Interlaboratory Study Research Articles

Quantitative comparison of immunohistochemical HER2-low detection in an interlaboratory study.

Recently, human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-low (i.e. HER2 score 1+ or 2+ without amplification) breast cancer patients became eligible for trastuzumab-deruxtecan treatment. To improve assay standardisation and detection of HER2-low in a quantitative manner, we conducted an external quality assessment-like study in the Netherlands. Dynamic range cell lines and immunohistochemistry (IHC) calibrators were used to quantify HER2 expression and to assess interlaboratory variability. Three blank slides with a dynamic range cell line and an IHC calibrator were stained with routine HER2 assays by 35 laboratories. Four different antibody clones were used: 19 (54.3%) 4B5, six (17.1%) A0485, five (14.3%) DG44 (HercepTest) and five (14.3%) SP3. Laboratories used two different detection kits for 4B5 assays: 14 (73.7%) ultraView and five (26.3%) OptiView. Variability of HER2 expression in cell lines, measured with artificial intelligence software, was median (min-max) = negative core 0.5% (0.0-57.0), 1+ core 4.3% (1.6-71.3), 2+ core 42.8% (30.4-92.6) and 3+ core 96.2% (91.8-98.8). The calibrators DG44 and 4B5 OptiView had the highest analytical sensitivity, closely followed by 4B5 ultraView. SP3 was the least sensitive. Calibrators of A0485 assays were not analysable due to background staining. As assays were validated for detecting HER2-amplified tumours, not all assays and antibodies proved suitable for HER2-low detection. Some tests showed distinct expression in the negative cell line. Dynamic range cell line controls and quantitative analysis using calibrators demonstrated more interlaboratory variability than commonly appreciated. Revalidation of HER2 tests by laboratories is needed to ensure clinical applicable HER2-low assays.

Determination of S, Ni, Cu in copper-nickel sulfide ores by total reflection X-ray fluorescence analysis: experience of participation in the interlaboratory comparisons

The quality of the determination of S, Ni, Cu in copper-nickel sulfide ores was assessed in the framework of the program for interlaboratory comparative tests (ICT) using total reflection X-ray fluorescence analysis (TXRF) taking into account the criteria for methods for determining the chemical composition of mineral raw materials. Certified TXRF techniques for the analysis of mineral materials are absent, so the interlaboratory comparison test was used to control and improve the accuracy of measurements by TXRF. Powdered ore samples were prepared as suspensions by wet grinding: 100 mg of the powder, 4 ml of ultra-pure water and 250 μl of the Ga standard solution were milled using 20 g of ZrO2 balls 1 mm in diameter in the mixing mill for 10 minutes at a frequency of 20 Hz. The ratio of the intensities of the characteristic lines of the analyzed elements and the Ga internal standard was chosen as an analytical signal. To plot calibration curves, a set of ore reference samples was analyzed using certified procedures (atomic absorption spectrometry for Cu, Ni, gravimetry for S). The quality of the TXRF analysis was assessed by the value of Z-criterion. The measurement error did not exceed 5 rel. %. The relative percentage differences between the TXRF results and the results obtained in the interlaboratory study was less than 10%. The described method can be used for rapid analysis of copper-nickel sulfide ores.

Quantifying the uncertainties in thermal–optical analysis of carbonaceous aircraft engine emissions: an interlaboratory study

Quantifying the uncertainties in thermal–optical analysis of carbonaceous aircraft engine emissions: an interlaboratory study

Validated methane adsorption isotherms up to 7.5 MPa on a reference Na-Y zeolite at near ambient temperatures

Reference gas adsorption isotherms are useful for validating equilibrium data obtained from various techniques and for ensuring that experimental systems are operating correctly. In this work, we extend an interlaboratory study on a NIST reference zeolite (Na-Y, RM8850) to two additional temperatures above and below the original 298.15 K, validating the results via independent measurements using two different techniques. Volumetric experiments on a novel Adsorption Differential Volumetric Apparatus (ADVA-270) were carried out at The University of Edinburgh, and gravimetric experiments were performed at Hiden Isochema using a proprietary XEMIS microbalance. Both techniques provided highly accurate results and an excellent match between the two independent measurements using less than 150 mg of sample. Absolute equilibrium data were modelled using a Langmuir-virial isotherm to obtain an accurate concentration dependence of the heat of adsorption.

The two-cavity method for characterizing acoustical materials-an interlaboratory study

The study focuses on understanding the sound absorption and transmission characteristics of porous acoustical materials, which are determined by two key parameters independent of material thickness: characteristic impedance and propagation constant. These parameters can be characterized by testing a porous sample concept in a normal incidence impedance tube using either the two-thickness or the two-cavity method. In the two-thickness method, two samples of varying thicknesses are required. In contrast, the two-cavity method requires testing one sample at two air cavity depths. This method is particularly advantageous for materials that are costly or challenging to fabricate. This interlaboratory study evaluates the variability of characteristic properties determined using the two-cavity method. Porous acoustical materials were additively manufactured and tested in the Liner Technology Facility at NASA Langley Research Center and the Mechanics, Acoustics and Dynamics Lab (MADLab) at Michigan Technological University. The characteristic properties, derived from various cavity depth combinations, were used to predict the sound absorption curves of the sample with a rigid backing. These predictions were then compared with actual experimental absorption curves. The findings indicate that both the combinations of cavity depths and the sample's static airflow resistivity significantly influence the accuracy of the deduced properties.

A Study on Distribution of Characteristics of Microplastic in the Han-River Watershed

Microplastic pollution in the marine environment is a global issue. Recently, in South Korea, there has been active research on the establishment of testing methods and investigation of distribution characteristics of microplastics not only in marine environments but also in freshwater systems. In particular, it is necessary to study the distribution of microplastics such as rivers and lakes, which are drinking water sources, to affect the water quality environment, management, and countermeasures. This study identified the distribution of microplastics in the mainstream and tributary of the Han River water system. The freshwater, sediment, and biological species samples were pre-treated accordingly, and microplastics larger than 20 µm were analyzed using μ-FT-IR. As a result of the inter-laboratory study, in the same way as in this study, it was possible to confirm that the trusted recovery rate was 63.6%. The survey results indicated that the number of microplastics per location ranged from 1,173 to 8,940 particles/L in freshwater samples, 3,800 to 192,000 particles/kg in sediment samples, and 34 to 384 particles/individual in fish samples. The most commonly found microplastic materials were PP, PE, and PTFE. The size distribution of plastics appeared in the following order: 45~100 µm, 100~300 µm, 20~45 µm, and greater than 300 µm, with predominantly fragmented shapes observed.

Cohort-based strategies as an in-house tool to evaluate and improve phenotyping robustness of LC–MS/MS lipidomics platforms

In recent years, instrumental improvements have enabled the spread of mass spectrometry–based lipidomics platforms in biomedical research. In mass spectrometry, the reliability of generated data varies for each compound, contingent on, among other factors, the availability of labeled internal standards. It is challenging to evaluate the data for lipids without specific labeled internal standards, especially when dozens to hundreds of lipids are measured simultaneously. Thus, evaluation of the performance of these platforms at the individual lipid level in interlaboratory studies is generally not feasible in a time-effective manner. Herein, using a focused subset of sphingolipids, we present an in-house validation methodology for individual lipid reliability assessment, tailored to the statistical analysis to be applied. Moreover, this approach enables the evaluation of various methodological aspects, including discerning coelutions sharing identical selected reaction monitoring transitions, pinpointing optimal labeled internal standards and their concentrations, and evaluating different extraction techniques. While the full validation according to analytical guidelines for all lipids included in a lipidomics method is currently not possible, this process shows areas to focus on for subsequent method development iterations as well as the robustness of data generated across diverse methodologies.Graphical abstract

Qualitative detection of E. coli in distributed drinking water using real-time reverse transcription PCR targeting 16S rRNA: Validation and practical experiences

Escherichia coli (E. coli) plays a central role as an indicator for fecal contamination to predict the possible presence of microbial pathogens in drinking water. Current detection methods for E. coli are based on time-consuming culture-based techniques. There is a strong need for methods to detect fecal contamination rapidly in distributed drinking water to prevent outbreaks of waterborne disease and support water utilities to efficiently manage their operations like actions to repair or maintain distribution pipes, to minimize impact on consumers. This study describes the validation and application of a qualitative real time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) method targeting 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) for rapid detection of E. coli in distributed drinking water. The RT-PCR assay targets 16S rRNA, a highly abundant RNA in viable cells, enabling robust detection at the required sensitivity of 1 CFU/100 ml. The validation was performed by comparing the RT-PCR method with the culture-based chromogenic reference method (CCA) using the protocol and criteria described in ISO 16,140–2:2016. The validation demonstrated that this RT-PCR method can be used to specifically detect E. coli in a broad range of drinking water samples with at least the same limit of detection as the culture method (Relative Limit Of Detection = 0.75, range 0.43–1.43). The inclusivity study showed that the RT-PCR method was able to detect a broad range of E. coli strains derived from different sources and geographic areas, including pathogenic serotype O157 strains that are not detected with the culture method. The exclusivity study determined that other bacterial genera are not detected with this RT-PCR. However, Escherichia fergusonii was detected and, based on “in silico” analysis, it is expected that also E. albertii and E. marmotae and Shigella species will be detectable using this RT-PCR. An interlaboratory study confirmed that the RT-PCR and culture method have comparable sensitivities when tested by different participants at different laboratories. The application of RT-PCR to confirm the hygienic quality of distributed drinking water after actions to repair or maintain distribution pipes was compared with the culture method on 8076 routine samples, analyzed by the drinking water laboratories in the Netherlands. This comparison study showed a 96.4 % agreement between RT-PCR and culture. In 3.3 % of the samples E. coli was detected with RT-PCR and not with the culture method and in 0.1 % of the samples E. coli was only detected by culture confirming either a higher sensitivity for RT-PCR or the detection of RNA from uncultivable cells. Finally, the application of RT-PCR was highlighted during a contamination event in Belgium where we demonstrate the potency of RT-PCR as a tool to rapidly monitor the spread of microbial contamination and to monitor the effect of measures to remove the contamination This is the first fully validated rapid nucleic based method for detection of E. coli in distributed drinking water. These results demonstrate that this RT-PCR method can be used as a rapid alternative to the culture method to monitor E. coli in distributed drinking water. However, it should be emphasized that nucleic acid based detection methods rely on highly different detection principles (detection of captured nucleic acids present in a sample) than culture base methods (presence of cells cultivable on a selective medium) resulting in occasional different analysis results. Varying treatment and disinfection steps (UV, chlorine, monochloramine, Ozone) or environmental factors (decay) can influence the results and cause differences between RT-PCR and culture methods.

Interlaboratory study on real-time PCR detection and quantification of the European anglerfish, pike, and seabream parvalbumin gene

This study presents a large-scale interlaboratory comparison (ILC) aimed at detecting and quantifying DNA from two European anglerfish (Lophius budegassa, Lophius piscatorius), pike (Esox lucius) and sea bream (Spondyliosoma cantharus) using real-time qPCR. To detect amplification of the parvalbumin genetic marker, single and multiplex qPCR assays using EvaGreen® dye or TaqMan™ probes were used. Genomic DNA isolated from target fish species and an advanced DNA calibrator, gBlocks® gene fragments, were used as standards. The DNA of anglerfish, pike and sea bream as well as their mixtures were analysed together with 14 other non-target fish species. All target fish samples were correctly identified by the participating laboratories. Qualitative assessment of anglerfish and seabream DNA showed an accuracy rate of 100%, while pike DNA achieved a match rate of 99%. Validation of quantitative protocols in four different laboratories consistently achieved z-scores below 2, indicating satisfactory performance and confirming the high degree of similarity of laboratory results. Furthermore, high accuracy and efficiency were demonstrated for the quantification of anglerfish and seabream DNA by triplex qPCR using TaqMan™ probes. Regarding the selected gene marker, the major fish allergenic protein parvalbumin enables indirect detection and quantification of the allergen in the sample. Therefore, the use of proposed protocols can significantly contribute to protecting the health of consumers and to controlling the food market.Graphical abstract

Characterization of transfusion-relevant bacteria reference strains in a lyophilized format.

Blood safety measures used by blood establishments to increase blood component safety can be validated using Transfusion-Relevant Bacterial Reference Strains (TRBRS). Ultra-cold storage conditions and manual preparation of the current TRBRS may restrict their practical use. To address this issue, the ISBT Transfusion-Transmitted Infectious Diseases Working Party's Bacterial Subgroup organized an international study to validate TRBRS in a user-friendly, lyophilised format. Two bacterial strains Klebsiella pneumoniae PEI-B-P-08 and Staphylococcus aureus PEI-B-P-63 were manufactured as lyophilised material. The lyophilised bacteria were distributed to 11 different labs worldwide to assess the robustness for enumeration, identification and determination of growth kinetics in platelet concentrates (PCs). Production of lyophilised TRBRS had no impact on the growth properties compared with the traditional format. The new format allows a direct low-quantity spiking of approximately 30 bacteria in PCs for transfusion-relevant experiments. In addition, the lyophilised bacteria exhibit long-term stability across a broad temperature range and can even be directly rehydrated in PCs without losing viability. Interlaboratory comparative study demonstrated the robustness of the new format as 100% of spiked PC exhibited growth. Lyophilised TRBRS provide a user-friendly material for transfusion-related studies. TRBRS in the new format have improved features that may lead to a more frequent use in the quality control of transfusion-related safety measures in the future.

An interlaboratory study for assessing repeatability and reproducibility of the data generated by rotating drum powder rheometers (Part 1: Granudrum)

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) organized an interlaboratory study to assess the repeatability and reproducibility of the data generated by two commercially available rotating drum powder rheometers namely, Granudrum and Revolution Powder Analyzer. Part 1 of this interlaboratory study focuses on the Granudrum rheometer. In total, thirteen laboratories comprised of industry, academia, and a national laboratory participated in this study. A nickel-based alloy, a titanium alloy, and a stainless-steel alloy in powder forms were tested, and an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model was used to rank the contributions of the study factors to the observed variability in the data. First, a maximum of five study factors were considered: material, sample, rotation speed, test, and participant (lab), which provides the ability to assess interactions, such as between lab and rotation speed and lab and material. The ANOVA results indicate that the ‘Flow Angle’ data showed 6% of its variation attributable to repeatability and 5% to reproducibility, whereas the ‘Cohesive Index’ data showed 21% of its variation attributable to repeatability and 17% to reproducibility. Next, because using the different rotation speeds and materials can add significant variability to the overall data, we also present separate ANOVA results for each combination of rotation speed and material. These results provide further insight into the repeatability and reproducibility of the Granudrum-generated data.

Variability and bias in microbiome metagenomic sequencing: an interlaboratory study comparing experimental protocols.

Several studies have documented the significant impact of methodological choices in microbiome analyses. The myriad of methodological options available complicate the replication of results and generally limit the comparability of findings between independent studies that use differing techniques and measurement pipelines. Here we describe the Mosaic Standards Challenge (MSC), an international interlaboratory study designed to assess the impact of methodological variables on the results. The MSC did not prescribe methods but rather asked participating labs to analyze 7 shared reference samples (5 × human stool samples and 2 × mock communities) using their standard laboratory methods. To capture the array of methodological variables, each participating lab completed a metadata reporting sheet that included 100 different questions regarding the details of their protocol. The goal of this study was to survey the methodological landscape for microbiome metagenomic sequencing (MGS) analyses and the impact of methodological decisions on metagenomic sequencing results. A total of 44 labs participated in the MSC by submitting results (16S or WGS) along with accompanying metadata; thirty 16S rRNA gene amplicon datasets and 14 WGS datasets were collected. The inclusion of two types of reference materials (human stool and mock communities) enabled analysis of both MGS measurement variability between different protocols using the biologically-relevant stool samples, and MGS bias with respect to ground truth values using the DNA mixtures. Owing to the compositional nature of MGS measurements, analyses were conducted on the ratio of Firmicutes: Bacteroidetes allowing us to directly apply common statistical methods. The resulting analysis demonstrated that protocol choices have significant effects, including both bias of the MGS measurement associated with a particular methodological choices, as well as effects on measurement robustness as observed through the spread of results between labs making similar methodological choices. In the analysis of the DNA mock communities, MGS measurement bias was observed even when there was general consensus among the participating laboratories. This study was the result of a collaborative effort that included academic, commercial, and government labs. In addition to highlighting the impact of different methodological decisions on MGS result comparability, this work also provides insights for consideration in future microbiome measurement study design.

One-instrument, objective microsatellite instability analysis using high-resolution melt.

In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors have proved immense clinical progression in the treatment of certain cancers. The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors is correlated with mismatch repair system deficiency and is exceptionally administered based exclusively on this biological mechanism independent of the cancer type. The promising effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors has left an increasing demand for analytical tools evaluating the mismatch repair status. The analysis of microsatellite instability (MSI), reflecting an indirect but objective manner the inactivation of the mismatch repair system, plays several roles in clinical practice and, therefore, its evaluation is of high relevance. Analysis of MSI by PCR followed by fragment analysis on capillary electrophoresis remains the gold standard method for detection of a deficient mismatch repair system and thereby treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Novel technologies have been applied and concepts such as tumor mutation burden have been introduced. However, to date, most of these technologies require high costs or the need of matched non-tumor tissue as internal comparator. In this study, we present a novel, one-instrument, fast, and objective method for the detection of MSI (MicroSight® MSI 1-step HRM Analysis), which does not depend on the use of matched non-tumor tissue. The assay analyzes five well-described mononucleotide microsatellite sequences by real-time PCR followed by high-resolution melt and evaluates microsatellite length variations via PCR product melting profiles. The assay was evaluated using two different patient cohorts and evaluation included several DNA extraction methodologies, two different PCR platforms, and an inter-laboratory ring study. The MicroSight® MSI assay showed a high repeatability regardless of DNA extraction method and PCR platform, and a 100% agreement of the MSI status with PCR fragment analysis methods applied as clinical comparator.

Verification of the presence of superabsorbent polymers (SAP) in fresh concrete: results of an interlaboratory study of RILEM TC 260-RSC

New methods are proposed for the verification of the presence of superabsorbent polymers (SAP) in freshly mixed concrete and estimation of SAP quantity. The methods are in general based on flushing concrete with excess water. They allow separating the light, water-sorbed hydrogel particles from the mineral components in the fresh concrete and making these particles available for further tests. Two types of tests are proposed: Test 1 serves for a visual verification of the presence of SAP (qualitative test), while Test 2 enables quantifying the mass of the collected SAP as a proxy of their concentration in concrete (quantitative test). Different procedures are proposed for these two test methods and their performance is evaluated. The testing procedures were scrutinized in an interlaboratory study carried out by 14 participants from 12 countries. All participating groups detected the presence of SAP in the mix using the qualitative procedures (Test 1). Based on this outcome, we suggest that this method should be applied in the field. In contrast, while most participants obtained reasonably reliable results with the quantification procedure of Test 2, some participants reported large errors. Therefore, the quantification method needs to be further refined, starting from the experience gained in this interlaboratory study.

Interlaboratory study of the operational stability of automated sorption balances

Automated sorption balances are widely used for characterizing the interaction of water vapor with hygroscopic materials. These instruments provide an efficient way to collect sorption isotherm data and kinetic data. A typical method for defining equilibrium after a step change in relative humidity (RH) is using a particular threshold value for the rate of change in mass with time. Recent studies indicate that commonly used threshold values yield substantial errors and that further measurements are needed at extended hold times as a basis to assess the accuracy of abbreviated equilibration criteria. However, the mass measurement accuracy at extended times depends on the operational stability of the instrument. Published data on the stability of automated sorption balances are rare. An interlaboratory study was undertaken to investigate equilibration criteria for automated sorption balances. This paper focuses on the mass, temperature, and RH stability and includes data from 25 laboratories throughout the world. An initial target for instrument mass stability was met on the first attempt in many cases, but several instruments were found to have unexpectedly large instabilities. The sources of these instabilities were investigated and greatly reduced. This paper highlights the importance of verifying operational mass stability of automated sorption balances, gives a method to perform stability checks, and provides guidance on identifying and correcting common sources of mass instability.

Interlaboratory comparison of a multiplex immunoassay that measures human serum IgG antibodies against six-group B streptococcus polysaccharides

ABSTRACT Measurement of IgG antibodies against group B streptococcus (GBS) capsular polysaccharide (CPS) by use of a standardized and internationally accepted multiplex immunoassay is important for the evaluation of candidate maternal GBS vaccines in order to compare results across studies. A standardized assay is also required if serocorrelates of protection against invasive GBS disease are to be established in infant sera for the six predominant GBS serotypes since it would permit the comparison of results across the six serotypes. We undertook an interlaboratory study across five laboratories that used standardized assay reagents and protocols with a panel of 44 human sera to measure IgG antibodies against GBS CPS serotypes Ia, Ib, II, III, IV, and V. The within-laboratory intermediate precision, which included factors like the lot of coated beads, laboratory analyst, and day, was generally below 20% relative standard deviation (RSD) for all six serotypes, across all five laboratories. The cross-laboratory reproducibility was < 25% RSD for all six serotypes, which demonstrated the consistency of results across the different laboratories. Additionally, anti-CPS IgG concentrations for the 44-member human serum panel were established. The results of this study showed assay robustness and that the resultant anti-CPS IgG concentrations were reproducible across laboratories for the six GBS CPS serotypes when the standardized assay was used.

ASTM interlaboratory study on tensile testing of AM deposited and wrought steel using miniature specimens

An interlaboratory study, involving eigth international laboratories and coordinated by COMTES FHT (Czech Republic), was conducted to validate tensile measurements obtained using miniature specimens on additively manufactured (AM) components and artifacts. In addition to AM 316L stainless steel (316L SS), a wrought high-strength steel (34CrNiMo6V, equivalent to AISI 4340) was also used. Based on the results, a precision statement in accordance with ASTM E691 standard practice was developed, intended for inclusion in a proposed annex to the ASTM E8/E8M tension testing method. The primary outcomes of the study highlighted the agreement between yield and tensile strength measured from miniature and standard-sized tensile specimens. Furthermore, most tensile properties exhibited similar standard deviations, offering users insight into the efficacy of miniature specimen applications.

An inter-laboratory comparison of probabilistic genotyping parameters and evaluation of performance on DNA mixtures from different laboratories

Probabilistic genotyping (PG) is becoming the preferred standard for evidence interpretation, amongst forensic DNA laboratories, especially those in the United States. Various groups have expressed concern about reliability of PG systems, especially for mixtures beyond two contributors. Studies involving interlaboratory testing of known mixtures have been identified as ways to evaluate the reliability of PG systems. Reliability means different things in different contexts. However, it suffices here to think about it as a mixture of precision and accuracy. We might also consider whether a system is prone to producing misleading results – for example large likelihood ratios (LRs) when the POI is truly not a contributor, or small LRs when the POI is a truly a contributor. In this paper we show that the PG system STRmix™ is relatively unaffected by differences in parameter settings. That is, a DNA mixture that is analyzed in different laboratories using STRmix™ will result in different LRs, but less than 0.05% of these LRs would result in a different, or misleading conclusion as long as the LR is greater than 50. For the purposes of this study, we define LRs assigned using different parameters for the same mixtures as similar if the LR of the true POI is greater than the LRs generated for 99.9% of the general population. These findings are based on an interlaboratory study involving eight laboratories that provided twenty known DNA mixtures of two to four contributors and their individual laboratory STRmix™ parameters. The eight sets of laboratory parameters included differences in STR kits and PCR cycles as well as the peak, stutter, and locus specific amplification efficiency variances.

Analyte Extension Method Validation of Elemental Analysis Manual Method 4.7 for Six Additional Elements, Cobalt (Co), Strontium (Sr), Thallium (Tl), Tin (Sn), Uranium (U), and Vanadium (V).

An interlaboratory study was conducted at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Northeast Food and Feed Laboratory (NFFL) and the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN) with the purpose to expand FDA Elemental Analysis Manual (EAM) method 4.7 (Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometric Determination of Arsenic, Cadmium, Chromium, Lead, Mercury, and Other Elements in Food Using Microwave Assisted Digestion) to include new analytes. The goal of the study was to demonstrate the performance of FDA EAM method 4.7 when analyzing new analytes cobalt (Co), strontium (Sr), thallium (Tl), tin (Sn), uranium (U), and vanadium (V). This analyte extension method validation of EAM 4.7 for six additional elements, Co, Sr, Tl, Sn, U, and V, followed all guidelines for a Level 2 or single-laboratory validation and met all acceptance criteria for analyte extensions as per the Guidelines for the Validation of Chemical Methods. As per EAM 4.7, this study followed the procedures and used specified equipment operated under recommended conditions. The analyte extension method validation was performed in accordance with protocol and with no deviations. All quality control (QC) requirements for this analyte extension method validation of EAM 4.7 passed as evidenced by the analytical data. The results presented demonstrate accuracy, linearity, and precision by successful analyses of method blanks, matrix spikes, unfortified test samples, and reference materials. The data analyzed met each of the validation requirements for each analyte in all representative matrixes. The study showed that the new analytes performed satisfactorily using EAM 4.7 for total acidic extractable elemental analysis of food according to FDA's guidelines. The method met or exceeded the performance criteria.

Interlaboratory Comparison of Antibody-Free LC-MS/MS Measurements of C-peptide and Insulin.

The enhanced precision and selectivity of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) makes it an attractive alternative to certain clinical immunoassays. Easily transferrable work flows could help facilitate harmonization and ensure high-quality patient care. We aimed to evaluate the interlaboratory comparability of antibody-free multiplexed insulin and C-peptide LC-MS/MS measurements. The laboratories that comprise the Targeted Mass Spectrometry Assays for Diabetes and Obesity Research (TaMADOR) consortium verified the performance of a validated peptide-based assay (reproducibility, linearity, and lower limit of the measuring interval [LLMI]). An interlaboratory comparison study was then performed using shared calibrators, de-identified leftover laboratory samples, and reference materials. During verification, the measurements were precise (2.7% to 3.7%CV), linear (4 to 15 ng/mL for C-peptide and 2 to 14 ng/mL for insulin), and sensitive (LLMI of 0.04 to 0.10 ng/mL for C-peptide and 0.03 ng/mL for insulin). Median imprecision across the 3 laboratories was 13.4% (inter-quartile range [IQR] 11.6%) for C-peptide and 22.2% (IQR 20.9%) for insulin using individual measurements, and 10.8% (IQR 8.7%) and 15.3% (IQR 14.9%) for C-peptide and insulin, respectively, when replicate measurements were averaged. Method comparison with the University of Missouri reference method for C-peptide demonstrated a robust linear correlation with a slope of 1.044 and r2 = 0.99. Our results suggest that combined LC-MS/MS measurements of C-peptide and insulin are robust and adaptable and that standardization with a reference measurement procedure could allow accurate and precise measurements across sites, which could be important to diabetes research and help patient care in the future.