A major clinical challenge is the adequate identification of patients with acute (<1 week) and subacute (1-6 weeks) ischemic stroke due to internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion who could benefit from a surgical revascularization after a failure of endovascular and/or medical treatment. Recently, two novel quantitative imaging modalities have been introduced: (I) quantitative magnetic resonance angiography (qMRA) with non-invasive optimal vessel analysis (NOVA) for quantification of blood flow in major cerebral arteries (in mL/min), and (II) blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR). The aim of this study is to present our cohort of patients who underwent surgical revascularization in the acute and subacute phase of ischemic stroke as well as to demonstrate the importance of hemodynamic and flow assessment for the decision-making regarding surgical revascularization in patients with acute and subacute stroke and ICA-occlusion. Symptomatic patients with acute and subacute ischemic stroke because of persistent ICA-occlusion despite optimal medical/endovascular recanalization therapy who were treated at the Neuroscience Clinical Center of the University Hospital Zurich underwent both BOLD-CVR and qMRA-NOVA to study the hemodynamic and collateral vessel status. Patients selected for surgical revascularization according to our previously published flowchart were included in this prospective cohort study. Repeated NOVA and BOLD-CVR investigations were done after bypass surgery as follow up as well as clinical follow up. Continuous BOLD-CVR and qMRA-NOVA variables were compared using paired Student t-test. Between May 2019 and September 2022, superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) bypass surgery was performed in 12 patients with acute and subacute stroke because of ICA-occlusion despite of optimal endovascular and/or medical treatment prior to the surgery. Impaired BOLD-CVR in the occluded vascular territory [MCA territory: ipsilateral vs. contralateral: -0.03±0.07 vs. 0.11±0.07 %BOLD/mmHgCO2, P<0.001] as well as reduced hemispheric flow with qMRA-NOVA (ipsilateral vs. contralateral: 228.00±54.62 vs. 384.50±70.99 mL/min, P=0.01) were measured indicating insufficient collateralization. Post-operative qMRA-NOVA showed improved hemispheric flow (via bypass) (pre-bypass vs. post-bypass: 236.60±76.45 vs. 334.20±131.33 mL/min, P=0.02) and the 3-month-follow-up with BOLD-CVR showed improved cerebral hemodynamics (MCA territory: pre-bypass vs. post-bypass: -0.01±0.05 vs. 0.06±0.03 %BOLD/mmHgCO2, P=0.02) in all patients studied. Quantitative assessment with BOLD-CVR and qMRA-NOVA allows us to evaluate the pre- and post-operative cerebral hemodynamics and collateral vessel status in patients with acute/subacute stroke due to ICA occlusion who may benefit from surgical revascularization after failure of endovascular/medical treatment.