Interfood Interval Research Articles

Effects of drugs on the temporal distribution of schedule-induced polydipsia in rats

Drinking was induced in food-deprived rats by a fixed-time 1-min schedule of food presentation. With three rats, d-amphetamine (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg/kg) led to a dose-related increase in licking early in the interfood intervals, the peak of the temporal distribution of licking being shifted to earlier values. These effects were seen even when d-amphetamine had no effect on overall rates of licking and drinking. With another three rats, however, diazepam (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 mg/kg) did not shift the peak of the temporal distribution of licks in interfood intervals, even at doses that produced small increases in overall rates of licking and drinking. However, diazepam did reduce the peak of the distributions of licks at doses that did not decrease water intake and licks per minute.

Temporal patterns of schedule-induced drinking and pawgrooming in rats exposed to periodic food

Five rats were exposed to fixed-time food schedules, ranging from 30 to 480 sec. Three rats displayed a postfood pattern of schedule-induced drinking, with short latencies from food delivery to drinking at all interfood interval durations. In contrast, drinking for the other 2 subjects tended to occur at lower overall levels, and drinking bouts frequently began in the middle of the interfood interval, such that the latency from food delivery to drinking increased dramatically as the interfood interval increased. Observation of these 2 subjects revealed that another form of licking-pawgrooming-occurred reliably after food delivery and before drinking bouts. A between subject comparison of the 3 postfood drinkers and the 2 pawgroomers revealed that, in addition to a common topography (repetitive licking), pawgrooming and drinking were similar with respect to their temporal locus, relation to the interfood interval, and extinction baseline levels. These similarities suggest that drinking and pawgrooming are induced by a common mechanism. Cohen, Looney, Campagnoni, and Lawler’s (1985) two-state model of reinforcer-induced motivation provides a useful framework for the interpretation of these results.

Waiting in pigeons: the effects of daily intercalation on temporal discrimination.

Pigeons trained on cyclic-interval schedules adjust their postfood pause from interval to interval within each experimental session. But on regular fixed-interval schedules, many sessions at a given parameter value are usually necessary before the typical fixed-interval "scallop" appears. In the first case, temporal control appears to act from one interfood interval to the next; in the second, it appears to act over hundreds of interfood intervals. The present experiments look at the intermediate case: daily variation in schedule parameters. In Experiments 1 and 2 we show that pauses proportional to interfood interval develop on short-valued response-initiated-delay schedules when parameters are changed daily, that additional experience under this regimen leads to little further improvement, and that pauses usually change as soon as the schedule parameter is changed. Experiment 3 demonstrates identical waiting behavior on fixed-interval and response-initiated-delay schedules when the food delays are short (less than 20 s) and conditions are changed daily. In Experiment 4 we show that daily intercalation prevents temporal control when interfood intervals are longer (25 to 60 s). The results of Experiment 5 suggest that downshifts in interfood interval produce more rapid waiting-time adjustments than upshifts. These and other results suggest that the effects of short interfood intervals seem to be more persistent than those of long intervals.

Food granules elicit heavy drinking in polydipsic rats independently of meal duration

Excessive drinking, in rats made polydipsic on intermittent delivery of food pellets, is inversely related to the time the rat spends with its head in the feeder, early in the interfood interval. In a sensitization model, this explains why food textures that induce more oral activity, e.g., powder, do not elicit drinking. This hypothesis was examined by coding the behavior of polydipsic rats and varying the duration of the meal delivered in each interval, while holding texture constant. Polydipsic rats were presented with pellets, food granules, or food powder. The food granules were dispensed over periods lasting 1, 14, 21, and 28 s. All food deliveries were of the same mass. The food was delivered periodically at 60-s intervals in each condition. The 14 rats in the experiment served as their own controls by experiencing every condition. The food granule conditions induced the expected increases in feeding early in the interval. However, instead of progressively reducing drinking, the excessive drinking simply occurred later in the interval. By contrast, the powder condition resulted in the immediate elimination of polydipsia. The results suggest that food texture elicits excessive drinking independently of temporal factors and that elicitation of the sensitized drinking response must depend on other factors.

Effects of d-amphetamine and of diazepam on non-punished and punished schedule-induced drinking in rats.

Drinking induced in food-deprived rats by a Fixed-Time 1min schedule of food presentation was measured by the amount of water consumed per session and the number of licks per inter-food interval. Subsequently each lick initiated a 10-sec signalled delay in the delivery of food, which led to a decrease in drinking (punishment). With three rats the effects of d-amphetamine (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0mg/kg) were assessed on non-punished and then on punished drinking. With another three rats, the effects of diazepam (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0mg/kg) were assessed. The smaller doses of d-amphetamine had no consistent effect on overall measures of non-punished schedule-induced drinking, but the largest dose decreased them. With the signalled delay d-amphetamine increased punished schedule-induced drinking. Non-punished drinking was increased by small doses of diazepam and decreased by the largest dose, but no dose of diazepam affected punished drinking.

The role of timing in reinforcement schedule performance

Reinforcement schedules produce distinctive and reliable temporal patterns of behavior. Temporal discrimination is known to be an important ingredient in these patterns. We sketch a simple dynamic model for the discrimination of short time intervals, linear waiting, in terms of four assumptions: that the time before the onset of the reinforced response, waiting time, is determined by the food delay in the just-preceding interfood interval; that waiting is triggered by the most recent time marker; that different delays signaled by the same time marker are averaged; and that the effectiveness of a given stimulus as a time marker is limited by memory constraints. We show that recursive application of linear waiting can generate contiguity learning and many molecular patterns of behavior on interval schedules, such as the fixed-interval “scallop” and interresponse times on variable-interval schedules, as well as molar properties such as the hyperbolic relation between response and reinforcement rates on variable-interval schedules. Linear waiting also implies the high response rates on ratio schedules and their instability. Linear waiting does not seem able to account for differences in response rates between ratio and interval schedules equated for reinforcement rate, molar response functions on ratio schedules, and some features of responding on cyclic schedules. These failures highlight our limited understanding of the role of memory in timing and hint at additional mechanisms.

Dynamics of time discrimination.

Pigeons tracked sinusoidal sequences of interfood intervals (IFIs) by pausing in each interval for a time proportional to the preceding interval. Schedules with either long (30-90 s) or short (5-15 s) values, with variable numbers of cycles and starting phase each day, were tracked about equally well. Tracking was apparently immediate and did not improve across sessions. Experiment 2, in which long and short series were presented on alternate days, showed that tracking on long was more impaired than on short. Experiment 3 showed that occasional presentation of a short IFI in a series of fixed, longer IFIs caused a reduction in waiting time in the next IFI. These effects are evidence for a fast-acting timing mechanism in which waiting time in the IFI N + 1 is strongly determined by the preceding IFI, N. Earlier IFIs have some cumulative effect, but the details remain to be elucidated.

SERIAL CONDITIONING AS A FUNCTION OF STIMULUS, RESPONSE, AND TEMPORAL DEPENDENCIES

Six experiments were used to examine the effects of explicit response, stimulus, and temporal dependencies on responding in an interfood interval. The first two experiments demonstrated that 10-segment 60-s interfood clocks controlled similar distributions of key pecking in pigeons regardless of whether response-reinforcement contiguity was required, allowed, or precluded. The third and fourth experiments found that in the absence of an explicit response-reinforcement dependency, systematic explicit stimuli in an interfood interval were sufficient to establish and maintain the characteristic distribution of key pecking and that an interval without an explicit clock failed to establish or maintain key pecking. The last two experiments demonstrated that the interfood interval need not be of fixed length, and that a simple correlation of stimuli with increments from either a minimum to a maximum imminency or probability of food presentation controlled behavior in a similar manner. Successively higher rates generally occurred to successively later stimuli in the upper half of the range.

EFFECTS OF d‐AMPHETAMINE, DIAZEPAM, AND PENTOBARBITAL ON THE SCHEDULE‐CONTROLLED PECKING AND LOCOMOTOR ACTIVITY OF PIGEONS

Pigeons were trained on a variant of the autoshaping procedure devised by Matthews and Lerer (1987) in which a keylight stimulus ramp of increasing brightness signaled the passing of a 30-s interfood interval. This procedure generates two distinct behavioral components: key pecking and locomotor activity. The effects of three psychoactive drugs on these behavior classes were measured. d-Amphetamine had negligible effects on both types of behavior, whereas diazepam and pentobartital increased key pecking and decreased activity in a dose-dependent fashion. In Experiment 2, the possibility that drug effects were suppressed by excessively strong stimulus control exerted in Experiment 1 was tested by decreasing the discriminability of the stimulus ramp. The direction of the effects of diazepam and pentobarbital was the same as in Experiment 1 but the magnitude of the effects tended to be larger. The effects of d-amphetamine, however, remained quite small, suggesting that, under these conditions, locomotor activity and key pecking are less sensitive to d-amphetamine. In Experiments 3 and 4, key pecking was eliminated by removing the keylight. Reinforcers were presented at fixed intervals in Experiment 3 and at variable intervals in Experiment 4. The drug effects on activity observed in Experiments 1 and 2 disappeared in both Experiments 3 and 4. The results suggest that diazepam and pentobarbital affect activity indirectly by increasing key-pecking behavior, which, in turn, competitively decreases activity.

TYPICAL DELAY DETERMINES WAITING TIME ON PERIODIC‐FOOD SCHEDULES: STATIC AND DYNAMIC TESTS

Pigeons and other animals soon learn to wait (pause) after food delivery on periodic-food schedules before resuming the food-rewarded response. Under most conditions the steady-state duration of the average waiting time, t, is a linear function of the typical interfood interval. We describe three experiments designed to explore the limits of this process. In all experiments, t was associated with one key color and the subsequent food delay, T, with another. In the first experiment, we compared the relation between t (waiting time) and T (food delay) under two conditions: when T was held constant, and when T was an inverse function of t. The pigeons could maximize the rate of food delivery under the first condition by setting t to a consistently short value; optimal behavior under the second condition required a linear relation with unit slope between t and T. Despite this difference in optimal policy, the pigeons in both cases showed the same linear relation, with slope less than one, between t and T. This result was confirmed in a second parametric experiment that added a third condition, in which T + t was held constant. Linear waiting appears to be an obligatory rule for pigeons. In a third experiment we arranged for a multiplicative relation between t and T (positive feedback), and produced either very short or very long waiting times as predicted by a quasi-dynamic model in which waiting time is strongly determined by the just-preceding food delay.

Adjunctive behavior of the rat under periodic food delivery in a 24-hour environment

The behavior of 4 rats living in complex environments was monitored 24 h per day during free-feeding baseline and under conditions of periodic access to food. Under the periodic schedules, the minimum interfood interval (IFI) was increased from 16 to 512 sec in an ascending series. Periodic food produced robust overall increases in investigation of the feeder, drinking, general activity, and rearing, but not in wheel-running. The temporal distribution of behavior within the IFI was similar across subjects and supported the hypothesis that some responses were largely time-locked to the period immediately following eating, while other responses expanded to fill the interval. However, these response differences were not adequately captured by present classification schemes. Finally, the distribution of drinking following a food pellet strongly resembled the distribution of drinking following bouts of feeding in baseline. The results suggest that adjunctive behavior stems from three sources: (1) a simple increase in the number of opportunities for expression of normal preprandial and postprandial behavior, (2) an increase in the preprandial behavior directed toward the site of expected food, and (3) an increase in the postprandial distribution of both site-directed and more general exploratory behavior. These findings suggest that adjunctive behavior is not extraneous, but is an orderly distribution of responses ordinarily related to feeding and foraging for food.

Serial conditioning as a function of parametric variations of an interfood clock

Two experiments examined the effects of differences in the parameters of a clocked interfood interval on the obtained distribution of responding to the stimuli in that interval. In the first experiment, a 3×3 factorial design assessed the effects of the number of components and the durations of those components. Food was presented irrespective of behavior following 5, 10, or 20 discrete stimuli across durations of 3, 6, or 12 sec each. Responding began at the approximate midpoint of the interval. More responding occurred in earlier portions of the last half of the interval as the number and the durations of individual stimuli decreased or as the overall interfood interval decreased. The second experiment, also a 3×3 factorial design, manipulated the probability and duration of food presentation following a 60-sec trial containing 10 discrete stimuli. A 2.0-, 3.5-, or 5.0-sec food presentation followed 100%, 25%, or 10% of the trials. Responding again began at the approximate midpoint of the interval. More responding occurred in earlier portions of the last half of the interval only when both food duration and the proportion of reinforced trials increased. Both experiments therefore showed that the onset of responding occurs at the approximate midpoint of clocked interfood intervals in spite of a wide variety of CS and US manipulations.

Behavior patterns in pigeons during autoshaping with an incremental conditioned stimulus

Pigeons were trained on a variant of the autoshaping procedure in which a keylight stimulus of increasing brightness was used to signal the passing of a 30-sec interfood interval (IFI). Key-pecking developed in all subjects within the first session (65 trials). Within trials, pecking began midway through the IFI, increased throughout the remainder, and decreased just before food delivery. Other behavioral stereotypies were also recorded: Low light levels were associated with a retreat to the rear of the test chamber, and medium light levels (during the midportion of the IFI) were associated with high rates of pacing toward and away from the food source. Probe trials revealed that pecking, pacing, and retreat were all under strong stimulus control; that is, when the light was held constant at its lowest or highest brightness, or when the brightness ramp was presented in reverse order, the behavior pattern almost invariably remained tied to stimulus brightness. Results are discussed in terms of associative and nonassociative sources of the form and sequential characteristics of the behavior.

SIGN‐TRACKING WITH AN INTERFOOD CLOCK

Food was presented to pigeons, irrespective of their behavior. The fixed 60-s interfood interval was segmented into ten 6-s periods, each signaled by a distinctive stimulus color, ordered by wavelength. This "interfood clock" reliably generated and maintained successively higher rates of key pecking at stimuli successively closer to food. Under extinction, key pecking ceased. When the standard stimulus sequence was changed to a different sequence for each bird, accelerated responding again emerged and was sustained under each of the new color sequences. However, responding was neither maintained nor acquired when each successive interfood interval provided a different random sequence of the ten stimuli. Thus, the interfood clock generated and maintained sign-tracking under stimulus control, and the resulting behavior was attributable neither to stimulus generalization nor to a simple temporal gradient.

Schedule-induced polydipsia and size of water dipper

Schedule-induced polydipsia as a function of six water dipper sizes was examined in four food-deprived rats under Fixed Time 1- and 2-minute schedules. Increasing dipper size increased session water intake but did not affect the number of intervals containing at least one barpress (i.e., number of bouts), nor the number of barpresses per bout, nor the temporal distribution of barpressing within the interfood interval. Previous research showing polydipsic intake to be impervious to other types of restrictions on water availability have suggested the notion of a volume constancy mechanism. The present research raises questions about the operation of the volume constancy mechanism, questions about how to conceptualize the dipper size manipulation, and questions about variables which affect the temporal locus of drinking.

BEHAVIOR INDUCED BY PERIODIC FOOD DELIVERY: THE EFFECTS OF INTERFOOD INTERVAL

Pigeons were exposed to fixed-time schedules of food presentation ranging from five to 300 seconds. Although consistent, stereotyped response patterns developed during interfood intervals on all schedules, there were distinct differences in the behavior observed on schedules with short, as opposed to long, intervals. During the shorter intervals, responses were performed quite vigorously, a feeder-directed terminal response was observed, and most activities were localized near the feeder. On the longer schedules, no feeder-directed terminal response developed, although the birds were usually near the feeder at the end of intervals. The predominant response involved moving about the chamber, often pacing along one of the walls. Performance during short intervals is accounted for quite well by the antagonistic-motivational state hypothesis suggested by Staddon (1977); however, performance during longer intervals is not. Behavior during interfood intervals may more accurately be classified as reflecting a single (food) motivational state and described simply in terms of Craig's (1918) appetitive behavior.

Effects of limited-target availability on schedule-induced attack

Pigeons exposed to a 180-sec fixed-time food schedule could attack a rear-projected conspecific target that was available either (a) continuously throughout the interfood interval, (b) randomly during one 30-sec portion of each interfood interval, or (c) during the final 90 sec of each interval. During continuous-target availability, attack was maximal shortly after food ingestion and progressively decreased thereafter. During random-target availability, five of seven pigeons attacked less per target-access period the later that period occurred within the interfood interval, whereas two subjects exhibited relatively high local attack rates even when access periods occurred within the final third of the interval. When the target was available only during the second half of the interfood interval, attack occurred as soon as the target was presented and progressively decreased throughout the remainder of the target-access period. In general, these results show that schedule-induced attack can be increased by limiting the availability of that target and also indicate that such attack can reliably occur at times other than shortly after food delivery.

DYNAMIC EFFECTS OF FOOD MAGNITUDE ON INTERIM‐TERMINAL INTERACTION

We tested the assumption of a facilitatory relation between periodic food presentation and schedule-induced drinking by examination of (a) elicited drinking, (b) drinking in anticipation of food delivery, and (c) possible indirect effects of food delivery on drinking. We exposed rats to a fixed-time 60-second schedule in which interfood intervals ended in either one or four food pellets with equal probability. In Phases 1 and 3, a stimulus signaled the magnitude of upcoming food presentation. In Phase 2, the stimulus was eliminated. Changes in drinking and "head-in-feeder" distributions within interfood intervals demonstrated that head-in-feeder was controlled directly by food presentation, but drinking was not. Head-in-feeder increased and drinking was reduced when large meals began or ended an interval. In Phases 4 to 6, meal size was manipulated across sessions yielding a positive relation between meal size and schedule-induced drinking. We conclude: (1) Schedule-induced drinking is determined by distributions of food-related behavior and results from indirect effects of food delivery; and (2) the amount of schedule-induced drinking and the form of the drinking distributions in this experiment can be accurately explained by two assumptions: (a) Food presentation facilitates food-related behavior through elicitation and anticipation; and (b) food-related behavior and drinking are reciprocally, linearly related.

Sensory superstition on multiple interval schedules.

Pigeons were exposed to multiple schedules in which an irregular repeating sequence of five stimulus components was correlated with the same reinforcement schedule throughout. Stable, idiosyncratic, response-rate differences developed across components. Components were rank-ordered by response rate; an approximately linear relation was found between rank order and the deviation of mean response rate from the overall mean rate. Nonzero slopes of this line were found for multiple fixed-interval and variable-time schedules and for multiple variable-interval schedules both when number of reinforcements was the same in all components and when it varied. The steepest function slopes were found in the variable schedules with relatively long interfood intervals and relatively short component durations. When just one stimulus was correlated with all components of a multiple variable-interval schedule, the slope of the line was close to zero. The results suggest that food-rate differences may be induced initially by different reactions to the stimuli and subsequently maintained by food.

THE ROLE OF INTERMITTENT FOOD IN THE INDUCTION OF ATTACK IN PIGEONS

The present experiments evaluated whether transitions in reinforcer probability are necessary to induce attack in pigeons. In Experiment I, three of six pigeons exposed to response-contingent constant-probability food schedules and a photograph of a conspecific as a target exhibited sustained postreinforcement attack on the target. The postreinforcement pattern of attack developed over the course of the experiment and was accompanied by a reduction in the rate of postreinforcement key pecking and an increase in the postreinforcement pause in key pecking. These effects on key pecking resulted in unprogrammed variations in the probability of reinforcement which may have been responsible for the induction of attack. In Experiment II, the attack-inducing properties of a constant-probability response-independent food schedule were compared to a periodic food schedule matched for overall rate of food delivery and to a no-food condition. In addition to attack, the spatial location of the subjects was monitored during each interfood interval. The periodic and aperiodic food schedules generated very different patterns of spatial location. Postfood attack was induced by both food schedules, although the constant-probability schedule induced attack in fewer birds. The no-food condition was not effective in inducing attack in any birds. These experiments indicate that intermittent food schedules without reductions in reinforcer probability are sufficient to induce attack in some pigeons, although not as effective as schedules with transitions in reinforcer probability.