Intermittent Social Defeat Research Articles

Social defeat stress-induced sensitization and escalated cocaine self-administration: the role of ERK signaling in the rat ventral tegmental area.

Intermittent social defeat stress can induce neuroadaptations that promote compulsive drug taking. Within the mesocorticolimbic circuit, repeated cocaine administration activates extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK). The present experiments examine whether changes in ERK phosphorylation are necessary for the behavioral and neural adaptations that occur as a consequence of intermittent defeat stress. Rats were exposed to four brief intermittent defeats over the course of 10 days. Ten days after the last defeat, rats were challenged with cocaine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) or saline, and ERK activity was examined in mesocorticolimbic regions. To determine the role of ERK in defeat stress-induced behavioral sensitization, we bilaterally microinjected the MAPK/ERK kinase inhibitor U0126 (1 μg/side) or vehicle (20 % DMSO) into the ventral tegmental area (VTA) prior to each of four defeats. Ten days following the last defeat, locomotor activity was assessed for the expression of behavioral cross-sensitization to cocaine (10 mg/kg, i.p.). Thereafter, rats self-administered cocaine under fixed and progressive ratio schedules of reinforcement, including a 24-h continuous access "binge" (0.3 mg/kg/infusion). We found that repeated defeat stress increased ERK phosphorylation in the VTA. Inhibition of VTA ERK prior to each social defeat attenuated the development of stress-induced sensitization and prevented stress-induced enhancement of cocaine self-administration during a continuous access binge. These results suggest that enhanced activation of ERK in the VTA due to brief defeats is critical in the induction of sensitization and escalated cocaine taking.

Knockdown of ventral tegmental area mu-opioid receptors in rats prevents effects of social defeat stress: Implications for amphetamine cross-sensitization, social avoidance, weight regulation and expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor

Social defeat stress causes social avoidance and long-lasting cross-sensitization to psychostimulants, both of which are associated with increased brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression in the ventral tegmental area (VTA). Moreover, social stress upregulates VTA mu-opioid receptor (MOR) mRNA. In the VTA, MOR activation inhibits GABA neurons to disinhibit VTA dopamine neurons, thus providing a role for VTA MORs in the regulation of psychostimulant sensitization. The present study determined the effect of lentivirus-mediated MOR knockdown in the VTA on the consequences of intermittent social defeat stress, a salient and profound stressor in humans and rodents. Social stress exposure induced social avoidance and attenuated weight gain in animals with non-manipulated VTA MORs, but both these effects were prevented by VTA MOR knockdown. Rats with non-manipulated VTA MOR expression exhibited cross-sensitization to amphetamine challenge (1.0 mg/kg, i.p.), evidenced by a significant augmentation of locomotion. By contrast, knockdown of VTA MORs prevented stress-induced cross-sensitization without blunting the locomotor-activating effects of amphetamine. At the time point corresponding to amphetamine challenge, immunohistochemical analysis was performed to examine the effect of stress on VTA BDNF expression. Prior stress exposure increased VTA BDNF expression in rats with non-manipulated VTA MOR expression, while VTA MOR knockdown prevented stress-induced expression of VTA BDNF. Taken together, these results suggest that upregulation of VTA MOR is necessary for the behavioral and biochemical changes induced by social defeat stress. Elucidating VTA MOR regulation of stress effects on the mesolimbic system may provide new therapeutic targets for treating stress-induced vulnerability to substance abuse.

Social stress and CRF-dopamine interactions in the VTA: role in long-term escalation of cocaine self-administration.

The nature of neuroadaptations in the genesis of escalated cocaine taking remains a topic of considerable interest. Intermittent social defeat stress induces both locomotor and dopaminergic cross-sensitization to cocaine, as well as escalated cocaine self-administration. The current study examines the role of corticotropin releasing factor receptor subtypes 1 and 2 (CRFR1, CRFR2) within the ventral tegmental area (VTA) during social defeat stress. This study investigated whether injecting either a CRFR1 or CRFR2 antagonist directly into the VTA before each social defeat would prevent the development of later (1) locomotor sensitization, (2) dopaminergic sensitization, and (3) escalated cocaine self-administration in rats. CRFR1 antagonist CP376395 (50 or 500 ng/side), CRFR2 antagonist Astressin2-B (100 or 1000 ng/side), or vehicle (aCSF) was microinjected into the VTA 20 min before social defeat stress (or handling) on days 1, 4, 7, and 10. Ten days later, rats were injected with cocaine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) and assessed for either locomotor sensitization, measured by walking activity, or dopaminergic sensitization, measured by extracellular dopamine (DA) in the nucleus accumbens shell (NAcSh) through in vivo microdialysis. Locomotor sensitization testing was followed by intravenous cocaine self-administration. Intra-VTA antagonism of CRFR1, but not CRFR2, inhibited the induction of locomotor cross-sensitization to cocaine, whereas both prevented dopaminergic cross-sensitization and escalated cocaine self-administration during a 24 h "binge." This may suggest dissociation between locomotor sensitization and cocaine taking. These data also suggest that interactions between CRF and VTA DA neurons projecting to the NAcSh are essential for the development of dopaminergic cross-sensitization to cocaine.

Knockdown of tropomyosin‐related kinase B receptor expression in the nucleus accumbens shell prevents intermittent social defeat stress‐induced cross‐sensitization to amphetamine in rats

The nucleus accumbens (NAc) is a critical brain region for the rewarding effects of drugs of abuse. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) can facilitate stress- and drug-induced neuroadaptation in the mesocorticolimbic system. BDNF-containing projections to the NAc originate from the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and the prefrontal cortex, and BDNF release activates tropomyosin-related kinase B (TrkB). In this study, we examined the necessity for BDNF-TrkB signaling in the NAc shell during social defeat stress-induced cross-sensitization to amphetamine. Adeno-associated virus expressing short hairpin RNA directed against TrkB (AAV-shTrkB) was infused bilaterally into the NAc shell to knock down TrkB, whereas AAV-GFP (green fluorescent protein) was used as the control virus. Rats were exposed to intermittent social defeat stress or handling procedures; amphetamine challenge was given at 10 days after the last defeat and locomotor activity was measured. Stressed rats that received the control virus showed cross-sensitization to amphetamine compared with the handled rats. In contrast, NAc TrkB knockdown prevented social defeat stress-induced cross-sensitization. TrkB knockdown in the NAc was found to reduce the level of phospho-extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 in this region. NAc TrkB knockdown also prevented stress-induced elevation of BDNF and the glutamate receptor type 1 (GluA1) subunit of AMPA receptor in the VTA, as well as ΔFosB expression in the NAc. These findings indicated that BDNF-TrkB signaling in the NAc shell was required for social defeat stress-induced cross-sensitization. NAc TrkB-BDNF signaling also appeared to be involved in the regulation of GluA1 in the VTA, as well as in the NAc ΔFosB accumulation that could trigger cross-sensitization after social defeat stress.

Structural and Electrical Myocardial Remodeling in a Rodent Model of Depression

Despite a well-documented association between stress and depression with cardiac morbidity and mortality, there is no satisfactory explanation for the mechanisms linking affective and cardiac disorders. This study investigated cardiac electrophysiological properties in an animal model of depression. Depression-relevant physiological and behavioral parameters were measured in adult male wild-type rats during and after a period of intermittent social defeat stress (n = 12) or empty cage exposure (control, n = 11). Nine days after the last defeat/empty cage exposure, high-definition epicardial mapping was performed under anesthesia. Stressed animals versus controls displayed a larger reduction in the circadian amplitude of heart rate (-32% [3%] versus -13 [2%]; p = .001) and body temperature (-33% [4%] versus -5% [2%]; p = .001) rhythms, had smaller body weight gain (+11% [1%] versus +17% [1%]; p < .001), and showed a larger reduction in sucrose solution intake (-19% [6%] versus -7% [4%]; p = .006). Epicardial mapping analysis revealed a decrease in the transversal conduction velocity of the wavefront (0.23 [0.0] versus 0.27 [0.1] m/s; p = .02) and a shortening of the effective refractory period (86.8 [2.1] versus 95.9 [3.0] milliseconds; p = .01) in stressed animals. Upon killing, moderate left ventricular fibrosis was observed in the stressed group. Intermittent social stress procedure is associated with depression-like symptoms and altered myocardial electrical stability in a potentially proarrhythmic manner. In particular, reduced myocardial refractoriness and impaired conduction, which are considered major determinants of arrhythmogenesis, represent possible mechanisms underlying cardiac vulnerability.

Intermittent social defeat stress enhances mesocorticolimbic ΔFosB/BDNF co-expression and persistently activates corticotegmental neurons: Implication for vulnerability to psychostimulants

Intermittent social defeat stress exposure augments behavioral response to psychostimulants in a process termed cross-sensitization. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) mediates synaptic plasticity and cellular responses to stress and drugs of abuse. We previously showed that repeated social defeat stress persistently alters BDNF and activates ΔFosB expression in mesocorticolimbic regions. Here, we hypothesized that social defeat stress would increase ΔFosB expression in BDNF-containing mesocorticolimbic neurons at a time when cross-sensitization is evident. Because the ventral tegmental area (VTA) is critical for cross-sensitization, we similarly hypothesized that repeated social defeat stress would induce ΔFosB in neurons of mesocorticolimbic terminal regions that innervate the VTA. We induced social defeat stress in rats by short confrontations with an aggressive resident rat every third day for 10days. Control rats were handled according to the same schedule. Defeated rats exhibited sensitized locomotor response to amphetamine (1.0mg/kg, i.p.) 10days after termination of stress exposure. Separate rats, which underwent stress procedures without amphetamine challenge, were used for histological assessments. Rats received intra-VTA infusion of the retrograde tracer, Fluorogold (FG), and brain tissue was collected 10days after stress or handling for immunohistochemistry. Stress exposure increased BDNF immunoreactivity in anterior cingulate, prelimbic and infralimbic regions of the prefrontal cortex (PFC), medial amygdala (AMY), nucleus accumbens (NAc) and VTA; ΔFosB labeling in anterior cingulate cortex (ACG) and nucleus accumbens; and ΔFosB/BDNF co-expression in prelimbic cortex (PL), nucleus accumbens and medial amygdala. Infralimbic ΔFosB-labeling was enhanced by stress in neurons innervating the VTA. Increased ΔFosB/BDNF co-expression and persistent functional activation of corticolimbic neurons after stress may contribute to mechanisms underlying cross-sensitization to psychostimulants.

Viral depletion of VTA BDNF in rats modulates social behavior, consequences of intermittent social defeat stress, and long-term weight regulation

Mesolimbic brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is implicated in sustained behavioral changes following chronic social stress, and its depletion may reduce susceptibility to such behavioral alterations. Enhanced mesolimbic BDNF is proposed as pro-depressive and anhedonic, while depleting ventral tegmetal area (VTA) BDNF increases weight by enhancing hedonic eating. Here, we questioned whether depletion of VTA BDNF would alleviate social defeat stress-induced deficits in weight regulation, or affect social behavior in the presence or absence of social stress. Male Sprague-Dawley rats received bilateral intra-VTA infusions of adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors containing shRNA against BDNF or a control virus. Three weeks later, rats underwent 4 episodes of social defeat stress involving exposure to an aggressive Long-Evans resident rat, or control handling every third day. Depleted VTA BDNF conferred resistance to the deficient weight regulation normally observed during intermittent social defeat stress, and enhanced long-term weight gain regardless of stress history. In addition, social approach and avoidance behavior towards a novel social target were measured 7 weeks after stress. Social defeat stress chronically reduced social behavior, whereas depletion of VTA BDNF chronically increased social behavior. Our results reveal that depletion of VTA BDNF alleviates some consequences of intermittent social defeat stress, enhances social behavior, and may contribute to weight gain. These data implicate VTA BDNF in protracted behavioral responses to stress, social stimuli, and weight regulation.

Prevention of social stress-escalated cocaine self-administration by CRF-R1 antagonist in the rat VTA.

Intermittent exposure to social defeat stress can induce long-term neural plasticity that may influence escalated cocaine-taking behavior. Stressful encounters can lead to activation of dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), which are modulated by corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) neurons. The study aims to prevent the effects of intermittently scheduled, brief social defeat stress on subsequent intravenous (IV) cocaine self-administration by pretreatment with a CRF receptor subtype 1 (CRF-R1) antagonist. Long-Evans rats were submitted to four intermittent social defeat experiences separated by 72 h over 10 days. Two experiments examined systemic or intra-VTA antagonism of CRF-R1 subtype during stress on the later expression of locomotor sensitization and cocaine self-administration during fixed (0.75 mg/kg/infusion) and progressive ratio schedules of reinforcement (0.3 mg/kg/infusion), including a continuous 24-h "binge" (0.3 mg/kg/infusion). Pretreatment with a CRF-R1 antagonist, CP 154,526, (20 mg/kg i.p.) prior to each social defeat episode prevented the development of stress-induced locomotor sensitization to a cocaine challenge and prevented escalated cocaine self-administration during a 24-h "binge". In addition, pretreatment with a CRF-R1 antagonist (0.3 μg/0.5 μl/side) into the VTA prior to each social defeat episode prevented stress-induced locomotor sensitization to a cocaine challenge and prevented escalated cocaine self-administration during a 24-h "binge". The current results suggest that CRF-R1 subtype in the VTA is critically involved in the development of stress-induced locomotor sensitization which may contribute to escalated cocaine self-administration during continuous access in a 24-h "binge".

Social defeat stress in rats: escalation of cocaine and “speedball” binge self-administration, but not heroin

Exposure to intermittent episodes of social defeat stress can increase drug seeking and leads to intense drug taking in rats. This study investigated the consequences of repeated, intermittent social defeat stress on patterns of drug self-administration in rats with access to heroin, cocaine, or a heroin-cocaine combination ("speedball"). Male Long-Evans rats were either handled (controls) or subjected to 25-min social defeat stress episodes on days 1, 4, 7, and 10 during confrontations with an aggressive resident. Ten days following the last defeat, rats were assessed for locomotor cross-sensitization in response to heroin or cocaine. Animals were then prepared with intrajugular catheters for drug self-administration. Separate groups of controls and defeated rats were examined for self-administration of heroin (experiment 1), a heroin-cocaine combination (experiment 2), or cocaine (experiment 3). Drug self-administration patterns were evaluated using fixed or progressive ratio schedules of reinforcement during limited access sessions or a 24-h unlimited access binge. Rats with a history of intermittent social defeat stress showed sensitized locomotor behavior when challenged with heroin or cocaine relative to controls. During the 24-h binge session, defeated rats escalated cocaine-taking behavior (ca. 110 mg/kg vs. 66 mg/kg in controls), persisted in self-administering cocaine or the heroin-cocaine mixture for more hours, and showed a tendency for increased heroin-cocaine intake, but no effects on heroin taking. A history of social defeat stress seems to preferentially promote escalated intake of cocaine but not heroin, unless a heroin-cocaine combination is available.

Short- and long-term effects of intermittent social defeat stress on brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression in mesocorticolimbic brain regions

Social defeat stress is an ethologically salient stressor which activates dopaminergic areas and, when experienced repeatedly, has long-term effects on dopaminergic function and related behavior. The mechanism for these long-lasting consequences remains unclear. A potential candidate for mediating these effects is brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a neurotrophin involved in synaptic plasticity and displaying alterations in dopaminergic regions in response to various types of stress. In this study, we sought to determine whether repeated social defeat stress altered BDNF mRNA and protein expression in dopaminergic brain regions either immediately after the last stress exposure or 4 weeks later. Male Sprague–Dawley rats were subjected to social defeat stress consisting of brief confrontation with an aggressive male rat every third day for 10 days; control rats were handled according to the same schedule. Animals were euthanized either 2 h or 28 days after the last stress or handling episode. Our results show that 2 h after stress, BDNF protein and mRNA expression increased in the medial prefrontal cortex. At this time-point, BDNF mRNA increased in the amygdala and protein expression increased in the substantia nigra. Twenty-eight days after stress, BDNF protein and mRNA expression were elevated in the medial amygdala and ventral tegmental area. Given the role of BDNF in neural plasticity, BDNF alterations that are long-lasting may be significant for neural adaptations to social stress. The dynamic nature of BDNF expression in dopaminergic brain regions in response to repeated social stress may therefore have implications for lasting neurochemical and behavioral changes related to dopaminergic function.

Repeated brief social defeat episodes in mice: Effects on cell proliferation in the dentate gyrus

Stressful experiences can affect hippocampal structure and function and can suppress new cell birth in the adult hippocampus in several species. Here we examine how repeated intermittent social defeat affects cell proliferation in the dentate gyrus (DG) in mice. Adult male CFW mice were subjected to 10 daily social defeat episodes, 3 defeat episodes within one day or a single defeat episode. Intruder mice were injected with 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU, 200 mg/kg, i.p.) 1 h after the last fight, and incorporation of BrdU into proliferating cells in the DG was quantified. In a third experiment, aggressive resident mice were allowed to fight with an intruder mouse every day for 10 days, and these residents were injected with BrdU 1 h after the last aggressive encounter. There was a significant decrease in cell proliferation in mice that received 10 social defeats, confirming and extending earlier results. This decrease is correlated with the intensity of the defeat experiences, as quantified by frequency of attack bites. Cell proliferation was slightly inhibited after a single defeat, although this effect was not significant. Three defeats within a 5-h period had no effect on levels of proliferation. Offensive aggressive stress in the residents did not result in any changes in hippocampal cell proliferation. These data indicate that repeated intermittent social defeat experienced over multiple days suppresses proliferation in the DG, and this may have important implications for our understanding of hippocampal changes related to stress psychopathologies.

Intense cocaine self-administration after episodic social defeat stress, but not after aggressive behavior: dissociation from corticosterone activation

An intense stress response characterizes both the dominant and submissive individuals during an aggressive confrontation, and these stress responses have enduring neural and behavioral consequences. In spite of similar glucocorticoid and corticolimbic dopamine activation, dominant and defeated individuals appear to diverge in terms of their drug taking. Do rats that are intermittently subjected to defeat stress become more sensitized to cocaine taking relative to rats that engage in aggressive bouts? Separate groups of male Long-Evans rats were investigated after an initial 10-day period with four brief episodes of social defeat (intruders) or aggressive behavior (residents): (1) the corticosterone responses to the very first and the last confrontations were measured; (2) the locomotor response to an amphetamine (1 mg/kg) challenge 10 days after the last stress exposure served as an index of behavioral sensitization; (3) intravenous self-administration sessions assessed the reinforcing effects of 0.75 mg/kg/infusion cocaine when available after every fifth response (fixed ratio), when delivered after completing progressively more demanding response requirements (progressive ratio; 0.3 mg/kg/infusion), and when available during a 24-h binge of continuous access (0.3 mg/kg/infusion). Both social defeat of the intruder rat and attack behavior by the resident rat rapidly increased plasma levels of corticosterone after the first and last aggressive confrontation, indicating no habituation to these types of stress. Intermittent social defeat engenders a sensitized locomotor response to a 1 mg/kg amphetamine challenge and increases cocaine self-administration as indicated by more behavioral effort to obtain cocaine infusions and by accumulating more cocaine during 24 h of continuous access (binge). By contrast, experiences with aggressive behavior do not impact on the motorically activating and reinforcing effects of stimulant administrations. The closely similar corticosterone activation in dominant and subordinate rats, followed by divergent patterns of cocaine self-administration indicates that different forms of social stress have dissociable effects on cocaine taking.

Behavioral sensitization due to social defeat stress in mice: antagonism at mGluR5 and NMDA receptors

Repeated administration of psychostimulants progressively augments the behavioral response to and increases self-administration behavior of these drugs. Experience of repeated intermittent social defeat stress episodes also leads to a sensitized locomotor response following psychostimulant challenge. Both metabotropic and ionotropic glutamate receptors have been shown to be critical in the induction and expression of stimulant sensitization, but their role in sensitization due to social defeat stress remains unclear. We evaluated the role of mGluR5 and NMDA glutamate receptors in the development of amphetamine-induced and social defeat stress-induced sensitization, using the non-competitive mGluR5 antagonist, MPEP, and the non-competitive NMDA antagonist, dizocilpine (MK-801). In adult, male CFW mice, sensitization was induced by either ten daily injections of D-amphetamine (1 mg/kg) or ten daily brief episodes of social defeat. Mice were pretreated with MPEP (3 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg) or dizocilpine (0.1 mg/kg) prior to amphetamine injections. Mice subjected to social defeat were pretreated with MPEP (10 mg/kg) or dizocilpine (0.1 mg/kg). Ten days after induction, the expression of locomotor sensitization to amphetamine was determined. The induction of sensitization due to social defeat stress was prevented by MPEP, yet MPEP did not inhibit the development of behavioral sensitization to amphetamine. Confirming and extending earlier results, dizocilpine pretreatment blocked both amphetamine-induced and stress-induced sensitization. These data indicate that behavioral sensitization to social defeat stress is dependent on mGluR5 receptors, whereas low-dose amphetamine sensitization may not be.

Cardiac autonomic responses to intermittent social conflict in rats

Intermittent exposure to the same stressor can lead to a gradual decline in physiological, neuroendocrine and behavioral stress responses (habituation). We investigated possible habituation of cardiac autonomic responsiveness and susceptibility to cardiac arrhythmias in male rats exposed to either intermittent social victory (VIC) or defeat (DEF) stress (10 exposures in each case). Electrocardiograms were recorded via radiotelemetry and the sympathovagal balance at the level of the heart was evaluated via time-domain measurements of heart rate variability, namely average R–R interval (average time interval between two consecutive heart beats, RR), the standard deviation of RR (SD RR) and the root-mean-square of successive R–R interval differences (r-MSSD). Values of these parameters were significantly lower in DEF as compared to VIC rats in the second part of the test period (from Minute 6 to Minute 15), suggesting a more pronounced sympathetic dominance in the former group of animals. Accordingly, the occurrence of the most frequent cardiac arrhythmias (ventricular and supraventricular premature beats) was higher in DEF rats. Habituation of cardiac autonomic responsivity was observed across repeated exposure to victory, both in terms of sympathovagal balance and susceptibility to cardiac tachyarrhythmias, whereas no habituation was found in repeatedly defeated animals. A possible explanation to this discrepancy could be the different degree of controllability characterizing the two social challenging situations.