Intermediate-risk Disease Research Articles

Accurate Documentation Contributes to Guideline-concordant Surveillance of Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Multisite Department of Veterans Affairs Study

To determine if accurate documentation of bladder cancer risk was associated with a clinician surveillance recommendation that is concordant with AUA guidelines among patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). We prospectively collected data from cystoscopy encounter notes from four Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) sites to ascertain whether they included accurate documentation of bladder cancer risk and a recommendation for a guideline-concordant surveillance interval. Accurate documentation was a clinician-recorded risk classification matching a gold standard assigned by the research team. Clinician recommendations were guideline-concordant if the clinician recorded a surveillance interval that was in line with the AUA guideline. Among 296 encounters, 75 were for low-, 98 for intermediate-, and 123 for high-risk NMIBC. 52% of encounters had accurate documentation of NMIBC risk. Accurate documentation of risk was less common among encounters for low-risk bladder cancer (36% vs 52% for intermediate- and 62% for high-risk, P<.05). Guideline-concordant surveillance recommendations were also less common in patients with low-risk bladder cancer (67% vs 89% for intermediate- and 94% for high-risk, P<.05). Accurate documentation was associated with a 29% and 15% increase in guideline-concordant surveillance recommendations for low- and intermediate-risk disease, respectively (P<.05). Accurate risk documentation was associated with more guideline-concordant surveillance recommendations among low- and intermediate-risk patients. Implementation strategies facilitating assessment and documentation of risk may be useful to reduce overuse of surveillance in this group and to prevent unnecessary cost, anxiety, and procedural harms.

Ten-year work burden after prostate cancer treatment.

We aim to characterize the magnitude of the work burden (weeks off from work) associated with prostate cancer (PCa) treatment over a 10-year period after PCa diagnosis and identify those at greatest risk. We identified men diagnosed with PCa treated with radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, or active surveillance/watchful waiting within CaPSURE. Patients self-reported work burden and SF36 general health scores via surveys before and 1,3,5, and 10 years after treatment. Using multivariate repeated measures generalized estimating equation modeling we examined the association between primary treatment with risk of any work weeks lost due to care. In total, 6693 men were included. The majority were White (81%, 5% Black, and 14% Other) with CAPRA low- (60%) or intermediate-risk (32%) disease and underwent surgery (62%) compared to 29% radiation and 9% active surveillance. Compared to other treatments, surgical patients were more likely to report greater than 7 days off work in the first year, with relatively less time off over time. Black men (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.54-0.77) and those undergoing radiation (vs. surgery, RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.41-0.51) were less likely to report time off from work over time. Mean baseline GH score (73 [SD 18]) was similar between race and treatment groups, and stable over time. The work burden of cancer care continued up to 10 years after treatment and varied across racial groups and primary treatment groups, highlighting the multifactorial nature of this issue and the call to leverage greater resources for those at greatest risk.

Prostate Cancer–specific and All-cause Mortality After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: 20 Years’ Report from the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group

BackgroundEvidence on long-term oncological efficacy is available only for open radical prostatectomy but remains scarce for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). ObjectiveTo validate the long-term survival rates after RARP and provide stratified outcomes based on contemporary prostate cancer (PCa) risk-stratification tools. Design, setting, and participantsA retrospective analysis of the European Association of Urology (EAU) Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group international multicenter database for RARP was performed. Patients who underwent RARP at seven pioneer robotic urology programs in Europe and the USA between 2002 and 2012 were included. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisThe primary outcomes were PCa-specific mortality and all-cause mortality. The probability of cancer-specific survival (CSS) was estimated with the competing risks method, and the probability of overall survival (OS) was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Results and limitationsA total of 9876 patients who underwent RARP between 2002 and 2012 were included. Within follow-up, 1071 deaths occurred and 159 were due to PCa. At 15 yr of follow-up, CSS and OS were 97.6% (97.2%, 98.0%) and 85.5% (84.6%, 86.4%), respectively. Stratified analyses based on EAU risk groups at diagnosis and pT stage showed favorable survival rates, with low-risk (n = 4601, 46.6%), intermediate-risk (n = 4056, 41.1%), and high-risk (n = 1219, 12.3%) patients demonstrating CSS rates of 99%, 98%, and 90% at 15 yr, respectively. Notably, patients with pT3a disease had similar survival outcomes to those with pT2 disease, with worse CSS in patients with pT3b PCa (98.9% vs 97.4% vs 86.5%). Multivariable analyses identified age, prostate-specific antigen, biopsy Gleason grade group, clinical T stage, and treatment year as independent predictors of worse oncological outcomes. ConclusionsOur multicenter study with long-term follow-up confirms favorable survival outcomes after RARP for localized PCa. Patients with low- and intermediate-risk disease face a higher risk of mortality from causes other than PCa. On the contrary, high-risk patients have a significantly higher risk of PCa-specific mortality. Patient summaryIn the present study, we reported the outcomes of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy between 10 and 20 yr ago, and we found a very low probability of dying from PCa in patients with low- and intermediate-risk PCa.

Phase 1/2 Study of Sorafenib Added to Cladribine, High-Dose Cytarabine, G-CSF, and Mitoxantrone in Untreated AML.

The multikinase inhibitor sorafenib improves event-free survival (EFS) when used with 7+3 in younger adults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) irrespective of FLT3 mutation status. Here, we evaluated adding sorafenib to CLAG-M (cladribine, high-dose cytarabine, G-CSF, mitoxantrone) in a phase 1/2 trial of 81 adults age ≤60 years with newly diagnosed AML or high-grade myeloid neoplasm. Forty-six patients were treated in phase 1 with escalating doses of sorafenib and mitoxantrone. No maximum tolerated dose was reached, and a regimen including mitoxantrone at 18 mg/m2/day and sorafenib 400 mg twice daily was declared the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Among 41 patients treated at the RP2D, a measurable residual disease-negative complete remission (MRDneg CR) rate of 83% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 68-93%) was obtained. Four-week mortality was 2% (95% CI: 0-13%). One-year overall survival (OS) and EFS were 80% (95% CI: 69-94%) and 76% (95% CI 64-90%), without significant difference in MRDneg CR rates, OS, or EFS between patients with or without FLT3-mutated disease. Comparing outcomes with CLAG-M/sorafenib to a matched cohort of 76 patients treated with CLAG-M alone, multivariable adjusted survival estimates were improved for the 41 patients receiving CLAG-M/sorafenib at RP2D (OS: hazard ratio [HR]=0.24 [95% CI: 0.07-0.82], P=0.023; EFS: HR=0.16 [95% CI: 0.05-0.53], P=0.003). Statistically significant benefit was limited to patients with intermediate-risk disease (in univariate analysis, P=0.01 for OS and P=0.02 for EFS). These data suggest CLAG-M/sorafenib is safe and improves OS and EFS relative to CLAG-M alone, with benefit primarily for patients with intermediate-risk disease. The trial is registered on clinicialtrials.gov as NCT02728050.

Efficacy of National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines in Identifying Pathogenic Germline Variants Among Unselected Patients with Prostate Cancer: The PROCLAIM Trial

BackgroundProstate cancer (PCa) patients with pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) in cancer predisposition genes may be eligible for U.S. Food and Drug Administration–approved targeted therapies, clinical trials, or enhanced screening. Studies suggest that eligible patients are missing genetics-informed care due to restrictive testing criteria. ObjectiveTo establish the prevalence of actionable PGVs among prospectively accrued, unselected PCa patients, stratified by their guideline eligibility. Design, setting, and participantsConsecutive, unselected PCa patients were enrolled at 15 sites in the USA from October 2019 to August 2021, and had multigene cancer panel testing. Outcome measurements and statistical analysisCorrelates between the prevalence of PGVs and clinician-reported demographic and clinical characteristics were examined. Results and limitationsAmong 958 patients (median [quartiles] age at diagnosis 65 [60, 71] yr), 627 (65%) had low- or intermediate-risk disease (grade group 1, 2, or 3). A total of 77 PGVs in 17 genes were identified in 74 patients (7.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.2–9.6%). No significant difference was found in the prevalence of PGVs among patients who met the 2019 National Comprehensive Cancer Network Prostate criteria (8.8%, 43/486, 95% CI 6.6–12%) versus those who did not (6.6%, 31/472, 95% CI 4.6–9.2%; odds ratio 1.38, 95% CI 0.85–2.23), indicating that these criteria would miss 42% of patients (31/74, 95% CI 31–53%) with PGVs. The criteria were less effective at predicting PGVs in patients from under-represented populations. Most PGVs (81%, 60/74) were potentially clinically actionable. Limitations include the inability to stratify analyses based on individual ethnicity due to low numbers of non-White patients with PGVs. ConclusionsOur results indicate that almost half of PCa patients with PGVs are missed by current testing guidelines. Comprehensive germline genetic testing should be offered to all patients with PCa. Patient summaryOne in 13 patients with prostate cancer carries an inherited variant that may be actionable for the patient’s current care or prevention of future cancer, and could benefit from expanded testing criteria.

Acute toxicity and quality of life in prostate cancer patients treated with definitive hypofractionated pelvic radiation therapy: a single-center report.

The objective was to report acute toxicity and quality of life in prostate cancer patients treated with definitive hypofractionated pelvic radiation therapy. Patients were designated candidates for hypofractionated pelvic radiation therapy if biopsy or imaging studies evidenced unfavorable intermediate-risk, high-risk or node-positive disease. Patients were treated using a regimen of 44 Gy to the nodal areas and simultaneous integrated boost of 60 Gy to the prostate in 20 fractions with CBCT-based imaging and volumetric arc therapy (VMAT). Patient data was obtained retrospectively; acute gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity was classified per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 and obtained from clinical records. Quality of life was surveyed via phone call using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire QLQ-PR25. 78 patients were treated between May and December 2021. 83.33% of patients had high-risk disease, 16.67% had intermediate-risk disease, and 34.62% patients had node-positive disease. Median follow-up was 10.6 months. No patients presented acute grade >3 GI toxicity, and one patient presented grade 3 GU toxicity. 25.64% patients presented acute G2 GI toxicity and 17.95% patients presented acute G2 GU toxicity. 60.26% of patients responded to the EORTC-PR25 questionnaire. Mean scores for symptom scales were 11.26, 4.96 and 9.57 for Urinary Symptoms, Bowel Symptoms and Hormonal Treatment-Related Symptoms; mean scores for Sexual Activity and Functioning were 19.86 and 31.08, respectively. Definitive hypofractionated pelvic radiation therapy has an acceptable acute toxicity and QoL profile in this series of patients, although longer follow-up is needed to properly evaluate short and long-term toxicity. Further follow-up and patient recruitment is ongoing.

American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy: Executive Summary of Clinical Topics

To conduct an appropriate use criteria expert panel update on clinical topics relevant to current clinical practice regarding postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). An analysis of the medical literature from peer-reviewed journals was conducted from May 4, 2010 to May 4, 2022 using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines to search the PubMed database to retrieve a comprehensive set of relevant articles. A well-established methodology (modified Delphi) was used by the expert panel to rate the appropriate use of procedures. Evidence for key questions in PMRT regarding benefit in special populations and technical considerations for delivery was examined and described. Risk factors for local-regional recurrence in patients with intermediate-risk disease that indicate benefit of PMRT include molecular subtype, age, clinical stage, and pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Use of hypofractionated radiation in PMRT has been examined in several recent randomized trials and is under investigation for patients with breast reconstruction. The use of bolus varies significantly by practice region and has limited evidence for routine use. Adverse effects occurred with both PMRT preimplant and postimplant exchange in 2-staged breast reconstruction. Most patients with even limited nodal involvement will likely benefit from PMRT with significant reduction in local-regional recurrence and potential survival. Patients with initial clinical stage III disease and/or any residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be strongly considered for PMRT. Growing evidence supports the use of hypofractionated radiation for PMRT with equivalent efficacy and decreased acute side effects, but additional evidence is needed for special populations. There is limited evidence to support routine use of bolus in all patients. Timing of PMRT regarding completion of 2-staged breast reconstruction requires a discussion of increased risks with radiation postimplant exchange compared with increased risk of failure of reconstruction or surgical complications with radiation preimplant exchange.

Children's Oncology Group's 2023 blueprint for research: Neuroblastoma.

Neuroblastoma is the most common extra-cranial solid tumor in children and is known for its clinical heterogeneity. A greater understanding of the biology of this disease has led to both improved risk stratification and new approaches to therapy. Outcomes for children with low and intermediate risk disease are excellent overall, and efforts to decrease therapy for such patients have been largely successful. Although survival has improved over time for patients with high-risk disease and treatments evaluated in the relapse setting are now being moved into earlier phases of treatment, much work remains to improve survival and decrease therapy-related toxicities. Studies of highly annotated biobanked samples continue to lead to important insights regarding neuroblastoma biology. Such studies, along with correlative biology studies incorporated into therapeutic trials, are expected to continue to provide insights that lead to new and more effective therapies. A focus on translational science is accompanied by an emphasis on new agent development, optimized risk stratification, and international collaboration to address questions relevant to molecularly defined subsets of patients. In addition, the COG Neuroblastoma Committee is committed to addressing the patient/family experience, mitigating late effects of therapy, and studying social determinants of health in patients with neuroblastoma.

Long-Term Outcomes of a Prospective Study on Highly Hypofractionated Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer for 3 Weeks

Reports of radiation therapy for prostate cancer using dose fractions between moderate hypofractionation and ultrahypofractionation are limited. This pilot study involved the application of highly hypofractionated intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in 15 fractions for 3 weeks and the number of fractions was intermediate between the 2 previously mentioned dose fractions. The long-term outcomes are reported. From April 2014 to September 2015, patients with low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer received 54 Gy in 15 fractions (3.6 Gy per fraction) for 3 weeks using IMRT without intraprostatic fiducial markers or a rectal hydrogel spacer. Neoadjuvant hormone therapy (HT) was administered for 4 to 8 months. Adjuvant HT was not administered to any patients. Rates of biochemical relapse-free survival, clinical relapse-free survival, overall survival, and the cumulative incidence of late grade ≥2 toxicities were analyzed. Twenty-five patients were enrolled in this prospective study; 24 of them were treated with highly hypofractionated IMRT (17% had low-risk and 83% had intermediate-risk disease). The median neoadjuvant HT duration was 5.3 months. The median follow-up period was 77 months (range, 57-87 months). Biochemical relapse-free survival, clinical relapse-free survival, and overall survival rates were 91.7%, 95.8%, and 95.8% at 5 years, and 87.5%, 86.3%, and 95.8% at 7 years, respectively. Neither grade ≥2 late gastrointestinal toxicity nor grade ≥3 late genitourinary toxicity was observed. The cumulative incidence rates of grade 2 genitourinary toxicity were 8.5% and 18.3% at 5 and 7 years, respectively. Highly hypofractionated IMRT delivering 54 Gy in 15 fractions for 3 weeks for prostate cancer without intraprostatic fiducial markers facilitated favorable oncological outcomes without severe complications. This treatment approach may be a possible alternative to moderate hypofractionation, but further validation is needed.

Use of expectant management based on prostate cancer risk and health status: How far are we from a risk-adapted approach?

While active surveillance, a form of expectant management (EM), is preferred for patients with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa), some favor a more risk-adapted approach that recognizes patient preferences and condition-specific factors. However, previous research has shown non-patient-related factors often drive PCa treatment. In this context, we characterized trends in AS with respect to disease risk and health status. Using SEER-Medicare data, we identified men 66 years and older diagnosed with localized low- and intermediate-risk PCa from 2008 to 2017 and examined receipt of EM, defined as the absence of treatment (i.e., surgery, cryotherapy, radiation, chemotherapy, and androgen deprivation therapies) within 1 year of diagnosis. We performed bivariable analysis to compare trends in use for EM vs. treatment, stratified by disease risk (i.e., Gleason 3+3, 3+4, 4+3; PSA<10, 10-20) and health status (i.e., NCI Comorbidity Index (NCI), frailty, life expectancy). We then ran a multivariable logistic regression model to examine determinants of EM. Within this cohort, 26,364 (38%) were categorized as low-risk (i.e., Gleason 3+3 and PSA<10) and 43,520 (62%) as intermediate-risk (i.e., all others). Over the study period, use of EM significantly increased across all risk groups, except for Gleason 4+3 (P = 0.662), as well across all health status groups. However, linear trends did not differ significantly between frail vs. nonfrail patients for both those categorized as low-risk (P = 0.446) and intermediate-risk (P = 0.208). Trends also did not differ between NCI 0 vs. 1 vs. >1 for low-risk PCa (P = 0.395). In the multivariable models, EM was associated with increasing age and being frail for men with both low- and intermediate risk disease. Conversely, EM selection was negatively associated with higher comorbidity score. EM increased significantly over time for patients with low- and favorable intermediate-risk disease, with the most notable differences based on age and Gleason score. In contrast, trends in uptake of EM did not differ substantively by health status, suggesting that physicians may not be effectively incorporating patient health into PCa treatment decisions. Additional work is needed to develop interventions that recognize health status as an essential component of a risk-adapted approach.

Socio-economic, education, and insurance-related factors associated with the treatment completion rates in patients with nonmetastatic urinary bladder cancer: A Retrospective cohort study.

Among urological malignancies, the diagnosis and treatment of urinary bladder cancer (UBC) incurs the highest cost per patient. Our objective was to broaden the current understanding of how demographic, socioeconomic, education, and insurance-related factors influence UBC management. Between January 2017 and December 2019, all patients with nonmetastatic bladder cancer were included. The demographic, treatment, and follow-up details were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database, and the Modified Kuppuswamy Index was used to evaluate the patients' socioeconomic level. Patients were divided into the completed treatment group, or the incomplete treatment group based on adherence to the initially intended treatment plan. Patients who presented with benign disease or metastases were not included. Eighty-nine patients did not complete the initially intended course of treatment out of 132 patients who needed additional management after the initial transurethral resection. Comparable risk factors and demographic profiles existed in both groups. Patients with intermediate-risk disease are more likely to fail to adhere to the initial intended treatment (odds ratio [OR] = 0.09; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.02-0.30). On logistic regression analysis, upper socioeconomic status (OR = 6.8; 95% CI: 0.35-132.1) patients and patients with higher educational status of graduation or above (OR = 3.62; 95% CI: 0.75-17.43) had higher chances of treatment completion. Education status significantly impacted treatment completion on multivariate analysis (P = 0.01). Patients who utilized employer-funded insurance had better treatment compliance (OR = 4.1; 95% CI: 0.90-18.7). The compliance was unaffected by smoking, occupation, or other demographic factors. Patients with low economic status, low levels of education, and who need adjuvant intravesical therapy had considerably greater treatment dropout rates.

Current evidence for moderate and ultra-hypofractionated radiation therapy in prostate cancer: a summary of the results from phase 3 randomised trials.

A low α/β ratio for prostate cancer (PCa) compared to surrounding normal tissue theoretically implies therapeutical advantages with hypofractionated treatment. Data from large randomised control trials (RCTs) comparing moderate hypofractionated (MHRT, 2.4-3.4 Gray/fraction (Gy/fx)) and ultra-hypofractionated (UHRT, >5 Gy/fx) with conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (CFRT, 1.8-2 Gy/fx) and the possible clinical implications have been reviewed. We searched PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus for RCT comparing MHRT/UHRT with CFRT treatment of locally and/or locally advanced (N0M0) PCa. We found six RCTs, which compared different radiation therapy regimes. Tumour control and acute and late toxicities are reported. MHRT was non-inferior to CFRT for intermediate-risk PCa, non-inferior for low-risk PCa and not superior in terms of tumour control for high-risk PCa. Acute toxicity rates were increased compared to CFRT, especially an increase in acute gastrointestinal adverse effects was seen. Late toxicity related to MHRT seems to be comparable. UHRT was non-inferior in terms of tumour control in one RCT, with increased acute toxicity, but with comparable late toxicity. One trial, however, indicated increased late toxicity rates with UHRT. MHRT delivers similar therapeutic outcomes compared to CFRT in terms of tumour control and late toxicity for intermediate-risk PCa patients. Slightly more acute transient toxicity could be tolerated in favour of a shorter treatment course. UHRT should be regarded as an optional treatment for patients with low- and intermediate-risk disease applied at experienced centres in concordance with international and national guidelines.

Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With a Focal Simultaneous Integrated Boost: 5-Year Toxicity and Biochemical Recurrence Results From a Prospective Trial

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is increasingly used as a definitive treatment option for patients with prostate adenocarcinoma. The aim of this study was to assess the late toxicity, patient-reported quality of life outcomes, and biochemical recurrence rates after prostate SBRT with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) targeting lesions defined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients were eligible if they had biopsy-proven low- or intermediate-risk prostate adenocarcinoma, one or more focal lesions on MRI, and an MRI-defined total prostate volume of <120 mL. All patients received SBRT delivered to the entire prostate to a dose of 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions with an SIB to the lesions seen on MRI to 40 Gy in 5 fractions. Late toxicity was defined as any possible treatment-related adverse event occurring after 3 months from the completion of SBRT. Patient-reported quality of life was ascertained using standardized patient surveys. A total of 26 patients were enrolled. Six patients (23.1%) had low-risk disease and 20 patients had intermediate-risk disease (76.9%). Seven patients (26.9%) received androgen deprivation therapy. Median follow-up was 59.5 months. No biochemical failures were observed. Three patients (11.5%) experienced late grade 2 genitourinary (GU) toxicity requiring cystoscopy, and 7 patients (26.9%) had late grade 2 GU toxicity requiring oral medications. Three patients (11.5%) had late grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity characterized by hematochezia requiring colonoscopy and steroids per rectum. There were no grade 3 or higher toxicity events observed. The patient-reported quality-of-life metrics at the time of last follow-up were not significantly different than the pre-treatment baseline. The results of this study support that SBRT to the entire prostate to a dose of 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions with focal SIB to 40 Gy in 5 fractions has excellent biochemical control and is not associated with undue late gastrointestinal or GU toxicity or long-term quality of life decrement. Focal dose escalation with an SIB planning approach may be an opportunity to improve biochemical control while limiting dose to nearby organs at risk.

UCHMC 1812: A phase 1b trial of CPX-351 plus gemtuzumab ozogamicin for relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

7024 Background: Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) is effective in favorable-risk acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), while its activity is limited in higher-risk AML in part due to multi-drug resistance (MDR) mechanisms, particularly P-glycoprotein efflux pumps. CPX-351 provides a survival benefit in secondary AML, a disease characterized by high MDR activity. The objective of this trial is to utilize CPX-351 as a bulk cytoreduction agent, to first reduce the high MDR leukemia clones, followed by sequential treatment with GO in a more favorable leukemia environment. Methods: This was a multicenter phase Ib trial of CPX-351 plus GO in relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML patients with standard 3+3 dose escalation design (NCT03904251). Cohort A was treated with CPX-351 100 u/m2 on days 1, 3, and 5 plus GO 3 mg/m2 (max 4.5 mg) on day 7. Cohort B was treated with the same regimen plus an additional dose of GO 3 mg/m2 on day 4. The primary endpoint was the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), defined as &lt; 2 dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) in the highest dose cohort. Secondary endpoints were IWG complete remission (CR) rate at day 28-42, liver veno-occlusive disease (VOD) rate diagnosed by the Baltimore criteria, and time of hematologic recovery (defined as ANC &gt; 1000/uL and platelet count &gt; 100,000/uL). Patients were enrolled at 4 University of California Hematologic Malignancies Consortium (UCHMC) centers: UC Los Angeles, UC San Francisco, UC Davis, and UC Irvine. Results: Thirteen participants were enrolled. The median age was 63 years (range 29-75). Eleven had relapsed disease, and two had refractory disease. Most received one prior line of therapy (n = 9). Seven had ELN 2022 adverse-risk disease at initial diagnosis, and two had intermediate-risk disease. The MTD was not reached. DLTs were observed in 1/6 participants in cohort A (grade 3 rash), and 1/6 participants in cohort B (grade 5 intracranial hemorrhage in the setting of severe thrombocytopenia). There were no cases of liver VOD. Of 12 evaluable participants, 4 achieved CR (33%), of whom 3 were negative for measurable residual disease by multiparametric flow cytometry, and 1 one achieved partial remission. The median age of responders was 30 years (range 28-65). The median time to return of normal hematopoiesis in those who achieved remission was 37 days (range 36-43). Three participants received allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) following investigational therapy: one remains in remission 34 months post-transplant, one died of infectious complications shortly after alloHCT, and one relapsed at day +60. Conclusions: CPX-351 plus two doses of GO 3 mg/m2 is a feasible treatment with acceptable toxicity and reasonable marrow recovery kinetics. However, only three participants went on to curative alloHCT. Further evaluation for efficacy in a larger patient population is needed to determine the utility of this regimen in R/R AML. Clinical trial information: NCT03904251 .

Treatment phase stratified outcomes of core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia.

e19055 Background: Mutations in core binding factor (CBF) are associated with a favorable prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, between 30-40% of patients with CBF-AML relapse, and relative outcomes with each subsequent line of therapy remain unclear. Additionally, the overall survival of CBF-AML compared to other favorable risk molecular aberrations — such as NPM1mut and CEBPA — is unknown in light of the addition of monoallelic CEBPA in ELN 2022. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to clarify the outcomes of CBF-AML relative to other favorable risk aberrations and to determine the relative overall survival associated with each subsequent relapse. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 46 consecutive patients with CBF-AML treated from January 2013 to January 2022 at VCU Massey Cancer Center that underwent intensive chemotherapy (IC) with or without gemtuzumab ozogamicin. During the same study period, we analyzed a comparison cohort of 272 consecutive patients: 103 ELN 2017 intermediate-risk patients, 111 adverse-risk patients, eight patients with mono- or biallelic mutations in CEBPA, and 50 with ELN 2017 favorable-risk NPM1mut. All patients were treated with front-line IC. We analyzed survival by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared groups with the log-rank test. Results: We analyzed 46 patients with CBF-AML across 136 treatment phases. Patients with CBF-AML had superior overall survival compared to patients with NPM1mut (median overall survival not reached at a median follow-up time of 5.0 years versus 21.0 m., p = 0.028). There were no differences in survival between CBF-AML and AML with monoallelic or biallelic mutations in CEBPA at a median follow-up time of 3.7 years (not reached, p = 0.976). Expectedly, the overall survival for CBF-AML was superior to ELN 2017 intermediate (30.1 m., p = 0.011) and adverse (10.9 m., p &lt; 0.0001) risk disease. Next, we analyzed survival trends in the relapsed or refractory setting for CBF-AML by lines of therapy, using ELN 2017 intermediate and adverse risk cohorts as a comparison. During the first relapse, CBF-AML was associated with a significantly superior overall survival compared to the adverse cohort (19.1 m. versus 10.0 m., p = 0.024) but not the intermediate cohort (14.5 m., p = 0.734). The absence of KITmut was not associated with improved survival compared to the ELN 2017 intermediate category at the first relapse ( p = 0.610). At the second relapse, the survival disparity disappeared between the CBF-AML and adverse risk groups (7.7 m. vs 4.0 m., p = 0.964). Conclusions: CBF-AML was associated with similar survival to mono- or biallelic mutations in CEBPA, and significantly prolonged overall survival compared to NPM1mut. Relative to a matched cohort of adverse-risk AML at the time of the first relapse, outcomes of relapsed CBF-AML remain favorable. The relative overall survival benefit of CBF-AML disappeared at the time of the second relapse.

Genomic Classifier Performance in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Results From NRG Oncology/RTOG 0126 Randomized Phase 3 Trial

Intermediate-risk prostate cancer is a heterogeneous disease state with diverse treatment options. The 22-gene Decipher genomic classifier (GC) retrospectively has shown to improve risk stratification in these patients. We assessed the performance of the GC in men with intermediate-risk disease enrolled in NRG Oncology/RTOG 01-26 with updated follow-up. After National Cancer Institute approval, biopsy slides were collected from NRG Oncology/RTOG 01-26, a randomized phase 3 trial of men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer randomized to 70.2 Gy versus 79.2 Gy of radiation therapy without androgen deprivation therapy. RNA was extracted from the highest-grade tumor foci to generate the locked 22-gene GC model. The primary endpoint for this ancillary project was disease progression (composite of biochemical failure, local failure, distant metastasis, prostate cancer-specific mortality, and use of salvage therapy). Individual endpoints were also assessed. Fine-Gray or cause-specific Cox multivariable models were constructed adjusting for randomization arm and trial stratification factors. Two-hundred fifteen patient samples passed quality control for analysis. The median follow-up was 12.8 years (range, 2.4-17.7). On multivariable analysis, the 22-gene GC (per 0.1 unit) was independently prognostic for disease progression (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.26; P=.04), biochemical failure (sHR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.10-1.37; P < .001), distant metastasis (sHR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.06-1.55; P=.01), and prostate cancer-specific mortality (sHR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.20-1.76; P < .001). Ten-year distant metastasis in GC low-risk patients was 4% compared with 16% for GC high-risk patients. In patients with lower GC scores, the 10-year difference in metastasis-free survival rate between arms was -7%, compared with 21% for higher GC patients (P-interaction=.04). This study represents the first validation of a biopsy-based gene expression classifier, assessing both its prognostic and predictive value, using data from a randomized phase 3 trial of intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Decipher improves risk stratification and can aid in treatment decision-making in men with intermediate-risk disease.

The impact of the apparent diffusion coefficient for the early prediction of the treatment response after definitive radiotherapy in prostate cancer patients

PurposeWe assessed early changes in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) values after definitive radiotherapy (RT) without androgen deprivation treatment in low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PC) patients. Materials and MethodsThe clinical data and ADC parameters of 229 PC patients were retrospectively evaluated. Pre-treatment and post-treatment serum PSA and primary tumor ADC values were calculated. Post-treatment DW-MRI was performed median 4.1 months after completion of definitive RT. The prognostic factors predicting freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using univariable and multivariable analyses. ResultsWith a median follow-up time of 80.8 months, the 5-year FFBF and PFS rates were 95.9% and 89.3%, respectively. Eleven patients (4.8%) had PSA relapse, with a median of 34.4 months after the completion of RT. A statistically significant difference in post-treatment ADC values was noted between patients with and without recurrence (0.94 ± 0.07 vs. 1.10 ± 0.20 × 10-3 mm2/sec; p< 0.001). Patients with a Gleason score (GS) of 6 and low-risk disease had significantly higher post-treatment tumor ADC and PSA levels than patients with a GS of 7 and intermediate-risk disease. The 5-year FFBF rate in patients with tumor ADC ≤ 0.96 × 10-3 mm2/sec was significantly lower than patients with tumor ADC > 0.96 × 10-3 mm2/sec (85.5% vs. 100; p< 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, a lower ADC value, GS 4 + 3 and intermediate-risk disease were independent predictors of worse FFBF. In the multivariate analysis, a lower post-treatment ADC value and a GS of 4 + 3 were significant prognostic factors for a lower PFS. ConclusionThese findings suggest that the post-treatment tumor ADC value could be used for early treatment response evaluation after definitive RT in PC patients.

A DNA copy number alteration classifier as a prognostic tool for prostate cancer patients.

Distinguishing between true indolent and potentially life-threatening prostate cancer is challenging in tumours displaying clinicopathologic features associated with low or intermediate risk of relapse. Several somatic DNA copy number alterations (CNAs) have been identified as potential prognostic biomarkers, but the standard cytogenetic method to assess them has a limited multiplexing capability. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) targeting 14 genes was optimised to survey 448 tumours of patients with low or intermediaterisk (Grade Group 1-3, Gleason score ≤7) who underwent radical prostatectomy. A 6-gene CNA classifier was developed using random survival forest and Cox proportional hazard modelling to predict biochemical recurrence. The classifier score was significantly associated with biochemical recurrence after adjusting for standard clinicopathologic variables and the known prognostic index CAPRA-S score with a hazard ratio of 2.17 and 1.80, respectively (n = 406, P < 0.01). The prognostic value of this classifier was externally validated in published CNA data from three radical prostatectomy cohorts and one radiation therapy pre-treatment biopsy cohort. The 6-gene CNA classifier generated by a single MLPA assay compatible with the small quantities of DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue specimens has the potential to improve the clinical management of patients with low or intermediaterisk disease.

Evaluation of Outcomes Following Focal Ablative Therapy for Treatment of Localized Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Patients >70 Years: A Multi-institute, Multi-energy 15-Year Experience.

In older patients who do not wish to undergo watchful waiting, focal therapy could be an alternative to the more morbid radical treatment. We evaluated the role of focal therapy in patients 70 years and older as an alternative management modality. A total of 649 patients across 11 UK sites receiving focal high-intensity focused ultrasound or cryotherapy between June 2006 and July 2020 reported within the UK-based HEAT (HIFU Evaluation and Assessment of Treatment) and ICE (International Cryotherapy Evaluation) registries were evaluated. Primary outcome was failure-free survival, defined by need for more than 1 focal reablation, progression to radical treatment, development of metastases, need for systemic treatment, or prostate cancer-specific death. This was compared to the failure-free survival in patients undergoing radical treatment via a propensity score weighted analysis. Median age was 74 years (IQR: 72, 77) and median follow-up 24 months (IQR: 12, 41). Sixty percent had intermediate-risk disease and 35% high-risk disease. A total of 113 patients (17%) required further treatment. Sixteen had radical treatment and 44 required systemic treatment. Failure-free survival was 82% (95% CI: 76%-87%) at 5 years. Comparing patients who had radical therapy to those who had focal therapy, 5-year failure-free survival was 96% (95% CI: 93%-100%) and 82% (95% CI: 75%-91%) respectively (P < .001). Ninety-three percent of those in the radical treatment arm had received radiotherapy as their primary treatment with its associated use of androgen deprivation therapy, thereby leading to potential overestimation of treatment success in the radical treatment arm, especially given the similar metastases-free and overall survival rates seen. We propose focal therapy to be an effective management option for the older or comorbid patient who is unsuitable for or not willing to undergo radical treatment.

Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: Past, Current, and Future Trends.

In response to the rising incidence of indolent, low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) due to increased prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening in the 1990s, active surveillance (AS) emerged as a treatment modality to combat overtreatment by delaying or avoiding unnecessary definitive treatment and its associated morbidity. AS consists of regular monitoring of PSA levels, digital rectal exams, medical imaging, and prostate biopsies, so that definitive treatment is only offered when deemed necessary. This paper provides a narrative review of the evolution of AS since its inception and an overview of its current landscape and challenges. Although AS was initially only performed in a study setting, numerous studies have provided evidence for the safety and efficacy of AS which has led guidelines to recommend it as a treatment option for patients with low-risk PCa. For intermediate-risk disease, AS appears to be a viable option for those with favourable clinical characteristics. Over the years, the inclusion criteria, follow-up schedule and triggers for definitive treatment have evolved based on the results of various large AS cohorts. Given the burdensome nature of repeat biopsies, risk-based dynamic monitoring may further reduce overtreatment by avoiding repeat biopsies in selected patients.