Intersession Reliability Research Articles

Experimental environment improves the reliability of short-latency afferent inhibition.

Evidence indicates attention can alter afferent inhibition, a Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) evoked measure of cortical inhibition following somatosensory input. When peripheral nerve stimulation is delivered prior to TMS, a phenomenon known as afferent inhibition occurs. The latency between the peripheral nerve stimulation dictates the subtype of afferent inhibition evoked, either short latency afferent inhibition (SAI) or long latency afferent inhibition (LAI). While afferent inhibition is emerging as a valuable tool for clinical assessment of sensorimotor function, the reliability of the measure remains relatively low. Therefore, to improve the translation of afferent inhibition within and beyond the research lab, the reliability of the measure must be improved. Previous literature suggests that the focus of attention can modify the magnitude of afferent inhibition. As such, controlling the focus of attention may be one method to improve the reliability of afferent inhibition. In the present study, the magnitude and reliability of SAI and LAI was assessed under four conditions with varying attentional demands focused on the somatosensory input that evokes SAI and LAI circuits. Thirty individuals participated in four conditions; three conditions were identical in their physical parameters and varied only in the focus of directed attention (visual attend, tactile attend, non- directed attend) and one condition consisted of no external physical parameters (no stimulation). Reliability was measured by repeating conditions at three time points to assess intrasession and intersession reliability. Results indicate that the magnitude of SAI and LAI were not modulated by attention. However, the reliability of SAI demonstrated increased intrasession and intersession reliability compared to the no stimulation condition. The reliability of LAI was unaffected by the attention conditions. This research demonstrates the impact of attention/arousal on the reliability of afferent inhibition and has identified new parameters to inform the design of TMS research to improve reliability.

Reliability of 3D freehand ultrasound to assess lower limb muscles in children with spastic cerebral palsy and typical development.

This study investigated the reliability of 3-dimensional freehand ultrasound (3DfUS) to quantify the size (muscle volume [MV] and anatomical cross-sectional area [aCSA]), length (muscle length [ML], tendon length [TL], and muscle tendon unit length [MTUL]), and echo-intensity (EI, whole muscle and 50% aCSA), of lower limb muscles in children with spastic cerebral palsy (SCP) and typical development (TD). In total, 13 children with SCP (median age 14.3 (7.3) years) and 13 TD children (median age 11.1 (1.7) years) participated. 3DfUS scans of rectus femoris, semitendinosus, medial gastrocnemius, and tibialis anterior were performed by two raters in two sessions. The intra- and inter-rater and intra- and inter-session reliability were defined with relative and absolute reliability measures, that is, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) and absolute and relative standard error of measurement (SEM and SEM%), respectively. Over all conditions, ICCs for muscle size measures ranged from 0.818 to 0.999 with SEM%s of 12.6%-1.6%. For EI measures, ICCs varied from 0.233 to 0.967 with SEM%s of 15.6%-1.7%. Length measure ICCs ranged from 0.642 to 0.999 with SEM%s of 16.0%-0.5%. In general, reliability did not differ between the TD and SCP cohort but the influence of different muscles, raters, and sessions was not constant for all 3DfUS parameters. Muscle length and muscle tendon unit length were the most reliable length parameters in all conditions. MV and aCSA showed comparable SEM%s over all muscles, where tibialis anterior MV was most reliable. EI had low-relative reliability, but absolute reliability was better, with better reliability for the distal muscles in comparison to the proximal muscles. Combining these results with earlier studies describing muscle morphology assessed in children with SCP, 3DfUS seems sufficiently reliable to determine differences between cohorts and functional levels. The applicability on an individual level, for longitudinal follow-up and after interventions is dependent on the investigated muscle and parameter. Moreover, the semitendinosus, the acquisition, and processing of multiple sweeps, and the definition of EI and TL require further investigation. In general, it is recommended, especially for longitudinal follow-up studies, to keep the rater the same, while standardizing acquisition settings and positioning of the subject.

Agreement and reliability of lower limb muscle architecture measurements using a portable ultrasound device

Although ultrasonography is commonly used to assess muscle architecture, high-end ultrasonography devices lack in portability and are expensive. Recently, ultrasonography devices consisting solely of a probe, an app, and/or a mobile display were introduced. These devices have lower acquisition costs than high-end devices and demonstrate higher portability. Portable systems would allow for cost-effective, on-site athlete or patient screenings of muscle architecture as well as diagnosis of pathologies or injury. Furthermore, portable systems can be easily transported to allow for uncomplicated assessment of athletes belonging to different teams or patients in different hospital units. Nonetheless, the reliability of portable systems and the comparability to high-end devices for muscle architecture assessment have not been investigated.
 We investigated the agreement and reliability of a portable and handheld ultrasonography system for muscle architecture measurements in human lower limb muscles. We acquired images of the rectus femoris (RF), vastus lateralis (VL) and gastrocnemius medialis (GM) in 36 active healthy participants (15 female, 21 male) at 50% of muscle length using the handheld Lumify (L12-4, linear array 37 mm, Philips Healthcare, Amsterdam, Netherlands) and a high-end laboratory device (ACUSON Juniper, linear-array 54 mm, 12L3, SIEMENS Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). Muscle length was determined as distance between the proximal and distal muscle tendon junction. We compared measurements of muscle fascicle length, pennation angle and thickness. To assess inter-session reliability of the Lumify system, participants were measured twice within 1 week.
 Comparing RF architecture measurements of both devices resulted in intra-class correlations (ICCs) ranging from 0.46–0.82 and standardized mean difference (SMDs) ranging from −0.45–0.05. For VL, ICCs ranged from 0.60–0.89 and SMDs ranged from −0.11–0.13. ICCs and SMDs for the GM ranged from 0.82–0.86 and −0.07–0.07. Calculating inter-session reliability for RF resulted in ICCs ranging from 0.44–0.76 and SMDs ranging from −0.38–0.15. For VL, ICCs and SMDs ranged from 0.57–0.75 and −0.13–0.02. ICCs for GM ranged from 0.75–0.92 and SMDs ranged from −0.15–0.16. The highest agreement (ICC ≥ 0.82) and reliability (ICC ≥ 0.75) across all muscles was demonstrated for the measurement of muscle thickness.
 The Lumify system was comparable to a high-end device and reliable for GM measurements. Nevertheless, agreement and reliability were lower for the RF and VL. Thus, when interpreting longitudinal observed changes in muscle architecture assessed with the Lumify system, measurement errors should be considered. Future investigations should consider including different participant populations, comparing the reliability of different portable systems for muscle architecture assessment as well as including different muscle groups.

Validity and Reliability of Hip Strength Assessment Using a Frame-Stabilized Dynamometer System Device

ABSTRACT The purpose was to evaluate the intra- and inter-session reliability of hip isometric strength assessment using a frame-stabilized dynamometer (FSD) and to compare the results in the hip adduction (ADD) and abduction (ABD) strength assessment using handheld dynamometer (HHD). Twenty participants (24.2 [2.6] years, 69.3 [10.0] kg) underwent testing on an FSD (ADD and ABD short and long-lever, internal [IR] and external rotation [ER] tests) and using an HHD (ADD and ABD long-lever tests). Analysis revealed excellent (ICC2.k > 0.90) relative intra-set and inter-set reliability for two visits and good reliability for test-retest results (ICC2.1 0.79–0.90), regardless of the test. Among the tests, SEM and MDC were the highest for the IR and ER results. In comparison with HHD, long-lever ADD strength was higher and long-lever ABD strength was lower when measured using FSD. Although both measurements have been shown to be highly reliable, the discrepancy between the devices exists.

Inter-Session Repeatability of Marker-Less Motion Capture of Treadmill Running Gait

Twenty-one experienced runners completed three treadmill running sessions on different days. Each session consisted of three consecutive 2 min trials at self-selected speeds (RPE = 3, 5, and 7). An eight-camera marker-less motion capture system and instrumented pressure treadmill (TM) collected data over the final ~25 s at each speed. Lower extremity joint angles (ankle, knee, and hip) and segmental angles (pelvis and trunk) were computed for each trial with foot contact and toe off being kinematically determined. Spatiotemporal metrics (ground contact time, step length, and cadence) were measured via TM and compared to their kinematically derived counterparts. All spatiotemporal metrics demonstrated excellent agreement (ICCs > 0.98). Both intra-trial and inter-session variability, averaged across the entire running cycle, for all lower extremity joint angles in all planes were low (intra-trial: sagittal = 2.0°, frontal = 1.2°, and transverse = 1.9°; inter-session: sagittal = 1.4°, frontal = 0.8°, and transverse = 1.3°). Discrete measures of lower extremity joint and segmental angles were evaluated for inter-session reliability at foot contact, toe off, and peak value during the stance phase. On average, discrete measures demonstrated good reliability (ICCsagittal = 0.85, ICCfrontal = 0.83, and ICCtransverse = 0.77) with average standard error of measurement < 1°. Marker-less motion capture reliably measured treadmill running kinematics in a group of runners demonstrating heterogenous foot strike patterns (13 rearfoot strike and 8 non-rearfoot strike) across a range of speeds (2.67–4.44 m/s).

In vivo assessment of the elastic properties of the external anal sphincter in term pregnant women using shear wave elastography.

The objective was to assess the intraobserver intersession and interobserver intrasession reliability of shear wave elastography applied to the external anal sphincter in term pregnant women. This prospective study involved nulliparous pregnant women at 37 weeks or more with two visits (V1: one observer; V2 two observers) planned within a 12-h to 7-day interval. Measurements were performed using an Aixplorer V12® device with an SL 18-5 linear probe using a transperineal approach, allowing a measurement of the shear modulus (SM) in kPa. Measures were performed at rest, Valsalva maneuver, and maximal contraction. Reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The study was approved by an ethics committee (ID RCB: 2020-A00764-65). A total of 37 women were included. Intraobserver reliability was excellent at rest (ICC = 0.91 [0.84-0.95) and good during the Valsalva maneuver (ICC = 0.83 [0.72-0.90]) and contraction (ICC = 0.85 [0.75-0.91]). Interobserver reliability was good at rest (ICC = 0.79 [0.66-0.87]) and during Valsalva (ICC = 0.84 [0.73-0.90]), but moderate during contraction (ICC = 0.70 [0.53-0.82]). Shear wave elastography is a reliable tool for assessing the elastic properties of the external anal sphincter in term pregnant women.

Post-game recovery of isometric hamstring strength in a high-risk hamstring strain injury group throughout an Australian Football League season

ABSTRACT This study sought to investigate post-game hamstring strength recovery of 26 Australian Football League (AFL) players with a previous hamstring strain injury (HSI) across an AFL season. Maximal unilateral isometric knee flexion strength was assessed using an externally fixed dynamometer, and inter-session reliability was measured during the pre-season period. Linear mixed effects models investigated the influence of numerous variables on post-game hamstring strength decrement (relative change between initial weekly test and individual baseline) and individual within-week strength change following gameplay. The test demonstrated good inter-tester reliability (ICC = 0.81–0.88; CV = 6.73–7.33), and an acceptable level of error (MAE = 5.77–7.14%). Player as a random effect strongly influenced post-game strength decrement and within-week strength change (marginal R2 = 0.185–0.407; conditional R2 = 0.455–0.654). Within-week hamstring strength change was strongly determined by post-game strength decrement alone (estimate = 0.51, 95% CI = -0.66- -0.36 ; η2 = 0.32; P=<0.001) and in interaction with number of days post-game (estimate = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.20–0.66; η2 = 0.096; P=<0.001). This study shows the importance of early individual assessment of post-game hamstring strength in players with prior hamstring injury and could be valuable to inform post-game hamstring recovery in future applications.

Pivot Step Jump: A New Test for Evaluating Jumping Ability in Young Basketball Players.

Jumping ability in basketball is usually assessed using standardized vertical jump tests. However, they lack specificity and do not consider the player’s basketball skills. Several studies have suggested performing specific jump tests, which are tailored to the movement patterns and requirements of a basketball game. The pivot step jump test (PSJT) is a novel test designed to evaluate the specific jumping abilities of basketball players by combining a pivot step on one leg with a maximum bilateral vertical jump. This study had two aims: to determine the reliability and validity of the PSJT using typical jump tests as the criterion measure and to demonstrate the PSJT as a practical test to evaluate specific jumping ability in young male and female basketball players. Twenty female (EGA; 14.0 ± 0.7 years, 59.3 ± 7.9 kg, 162.1 ± 5.5 cm) and fifteen male (EGB; 14.0 ± 0.7 years, 58.1 ± 7.7 kg, 170.3 ± 6.4 cm) basketball players participated in the study. The test−retest reliability of the PSJT within sessions (intrasession reliability) and across sessions (intersession reliability) was assessed within EGA. For the evaluation of validity, EGB performed the PSJT and a series of criterion jumping tests. For EGA, no changes (p > 0.05) were found in PSJT performance between test sessions and excellent intra- and intersession reliability was observed (ICCs > 0.75). Correlation coefficients indicated high factorial validity between the jumping tests and PSJT (r = 0.71−0.91, p < 0.001). The PSJT appears to offer a valid assessment of jumping ability in basketball and is a practical test for assessing sport-specific jumping skills in young basketball players.

Reliability of Repeated Nordic Hamstring Strength in Rugby Players Using a Load Cell Device.

Hamstring strain injuries are one of the most common injuries in Rugby Union players, representing up to 15% of all sustained injuries. The Nordic eccentric hamstring test assesses the maximal hamstring eccentric strength and imbalances between limbs. Asymmetries and deficits in hamstring strength between legs are commonly assessed and used as screening methods to prevent injuries which can only be proven effective if hamstring strength measures are reliable over time. We conducted a repeated-measures reliability study with 25 male Rugby Union players. Nordic eccentric strength and bilateral strength balance was assessed. Three testing sessions were undertaken over three consecutive weeks. Intrasession and intersession reliabilities were assessed using typical errors (TE), coefficient of variations (CV), and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Our results showed good intrasession reliability (ICC = 0.79-0.90, TE = 26.8 N to 28.9 N, CV = 5.5% to 6.7%), whilst intersession reliability was fair for mean and the max (ICC = 0.52-0.64, TE = 44.1 N to 55.9 N, CV from 7.4% to 12.5%). Regarding the bilateral strength balance ratios, our results showed good intrasession reliability (ICC = 0.62-0.89, TE = 0.5, CV = 4.4% to 7.2%), whilst the intersession reliability for mean and max values was fair (ICC = 0.52-0.54) with a good absolute intersession reliability CV ranging from 8.2% to 9.6%. Assessing the Nordic eccentric hamstring strength and the bilateral strength balance in Rugby players using a load cell device is a feasible method to test, and demonstrated good intrasession and fair intersession reliability. Nordic eccentric strength assessment is a more practical and functional test than isokinetic; we provide data from Rugby Union players to inform clinicians, and to establish normative values in this cohort.

Instrumented strength assessment in typically developing children and children with a neural or neuromuscular disorder: A reliability, validity and responsiveness study.

The aim of this study was to determine the clinimetric properties, i.e., reliability, validity and responsiveness of an instrumented strength assessment in typically developing (TD) children and children with cerebral palsy (CP) and Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Force (N), torque (Nm) and normalized torque (Nm/kg) were defined for maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVICs) of the lower limb muscles using a pre-established protocol. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC) of TD children (n = 14), children with CP (n = 11) and DMD (n = 11) were used to evaluate intra-rater reliability for the three cohorts and the inter-rater intersession as well as inter-rater intrasession reliability for TD children. Construct validity was assessed by comparing MVICs in TD children (n = 28) to children with CP (n = 26) and to children with DMD (n = 30), using the Kruskal Wallis and post-hoc Mann-Whitney U tests. Responsiveness was investigated by assessing changes in MVICs following a strength intervention in CP (n = 26) and a 1 and 2year follow-up study in DMD (n = 13 and n = 6, respectively), using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test. The overall intra-rater reliability, was classified as good to excellent for 65.1%, moderate for 27.0% and poor for 7.9% of the measures (47.6%, 76.2%, and 66.7% good-excellent; 28.6%, 23.8%, and 33.7% moderate; 23.8%, 0%, and 0% poor in TD, CP, and DMD, respectively), while ICC values for TD children were slightly lower for inter-rater intrasession reliability (38.1% good-excellent, 33.3% moderate and 26.6% poor) and for inter-rater intersession reliability (47.6% good-excellent, 23.8% moderate and 28.6% poor). Children with CP and DMD were significantly weaker than TD children (p < 0.001) and the majority of these strength differences exceeded the MDC. Children with CP significantly improved strength after training, with changes that exceeded the SEMs, whereas only limited strength decreases over time were observed in the DMD cohort. In conclusion, the investigated instrumented strength assessment was sufficiently reliable to confirm known-group validity for both cohorts and could detect the responsiveness of children with CP after a strength intervention. However, more research is necessary to determine the responsiveness of this assessment in children with DMD regarding their natural decline.

Reliability of Upper Limb Neurodynamic Tests: Median, Radial, and Ulnar Nerves

Objective Upper limb neurodynamic tests are used to evaluate the mechanical sensitivity of the peripheral nerves. However, very little is known about the reliability of upper limb neurodynamic tests, especially for the radial and ulnar nerves. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of neurodynamic tests of the upper extremities to test median, radial, and ulnar nerves. Materials &amp; Methods In this observational cross-sectional study, 25 asymptomatic subjects aged 19-45 years participated. They were selected using simple non-random sampling. Then two examiners performed the neurodynamic tests on them on two successive days. The goal was to assess the reliability of median, radial, and ulnar neurodynamic tests. During the neurodynamic tests, the participants reported the initial stretching pain and the moment of submaximal pain (substantially obvious pain) in related areas of the nerve distribution, including the anterior side of the elbow and forearm for the median nerve, posterolateral aspect of the elbow and forearm for radial nerve, and medial side of elbow and forearm for the ulnar nerve. At the starting point of painful stretching and the submaximal pain, the angle of elbow extension (for median and radial nerve tests) and shoulder abduction angle (for ulnar nerve test) were measured using a mechanical goniometer. The range between these two points was used to analyze the reliability. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the standard error of measurement (SEM) were calculated to examine the relative and absolute reliability, respectively. Using t-test, the difference in the mean of the measurements was calculated. Results No significant difference was found between the mean measurements of the two testers in intra-session and inter-session reliability. For examiners 1 and 2, was obtained 0.94 (SEM:2ο) and 0.89 (SEM:2.85ο) for the median nerve, 0.56 (SEM:6.36˚ ) and 0.93 (SEM:1.82ο) for radial nerve, and 0.42 (SEM:3.27ο) and 0.79 (SEM:1.42ο) for the ulnar nerve. Inter-tester intra-session reliability was obtained at 0.84 (SEM: 3.44ο), 0.54 (SEM: 6.1ο), and 0.55 (SEM: 2.75ο), respectively, for median, radial, and ulnar nerves. Inter-tester inter-session reliability was obtained at 0.97 (SEM:1.43ο), 0.69 (SEM:5.06ο), and 0.51 (SEM: 2.8˚ο), respectively, for median, radial, and ulnar nerves. Conclusion The upper limb neurodynamic tests and measurement of the range between the onset of stretching pain and the point of submaximal pain have moderate to excellent reliability. Therefore, these clinical tests can be used in diagnostic evaluations and treatment interventions. Also, the median nerve neurodynamic test has higher relative reliability than radial and ulnar nerve neurodynamic tests.

Measurement of Achilles tendon loading using shear wave tensiometry: A reliability study

BackgroundShear wave tensiometry is a recent promising technology which can be used to evaluate tendon loading. Knowing the clinimetric features (e.g., reliability) of this technology is important for use in clinical and research settings. ObjectivesTo evaluate the inter-session reliability of a novel shear wave tensiometer for the assessment of Achilles tendon loading. A further aim was to test the construct validity of this device by evaluating its precision in detecting Achilles tendon loading changes induced by a plantar flexor isometric contraction of increasing intensity. MethodTen healthy participants were recruited. Five measurements were performed at different time points to evaluate inter-session reliability. Shear wave speed along the Achilles tendon was evaluated during different isometric contractions using a shear wave tensiometer composed of an array of four accelerometers fixed on the tendon, ranging from 4 to 8.5 cm from the calcaneal insertion of the tendon. Test-retest, intra- and inter-session reliability were determined using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC3.1). Absolute reliability was calculated using the standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change. ResultsTest-retest reliability was good to excellent (ICC3.1 0.87–0.99) for each of the contraction levels examined. Intra-session reliability was good to excellent (ICC3.1 0.85–0.96) and inter-session reliability was also good to excellent (ICC3.1 0.75–0.93) for each of the contraction levels. ConclusionsThis study confirms the reliability of this novel device. Future studies analyzing participants with Achilles tendinopathy are needed to evaluate the capability of shear wave tensiometry to detect transient changes in loading due to pathology.

Reliability of high-density surface electromyography for assessing characteristics of the thoracic erector spinae during static and dynamic tasks

PurposeTo establish intra- and inter-session reliability of high-density surface electromyography (HDEMG)-derived parameters from the thoracic erector spinae (ES) during static and dynamic goal-directed voluntary movements of the trunk, and during functional reaching tasks. MethodsTwenty participants performed: 1) static trunk extension, 2) dynamic trunk forward and lateral flexion, and 3) multidirectional functional reaching tasks on two occasions separated by 7.5 ± 1.2 days. Muscle activity was recorded bilaterally from the thoracic ES. Root mean square (RMS), coordinates of the barycentre, mean frequency (MNF), and entropy were derived from the HDEMG signals. Reliability was determined with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation, and standard error of measurement. ResultsGood-to-excellent intra-session reliability was found for all parameters and tasks (ICC: 0.79-0.99), whereas inter-session reliability varied across tasks. Static tasks demonstrated higher reliability in most parameters compared to functional and dynamic tasks. Absolute RMS and MNF showed the highest overall reliability across tasks (ICC: 0.66-0.98), while reliability of the barycentre was influenced by the direction of the movements. ConclusionRMS and MNF derived from HDEMG show consistent inter-session reliability in goal-directed voluntary movements of the trunk and reaching tasks, whereas the measures of the barycentre and entropy demonstrate task-dependent reliability.

Agreement and reliability of lower limb muscle architecture measurements using a portable ultrasound device.

High end ultrasonography devices lack in portability and are expensive. We investigated the agreement and reliability of a handheld and portable ultrasound system for human lower limb muscle architecture measurements. We captured ultrasound images of the rectus femoris (RF), vastus lateralis (VL) and gastrocnemius medialis (GM) in 36 active healthy participants (15 female, 21 male) at 50% of muscle length using the handheld Lumify (L12-4, linear-array 37 mm, Philips Healthcare, Amsterdam, Netherlands) and a high-end laboratory device (ACUSON Juniper, linear-array 54 mm, 12L3, SIEMENS Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). We compared measurements of muscle fascicle length, pennation angle and thickness. To assess inter-session reliability of the Lumify system, participants were measured twice within 1 week. Comparing RF architecture measurements of both devices resulted in intra-class correlations (ICCs) ranging from 0.46–0.82 and standardized mean difference (SMDs) ranging from −0.45–0.05. For VL, ICCs ranged from 0.60–0.89 and SMDs ranged from −0.11–0.13. ICCs and SMDs for the GM ranged from 0.82–0.86 and −0.07–0.07. Calculating inter-session reliability for RF resulted in ICCs ranging from 0.44–0.76 and SMDs ranging from −0.38–0.15. For VL, ICCs and SMDs ranged from 0.57–0.75 and −0.13–0.02. ICCs for GM ranged from 0.75–0.92 and SMDs ranged from −0.15–0.16. Measurement of muscle thickness demonstrated the highest agreement (ICC ≥0.82) and reliability (ICC ≥0.75) across all muscles. The Lumify system was comparable to a high-end device and reliable for GM measurements. However, agreement and reliability were lower for the RF and VL. Of all evaluated architectural parameters, muscle thickness exhibited highest agreement and reliability.

Inter-session Reliability Of A Linear Position Transducer To Measure Velocity Of Bench Press

PURPOSE: To assess inter-session reliability of a linear position transducer (LPT) to measure mean velocity (MV), peak velocity (PV) and displacement (D) of the barbell bench press (BP) at various submaximal loads. METHODS: Nine participants (Men: N = 6; 24 ± 5 years; 1.71 ± 0.47 m; 81.3 ± 12.0 kg) with prior resistance training experience completed three experimental visits separated by at least 48 hours. On Day 1, following an informed consent, participants were asked to complete a 1-RM assessment for the BP after a standard warm-up. On Days 2 and 3, participants completed two sets of three BP repetitions at submaximal loads equal to 30, 50, 60, and 70% 1-RM in a sequential order, following a standard warm-up. The LPT was attached inside the sleeve of the barbell and placed on the ground with the retractable belt perpendicular to the ground. Barbell position was collected at a sampling rate of 100 Hz, exported into a customized spreadsheet, and filtered with a 0.10s rolling average. The repetition onset was defined as a filtered velocity of 0.15 m•s-1. MV, PV, and D were calculated for each repetition and averaged for each set (SA). The repetition with the fastest MV was defined as the best repetition (BR). Inter-session reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and differences between sets were assessed using paired samples t-tests. RESULTS: Data is presented in Table 1. Good (ICC 0.75-0.90) to excellent (ICC >0.90) SA reliability was observed at 30 and 50% using MV and PV, however poor SA reliability was observed at 60 and 70%. A similar pattern was observed for BR reliability; however, only good reliability was observed at 30 and 50%. Reliability for D was consistently higher when using SA in comparison to BR. CONCLUSIONS: When assessing MV and PV using the LPT, higher inter-session reliability is observed at lighter intensities whereas heavier intensities provide questionable reliability. The LPT may be better suited for exercise at lighter intensities.

Inter-session Reliability Of A Linear Position Transducer During Four Intensities Of The Barbell Back Squat

PURPOSE: To determine inter-session reliability of a linear position transducer (LT) during four intensities of a one-repetition maximum (1RM) barbell back squat (BBS). METHODS: Eight healthy men and women (Men: N = 5; 24 ± 5 yrs; 79.6 ± 11.6 kg; 171.1 ± 5.0 cm) with at least six months of prior resistance training experience and an ability to safely perform the BBS were recruited for this investigation. Participants reported to the laboratory for three visits separated by at least 48 hours. Visit one consisted of providing written informed consent and completing a 1RM of the BBS. Visits two and three consisted of two sets of three repetitions at 30, 50, 60, and 70% 1RM with at least three minutes of rest between sets. The LT was placed on the medial side of the barbell sleeve, with the retractable belt perpendicular to the ground. Position was measured at a frequency of 100 Hz with raw data filtered using a 0.10s rolling average while each repetition began once filtered velocity exceeded 0.15 m•s-1. The set with the highest mean velocity (MV), defined as the average over three repetitions and best repetition were compared in bar displacement (D), MV and peak velocity (PV). Reliability was determined using a two-tailed dependent sampled t-test and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: Data are presented in Table 1. Most measures revealed strong reliability with no differences between sessions. However, differences between days were found in average MV and PV at 30%, average D at 60%, best MV and PV at 30%. Moderate reliability with no difference between sessions was found in best D 60%. CONCLUSION: The LT exhibits strong inter-session reliability for average and best MV, PV, and D. Differences observed between days at 30% MV and PV, and the moderate reliability in best 60% D, may have been influenced by the variable training status of our participants. Future research should consider participant training status when examining inter-session reliability of the LT.

The Modified-Athletic Shoulder Test: Reliability and validity of a new on-field assessment tool

ObjectivesTo assess the reliability and the validity of a modified version of the Athletic Shoulder Test (M-AST), using a handheld dynamometer instead of a force plate. DesignTest-retest reliability and concordance between tools. SettingUniversity Motion Lab. ParticipantsTwenty healthy volunteers who practiced an upper limb sport for at least 5 h per week were recruited for the study. Main outcome measuresThe concordance between the Athletic Shoulder Test (AST) and the Modified-Athletic Shoulder Test (M-AST) was assessed with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), paired T-Test and Bland-Altman plots. The inter-session reliability was assessed with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), SEM, MDC and paired T-Test. ResultsA strong concordance was found between AST and M-AST values (ICC = 0.86–0.97; p > 0.05) in all the positions considered and for both sessions. Bland-Altman plots confirmed these results. However, the inter-session reliability was more variable for both AST and M-AST (ICC = 0.643–0.923; p < 0.05). ConclusionsThe M-AST seems to be a reliable, cheaper and easier to implement alternative to the AST to measure recovery status following matches or training sessions in upper limb athletes. As for the AST, familiarization trials will have to be performed before the assessment to have accurate measurements. Clinical trials registration numberNCT05112380.

Original article: Validity and reliability of gait metrics derived from researcher-placed and self-placed wearable inertial sensors

To compare the inter-session placement reliability for researcher-placed and self-placed sensors, and to evaluate the validity and reliability of waveforms and discrete variables from researcher-placed and self-placed sensors following a previously described alignment correction algorithm. Fourteen healthy, pain-free participants underwent gait analysis over two data collection sessions. Participants self-placed an inertial sensor on their left tibia and a researcher placed one on their right tibia, before completing 10 overground walking trials. Following an axis correction from a principal component analysis-based algorithm, validity and reliability were assessed within and between days for each sensor placement type through Euclidean distances, waveforms, and discrete outcomes. The placement location of researcher-placed sensors exhibited good inter-session reliability (ICC = 0.85) in comparison to self-placed sensors (ICC = 0.55). Similarly, waveforms from researcher-placed sensors exhibited excellent validity across all variables (CMC ≥ 0.90), while self-placed sensors saw high validity for most axes with reductions in validity for mediolateral acceleration and frontal plane angular velocity. Discrete outcomes saw good to excellent reliability across both sensor placement types. A simple alignment correction algorithm for inertial sensor gait data demonstrated good to excellent validity and reliability in self-placed sensors with no additional data or measures. This method can be used to align sensors easily and effectively despite sensor placement errors during straight, level walking to improve 3D gait data outcomes in data collected with self-placed sensors.

Novel Metrics for Assessing Mobility During Ground-Standing Transitions.

Transitioning between the ground and standing is a required activity for many professions including skilled trades, law enforcement, and military service. However, available assessments are limited and focus primarily on quality of movement. Thus, we developed two novel assessments of functional mobility specific for ground-to-standing transitions: Stand-Prone-Standx2 (SPS2) and Stand-Kneel-Standx2 (SKS2-L/R) tests. The purpose of this study was to determine the psychometrics of these two new measures in able-bodied (AB) service members and in service members with unilateral lower extremity injury (LEI). A total of 57 AB service members and 31 service members with a traumatic unilateral LEI wearing a custom carbon-fiber ankle-foot orthosis participated in this study. In total, 36 AB and 18 LEI participants returned for a second session to assess intersession reliability. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for intersession and inter-rater comparisons (two-way random model for consistency and single measure). Additionally, performance was compared between legs and groups. The SPS2 and SKS2 assessments demonstrated excellent inter-rater and intersession reliability in both the AB and LEI groups with all intraclass correlation coefficient values greater than 0.8. Further, the tests were responsive to deficits associated with LEI, with the LEI group having significantly longer times on all assessments compared to the AB group. The SPS2 and SKS2 performance measures were found to have excellent inter-rater and intersession reliability in both AB participants and participants with LEI. Further, participants with LEI performed significantly slower than the AB participants. Excellent reliability and responsiveness to deficits associated with LEI support the use of the SPS2 and SKS2 to assess mobility in individuals with LEI. Transitions between the ground and standing occur in many occupational and daily tasks. These reliable performance measures that assess ground-to-stand transitions can be applied widely, in many populations beyond highly functioning service members with LEI.

Test-retest reliability of wireless inertial-sensor derived measurements of knee joint kinematics.

Advances in sensor technology have provided an opportunity to measure gait characteristics using body-worn inertial measurement units (IMUs). Whilst research investigating the validity of IMUs in reporting gait characteristics is extensive, research investigating the reliability of IMUs is limited. This study aimed to investigate the inter-session reliability of wireless IMU derived measures of gait (i.e., knee angle, range of motion) taking multiple test administrators into account. Fifteen healthy volunteers (43 ± 15 years) completed two visits. Within each visit, participants were required to perform two sets of 6 gait trials (6-metre walk tests). IMUs were placed on the participant in 7 locations on the lower limbs and waist. A different test administrator (n = 3) applied the IMUs at each set. At visit 2, this procedure was repeated with the same test administrators as visit 1. Kinematic measures of maximum angle (Knee_Max), minimum angle (Knee_Min), and range of motion (RoM) are reported for the left and right knee. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC) are reported to determine IMU reliability. The results confirmed moderate to good inter-session reliability across all features (0.73-0.87). SEM values ranged from 1.21-3.32° and MDC values ranged from 3.37 - 9.21°. Therefore, IMUs appear to be a reliable method to determine inter-session gait characteristics across multiple test administrators.