REVIEWS 375 pay off for supplying some of its former client states with energy at below market prices? Perhaps too stridently anti-Russian for West European sensibilities this book remains, nevertheless, an invaluable study for regional specialists and for those concerned with the politics of energy supply in both Central and Western Europe. School ofHistoy STUART THOMPSTONE University ofNottingham Gallagher, Tom. TheBalkansin theNew Millennium: In theShadowof Warand Peace.Outcast Europe, 3. Routledge, London and New York, 2005. xix + 232 pp. Maps. Tables. Notes. Bibliography.Index. ?65.oo. THE simplestway to convey a general impressionof the scope of this book is by commenting brieflyon the eight chaptersthat make up most of it. Chapter two ('The road to war in Kosovo') and chapter three ('Milosevic and NATO collide over Kosovo') are oddities in the sense that they examine specifichistorical moments in the Kosovo conflict, and it is not clear why these themes should be singled out for particularattention. In contrast, chapter one and chapters four to seven are firmly anchored in the political geography of the region as it emergedwhen the fightingstopped, and they bringthe storyup to about the end of 2004, with a sprinklingof references dated 2005. Chapter one is headed 'Greece: a peace-makingrole lost and re-found';chapter four, 'Macedonia: internal dangers supplant external ones'; chapter five, 'Serbia from 2000: Milosevic's poisonous legacy'; chapter six, 'Bosnia:redesigninga flawed peace process'; chapter seven, 'Still a danger-point: Kosovo under internationalrule'; chapter eight, 'The European Union in search of Balkan answers'. These chapters form the backbone of the work, and in them Gallagherdemonstratesa trulyimpressivecommand of sourcesand painstaking attention to detail. The trouble is that the essentialoutlines of the story in every instance are well known: the sorrylack of progressin Bosnia and Kosovo under international control, the political and economic mess in Serbia, the difficultiesof state-building in Macedonia, the timidity and ineptitude of the European Union in dealing with the huge problems of security and economic reconstructionin the region. If our detailedknowledgeof these mattersis enhanced by reading these essays, they add nothing new by way of historical understanding , nor do they give a fresh angle of vision on the future. Gallagher's winding-up of the chapter on Bosnia is an accuratereflectionof the style and content of the book as a whole. He writes that by 'the middle of the first decade of the new century, it is likely to become apparent if Bosnia has acquired functioning state-level structures that will enable it to be drawn firmly into the mainstreamof European affairs.If a decade of externallyled state building reveals that it is still a deeply fracturedpolity, then it is likely that Bosniawill remain under internationalsupervision'(p. I48).A prettysafe each-way bet, one would have thought. True, the passage seems to contain a 376 SEER, 85, 2, 2007 prediction of a kind, tied to mid-decade, but the book was publishedin 2005. Were there no clues when it went to press as to which way Bosnia might be heading? The authorseems to have a bit of a thing about dates.There is an irritating portentousness about the phrase 'New Millennium' in the main title, reinforced by the sonorousbut meaninglesssub-title.Certainly,momentous questions of war and peace in the Balkanswere settled when Serbia's army and paramilitariespulled out of Kosovo in I999, but the peoples of the region are still living in the old millennium, historicallyspeaking.Gallagher amply confirms that the turning of the century has brought no new starts anywhere. Readers will also notice that the Balkanshave undergone a drasticshrinkage in thisbook, both conceptuallyand geographically.When he finallyattendsto the concept at all, it transpiresthat Gallagheruses 'Balkans'as simple shorthand for the 'formercommunist states of South-EastEurope' (p. i86). (I had to work out this connection for myself, by digging in the Index, and finding 'Balkans',sub-heading'common legacy'.)For the purposesof argument,let us accept this as a legitimate conflation of analyticalcategories, and leave aside the question of why in that case chapter one is on Greece. The fact remains that the book is not even a survey of the Western Balkans,because Croatia, Montenegro and Albania figureonly in passing.In chaptersfour to seven, the field...