching. The authors aimed to assess the impact of clinical fellow programmes in an acute teaching hospital trust. An anonymous electronic service evaluation was sent to clinical fellows to investigate their views on whether the programme had improved patient safety, doctors' clinical performance, training and wellbeing. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the free-text responses. A total of 95 out of 144 clinical fellows responded to the evaluation survey. The clinical fellows believed that the programme had improved patient safety, clinical performance (time to manage acute patients), foundation and internal medicine training, undergraduate teaching and junior doctors' wellbeing. Four similar themes emerged from the free-text responses: career development, patient safety, training and doctors' wellbeing. Clinical fellow programmes may improve patient safety, clinical performance, training, undergraduate education and doctors' wellbeing.

UK-wide survey of gastroenterology and hepatology trainees in 2022: endoscopy, workforce planning and the Shape of things to come

ObjectiveShape of Training has shortened the gastroenterology curriculum in the UK from a 5 to 4-year programme. There are ongoing concerns that this will negatively impact training and the attainment...

347 Competency frameworks for non-geriatric medicine physicians caring for older adults: a scoping review

Abstract Background The scale of our ageing demographic is such that specialist geriatric medicine services are unable to keep pace with the growing demand. An exclusive reliance on geriatricians to treat older adults is not always appropriate as their care may necessitate the involvement of other specialties. Consequently, many of the interactions with frail older adults will be carried out by professionals who have not received specialised training in gerontological principles. There is an urgent requirement to ensure that all physicians are trained in the competencies to care for older adults. We aimed to summarise the available literature on the competencies required by non-geriatric medicine physicians caring for older adults. Methods We undertook a scoping review following Arksey and O’Malley and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) as a guide. We systematically searched the electronic databases PubMed, Cochrane, Cinahl, PsycInfo, ERIC and Embase for eligible records from January 2012 to December 2022. Studies related to physician or doctor or resident and competencies or curriculum or education or entrustable professional activities and geriatric medicine or gerontology were included. Results We identified 5,177 records. Four hundred and forty-six full texts were screened for eligibility. Thirty sources of evidence were included in the review. Most studies were from the United States and used quantitative methods. Competency frameworks primarily focused on internal medicine trainees with few targeting other specialties. Seventeen cited the purpose as addressing a specific competency. The most common competencies explored related to medication management, palliative care and cognitive impairment followed by bone health, transitions of care and falls and syncope. Conclusion Many frameworks attempt to outline gerontological competencies for specific specialties. However it is evident that a dedicated competency framework is necessary to define the required competencies for all non-geriatric medicine physicians caring for older adults.

Exploring Competency-Based Medical Education Through the Lens of the UME-GME Transition: A Qualitative Study.

Competency-based medical education (CBME) represents a shift to a paradigm with shared definitions, explicit outcomes, and assessments of competence. The groundwork has been laid to ensure all learners achieve the desired outcomes along the medical education continuum using the principles of CBME. However, this continuum spans the major transition from undergraduate medical education (UME) to graduate medical education (GME) that is also evolving. This study explores the experiences of medical educators working to use CBME assessments in the context of the UME-GME transition and their perspectives on the existing challenges. This study used a constructivist-oriented qualitative methodology. In-depth, semistructured interviews of UME and GME leaders in CBME were performed between February 2019 and January 2020 via Zoom. When possible, each interviewee was interviewed by 2 team members, one with UME and one with GME experience, which allowed follow-up questions to be pursued that reflected the perspectives of both UME and GME educators more fully. A multistep iterative process of thematic analysis was used to analyze the transcripts and identify patterns across interviews. The 9 interviewees represented a broad swath of UME and GME leadership positions, though most had an internal medicine training background. Analysis identified 4 overarching themes: mistrust (a trust chasm exists between UME and GME); misaligned goals (the residency selection process is antithetical to CBME); inadequate communication (communication regarding competence is infrequent, often unidirectional, and lacks a shared language); and inflexible timeframes (current training timeframes do not account for individual learners' competency trajectories). Despite the mutual desire and commitment to move to CBME across the continuum, mistrust, misaligned goals, inadequate communication, and inflexible timeframes confound such efforts of individual schools and programs. If current efforts to improve the UME-GME transition address the themes identified, educators may be more successful implementing CBME along the continuum.

Educational supervision in internal medicine residency training – a scoping review

BackgroundAlthough supervision is an important part of residency training, its scope and how it relates to other types of support, such as mentoring, precepting and feedback, remain unclear. While clinical supervision consists of ongoing instructions and feedback in the workplace setting, educational supervision is a formalized component of postgraduate medical educational and supports the process that facilitates a trainee’s progression throughout their training. Since medical specialties have different supervisory traditions, this study focuses on educational supervision in internal medicine. Our aim was to investigate what is known about educational supervision practices in internal medicine and the role of educational supervision in supporting residents’ learning.MethodsWe conducted a scoping review of the literature on educational supervision in residency training in internal medicine based on Levac et al.’s modification of Arksey and O’Malley’s six-step framework. The literature search was performed in the following databases: Medline, Embase, Web of Science and the Educational Resources Information Center. In addition, we conducted a handsearch in Medical Teacher and Google Scholar. We followed the PRISMA guidelines for systematic research.ResultsEighteen of the 3,284 identified articles were included in the analysis. We found few empirical studies describing how educational supervision is conducted and what effect routine educational supervision has on residents’ learning. Our findings suggest that the terminology can be confusing and that educational supervision practices in internal medicine has a weak theoretical foundation.ConclusionThe distinction between educational supervision and other support structures, such as mentoring and feedback, has not been clearly defined in the research literature. We argue that shared terminology is needed to better understand current educational practices and to facilitate clear communication about how to help residents learn.

The Utility of Narrow-Band Imaging International Colorectal Endoscopic Classification in Predicting the Histologies of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps Using I-Scan Optical Enhancement: A Prospective Study.

(1) Background: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of predicting the histology of diminutive colonic polyps (DCPs) (≤5 mm) using i-scan optical enhancement (OE) based on the narrow-band imaging international colorectal endoscopic (NICE) classification. The study compared the diagnostic accuracy between experts who were already familiar with the NICE classification and trainees who were not, both before and after receiving brief training on the NICE classification. (2) Method: This prospective, single-center clinical trial was conducted at the Dong-A University Hospital from March 2020 to August 2020 and involved two groups of participants. The first group comprised two experienced endoscopists who were proficient in using i-scan OE and had received formal training in optical diagnosis and dye-less chromoendoscopy (DLC) techniques. The second group consisted of three endoscopists in the process of training in internal medicine at the Dong-A University Hospital. Each endoscopist examined the polyps and evaluated them using the NICE classification through i-scan OE. The results were not among the participants. Trained endoscopists were divided into pre- and post-training groups. (3) Results: During the study, a total of 259 DCPs were assessed using i-scan OE by the two expert endoscopists. They made real-time histological predictions according to the NICE classification criteria. For the trainee group, before training, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) for predicting histopathological results using i-scan OE were 0.791, 0.775, and 0.818. However, after receiving training, the AUROCs improved to 0.935, 0.949, and 0.963, which were not significantly different from the results achieved by the expert endoscopists. (4) Conclusions: This study highlights the potential of i-scan OE, along with the NICE classification, in predicting the histopathological results of DCPs during colonoscopy. In addition, this study suggests that even an endoscopist without experience in DLC can effectively use i-scan OE to improve diagnostic performance with only brief training.

Developing a Web-Based Asynchronous Case Discussion Format on Social Media to Teach Clinical Reasoning: Mixed Methods Study.

Case-based learning conferences are valuable to trainees, but growing clinical demands hinder consistent attendance. Social media increasingly acts as a venue for trainees to supplement their education asynchronously. We designed and implemented a web-based asynchronous clinical case discussion series on the Twitter social media platform to fill this educational gap. The aim of this mixed methods study is to examine the nature of interactions among web-based case discussion participants and assess local attitudes regarding the educational intervention. Starting in February 2018, we posted clinical vignettes to a dedicated Twitter account with the prompt "What else do you want to know?" to stimulate discussion. The authors replied in real time when case discussion participants requested additional details. Additional data about the case were posted at regular intervals to the discussion thread to advance the overall case discussion. Participants were asked to explain their reasoning and support their conclusions when appropriate. Web-based engagement was assessed using Twitter Analytics. Participants' posts were qualitatively analyzed for themes, with special attention to examples of using clinical reasoning skills. A codebook of types of participant posts and interactions was refined iteratively. Local engagement and attitudes at our institution were assessed by surveying internal medicine trainees (n=182) and faculty (n=165) after 6 months. Over a 6-month period, 11 live case discussions were engaged with by users 1773 times. A total of 86 Twitter profiles spanning 22 US states and 6 countries contributed to discussions among participants and the authors. Participants from all training levels were present, ranging from students to faculty. Interactions among participants and the case moderators were most commonly driven by clinical reasoning, including hypothesis-driven information gathering, discussing the differential diagnosis, and data interpretation or organization. Of 71 respondents to the local survey, 29 (41%) reported having a Twitter account. Of the 29 respondents with Twitter accounts, 17 (59%) reported participating in the case discussions. Respondents agreed that case participation increased both their clinical reasoning skills (15/17, 88%) and clinical knowledge (13/17, 76%). A social media-based serialized case discussion was a feasible asynchronous teaching method for engaging web-based learners of all levels in a clinical reasoning discussion. Further study should examine what factors drive trainee participation in web-based case discussions and under what circumstances asynchronous discussion might be preferred over in-person teaching activities.

“Ego massaging that helps”: a framework analysis study of internal medicine trainees’ interprofessional collaboration approaches

ABSTRACT Introduction Patient care depends on collaborative practice. Debate remains as to the best approach to providing education for collaboration, with educational interventions often far removed from the realities of the clinical workplace. Understanding the approaches used for collaboration in clinical practice could inform practical strategies for training. For internal medicine trainees, this involves collaboration with other professions but also with other specialties. This study aimed to explore the approaches that internal medicine trainees use for interprofessional collaboration and the ways that these approaches vary when internal medicine trainees interact with different healthcare provider groups. Methods Following ethical approval and participant consent, interprofessional communication workshops between August 2020 and March 2021 were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Workshops involved groups of internal medicine trainees discussing collaboration challenges and the approaches they use in clinical practice. This framework analysis study used the interprofessional collaboration framework described by Bainbridge and Regehr (building social capital, perspective taking and negotiating priorities and resources), and cross-referenced the categorised data with the healthcare groups that trainees collaborate with, to look for patterns in the data. Results Seventeen workshops, involving 100 trainees, were included. Trainees described relationship building, perspective taking and negotiating priorities and resources. Relationship building was a modification to the original framework domain of building social capital. Themes of power and civility transcended domains with evidence of using hierarchy as leverage when negotiating and employing civility as a tactical approach throughout. Discussion This bi-dimensional analysis highlights patterns of perspective taking when collaborating with other specialties and professions, and the approaches to negotiation of courting favour and coercion when interacting with other specialties. This study provides evidence of the strategies currently utilised by internal medicine trainees, with different healthcare groups, and presents a modified framework which could inform the development of training for collaboration.

Development and Implementation of an Escalation Protocol for Internal Medicine Trainees.

Overnight, physicians in training receive less direct supervision. Decreased direct supervision requires trainees to appropriately assess patients at risk of clinical deterioration and escalate to supervising physicians. Failure of trainees to escalate contributes to adverse patient safety events. To standardize the evaluation of patients at risk of deterioration overnight by internal medicine residents, increase communication between residents and supervising physicians, and improve perceptions of patient safety at a tertiary academic medical center. A multidisciplinary stakeholder team developed an overnight escalation-of-care protocol for residents. The protocol was implemented with badge buddies and an educational campaign targeted at residents, supervising physicians, and nursing staff. Residents and supervising physicians completed anonymous surveys to assess the use of the protocol; the frequency of overnight communication between residents and supervising physicians; and perceptions of escalation and patient safety before, immediately after ("early postintervention"), and 8 months after ("delayed postintervention") the intervention. Seventy-five (100%) residents participated in the intervention, and 57-89% of those invited to complete surveys at the various time points responded. After the intervention, 82% of residents reported using the protocol, though no change was observed in the frequency of communication between residents and supervising physicians. After the implementation, residents perceived that patient care was safer (early postintervention, 47%; delayed postintervention, 72%; P = 0.02), and interns expressed decreased fear of waking and being criticized by supervising physicians. An escalation-of-care protocol was developed and successfully implemented using a multimodal approach. The implementation and dissemination of the protocol standardized resident escalation overnight and improved resident-perceived patient safety and interns' comfort with escalation.

Editorial introductions.

Editorial introductions.

Editorial introductions.

Editorial introductions.

An Online Educational Module to Improve General Internal Medicine Trainees’ Knowledge and Comfort in Managing Acute Complications of Sickle Cell Disease

BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a genetic disorder characterized by hemolytic anemia and vaso-occlusive episodes. Many adults with SCD require hospitalization for the management of acute manifestations. There appears to be a gap in the level of knowledge that general internal medicine (GIM) trainees possess regarding the treatment and management of SCD. METHODS: We created an online module that helps medical residents improve their knowledge about SCD. Participants were exposed to different scenarios related to SCD. A pre-and posttests were administered to detect improvement in knowledge and comfort when managing SCD and its acute complications. RESULTS: Thirty consecutive GIM residents participated. Of these, 20 completed the demographic survey, 17 completed the pretest, and 10 completed the posttest and usability survey. The median time to complete the module was 68 min. Fifty percent of participants were 1st-year postgraduation from medical school. Forty-five percent stated that they were uncomfortable managing patients with SCD 80% had cared for at least 1–5 patients with SCD. All reported having no SCD lectures in residency. The median pretest score was 12/20 (range, 8–15) and posttest score was 20.5/25 (range, 13–24). CONCLUSIONS: Residents agreed that the module was useful, helps understanding about SCD and its complication, and aids with clinical duties. This module demonstrated to be an effective educational tool that can support resident education during their internal medicine. Further strategies will be needed to improve the delivery of online modules to keep residents engaged with the module and attaint full benefit from these activities.

Global leadership in paediatric and congenital cardiac care: education and empowerment to improve outcomes in low- and middle-income countries - an interview with Krishna Kumar, MD, DM FAHA.

Dr Krishna Kumar is the focus of our sixth in a series of interviews in Cardiology in the Young entitled, "Global Leadership in Paediatric and Congenital Cardiac Care." Dr Kumar was born in Raurkela, India. He attended medical school at Maulana Azad Medical College in New Delhi, graduating in 1984. Dr Kumar then went on to complete internal medicine, emergency medicine, and adult cardiology training at All India Institute of Medical Sciences in 1988, 1989, and 1990, respectively. He then pursued paediatric cardiology training at Harvard Medical School in Boston, MA, USA. Dr Kumar began his clinical position as a paediatric cardiologist at Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences in Kochi, Kerala, India.During his impressive career, Dr Kumar has made significant contributions to educational advancement, research and innovation, public health advocacy, and clinical care. Dr Kumar is credited for distinguishing paediatric cardiology as a distinct subspecialty in India. He was a founding member of the Pediatric Cardiology Society of India and the original editor of the society's academic journal. Recognising the deficit of paediatric cardiology-trained physicians in low- and middle-income countries, Dr Kumar helped establish formal structured training programmes for paediatric cardiology in India. More recently, he established the Children's HeartLink Fellowships in paediatric cardiac sciences at Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences in Kochi and Institut Jantung Negara in Malaysia. Through educational programmes, Dr Kumar has taught countless caregivers and paediatricians, in India and neighbouring countries, the early identification and management of children with CHD. Dr Kumar has established a premier paediatric heart programme at Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences. As department Chief, he emphasises the importance of teamwork, advocacy, and continuous quality improvement. He has developed numerous low-cost strategies for the management of CHD. He has established large community-based studies on rheumatic heart disease and CHD in South India. Dr Kumar's focus on advocacy and policy change in India has made a substantial impact on early identification and treatment of CHD in the subcontinent. He has made a global impact on the care of paediatric cardiology patients through his educational programmes, research and innovation, large-scale research registries, and advocacy for public health policy changes. He is an incredibly humble and generous leader, and his patients and community are the source of his unending motivation.