This study investigates the role of visual framing in shaping public perceptions of the Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests through an online experiment, informed by news value and protest paradigm theory. It specifically examines the effects of conflict versus solidarity visual frames on audience reactions when paired with textual framing of protest goals. Results indicate that solidarity visuals significantly decrease negative perceptions about protesters compared to conflict visuals, increase positive affect, and boost engagement intentions. Furthermore, the interaction between visual and textual framing demonstrates that “defund” and “reform” messages paired with solidarity visuals effectively reduce negative perceptions. These findings underscore the impact of visual elements in news coverage, highlighting the need for ethical considerations in visual journalism and suggesting that such framing can significantly influence audience attitudes and engagement with social issues.
Read full abstract