Interdisciplinary Rounds Research Articles

Characteristics Contributing to a Pharmacy Services Excellence Model in a Large Health System.

To identify characteristics that contribute to and promote a pharmacy services center of excellence model in a large health system. In 2019, a survey was conducted of 161 acute care pharmacy departments of health system-affiliated hospitals. Information captured included pharmacy practice models, pharmacist resource allocation, training of pharmacy residents, postgraduate training and pharmacist certifications. Results were combined with clinical pharmacy metric performance and centralized electronic data to identify features of top performing pharmacy departments. Survey results were received from 141 of 161 affiliated hospitals (88%). Hospitals with 100 to 299 beds comprised 54% (n = 16 of 30) of the hospitals "at goal" and 66% (n = 26 of 40) of hospitals with "opportunity". Hospitals with top performing pharmacy services had greater participation in interdisciplinary rounds, reporting "always" participating in Adult Critical Care (67% versus 43%) and Medical/Surgical (30% vs. 8%) rounds. Hospitals that trained pharmacy residents had a greater number of clinical pharmacy metrics at goal (5.89 ± 1.59 versus 4.16 ± 1.86, p < 0.001), employed more board-certified pharmacists (2.32 ± 1.49 versus 1.57 ± 1.62, p = 0.019), more postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) trained pharmacists (2.06 ± 1.33 versus 1.19 ± 1.19, p < 0.001) and more PGY2 trained pharmacists (0.58 ± 0.64 versus 0.19 ± 0.44, p = 0.002). When including several key hospital characteristics into a single model, hospitals that trained pharmacy residents were significantly associated with achieving "at goal" status (p = 0.011). Defining characteristics of a pharmacy services center of excellence model included "at goal" clinical pharmacy metrics performance, clinical pharmacist time dedicated to patient care activities, accredited pharmacy residency training programs, presence of pharmacists with advanced training or board certification and optimal operations and scheduling.

Developing a Transitions of Care Elective for Medical Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond.

Health care in the United States is costly, fragmented, and often ineffective. Transitions of care (TOC), particularly from the inpatient to the outpatient setting, is an especially complicated time and one that is potentially fraught with errors that contribute to negative outcomes. The coronavirus 2019 pandemic exacerbated many of these challenges. In particular, vulnerable patient populations have experienced more barriers to successful care transitions. Effective care transitions should include interprofessional teamwork, robust patient education, and seamless communication among the various healthcare team members. Increasingly, medical schools are working toward graduating systems-ready physicians who demonstrate competency in the health system sciences and are able to operate effectively within the healthcare system, including being able to navigate complex transitions of care issues. Undergraduate medical education, however, continues to provide experiential learning in the traditional silos of inpatient versus outpatient medicine, so that learners do not have the opportunity to directly participate in transitions of care. Although transitions of care is a pivotal part of patient care, it is rarely taught at the undergraduate level, and when it is, it is typically relegated to the classroom setting. We used the disruption of the coronavirus 2019 pandemic to develop a TOC elective. The aim was to fulfill an acute educational need and to develop competencies around care transitions for students while concurrently providing support for patient care and teamwork. The elective was offered to second-, third- and fourth-year medical students. Our educational innovation was initiated within our safety-net hospital where we care for a high percentage of uninsured patients, with a high language discordance. In addition, our city has multiple care systems without a single or connected electronic health record system, further complicating patient care transitions. The work of the TOC elective crossed inpatient and outpatient silos, with close collaboration with our local federally qualified health centers. This remotely conducted elective includes three main pillars: participation in team activities, including virtual participation in interdisciplinary rounds and care coordination; discharge planning; and communication, including goals of care and end of life communication. Medical students successfully integrated into team structures to directly counsel families, facilitate goals of care conversations, and engage a multidisciplinary team for discharge planning. Students found this experience valuable in their reflections. In addition, there was a value-added component from a patient care and teamwork perspective. Participation of students in TOC is a valuable educational experience and contributes a value-added component to patient care and interprofessional teamwork. Moreover, an appreciation of the failures of the current system is pivotal as learners start to reimagine, explore, and design improved patient-centered systems in the future.

Positive evidence for clinical pharmacist interventions during interdisciplinary rounding at a psychiatric hospital

Clinical pharmacists have not yet become an integral part of interdisciplinary ward rounds in most psychiatric hospitals across the European Union. This retrospective observational pre-post study examined the impact of clinical pharmacist recommendations in an interdisciplinary medical team during psychiatric hospital rounding. The study included all patients in a Slovenian psychiatric hospital who were hospitalized 2019–2020. The clinical pharmacist made 315 recommendations for a total of 224 participants (average age M = 59.4, median = 56). Psychiatrists accepted 295 (93.7%) of the recommendations. After the recommendations, the number of expressed and potential drug-related problems decreased in 166 (93.8%) and 129 (93.8%) interventions, respectively. Three months after discharge, 222 accepted recommendations were continued (70.5%). The most common recommendations were related to antipsychotics (19.4%, N = 61) followed by antidepressants (16.8%, N = 53). Including a clinical pharmacist in the interdisciplinary ward rounds at a psychiatric hospital reduced the number of expressed and potential drug-related problems with a very high recommendation acceptance rate. These results are the first in Central Europe to explore the benefits of including a clinical pharmacist in ward rounding.

Improved Clinical Competence and Patients Satisfaction: Comparison of Patient-centered, Interdisciplinary Collaborative Round versus Traditional Post-partum Round.

The origin of the patient-centered interdisciplinary collaborative round, which involves health care members of all levels at a time, is an effective and emerging approach to offer inpatient healthcare. Traditionally, post-partum rounds at teaching hospitals consisted of separate visits from all members of the obstetric team that resulted in patient inconvenience, care insufficiencies, and communication gaps. The main objective of this study was to assess the patient's satisfaction level from the traditional post-partum round versus the patient-centered collaborative care (PCCC) round. This study showed that in the traditional round, the patient's satisfaction with the treatment was 95.1%; whereas, in PCCC rounds it was 96.9%. Patients were more satisfied with the treatment options discussed with them and the results of the medical tests explained to them. In conclusion, the survey showed that the implementation of the PCCC round improved patient satisfaction. Key Words: Interdisciplinary collaborative round, Traditional postpartum round, Patients satisfaction, Clinical competence.

The impact of an accountable care unit on mortality: an observational study

ABSTRACT Background: Despite enthusiasm for inpatient ward redesign, coordinated models require high effort with uncertain return on investment. Objective: We aimed to reduce mortality and achieve a benchmark of zero preventable deaths by committing to an interprofessional model, including partnered nurse-physician unit leadership, geographic localization, and structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds (SIBR). Methods: An observational pre-post design with 5-year follow-up studied the transition of a medical unit to an Accountable Care Unit (ACU). This geographic model enables partnered nurse-physician leadership and patient-centered workflows, including daily interdisciplinary bedside rounds. Potentially additive or confounding hospital-wide safety initiatives were tracked. Yearly mortality was compared using multivariable logistic regression and reported as odds ratio (OR). For the pre-specified goal of no preventable deaths, we report unexpected deaths, defined as those occurring without documentation of comfort as the goal of care. Results: 12,158 inpatients (55.1% female, mean [sd] age 62.2 [19.7]) were observed over 6 years. Reduction in the risk-adjusted mortality was observed following ACU implementation, with Year 2 significantly lower than the pre-implementation year (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.58 [0.35–0.94]). Risk-adjusted mortality was similar in Year 3 (aOR = 0.64 [0.39–1.0]) but returned to baseline for Years 4 and 5. Unexpected deaths reached zero in Year 3 and plateaued in Years 4 and 5 at a rate below pre-implementation year (~0.1% vs. 0.38%). Conclusions: A geographic ACU with nurse-physician partnered leadership and daily structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds can reduce total and unexpected mortality. However, maintenance requires constant effort and, in the real world, multiple confounders complicate study.

Critical Care Clinical Nurse Specialist Role in Developmental Care for Infants With Heart Disease.

Critical Care Clinical Nurse Specialist Role in Developmental Care for Infants With Heart Disease.

Ethical Issues in the Care of Emerging Adults in Pediatric Intensive Care Units.

Ethical Issues in the Care of Emerging Adults in Pediatric Intensive Care Units.

The ABCDE bundle implementation in an intensive care unit: Facilitators and barriers perceived by nurses and doctors.

To describe the facilitators and barriers perceived by healthcare teams after the implementation of the Awakening, Breathing, Coordination, Delirium monitoring/management and Early mobility bundle in an intensive care unit in Italy. This multicomponent intervention strategy has been associated with lower probabilities of delirium, improved functional outcomes and shorter duration of mechanical ventilation. A survey study conducted between June 2015 and May 2016 explored variables related to intensive care unit team members: perceptions of delirium; knowledge of the Awakening, Breathing, Coordination, Delirium monitoring/management and Early mobility bundle; teamwork perception and resource availability. Most of the participants affirmed having reasonable knowledge of delirium, outcomes of delirious episodes, Awakening, Breathing, Coordination, Delirium monitoring/management and Early mobility bundle components and their effectiveness. Low coordination between healthcare professionals was identified as a barrier. Overall, the time elapsing from the beginning of implementation of the bundle determined an increase in levels of awareness and confidence in the application of the bundle protocol and the Confusion Assessment Method Intensive Care Unit scale. Issues with the Awakening, Breathing, Coordination, Delirium monitoring/management and Early mobility bundle relating to coordination, management and interdisciplinary ward rounds are critical and should be remedied and monitored. This study could provide the basis for improving bundle implementation strategies and surveying levels of progression in other intensive care units.

A Resident-driven Initiative to Increase Bedside Teaching on Interdisciplinary Rounds.

We developed an organizational structure to complete a long-term resident-led project. Interventions included daily bedside examination teaching on rounds, afternoon examinations, goal communication, topic recording, and a teaching "tip sheet." Using an institutional QI framework, we utilized iterative plan-do-study-act cycles to implement interventions and surveys to assess outcomes, with rounding efficiency as a balancing measure. The survey response rate was 57%. Bedside teaching frequency increased from a mean of 10% to 61%, perceived time at the bedside increased from 37% to 59%, and rounding satisfaction improved from a rating of 6.7/10 to 7.4/10. Efficiency was not impacted. We improved inpatient rounds bedside physical examination teaching and satisfaction without sacrificing efficiency. This project demonstrates the feasibility and success of a resident-driven education initiative to successfully motivate fellow residents and colleagues across disciplines to enact change. The organizational structure may serve as a model for resident-led QI projects across institutions.

576 Striving for Excellence: Beacon Application Submission and Achievement

Abstract Introduction The American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN) Beacon Award (BA) recognizes individual nursing units with Gold, Silver, or Bronze level for excellence. The BA signifies an effective and systematic approach to policies, procedures and processes that include engagement of staff and key stakeholders; fact-based evaluation strategies for continuous process improvement; and performance measures that meet or exceed relevant benchmarks. Units designated with BA show an overall higher morale and lower turnover rate. Being a verified burn unit and Magnet designated facility, the unit practice council (upc) began the application process for Beacon. Methods The application process started in 2017 through a core group of UPC members. Different sections of the application were written through the guidance of the team leader and with support of the unit management. Data was gathered from various hospital departments and dashboards which included: leadership structures and systems, appropriate staffing and staff engagement, effective communication, knowledge management and learning development, evidence-based practice and processes, and outcome measurements. After data collection/synthesis, small group meetings were conducted to complete the application. The application was reviewed and edited by the unit management prior to submission. Highlights included: low infection rates in the unit exceeding national benchmarks, peer supporter events for burn survivors, team bonding, community outreach, multiple abstract submission/presentations from nursing at local/national conferences, high patient satisfaction scores, implementing new burn care practices based on evidence, and interdisciplinary rounds. Results Burn unit was designated as a Beacon Gold Award Recipient in 2019. This designation lasts for three years. Our burn unit became one of seven units in the nation with BA and is the second one to achieve Gold designation. During and after this process, there was an increase in staff engagement, teamwork, and exceptional quality metrics. Conclusions Persistent effort combined with teamwork and leadership can help a unit achieve Gold BA designation. This award requires ongoing work to refine processes and promote evidence-based practices.

Stay Current Through Recertification

Stay Current Through Recertification

A Clinical Nurse Leader's Improvement of Interdisciplinary Rounds.

A Clinical Nurse Leader's Improvement of Interdisciplinary Rounds.

Utilizing Skin Rounds and Kamishibai Cards to Prevent DTPIs in Hospitalized Children: Hassenfeld Children’s Hospital at NYU Langone Health

Background: In FY2018, Hassenfeld Children’s Hospital (HCH) deep tissue injury (DTPI) rate was 0.55 DTPIs per 1,000 patient days compared to the SPS centerline of 0.179 DTPIs per 1,000 patient days. Objectives: We aimed to decrease our DTPI rate by 50% by August 31, 2019. Our objectives were to increase opportunities to observe practice and provide real-time education to frontline staff utilizing Kamishibai Cards and develop local interdisciplinary champions to lead prevention efforts. We hypothesized that shifting the focus to observation of practice and real-time education rather than PI bundle element documentation would empower bedside nurses to drive prevention efforts and decrease our DTPI rate. Methods: Twice weekly, pediatric units participate in interdisciplinary skin rounds led by a unit-based nursing champion and a physical or occupational therapist. This team observes the bedside nurse perform offloading of heels, offloading and rotating of devices, and turning and positioning of the patient and performs a K-Card observation to deliver real-time feedback. K-Card observations reveal opportunities for improvement that are acted upon immediately rather than retrospectively based on EMR documentation review. Our work is sustained through monthly multidisciplinary meetings that promote sharing best practices and unit PI prevention binders that include important protocols and reference materials. Results: The HCH DTPI rate decreased by 79%, from 0.55 DTPIs per 1,000 patient days in FY2018 to 0.117 DTPIs per 1,000 patient days in FY2019. In FY2020, we further reduced our rate to 0.061 DTPIs per 1,000 patient days (Figure 1). Our safety culture has matured to proactive PI prevention at the bedside, quick identification of high-risk patients, and escalation of concerns. Conclusions/Implications: Observational skin rounds and bedside nurse engagement have been foundational to DTPI prevention efforts. An emphasis on observation of practice reveals opportunities for improvement and real-time education. Skin Rounds empower staff to share concerns that are acted upon immediately to provide safe care for the patient.Fig. 1.: Deep tissue injury rate. © Copyright 2020, Solutions for Patient Safety (SPS). All rights reserved. This document was created as part of the quality assessment and peer review activities of SPS Learning Network, and the underlying information used to create this document is not subject to discovery pursuant to ORC Section 2305.25, 2305.251, 2305.252, and 2305.253. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this information is prohibited without the express permission of SPS.

Enhanced Communication through Virtual Interdisciplinary Team Rounds for Pediatric Patients Receiving Hospice Care in Outlying Communities

Enhanced Communication through Virtual Interdisciplinary Team Rounds for Pediatric Patients Receiving Hospice Care in Outlying Communities

Environmental Factors Affecting Early Mobilization and Physical Disability Post-Intensive Care: An Integrative Review Through the Lens of the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health.

Early mobilization (EM) is one of few potential protective factors associated with reduced physical disability post-intensive care (PD PIC). However, only 45% of intensive care units (ICUs) in the United States routinely practice EM despite its recognized benefits. To analyze the evidence on the relationship between critical care EM, PD PIC, and environmental factors, using the theoretical lens of the World Health Organization's (WHO's) International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). The Whittemore and Knafl methodology for integrative reviews and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) reporting guidelines were followed. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies (n = 38) that evaluated EM and 1 or more domains of the WHO ICF were included. Quality was appraised using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool. Study characteristics were evaluated for common themes and relationships. The ICF domains and subdomains pertaining to each study were synthesized. Early mobilization was related to improved functioning on the disability continuum of the WHO ICF. Early mobilization was influenced by several WHO ICF environmental factors. Dedicated physical and occupational therapy teams in the ICU, interdisciplinary rounds, and positive family and staff perception of EM facilitated intervention delivery. However, poor staffing levels, negative unit culture, perceived workload burden, and lack of equipment, education, and financial support impeded delivery of EM. Early mobilization is a promising intervention that may reduce PD PIC. However, environmental factors negatively influence delivery of EM in the ICU. Several gaps in EM research limit its acceptability in ICU practice. Existing EM research is challenged by poor methodological quality. Further study is necessary to better understand the role of EM on PD PIC and improve patient outcomes following critical illness.

Structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds improve interprofessional communication and workplace efficiency among residents and nurses on an inpatient internal medicine unit

ABSTRACT Structured Interdisciplinary Bedside Rounds (SIBR) is a standardized, team-based intervention for hospitals to deliver high quality interprofessional care. Despite its potential for improving IPC and the workplace environment, relatively little is known about SIBR’s effect on these outcomes. Our study aimed to assess the fidelity of SIBR implementation on an inpatient medicine teaching unit and its effects on perceived IPC and workplace efficiency. We conducted a quasi-experimental study with 88 residents and 44 nurses at a large academic medical center and observed 1308 SIBR encounters over 24 weeks. Of these 1308 encounters, the bedside nurse was present for 96.7%, physician for 97.6%, and care manager for 94.7, and 64.7% occurred at the bedside. Following SIBR implementation, perceived IPC improved significantly among residents (93.3% versus 67.9%, p < .024) and nurses (73.7% versus 36.0%, p < .008) compared to before implementation. Moreover, residents perceived greater workplace efficiency operationalized as being paged less frequently with questions by nurses (20.0% versus 49.1%, p = .01). No statistically significant improvements were reported regarding burnout, meaning at work, and workplace satisfaction. Our implementation of SIBR significantly improved perceived IPC and workplace efficiency, which are two important domains of healthcare quality. Future work should examine the impact of SIBR on patient-centered outcomes such as patient experience.

Twice‐Weekly Structured Interdisciplinary Bedside Rounds and Falls among Older Adult Inpatients

Ineffective interdisciplinary communication has negative impacts on patient outcomes. The use of regular structured interdisciplinary bedside rounds (SIBR), where each patient interaction lasts 3-5 minutes, is a model of care that improves interdisciplinary communication. We evaluated the impact of SIBR on in-hospital falls. Prospective before-after study of older people hospitalized with acute illness. Two side-by-side aged care wards in a university hospital in Sydney, Australia. A total of 3,673 consecutive inpatients of mean age 83.8 ± 7.7 years, with 1,703 before SIBR compared with 1,970 after SIBR. No patients were excluded from potential participation. Twice-weekly SIBR. Falls data were manually extracted from a mandatory institutional incident reporting database. Medical diagnoses were based on the Australian Refined Diagnosis Related Groups classification system. Injuries due to falls were corroborated using the institutional electronic medical record (Cerner PowerChart). Generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of falls and fall-related injuries. A negative binomial distribution and a logarithmic link function were used to linearize regression equations. After SIBR, there were 7.4 falls per 1,000 occupied bed days (OBD), compared with 10.6 falls per 1,000 OBD before SIBR (P < .001). The implementation of SIBR reduced falls (IRR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.52-0.85), after adjusting for age, gender, cognitive impairment, behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, deconditioning and frailty, but not fall-related injuries (IRR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.52-1.20). This study is the first to investigate the effect of SIBR on in-hospital falls. It provides evidence that a sustainable, twice-weekly intervention is associated with a reduction in falls. It has the potential to be used in other settings where falls are frequent.

From the Patient's Perspective: Orthopedic Virtual Rounds.

Interdisciplinary rounding on hospital inpatients is an integral part of providing high-quality, safe patient care. As orthopedic groups have grown and geographic coverage increased, surgeons are challenged to make in-person rounds on their patients every day given time constraints and physical distances. Virtual technology is being used in multiple healthcare settings to provide patients with the opportunity to connect with health care professionals when in-person options are not available. The purpose of this study was to explore the patient experience of virtual inpatient rounding. Using digital communication technology, virtual rounds were conducted by having the surgeon connect via their mobile device or laptop to the nursing unit's communication tablet. Twenty-seven patient interviews were digitally recorded and qualitatively analyzed. Results demonstrated that virtual rounds provided a positive patient experience for many. Most patients felt that virtual rounds were a good alternative when in-person rounds are not possible. Dissatisfaction was related to feeling “rushed” by the surgeon. This feedback can be used to better prepare patients and providers for virtual rounds and to enhance virtual technologies.

157. A Multidisciplinary Approach to Carbapenem Stewardship at a Large Community Hospital in Brooklyn, New York

BackgroundCarbapenem-resistant gram-negative organisms are a continuously mounting threat, underscoring the need for effective antimicrobial stewardship interventions to improve the use of carbapenems. We sought to implement several multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship interventions beginning in January 2019 in an effort to reduce unnecessary meropenem use and the incidence of carbapenem-resistant gram-negatives.MethodsProspective audit and feedback was utilized daily in combination with weekly stewardship rounds between an Infectious Diseases pharmacist and physician in the Intensive Care Units. A second Infectious Diseases physician attended weekly interdisciplinary rounds on meropenem high-use units. Meropenem Days of Therapy (DOT) per 1,000 patient days and the incidence of meropenem resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae were compared by the chi-square test of proportions.ResultsBetween 2018 and 2019 the institution’s meropenem DOT per 1,000 patient days decreased 33%, from 57 to 38 days per 1,000 patient days (difference, 19 days per 1,000 patient days; p< 0.001). In the hospital antibiogram, the meropenem susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa over the same time period increased from 71% to 77% of isolates (difference, 6%; p = 0.009). A non-significant decrease in the susceptibility of meropenem to Klebsiella pneumoniae was also observed from 92 to 90% (difference, 2%: p = 0.1658).ConclusionThese data support the need for antimicrobial stewardship efforts targeting broad-spectrum antimicrobials such as meropenem. In the setting of a sustained decrease in meropenem use over 12 months, we observed a significant improvement in the percent susceptibility rate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to meropenem for the first time in five years.Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Perceptions of interdisciplinary bedside rounds by head nurses in Flanders: a cross-sectional exploration

ABSTRACT Objectives Interdisciplinary bedside rounds is gaining ground as a method to improve patient centredness and involvement, quality of care and team collaboration. An exploratory study was conducted in Flemish hospitals to (1) map and (2) examine the current form of rounds and the extent to which these were bedside, patient and family participatory and interdisciplinary. Methods In February 2020, a quantitative cross-sectional self-reporting web-based survey was conducted in 23 hospitals in Flanders, 213 head nurses of 213 wards completed the survey. A self-reporting 19-item questionnaire was developed in Lime Survey®. The questionnaire contained a mix of closed-ended questions an open-ended questions. The data were analysed using SPSS 26.0. Results Most of the wards in Flanders organise a form of daily rounds at the bedside. In only half of the wards these rounds are organised at a fixed time. The rounds most often include a physician and a nurse. Other disciplines are rarely actively involved. Only a minority of wards uses checklists, structures or protocols to standardise the rounds. The majority of the wards reports that patients (and family) get sufficient time to ask questions and say they are actively stimulated to do so. Conclusion In current practice, most rounds are (partially) bedside, open for patient and family participatory and often include only a physician and a nurse. However, these elements of interdisciplinary rounds are not yet well integrated and vary strongly amongst ward. Most rounds should be considered as an extended form of physician rounds, rather than being interdisciplinary.