Intercostal Block Research Articles

Puncture Site Bleeding Complications of Peripheral Nerve Block in Patients Taking Antithrombotic and Anticoagulant Drugs: An Umbrella Review.

While there are multiple guidelines for the management of bleeding complications and hematoma if being treated with antithrombotic and anticoagulant drugs, these risks are not yet stratified for procedures with regional anesthesia. This study was an umbrella review of systematic studies and meta-analysis based on PRISMA guidelines in databases of Scopus, PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Due to heterogeneity in evaluated outcomes and methods of studies, only the qualitative evidence synthesis was performed. AMSTAR checklist was used to assess the risk of bias in included systematic reviews. After an extensive search of relevant studies, 971 primary cases were identified. Following a thorough screening process, 5 systematic reviews were selected. The evidence suggests that head and neck punctures generally do not result in bleeding complications, except for rare cases of hematoma associated with Infraclavicular brachial plexus block. A deep cervical plexus block is not recommended. Interscalene blocks have varying findings, with some studies reporting hematoma incidence and spinal injury, while others consider them low risk. Supraclavicular brachial plexus block might be associated with hemothorax and infraclavicular blocks are not favored by reviews. Axillary brachial plexus blocks have a minor incidence of hematoma. Abdomen blocks, TAP blocks, ilioinguinal blocks, and rectus sheath blocks carry a higher risk of hematoma. Pectoral nerve (PECS) blocks have a relatively high risk, while paravertebral and intercostal blocks are considered high risk, but further research is needed regarding paravertebral blocks. The available evidence from systematic reviews and studies suggests varying levels of risk for different blocks and procedures that should be considered before decision-making.

Twelfth rib syndrome: role of intercostal blocks: case series of 10 patients

Twelfth rib syndrome (TRS) is a rare condition that causes severe pain in the loin. It is often misdiagnosed, leading to unnecessary investigations and treatments. Intercostal blocks in the 11th and 12th rib often resolve the pain for these patients. In this research paper, we aim to explore the role of intercostal block in the management of TRS based on our experience with 10 patients. Data of patients who were diagnosed with TRS were studied retrospectively from our hospital records who have been given intercostal block injection from the period of Jan 2022 to August 2023 as an audit. Four patients underwent intercostal blocks. VAS scores were measured in follow-up for 1 and 3 months. 4 patients were lost to follow up and hence not considered in this study. The male to female ratio was 7:3. There was a statistically significant reduction in VAS score at 1 month and 3 months compared to pre-injection times. Patients who have failed conservative management for TRS can be effectively managed with intercostal block injections.

Serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block: novel block for minimal invasive cardiac surgery -A report of three cases.

Serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block: novel block for minimal invasive cardiac surgery -A report of three cases.

Continuous Analgesia with Intercostal Catheterization after Thoracoscopy.

There are few studies on continuous intercostal nerve block after single operation hole thoracoscopic surgery, that is, two-port thoracoscopic surgery. To evaluate the analgesic effect of continuous intercostal nerve block after thoracoscopic surgery. A total of 80 patients who underwent single operation hole thoracoscopic surgery in our hospital between September 2020 and June 2021 were enrolled and divided into two groups. Based on basic analgesia, an intercostal catheter was placed during the operation for continuous intercostal block analgesia after the operation in the experimental group (group A, n = 40). The control group (group B, n = 40) was treated with sufentanil intravenous analgesia after surgery, which is namely "basic analgesia." The postoperative pain scores, restlessness during the recovery period, effect on reducing opioid use, postoperative chest complications, patient satisfaction, etc., were compared between the two groups. The pain scores of patients in group A were significantly lower compared with those in group B at 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours after surgery (3.325 ± 1.163 vs. 4.550 ± 1.176, 2.650 ± 1.001 vs. 4.000 ± 1.038, 2.325 ± 0.917 vs. 3.700 ± 0.966, and 1.775 ± 1.050 vs. 3.150 ± 1.075, p < 0.001, respectively). Sufentanil consumption in group A was significantly lower than in group B at 48 hours after surgery (98.625 ± 4.158 vs. 106.000 ± 7.228, p < 0.001). Multimodal analgesia is ideal for early pain control after thoracotomy. A continuous intercostal nerve block can effectively reduce postoperative pain in patients.

Effects of parasternal intercostal block on surgical site wound infection and pain in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis.

This study aimed to assess the effect of parasternal intercostal block on postoperative wound infection, pain, and length of hospital stay in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP, and Wanfang databases were extensively queried using a computer, and randomised controlled studies (RCTs) from the inception of each database to July 2023 were sought using keywords in English and Chinese language. Literature quality was assessed using Cochrane-recommended tools, and the included data were collated and analysed using Stata 17.0 software for meta-analysis. Ultimately, eight RCTs were included. Meta-analysis revealed that utilising parasternal intercostal block during cardiac surgery significantly reduced postoperative wound pain (standardised mean difference [SMD] = -1.01, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: -1.70 to -0.31, p = 0.005) and significantly shortened hospital stay (SMD = -0.40, 95% CI: -0.77 to -0.04, p = 0.029), though it may increase the risk of wound infection (OR = 5.03, 95% CI:0.58-44.02, p = 0.144); however, the difference was not statistically significant. The application of parasternal intercostal block during cardiac surgery can significantly reduce postoperative pain and shorten hospital stay. This approach is worth considering for clinical implementation. Decisions regarding its adoption should be made in conjunction with the relevant clinical indices and surgeon's experience.

Continuous Serratus - Intercostal Plane Block for Perioperative Analgesia in Upper Abdominal Surgeries: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.

Acute pain management after open abdominal surgeries is an essential goal in perioperative management.. Recently, serratus-intercostal plane block (SIPB) was suggested as an analgesic technique for upper abdominal surgeries. This prospective, randomized, controlled study included sixty adult patients scheduled for open upper abdominal surgeries. Patients were allocated into two equal groups: SIPB group (S group, n = 30) and control group (the C group, n = 30). In the S group, SIPB was performed in the midaxillary line at the eighth rib level followed by continuous infusion of local anaesthetic for the first postoperative day. In the C group, no block was done. The primary objective of the study was to control postoperative pain on the first postoperative day as assessed by the numerical rating scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes included perioperative hemodynamics, total postoperative analgesic consumption, number of analgesic requests, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. The mean postoperative NRS reported in group S was statistically lower than that in group C (2.4±0.7, 3.9±0.31, P < 0.001). The postoperative morphine consumption was lower in the S group than in the C group [(0 (0-4), 3 (1-4), respectively, P < 0.001]. The incidence of PONV was significantly lower in the S group than in the C group (16.7% and 40%, P < 0.045). SIPB was associated with a better analgesic profile compared with the control group after upper abdominal surgeries. Further studies are recommended to determine block safety in special patient groups, including bariatric and laparoscopic surgeries.

The efficacy of ultrasound-guided rhomboid intercostal block versus serratus plane block in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy

The efficacy of ultrasound-guided rhomboid intercostal block versus serratus plane block in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy

Analgesic effect of rhomboid intercostal block with sub serratus plane block versus thoracic erector Spinae block in multiple rib fractures: A randomized study

Analgesic effect of rhomboid intercostal block with sub serratus plane block versus thoracic erector Spinae block in multiple rib fractures: A randomized study

Comparing Opioid with Opioid-free Anesthesia Technique in Neonates Undergoing Tracheoesophageal Fistula Repair.

Tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) is a congenital disorder that presents as a surgical emergency in neonates. In regions where neonatal intensive care unit facilities and resources are inadequate and skilled personnel are scarce, not extubating neonates on table, contributes to mortality. Our aim was to assess and compare the on-table extubation rate, extubation time, and postoperative pain scores between opioid and opioid-free anesthesia techniques in neonates undergoing surgical repair of TEF. We conducted a prospective, single-blind, randomized trial over 18 months between January 2021 and June 2022 in Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi on 60 full-term neonates scheduled for TEF surgeries randomly allocated to two groups according to the mode of analgesia administered. Group O were given fentanyl injection 1 µg/kg intravenous (IV) loading dose with IV injection. acetaminophen at 7.5 mg/kg and top-up of 0.25 µg/kg fentanyl IV si opus sit. Group NO were given pre-surgical local infiltration and intercostal block with 0.25% and 0.5% bupivacaine, respectively, with IV acetaminophen at 7.5 mg/kg. Mean age in days, gender distribution, and weight in both groups were statistically comparable. The difference in the number of neonates extubated on table was statistically significant (p =0.002) in group NO compared to group O. Lower mean extubation time was seen in group NO (9.0 min 40.0 secs±3.0 min 3.0 secs) compared to group O (16.0 min 45.0 secs±8.0 min 5.0 secs) (p < 0.001). There was a statistically significant (p =0.010) lower Neonatal Infant Pain Scale score in group NO with mean and SD as 1.8±0.8 compared with group O, 2.5±1.1 at 90 min. In neonates undergoing TEF repair, opioid-free anesthesia is a safe and effective method, providing a better extubation rate, faster time to extubation, and better postoperative pain control.

Superficial versus deep parasternal intercostal plane blocks: cadaveric evaluation of injectate spread

BackgroundDeep and superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks provide anterior chest wall analgesia for both breast and cardiac surgery. Our primary objective of this cadaveric study was to describe the parasternal spread of deep and superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks. Our secondary objectives were to describe needle proximity to the internal mammary artery when performing deep parasternal intercostal plane blocks, and compare lateral injectate spread and extension into the rectus sheath. MethodsWe performed ultrasound-guided deep and superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks 2 cm from the sternum at the T3–4 interspace in four fresh frozen cadavers as described in clinical studies. ResultsParasternal spread of injectate was greater with the deep parasternal intercostal plane injection than with the superficial parasternal intercostal plane injection. The internal mammary artery was ∼3 mm away from the needle trajectory in cadaver #1 and ∼5 mm from the internal mammary artery in cadaver #2. Lateral spread extended to the midclavicular line for all deep parasternal intercostal plane blocks and beyond the midclavicular line for all superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks. Neither block extended to the rectus sheath. ConclusionsA greater number of parasternal interspaces were covered with the deep parasternal intercostal plane block than with the superficial parasternal intercostal plane block when one injection was performed at the T3–4 interspace. However, considering proximity to the internal mammary artery, and potential devastating consequences of an arterial injury, we propose that the deep parasternal intercostal plane block be classified as an advanced block and that future studies focus on optimising superficial parasternal intercostal plane parasternal spread.

Intercostal cryonerve block versus elastomeric infusion pump for postoperative analgesia following surgical stabilization of traumatic rib fractures

ObjectivePatients with blunt thoracic trauma requiring surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) frequently experience severe pain. Further, a rising prevalence of opioid-tolerant patients sustain traumatic injuries. The optimal pain management adjunct for concurrent use with SSRF remains uncertain. This study compared outcomes in patients undergoing SSRF with concomitant cryonerve block (CryoNB) or ropivacaine 0.2% elastomeric infusion pump (EIP). MethodsA single-center retrospective comparative analysis was performed at a level II trauma center. A query of our institution's trauma registry of consecutive patients undergoing SSRF from October 2017 to November 2020 with either intercostal CryoNB or ropivacaine 0.2% EIP was conducted. Opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents (OME), patient-reported pain scores by numerical rating scale, and pulmonary function measured by incentive spirometry effort (mL) were collected at baseline and on postoperative days 1–3. Results were analyzed using a linear-mixed-effects model. Length of stay (LOS), complications, and hospital charges were assessed as secondary outcomes. ResultsTwenty-six patients meeting inclusion criteria were evaluated. Patient demographics, injury, and surgical variables were similar between groups. The estimated effect for patients treated with CryoNB (n = 14) compared to EIP (n = 12) demonstrated a 25% (estimated -1.37 OME, 95% CI, -2.411 to -0.335, p = 0.01) reduction in hospital opioid requirements, fewer discharge opioids (41.3 mg (37.5–45) versus 175 mg (150- 200), p = 0.03), 22% (estimated -1.506, 95% CI, -2.722 to -0.290, p = 0.02) reduction in pain scores, and shorter postoperative LOS (4 days (4–5) versus 6 days (5–9.5), p = 0.04). Pulmonary function (estimated -48.8 mL, 95% CI, -312.74 to 215.05, p = 0.71), total hospital costs (CryoNB: $90,224 ± 34,633; EIP: $131,498 ± 73,072, p = 0.07), and complications were no different between cohorts. ConclusionThe addition of intercostal CryoNB as an adjunct to multimodal pain management in trauma patients undergoing surgical fixation of rib fractures may be of benefit. Based on our early data, this technique appears to be promising in reducing opioid requirements and providing an extended duration of pain control without increased costs or complications.

Alcoholization of intercostal nerves for incident pain due to rib metastases.

Rib metastases may cause incident pain on coughing, deep respiration, or on specific thoracic wall movement. Proper titration of opioid doses relieves the background pain adequately, but does not allow a good pain control for incident pain. A patient with rib metastases presented incident pain due to minimal chest wall movement, limiting breathing. Alcoholization of intercostal nerves at T6,T7, T8, and T9, at level of ribs angle, RESULTS: Intercostal blocks were highly effective in relieving incident pain due to rib metastases. A simple and safe procedure may produce effective analgesia preventing incident pain due to rib metastases. Differently from other sites of bone metastases, ribs are easily localized and the neurolytic block results to be effective and safe.

Patient, operative and pain management factors influencing inpatient compared with surgical day care mastectomy procedures at a community hospital.

The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of maximizing same-day discharge after surgery to mitigate potential patient harms associated with inpatient admission and conserve valuable hospital resources. Adoption of same-day discharge after breast surgery, particularly mastectomy, has been slow despite recent research suggesting the physical and psychological benefits of same-day discharge after surgery. We sought to identify factors associated with inpatient compared with surgical day care mastectomy procedures at a community hospital in Vernon, British Columbia. We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent a total mastectomy without reconstruction at Vernon Jubilee Hospital, a 196-bed community hospital, between April 2016 and March 2019. Patient characteristics, operative variables and pain management were compared between inpatient and surgical day care mastectomy procedures. We also compared 7-day readmission, reoperation and complications. A total of 187 mastectomy patients were analyzed with 72 (38.5%) surgical day care procedures. Factors associated with inpatient procedures included longer operative time (66.1 min v. 53.5 min, p = 0.001), bilateral mastectomy (91% v. 9%, p = 0.01) and suspected or confirmed obstructive sleep apnea (32% v. 17%, p = 0.04). Preoperative acetaminophen (83% v. 17%, p < 0.001), multilevel intercostal block (83% v. 17%, p < 0.001) and a prescription for acetaminophen plus tramadol (58% v. 42%, p < 0.001) were associated with day care surgeries. There were no significant differences between the inpatient and surgical day care groups with respect to 7-day readmission, reoperation or postoperative complications. We found no significant differences in surgical outcomes between inpatients and those with same-day discharge after mastectomy procedures. These findings add to the growing body of evidence that surgical day care mastectomy procedures are safe in the community setting.

Rhomboid intercostal block versus serratus block for postoperative analgesia after thoracoscopic sympathectomy for primary palmar hyperhidrosis: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundAlthough thoracoscopic sympathectomy is made via small incisions, it is associated with severe postoperative pain. Both Rhomboid intercostal block (RIB) and serratus anterior plane block (SABP) are recent techniques used for pain control after such procedures. Herein, we compared RIB and SAPB regarding pain control in patients undergoing thoracoscopic sympathectomy for palmar hyperhidrosis.Patients and methodsThree groups were enrolled in this prospective randomized study (71 patients in each group); Group S received SAPB, Group R received RIB and Group C as controls. The block procedures were performed after general anesthesia and prior to the skin incision.ResultsThe three groups showed comparable demographics and operative time (P ˃ 0.05). Pain scores showed a significant decline with the two block procedures compared to controls during the first day following surgery (both P ˂ 0.05), but Group R had better scores compared to Group S. Both block techniques were associated with a significant prolongation of the time to first rescue analgesic and less fentanyl consumption compared to controls (both P ˂ 0.05). However, both parameters were improved with RIB rather than SAPB (both P ˂ 0.05). Both blocks led to a significant improvement in patient satisfaction than in the control group (both P ˂ 0.05), but it was comparable between the two approaches (P ˃ 0.05).ConclusionBoth RIB and SAPB are safe and effective in pain reduction after thoracoscopic sympathectomy procedures in patients with hyperhidrosis. Moreover, RIB is superior to SAPB as it is associated with better analgesic outcomes.Trial registrationPan African Trial Registry PACTR202203766891354. https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/Researcher/TrialRegister.aspx?TrialID=21522

Parasternal intercostal plane block catheters for cardiac surgery: a retrospective, propensity weighted, cohort study.

Aim: Anesthesia for cardiac surgery has evolved toward fast-track recovery strategies incorporating nonopioid analgesics and regional anesthesia. Materials & methods: This retrospective cohort study compared opioid consumption, pain scoresand length of stay in patients who underwent cardiac surgery via median sternotomy and did or did not receive preoperative parasternal intercostal plane block catheters with postoperative ropivacaine infusions. Results: Postoperative opioid consumption and postoperative pain scores did not differ. Blocks were associated with decreased intraoperative opioids and reduced length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital. Conclusion: Parasternal intercostal plane block catheters were not associated with decreased postoperative opioid consumption or pain scores, but were associated with reduced intraoperative opioids and length of stay.

Comparison of the efficacy of ultrasound guided pectoralis-II block and intercostal approach to paravertebral block (proximal intercostal block) among patients undergoing conservative breast surgery: A randomised control study.

Regional anesthesia techniques have attributed a multimodal dimension to pain management after breast surgery. The intercostal approach to paravertebral block has been gaining interest, becoming an alternative to conventional paravertebral block, devoid of complexities in its approach, being recognized as the proximal intercostal block. Parallel to the widespread acceptance of fascial plane blocks in breast surgery, pectoralis II block has emerged as being non-inferior to paravertebral block. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two independent fascial plane blocks, proximal intercostal block and pectoralis II block, in breast conservation surgery. This prospective, randomized control, pilot study included 40 patients, randomly allocated among two groups: proximal intercostal block and pectoralis II block. The pectoralis II block group had significantly lower pain scores at rest in the immediate postoperative period but became comparable with the proximal intercostal block group in the late postoperative period. Pain scores on movement though were lower at 0 h postoperatively and became comparable with the proximal intercostal block group subsequently. Although the pectoralis II group had earlier recovery in the post-anesthesia care unit, the overall time to discharge from the hospital was comparable and not influential. Both groups had high patient satisfaction scores and similar perioperative opioid consumption. Sedation, time to first rescue analgesia, and postoperative nausea vomiting scores were comparable. Fascial plane blocks in the form of pectoralis II and proximal intercostal block facilitate pain alleviation, early return to shoulder arm exercise, and enhanced recovery, which should render them to be incorporated into multimodal interdisciplinary pain management in breast conservation surgery.

Rhomboid intercostal block or thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative recovery quality after video-assisted thoracic surgery: A prospective, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial.

The analgesic characteristics of rhomboid intercostal block (RIB) remain unclear. Before it can be fully recommended, we compared the recovery quality and analgesic effects of RIB and thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). The current study aimed to investigate whether there is a difference in postoperative recovery quality between TPVB and RIB. A prospective, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University in China from March 2021 to August 2022. Eighty patients aged 18 to 80 years, with ASA physical status I to III, and scheduled for elective VATS were enrolled in the trial. Ultrasound-guided TPVB or RIB was performed with 20 ml 0.375% ropivacaine. The primary outcome of the study was the mean difference of quality of recovery-40 scores 24 h postoperatively. The non-inferiority margin was defined as 6.3. Numeric rating scores (NRS) for pain at 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h postoperatively in all patients were also recorded. A total of 75 participants completed the study. The mean difference of quality of recovery-40 scores 24 h postoperatively was -1.6 (95% CI, -4.5 to 1.3), demonstrating the non-inferiority of RIB to TPVB. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the area under the curve for pain NRS over time, at rest and on movement, at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h postoperatively (all P > 0.05), except for the area under the curve pain NRS over time on movement at 48 h postoperatively (P = 0.046). There were no statistical differences between the two groups in the postoperative sufentanil use at 0 to 24 h or 24 to 48 h (all P > 0.05). Our study suggests that RIB was non-inferior to TPVB for the quality of recovery, with almost the same postoperative analgesic effect as TPVB after VATS. chictr.org.cn: ChiCTR2100043841.

Serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block for breast surgery: a report of three cases, novel block and new indication.

Serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block for breast surgery: a report of three cases, novel block and new indication.

Comparison of Intercostal Block and Epidural Analgesia for Post-thoracotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND: Thoracotomy is associated with severe postoperative pain. Effective management of acute pain after thoracotomy may reduce complications and chronic pain. Epidural analgesia (EPI) is considered the gold standard for postthoracotomy analgesia; however, it is associated with complications and limitations. Emerging evidence suggests that an intercostal nerve block (ICB) has a low risk of severe complications. Anesthetists will benefit from a review that assesses the advantages and disadvantages associated with ICB and EPI in thoracotomy. OBJECTIVES: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of ICB and EPI for pain treatment after thoracotomy. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: This study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42021255127). Relevant studies were searched for in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Ovid databases. Primary (postoperative pain at rest and during cough) and secondary (nausea and vomiting, morphine consumption, and length of hospital stay) outcomes were analyzed. The standard mean difference for continuous variables and the risk ratio for dichotomous variables were calculated. RESULTS: Nine randomized controlled studies with a total of 498 patients who underwent thoracotomy were included. The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated no statistically significant differences between the 2 methods in terms of the Visual Analog Scale scores for pain at 6-8, 12-15, 24-25, and 48-50 hours at rest and at 24 hours during coughing after surgery. There were no significant differences in nausea and vomiting, morphine consumption, or length of hospital stay between the ICB and EPI groups. LIMITATIONS: The number of included studies was small, and the quality of evidence was low. CONCLUSIONS: ICB may be as effective as EPI for pain relief after thoracotomy. KEY WORDS: Thoracic surgery, intercostal nerve block, epidural analgesia, postthoracotomy pain, postoperative pain, randomized controlled trial, meta-analysis, systematic review

PO-04-185 SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF BEDSIDE ULTRASOUND-GUIDED SYMPATHETIC BLOCKADE BY PROXIMAL INTERCOSTAL BLOCK IN PATIENTS WITH ELECTRICAL STORM

Electrical storm (ES) patients (pts) who fail standard therapies have a high mortality rate. Previous studies report effective management of ES with bedside, ultrasound-guided percutaneous stellate ganglion block (SGB) as single injection or continuous infusion of local anesthetics. SGB can be technically challenging by the presence of other catheters and support devices in the anatomical area. We report our experience with sympathetic blockade administered by the regional anesthesiology team via the alternative proximal intercostal block (PICB) (Figure 1A-C). This technique targets an area typically free of catheters and support devices, and may pose less strict requirements for anticoagulation interruption, along with lower risk of focal neurologic side effects. To describe safety and efficacy of PICB in patients with refractory ES. We reviewed our institutional data on ES pts who underwent PICB between 1/2019-10/2022 to analyze procedural safety, short and long-term outcome. Total of 12 pts with ES underwent PICB during this period (Table 1). Five pts initially had left SGB, but 2/5 required PICB due to need for prolonged infusion and rotating site of infusion catheter. Three pts underwent PICB due to lack of efficacy of SGB alone. Sympathetic blockade efficacy appeared higher when left SGB was combined with PICB with response rate of 71.4%. Among ten pts who presented with recurrent ICD shocks (Figure 1D), nine had no further ICD shock after PICB until discharge, heart transplant, or death (P=0.01). There was no procedure-related complication or focal neurologic symptoms. Overall, 8 (66.7%) pts had VT ablation, 9 (75%) pts survived to discharge, 2 (16.7%) pts underwent heart transplantation, 1 (8.4%) patient had ventricular assist device implanted as a bridge to transplant, and 2 (16.7%) pts died. During median of 168 +/- 148.5 days follow up on those pts who survived to discharge without heart transplant, 71.4% remain free of any VT recurrence. In patients with refractory ES, continuous PICB provided safe and effective sympathetic block with no incidence of block-related focal neurologic symptoms. In our series, overall PICB efficacy was 66.7% and the combination of PICB and left SGB appeared complementary. The potential benefits of bilateral sympathetic blocks or block combinations should be carefully weighed against patient- and technique-specific risks and side effects. Larger studies are needed to compare these treatment techniques.