Antiepileptic Drug Interactions Research Articles

Interactions between antiepileptic drugs, and between antiepileptic drugs and other drugs.

Interactions between antiepileptic drugs, or between antiepileptic drugs and other drugs, can be pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic in nature. Pharmacokinetic interactions involve changes in absorption, distribution or elimination, whereas pharmacodynamic interactions involve synergism and antagonism at the site of action. Most clinically important interactions of antiepileptic drugs result from induction or inhibition of drug metabolism. Carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital and primidone are strong inducers of cytochrome P450 and glucuronizing enzymes (as well as P-glycoprotein) and can reduce the efficacy of co-administered medications such as oral anticoagulants, calcium antagonists, steroids, antimicrobial and antineoplastic drugs through this mechanism. Oxcarbazepine, eslicarbazepine acetate, felbamate, rufinamide, topiramate (at doses ≥ 200 mg/day) and perampanel (at doses ≥ 8 mg/day) have weaker inducing properties, and a lower propensity to cause interactions mediated by enzyme induction. Unlike enzyme induction, enzyme inhibition results in decreased metabolic clearance of the affected drug, the serum concentration of which may increase leading to toxic effects. Examples of important interactions mediated by enzyme inhibition include the increase in the serum concentration of phenobarbital and lamotrigine caused by valproic acid. There are also interactions whereby other drugs induce or inhibit the metabolism of antiepileptic drugs, examples being the increase in serum carbamazepine concentration by erythromycin, and the decrease in serum lamotrigine concentration by oestrogen-containing contraceptives. Pharmacodynamic interactions between antiepileptic drugs may also be clinically important. These interactions can have potentially beneficial effects, such as the therapeutic synergism of valproic acid combined with lamotrigine, or adverse effects, such as the reciprocal potentiation of neurotoxicity observed in patients treated with a combination of sodium channel blocking antiepileptic drugs.

Non-convulsive status epilepticus in the elderly.

Altered mental state is a very common presentation in the elderly admitted to the emergency department. It has been determined that about 16% of patients aged 60 or older with confusion of unknown origin have non-convulsive status epilepticus. The diagnosis of non-convulsive status epilepticus is difficult in the elderly because possible aetiologies of confusion may present with the same clinical picture. Non-convulsive status epilepticus in the elderly carries major morbidity and mortality, attributable primarily to aetiology, and treatment is complex, involving treatment of the aetiology and concomitant medical illnesses, whilst balancing the side effects and drug interactions of antiepileptic drugs.

34.: Non-convulsive status epilepticus in the elderly: A review

Altered mental state (AMS) is a common presentation in the elderly to the emergency department. It has been determined that about 16% of patients aged 60 or older with confusion of unknown origin had non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). The diagnosis of NCSE is difficult in the elderly because possible etiologies of confusion could present with the same clinical picture. NCSE in the elderly carries major morbidity and mortality, attributable primarily to the etiology. Treatment of NCSE in the elderly is complex, involving treatment of the etiology and concomitant medical illnesses, whilst balancing the side effects and drug interactions of antiepileptic drugs. A review of the recent literature had been undertaken to look at the studies done on elderly patients with confusion of unknown origin or altered mental states that used an electroencephalogram (EEG) in the workup of these patients, and considered the differential diagnosis of NCSE. At this point, there are many unanswered questions. There needs to be a prospective study to determine the prevalence of NCSE specifically in the elderly patients who present with AMS consecutively. There probably is a need to look at the prevalence of NCSE due to specific etiologies in the elderly. There is a need to identify clinical features in these elderly patients which would predict NCSE with adequate sensitivity and specificity. There is also a need to develop management guidelines on timing, duration and cost effectiveness of emergency EEG in the context of investigating these elderly patients who present with AMS. In an ideal scenario, elderly patients with AMS could have an array of investigations done routinely in the emergency department without delay. NCSE could be picked up on the initial emergent EEG, and together with other neuro-imaging and biochemistry investigations, work out the etiology of the NCSE, and then decide on the appropriate treatment. The treatment plan could be analyzed for risk and benefits with the aid of a decision analysis tool.

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions of perampanel and other antiepileptic drugs in a rat amygdala kindling model

PurposeThis study explored the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic effects of combining perampanel (PER) with commonly co-administered AEDs. MethodA strong stimulus intensity (three-fold higher than after-discharge threshold) was used to elicit drug-resistant seizures in a rat amygdala kindling model. Vehicle, low-dose PER (0.75mg/kg), or high-dose PER (1.5mg/kg), in combination with vehicle, levetiracetam (LEV) 50mg/kg, lamotrigine (LAM) 20mg/kg, carbamazepine (CBZ) 20mg/kg, or valproic acid (VPA) 200mg/kg, were administered intraperitoneally to groups of 6–13 rats. Seizure score, electroencephalography (EEG) seizure duration, and motor seizure duration were evaluated, with pharmacodynamic interactions determined by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Motor impairment was evaluated by rotarod test and two-way ANOVA. ResultsHigh-dose PER, but not low-dose PER, LEV, LAM, CBZ, or VPA, reduced EEG seizure duration, motor seizure duration, and seizure score compared with vehicle alone. However, when low-dose PER was administered in combination with LEV, LAM, CBZ, or VPA, seizure severity parameters were reduced compared with the concomitant AEDs alone. These pharmacodynamic interactions were statistically significant in some cases, but the same AED combinations were not associated with statistically significant neurotoxic interactions. Efficacy may have been slightly affected by changes in PER plasma concentrations in the presence of other AEDs:PER plasma concentrations increased with LEV or LAM co-administration, and decreased with CBZ or VPA co-administration. ConclusionOverall, these data support published Phase III data demonstrating the efficacy of PER as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of refractory partial-onset seizures in patients aged ≥12 years.

Treating epilepsy in the setting of medical comorbidities.

Treatment of epilepsy in patients with medical comorbidities can be challenging. Comorbidities can affect medical management and quality of life. In this review, we discuss treatment options in patients with epilepsy and medical comorbidities. In our opinion, the best way to manage patients with medical comorbidities and epilepsy is to accurately recognize and diagnose medical comorbidities, and to have adequate knowledge and familiarity with antiepileptic drug (AED) metabolism, dosing, side effects, and drug interactions. We believe the trend should move toward using the newer generation of AEDs given their generally reduced rate of adverse effects and interactions. The primary goal of therapy is seizure freedom without side effects.

Additive Interactions between 1-Methyl-1,2,3,4-Tetrahydroisoquinoline and Clobazam in the Mouse Maximal Electroshock-Induced Tonic Seizure Model - An Isobolographic Analysis for Parallel Dose-Response Relationship Curves

Background: The aim of this study was to characterize the anticonvulsant effect of 1-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline (1-MeTHIQ) in combination with clobazam (CLB) in the mouse maximal electroshock-induced seizure (MES) model. Methods: The anticonvulsant interaction profile between 1-MeTHIQ and CLB in the mouse MES model was determined using an isobolographic analysis for parallel dose-response relationship curves. Results: Electroconvulsions were produced in albino Swiss mice by a current (sine wave, 25 mA, 500 V, 50 Hz, 0.2-second stimulus duration) delivered via auricular electrodes by a Hugo Sachs generator. There was an additive effect of the combination of 1-MeTHIQ with CLB (at the fixed ratios of 1:3, 1:1 and 3:1) in the mouse MES-induced tonic seizure model. Conclusions: The additive interaction of the combination of 1-MeTHIQ with CLB (at fixed-ratios of 1:3, 1:1 and 3:1) in the mouse MES model seems to be pharmacodynamic in nature and worth of considering in further clinical practice.

Interactions of levetiracetam with carbamazepine, phenytoin, topiramate and vigabatrin in the mouse 6 Hz psychomotor seizure model – A type II isobolographic analysis

The aim of the presented study was to characterize the anticonvulsant effects of levetiracetam in combination with various antiepileptic drugs (carbamazepine, phenytoin, topiramate and vigabatrin) in the mouse 6Hz psychomotor seizure model. Limbic (psychomotor) seizure activity was evoked in albino Swiss mice by a current (32mA, 6Hz, 3s stimulus duration) delivered via ocular electrodes; type II isobolographic analysis was used to characterize the consequent anticonvulsant interactions between the various drug combinations for fixed-ratios of 1:1, 1:2, 1:5 and 1:10. With type II isobolographic analysis, the combinations of levetiracetam with carbamazepine and phenytoin for the fixed-ratios of 1:5 and 1:10 were supra-additive (synergistic; P<0.01) in terms of seizure suppression, while the combinations for the fixed-ratios of 1:1 and 1:2 were additive. Levetiracetam combined with topiramate and vigabatrin for the fixed-ratio of 1:10 exerted supra-additive interaction (P<0.05), and simultaneously, the two-drug combinations for the fixed-ratios of 1:1, 1:2 and 1:5 produced additive interaction in the mouse 6Hz psychomotor seizure model. The combinations of levetiracetam with carbamazepine and phenytoin for the fixed-ratios of 1:5 and 1:10, as well as the combinations of levetiracetam with topiramate and vigabatrin for the fixed-ratio of 1:10 appear to be particularly favorable combinations exerting supra-additive interaction in the mouse 6Hz psychomotor seizure model. Finally, it may be concluded that because of the synergistic interactions between levetiracetam and carbamazepine, phenytoin, topiramate and vigabatrin, the combinations might be useful in clinical practice.

Drug Interactions with the Newer Antiepileptic Drugs (AEDs)—Part 1: Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Interactions Between AEDs

Since 1989 there has been an exponential introduction of new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) into clinical practice and these include eslicarbazepine acetate, felbamate, gabapentin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, perampanel, pregabalin, retigabine (ezogabine), rufinamide, stiripentol, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide; 16 in total. Because often the treatment of epilepsy is lifelong, and because patients are commonly prescribed polytherapy with other AEDs, AED interactions are an important consideration in the treatment of epilepsy and indeed can be a major therapeutic challenge. For new AEDs, their propensity to interact is particularly important because inevitably they can only be prescribed, at least in the first instance, as adjunctive polytherapy. The present review details the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions that have been reported to occur with the new AEDs. Interaction study details are described, as necessary, so as to allow the reader to take a view as to the possible clinical significance of particular interactions. The principal pharmacokinetic interaction relates to hepatic enzyme induction or inhibition whilst pharmacodynamic interactions principally entail adverse effect synergism, although examples of anticonvulsant synergism also exist. Overall, the new AEDs are less interacting primarily because many are renally excreted or not hepatically metabolised (e.g. gabapentin, lacosamide, levetiracetam, topiramate, vigabatrin) and most do not (or minimally) induce or inhibit hepatic metabolism. A total of 139 pharmacokinetic interactions between concurrent AEDs have been described. The least pharmacokinetic interactions (n ≤ 5) are associated with gabapentin, lacosamide, tiagabine, vigabatrin and zonisamide, whilst lamotrigine (n = 17), felbamate (n = 15), oxcarbazepine (n = 14) and rufinamide (n = 13) are associated with the most. To date, felbamate, gabapentin, oxcarbazepine, perampanel, pregabalin, retigabine, rufinamide, stiripentol and zonisamide have not been associated with any pharmacodynamic interactions.

Synergism of lacosamide with established antiepileptic drugs in the 6‐Hz seizure model in mice

Lacosamide (LCM, Vimpat) is an anticonvulsant with a unique mode of action. This provides lacosamide with the potential to act additively or even synergistically with other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The objective of this study was to determine the presence of such interactions by isobolographic analysis. The anticonvulsant effect of LCM in combination with other AEDs including carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin (PHT), valproate (VPA), lamotrigine (LTG), topiramate (TPM), gabapentin (GBP), and levetiracetam (LEV) at fixed dose ratios of 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1, was evaluated in the 6-Hz-induced seizure model in mice. In addition, the impact of the combinations of LCM with the other AEDs on motor coordination was assessed in the rotarod test. Finally, AED concentrations were measured in blood and brain to evaluate potential pharmacokinetic drug interactions. All studied AEDs produced dose-dependent anticonvulsant effects against 6-Hz-induced seizures. Combinations of LCM with CBZ, LTG, TPM, GBP, or LEV were synergistic. All other LCM/AED combinations displayed additive effects with a tendency toward synergism. Furthermore, no enhanced adverse effects were observed in the rotarod test by combining LCM with other AEDs. No pharmacokinetic interactions were seen on brain AED concentrations. Coadministration of LCM and TPM led to an increase in plasma levels of LCM, whereas the plasma concentration of PHT was increased by coadministration of LCM. The synergistic anticonvulsant interaction of LCM with various AEDs, without exacerbation of adverse motor effects, highlights promising properties of LCM as add-on therapy for drug refractory epilepsy.

Potential role of multidrug resistant proteins in refractory epilepsy and antiepileptic drugs interactions

Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder. About one-third of epilepsy patients have a multidrug resistance (MDR) phenotype and develop refractory epilepsy (RE). Changes in the properties of the antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) targets resulting in reduced drug sensitivity, can't explain the MDR phenotype. This particular refractoriness is now attributed to overexpression of multidrug transporters in brain, leading to impaired access of AEDs to CNS targets, and it was documented in both human as well as in experimental models of RE. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) identified in the MDR1-ABCB1 gene (C3435T/CC-genotype) is associated with increased intestinal expression of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) that affects levels of AEDs in plasma. The functional studies of P-gp using P-gp inhibitors could show the still unclear clinical impact of ABCB1 polymorphisms on AEDs resistance. Some drug-drug interactions previously believed to be cytochrome P450 (CYP) mediated are now also considered to be due to the modulation of multidrug-transporters. Because in certain cases pharmacoresistance can be overcome by add-on therapy, co-administered P-gp inhibitors could contribute to the effectiveness of AEDs treatment in RE. And in this regard, perhaps we can postulate to P-gp as a new clinical therapeutic target in multidrug-refractory epilepsy.

Anticonvulsant interaction of cannabidiol and ethosuximide in rats.

Journal Article Anticonvulsant interaction of cannabidiol and ethosuximide in rats Get access Paul F Consroe, Paul F Consroe College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA Correspondence: College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, U.S.A. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Andrea L Wolkin Andrea L Wolkin College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Volume 29, Issue 1, September 1977, Pages 500–501, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7158.1977.tb11378.x Published: 12 April 2011 Article history Received: 26 January 1977 Published: 12 April 2011

Antiepileptic Drug Interactions - Principles and Clinical Implications

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are widely used as long-term adjunctive therapy or as monotherapy in epilepsy and other indications and consist of a group of drugs that are highly susceptible to drug interactions. The purpose of the present review is to focus upon clinically relevant interactions where AEDs are involved and especially on pharmacokinetic interactions. The older AEDs are susceptible to cause induction (carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone) or inhibition (valproic acid), resulting in a decrease or increase, respectively, in the serum concentration of other AEDs, as well as other drug classes (anticoagulants, oral contraceptives, antidepressants, antipsychotics, antimicrobal drugs, antineoplastic drugs, and immunosupressants). Conversely, the serum concentrations of AEDs may be increased by enzyme inhibitors among antidepressants and antipsychotics, antimicrobal drugs (as macrolides or isoniazid) and decreased by other mechanisms as induction, reduced absorption or excretion (as oral contraceptives, cimetidine, probenicid and antacides). Pharmacokinetic interactions involving newer AEDs include the enzyme inhibitors felbamate, rufinamide, and stiripentol and the inducers oxcarbazepine and topiramate. Lamotrigine is affected by these drugs, older AEDs and other drug classes as oral contraceptives. Individual AED interactions may be divided into three levels depending on the clinical consequences of alterations in serum concentrations. This approach may point to interactions of specific importance, although it should be implemented with caution, as it is not meant to oversimplify fact matters. Level 1 involves serious clinical consequences, and the combination should be avoided. Level 2 usually implies cautiousness and possible dosage adjustments, as the combination may not be possible to avoid. Level 3 refers to interactions where dosage adjustments are usually not necessary. Updated knowledge regarding drug interactions is important to predict the potential for harmful or lacking effects involving AEDs.

Clinical pharmacokinetic interactions between antiepileptic drugs and hormonal contraceptives

Contraceptive management in women with epilepsy is critical owing to the potential maternal and fetal risks if contraception or seizure management fails. This article briefly describes the pharmacokinetic interactions between antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and hormonal contraceptives and the rational strategies that may overcome these risks. Hormonal contraception, including the use of oral contraceptives (OCs), is widely used in many women with epilepsy – there is no strong evidence of seizures worsening with their use. AEDs are the mainstay for seizure control in women with epilepsy. However, there are many factors to consider in the choice of AED therapy and hormonal contraception, since some AEDs can reduce the efficacy of OCs owing to pharmacokinetic interactions. Estrogens and progestogens are metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4. AEDs, such as phenytoin, phenobarbital, carbamazepine, felbamate, topiramate, oxcarbazepine and primidone, induce cytochrome P450 3A4, leading to enhanced metabolism of either or both the estrogenic and progestogenic component of OCs, thereby reducing their efficacy in preventing pregnancy. OCs can also decrease the concentrations of AEDs such as lamotrigine and, thereby, increase the risk of seizures. Increased awareness of AED interactions may help optimize seizure therapy in women with epilepsy.

Isobolographic characterization of the anticonvulsant interaction profiles of levetiracetam in combination with clonazepam, ethosuximide, phenobarbital and valproate in the mouse pentylenetetrazole-induced seizure model

This study was designed so as to characterize the interactions between levetiracetam (LEV) and the conventional antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) clonazepam (CZP), ethosuximide (ETS), phenobarbital (PB), and valproate (VPA) in suppressing pentylenetetrazole (PTZ)-induced clonic seizures in mice by use of type II isobolographic analysis. Adverse-effect profiles of the drugs in combination were determined and brain AED concentrations were measured. The combinations of VPA and ETS with LEV at the fixed-ratio of 1:2, CZP with LEV (1:20,000), and PB with LEV (1:20) were supra-additive (synergistic) in suppressing seizures. In contrast, VPA and ETS with LEV (1:1, 2:1, and 4:1), CZP with LEV (1:1000, 1:5000, and 1:10,000), and PB with LEV (1:1, 1:5, and 1:10) were additive. No adverse effects were observed. ETS significantly reduced brain LEV concentrations but no other pharmacokinetic changes were observed. The combinations of CZP with LEV (1:20,000); VPA and ETS with LEV (1:2); and PB with LEV (1:20) appear to be favorable combinations exerting supra-additive interactions in suppressing PTZ-induced seizures.

Isobolographic characterization of interactions of levetiracetam with the various antiepileptic drugs in the mouse 6 Hz psychomotor seizure model

The aim of this study was to characterize the anticonvulsant effects of levetiracetam (LEV) in combination with the various antiepileptic drugs (clonazepam [CZP], oxcarbazepine [OXC], phenobarbital [PB], tiagabine [TGB], and valproate [VPA]), in the mouse 6 Hz psychomotor seizure model. Limbic (psychomotor) seizure activity was evoked in albino Swiss mice by a current (32 mA, 6 Hz, 3s stimulus duration) delivered via ocular electrodes and isobolographic analysis for parallel and non-parallel dose-response effects was used to characterize the consequent anticonvulsant interactions between the various drug combinations. Potential concurrent adverse-effect profiles of interactions between LEV and CZP, OXC, PB, TGB, and VPA at the fixed-ratio of 1:1 were evaluated in the chimney (motor performance), passive avoidance (long-term memory), and grip-strength (muscular strength) tests. LEV administered singly was associated with a dose-response relationship curve (DRRC) that was parallel to that for CZP and non-parallel to that for OXC, PB, TGB and VPA. With isobolography for parallel DRRCs, the combination of LEV with CZP at three fixed-ratios of 1:3, 1:1 and 3:1 was additive in nature. With isobolography for non-parallel DRRCs the combinations of LEV with OXC, TGB and VPA at the fixed-ratio of 1:1 were also additive. In contrast, the isobolography for non-parallel DRRCs revealed that the interaction for the combination of LEV with PB at the fixed-ratio of 1:1 was supra-additive (synergistic). None of the combinations were associated with any concurrent adverse effects with regards to motor coordination, long-term memory or muscular strength. LEV is associated with favorable anticonvulsant synergism with PB and is additive with regards to CZP, OXC, TGB and VPA in the mouse 6 Hz psychomotor seizure model.

Differential effects of antiepileptic drugs on steroidogenesis in a humanin vitrocell model

To better understand the interaction of antiepileptic drugs and production of sex hormones, possible effects of valproate (VPA), levetiracetam (LEV) and carbamazepine (CBZ) on steroidogenesis were investigated in the human adrenal carcinoma cell line H295R. H295R cells were exposed to different concentrations of VPA, LEV or CBZ for 48 h. Sex hormone concentrations and mRNA expression levels were analyzed via radioimmunoassay and quantitative real time (RT)-PCR, respectively. In VPA-exposed cells estradiol levels decreased in a dose-dependent manner, while testosterone and progesterone levels were unaffected. Expression of 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGR), steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR), CYP11a, CYP17, CYP21, 3betaHSD2, 17betaHSD1 was downregulated and expression of CYP11beta2 was upregulated. No effect on sex hormone production was observed under influence of LEV or CBZ. Expression of StAR, CYP17, CYP19 and 3betaHSD2 was downregulated in LEV-exposed cells, and expression of HMGR, CYP11beta2 and CYP17 was downregulated in CBZ-exposed cells. VPA exposure resulted in a decrease in estradiol levels and a general downregulation of expression of genes encoding for enzymes early in steroidogenesis. No consistent changes were seen with LEV or CBZ exposure.

Antiepileptic drugs: Are women aware of interactions with oral contraceptives and potential teratogenicity?

Women with epilepsy (WWE)'s knowledge of the interaction between antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and oral contraceptives (OCs) and the potential teratogenicity of AEDs has received limited study. We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire study (English or Spanish) among young WWE (18-44 years) to assess demographic characteristics, current AED use, and knowledge of AED interactions with OCs and teratogenicity. We used the Food and Drug Administration's classification system to categorize each AED's teratogenic potential. Participants (n=148) had a mean age of 32 years (SD 8); 32% spoke Spanish and described themselves as Hispanic. Among women prescribed a cytochrome p450-inducing AED, 65% were unaware of decreased OC efficacy. Forty percent of those prescribed Category D AEDs were unaware of potential teratogenic effects. WWE have limited knowledge of the potential interaction between AEDs and OCs and the teratogenic effects of AEDs. Educational efforts should highlight the reproductive health effects of AEDs in WWE.

Antiepileptic Drug Interactions

Antiepileptics are drugs used in the long-term treatment of epilepsy and other conditions such as pain or psychiatric diseases. They are often administered as polytherapy or in combination with other treatments. It is therefore important to know their potential interactions (with each other and with other substances) in order to avoid altering their efficacy or potentiating their side effects. The purpose of this article is to review these aspects and stress the most important interactions in day-to-day clinical practice. Older antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) such as phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital and valproic acid can significantly interfere not only with each other and other AEDs, but also with other treatments. Although newer AEDs have a more favourable pharmacokinetic profile, they are not entirely exempt from interactions and they are also commonly administered in combination with older AEDs. Another aspect that should be considered is the existence of any clinically important pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions in patients requiring the continuous administration of other treatments. We must be aware of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions of AEDs. Because of a lack of significant interactions, drugs such as levetiracetam, gabapentin or pregabalin can be recommended in particular groups such as patients with cancer, transplants, anticoagulant treatments or HIV infection. In all cases, it is important to ensure AED efficacy and prevent serious complications.

Exploring the possible interaction between anti-epilepsy drugs and multidrug efflux pumps; in vitro observations

Approximately one-third of patients with epilepsy display an inherent resistance to pharmacological therapy, manifest as continuing seizures despite maximal tolerated doses of anti-epileptic drugs. One hypothesis for the underlying mechanism of anti-epileptic drug pharmacoresistance is lower drug entry to the epileptic neurones due to the activity of multidrug efflux pumps from the ATP Binding Cassette (ABC) superfamily at the blood-brain barrier. There has been a steady accumulation of animal and human data supporting this theory, particularly for ABC B1 ( P-glycoprotein). However, much of this evidence is indirect. In the present study, several anti-epileptic drugs (carbamazepine, valproic acid, phenytoin, lamotrigine and primidone) were examined for their ability to interact with three ABC transporters that have been implicated pharmacoresistance of anti-epileptic drugs — ABC B1, ABC C1 and ABC G2. Interaction of anti-epileptic drugs with the transporters was assessed by determining whether they could reverse the ability of multidrug ABC transporters to confer a drug resistance phenotype on cancer cell lines. None of these compounds was able to affect the phenotype, suggesting an absence of any interaction with the multidrug transporters. This finding was further investigated by examination of transporter activity; namely the ability to reduce steady-state intracellular [ 3H]-radiolabelled drug accumulation. None of the anti-epileptic drugs affected labelled drug accumulation by any of the triumvirate of multidrug transporters examined, indicating that they are unlikely to be substrates. The lack of direct modulation by anti-epileptic drugs of ABC transporter function suggests that these proteins do not contribute significantly to resistance in epilepsy.

Response to Birbeck et al.

To the Editors: With their letter, Birbeck and colleagues call the attention of the epileptologic community to the problems that derive from the pharmacokinetic interaction between antiretroviral agents (ARTs) and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). This issue is particularly important in sub-Saharan African countries where AIDS prevalence is dramatically high and epilepsy comorbidity is rather frequent due to opportunistic central nervous system infections. As stressed by the authors, no systematic studies of ART–AED interactions have been carried out to date, the available evidence being exclusively based on case reports. Liedtke et al. (2004) reported that carbamazepine levels are increased by approximately two- to threefold with concurrent ART ritonavir, resulting in carbamazepine-related toxicity. The same authors found the effect of ritonavir on phenytoin to be variable; a 30% reduction in phenytoin serum concentration occurred in one patient, while no apparent change was observed in another patient. Another ART, nelfinavir, decreased the plasma levels of phenytoin in a patient who subsequently developed recurrent seizures. Of even more severe concern is the reciprocal effect of enzyme inducer AEDs, which significantly shorten the half-life of the ART, navirapine. The resulting suboptimal levels of navirapine can lead to drug resistance and ART failure. Thus, the enzyme inducers carbamazepine and phenobarbital, two of the most widely-used traditional AEDs, may have a contra-productive effect on antiviral therapy, leading to loss of viral suppression and the emergence of resistance. Conversely, the other widely used traditional AED, sodium valproate, is an enzyme inhibitor and may therefore lead to an unwanted increase in ARTs levels. Moreover, in vitro studies suggest that sodium valproate may increase viral replication (Jennings and Romanelli, 1999). The above problems can be significantly reduced with the use of newer AEDs whose metabolism is independent from, or only partially dependent on the cytochrome P450 system—and thus are less likely to interact with coadministered ARTs. Since some newer AEDs have no enzyme inducing properties, they have little potential for reducing ART effect. The obvious recommendation of using newer AEDs when dealing with AIDS-epilepsy comorbidity clashes with the issue of economic sustainability, which is particularly dramatic in some sub-Saharan countries where the per capita health expenditure is only $5/year. The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) and the International Bureau for Epilepsy (IBE) have among its priorities the epilepsy care across the world. Through the Global Campaign Against Epilepsy (GCAE), a joint ILAE-IBE-World Health Organization (WHO) program, ILAE and IBE are strongly engaged in reducing the treatment gap in developing countries. The problem raised in the letter from Birbeck et al., will be brought to the attention of the GCAE with the following recommendations: A group of experts should review the available evidence about AED–ART interactions. Prospective studies, which focus on systematic monitoring of plasma levels of both AEDs and ARTs, should be carried out in more developed countries. Using these findings, the GCAE should develop a plan that WHO can implement in Africa to face this emergency. To find the necessary resources for implementation, GCAE should seek the collaboration of the pharmaceutical industry.