Intent-to-treat Population Research Articles

Abstract P2-14-18: A randomized phase II trial of carboplatin with or without nivolumab in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

Abstract Background: Platinum agents induce DNA crosslinking and cause accumulation of genotoxic stress, which leads to immune activation via IFN-γ signaling, making the combination with nivolumab (PD-1 antibody) an attractive strategy to enhance the benefit of either agent alone in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). Methods: In this phase II open-label, investigator-initiated, multicenter trial, patients with unresectable locally advanced or mTNBC treated with 0-1 prior lines of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting were randomized 1:1 to carboplatin (AUC 6) with or without nivolumab (360 mg) IV every 3 weeks. Stratification factors included: germline BRCA (gBRCA) status, prior neo/adjuvant platinum, and number of prior lines of metastatic therapy. After approval of PD-L1 inhibition for mTNBC, the study was amended to include first-line mTNBC only and PD-L1 status was added as a stratification factor. Patients randomized to carboplatin alone were allowed to crossover at progression to receive nivolumab (+ nab-paclitaxel post-amendment). The primary objective was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST 1.1 criteria of carboplatin with or without nivolumab in first-line mTNBC in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Key secondary objectives were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate, and duration and time to objective response. PD-L1 status was confirmed centrally using the SP142 Ventana assay (positive, ≥1% IC). Paired research biopsies at baseline, on-treatment and at progression were performed, if safely accessible. The trial closed to accrual prior to reaching target accrual due to approval of PD-1 inhibition in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy for PD-L1+ mTNBC. Results: Between 1/30/2018 and 12/9/2020, 78 patients enrolled. Three patients did not receive protocol treatment, and the safety analysis was conducted among the 75 that received any treatment; 37 received carboplatin + nivolumab (Arm A), 38 received carboplatin alone (Arm B). Median age was 59.1 yrs (range: 25.4-75.8). Four patients (5.3%) had a known gBRCA1/2 mutation. Sixty-two (82.7%) patients received 0 prior lines (ITT population) and 13 (17.3%) 1 prior line of metastatic therapy. Sixty-seven patients (89.3%) experienced any grade ≥2 treatment-related adverse event (AE). The most frequent AE were platelet count decrease (n=40; 53.3%), anemia (n=36; 48.0%), neutrophil count decrease (n=33; 44.0%) and fatigue (n=24; 32.0%). Grade 3/4 AE were observed in 46 (61.3%) patients, and there was one grade 5 AE (COVID19 pneumonia). Any grade ≥2 immune-related AE (irAE) were observed in 25 of the 37 (67.6%) patients treated with carboplatin + nivolumab. Grade 3/4 irAE were observed in 11 (29.7%) patients. In the ITT population (32 on Arm A; 30 on Arm B), median PFS was 4.2 months with carboplatin + nivolumab, and 5.5 months with carboplatin (stratified HR 0.98, 95% CI [0.51 - 1.88]; p=0.95). ORR was 25% vs. 23.3%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 23.5 months, median OS was 17.5 months vs. 10.7 months (stratified HR 0.63, 95% CI [0.32 - 1.24]; p=0.18). In patients with PD-L1+ mTNBC (13 on Arm A; 11 on Arm B), median PFS was 8.3 months and 4.7 months, respectively (stratified HR 0.63, 95% CI [0.21 - 1.89]; p=0.41). ORR was 23.1% vs. 27.3%, respectively. Median OS was 17.5 months vs. 9.6 months (stratified HR 0.59, 95% CI [0.20 - 1.75]; p=0.34). Conclusions: Addition of nivolumab to carboplatin in patients with previously untreated mTNBC, unselected by PD-L1 status, did not significantly improve PFS. A trend toward improved PFS and OS was observed in patients with PD-L1+ mTNBC. Tissue, blood and intestinal microbiome biomarker analyses are planned; bulk tumor and single-cell sequencing, and TCR sequencing in peripheral blood are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03414684. Citation Format: Ana C Garrido-Castro, Noah Graham, Kevin Bi, Jihye Park, Jingxin Fu, Tanya Keenan, Edward Thomas Richardson, Ricardo Pastorello, Paulina Lange, Victoria Attaya, Robert Wesolowski, Natalie Sinclair, Zarah Lucas, Steve Lo, Nadine Tung, Meredith Faggen, Peter A Kaufman, Caroline C Block, Fred Briccetti, Madhavi Toke, Wendy Chen, Kai Wucherpfennig, Sascha Marx, Ye Tian, Judith Agudo, Jennifer L Guerriero, Stuart Schnitt, Nancy U Lin, Eric P Winer, Elizabeth A Mittendorf, Nabihah Tayob, Eliezer Van Allen, Sara M Tolaney. A randomized phase II trial of carboplatin with or without nivolumab in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-14-18.

Abstract GS2-05: Randomized comparison of adjuvant aromatase inhibitor exemestane (E) plus ovarian function suppression (OFS) vs tamoxifen (T) plus OFS in premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early breast cancer (BC): update of the combined TEXT and SOFT trials

Abstract Background The updated combined SOFT+TEXT analysis, after 9 years median follow-up (MFU), revealed that adjuvant E+OFS vs T+OFS significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) and distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) but not overall survival (OS) in premenopausal women with HR+ early BC (Francis et al NEJM 2018). Given the high rate of OS in both arms and the long-term risk of relapse in HR+ BC, continued follow-up is key to assessing treatment benefit. We report a planned update analysis including OS with database lock of May 2021, after 13 years MFU.. Methods TEXT and SOFT enrolled premenopausal women with HR+ early BC from November 2003 to April 2011 (2660 in TEXT, 3047 in SOFT intention-to-treat (ITT) populations). TEXT randomized women within 12 weeks of surgery to 5 years E+OFS vs T+OFS; chemotherapy (CT) was optional and concurrent with OFS. SOFT randomized women to 5 years E+OFS vs T+OFS vs T alone, within 12 weeks of surgery if no CT planned, or within 8 months of completing (neo)adjuvant CT. Both trials were stratified by CT use. For the combined analysis of E+OFS vs T+OFS, the primary endpoint was DFS defined as invasive local, regional, distant recurrence, contralateral BC, second malignancy, death. Secondary endpoints included invasive breast cancer-free interval (BCFI), DRFI and OS.. Results: At database lock there were 953 DFS events and 473 deaths among 4690 pts assigned to T+OFS or E+OFS. In the ITT population, DFS, BCFI and DRFI outcomes for pts assigned E+OFS (n=2346) continued to be significantly improved over T+OFS (n=2344). 12-yr DFS was 80.5% vs. 75.9% (4.6% absolute improvement; HR 0.79 95% CI 0.70-0.90), 12-yr BCFI was improved by 4.1% and 12-yr DRFI by 1.8%. At 12 years OS was excellent in both groups, 90.1% in pts assigned E+OFS vs 89.1% in pts assigned T+OFS (HR 0.93; 95% CI, 0.78-1.11). There was heterogeneity of relative treatment effect according to HER2 status. When enrollment commenced, anti-HER2 adjuvant therapy was not standard; 53% of 583 pts with HER2+ tumors received HER2-targeted therapy. Below are Kaplan-Meier 12-yr estimates for patients with HER2 negative tumors by trial and chemotherapy stratum and for those with high-grade tumours, as an example of high-risk feature (Table). There is an emerging OS benefit for E+OFS vs T+OFS in pts with HER2 negative tumors who received chemotherapy in both trials.In pts with HER2-negative tumors, clinically-relevant outcome benefits were also seen in other high-risk subgroups: 12-yr DFS and OS were improved by 7.4% and 2.7%, respectively, in pts with pN1a disease, and by 10.6% and 4.5%, respectively, in those with tumors >2cm. Conclusions After 13 years MFU, adjuvant E+OFS, as compared with T+OFS, shows a sustained reduction in the risk of recurrence, more consistent in HER2 negative patients and in those with high-risk disease features, e.g., indication for adjuvant chemotherapy and G3 tumors. Oncologists may use this information to discuss potential benefits of E+OFS with individual patients. Follow-up continues for 5 additional years. Chemotherapy HER2-negativeSOFTT+OFS (n=424)E+OFS (n=411)Absolute difference12-yr DFS67.4%74.1%6.7%12-yr OS81.1%84.4%3.3%TEXTT+OFS (n=656)E+OFS (n=661)Absolute difference12-yr DFS71.0%78.4%7.4%12-yr OS83.5%86.8%3.3%No chemotherapy HER2-negativeSOFTT+OFS (n=445)E+OFS (n=447)Absolute difference12-yr DFS82.9%88.2%5.3%12-yr OS96.1%96.9%0.9%TEXTT+OFS (n=499)E+OFS (n=492)Absolute difference12-yr DFS80.2%86.7%6.5%12-yr OS95.9%96.2%0.2%G3 HER2-negativeT+OFS (n=423)E+OFS (n=405)Absolute difference12-yr DFS62.7%73.0%10.3%12-yr OS78.1%83.6%5.5% Citation Format: Meredith M Regan, Barbara A Walley, Gini F Fleming, Prudence A Francis, Marco A Colleoni, István Láng, Henry L Gómez, Carlo A Tondini, Harold J Burstein, Matthew P Goetz, Eva M Ciruelos, Vered Stearns, Hervé R Bonnefoi, Silvana Martino, Charles E Geyer, Jr, Claudio Chini, Alessandro M Minisini, Simon Spazzapan, Thomas Ruhstaller, Eric P Winer, Barbara Ruepp, Sherene Loi, Alan S Coates, Aron Goldhirsch, Richard D Gelber, Olivia Pagani. Randomized comparison of adjuvant aromatase inhibitor exemestane (E) plus ovarian function suppression (OFS) vs tamoxifen (T) plus OFS in premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early breast cancer (BC): update of the combined TEXT and SOFT trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS2-05.

Abstract P2-13-21: Improved central nervous system outcomes in patients with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer who receive neratinib for the recommended duration: Findings from the phase 3 ExteNET trial

Abstract Background: Non-adherence or early discontinuation from systemic adjuvant therapy is associated with an increased risk of disease recurrence and mortality. In the phase 3 ExteNET trial, neratinib (NERLYNX®), an oral irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, significantly improved invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) when given for 12 months in patients with early-stage HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer after trastuzumab-based therapy. Anti-diarrheal prophylaxis was not mandated by protocol and 17% of patients discontinued neratinib early because of diarrhea. Improved iDFS, distant disease-free survival, and overall survival (OS) have since been reported in patients who completed the planned duration of neratinib therapy compared with all randomized patients [ASCO 2021]. Here we assess central nervous system disease-free survival (CNS-DFS) in 3 discrete groups of patients who completed planned therapy with neratinib in ExteNET: intent-to-treat (ITT) population; patients with hormone receptor-positive disease who initiated neratinib within 1 year after prior trastuzumab (HR+/≤1 year, the population for which neratinib is approved in the EU); and HR+/≤1 year with residual disease post-neoadjuvant therapy (i.e. no pathologic complete response [pCR]). Methods: Patients with early-stage HER2+ breast cancer received oral neratinib 240 mg/day or placebo after trastuzumab-based (neo)adjuvant therapy for 12 months. Patients who completed neratinib therapy (defined as treatment duration ≥11 months or cessation of neratinib if recurrence occurred prior to 11 months) were compared with placebo (all randomized patients). CNS-DFS was defined as time from randomization to any CNS recurrence or death from any cause (exploratory endpoint). Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate CNS-DFS and OS rates. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for neratinib versus placebo were estimated using a Cox proportional hazards model. Data cutoffs: March 2017 (CNS-DFS); July 2019 (OS); median follow-up 8.0 (range 0-9.8) years. Results: 2840 patients were included in the ITT population (1420 per group). Among patients who completed neratinib therapy, CNS-DFS was improved versus placebo in each of the 3 patient groups (see Table). For CNS-DFS, the magnitude of effect of neratinib versus placebo was consistently greater in patients who completed neratinib therapy than in the corresponding overall randomized patient group: ITT HR, 0.70 vs 0.73; HR+/≤1 year HR, 0.27 vs 0.41; HR+/≤ 1 year no pCR HR: 0.16 vs 0.24, respectively. Conclusions: These descriptive findings suggest that, in addition to improved OS, patients who receive the recommended 12-month course of neratinib may have improved CNS outcomes. A dose-escalation strategy, which was shown to improve the tolerability of neratinib, decrease the proportion of patients who discontinue treatment due to diarrhea (3.3%), and allow more patients to stay on treatment for 11 months or longer in the CONTROL trial (NCT02400476) compared with ExteNET, may help to realize these benefits in the real-world setting. Table: CNS-DFS and OS in patients who completed planned therapy with neratinib (ITT, HR+/≤1 year and HR+/≤1 year no pCR)NCNS-DFS rate (5 years)OS rateaPopulation/group NeratinibPlaceboDifference, %bHR (95% CI)Difference, %bHR (95% CI)ITT14201420+1.10.73 (0.45-1.17)-0.10.95 (0.75-1.21)cCompleted therapyd8721420+1.20.70 (0.40-1.19)+2.00.78 (0.58-1.04)HR+/≤1 yeare670664+2.70.41 (0.18-0.85)+2.10.79 (0.55-1.13)Completed therapyd402664+3.20.27 (0.08-0.69)+5.80.49 (0.29-0.78)HR+/≤1 yearb no pCRf131164+6.40.24 (0.04-0.92)+9.10.47 (0.23-0.92)Completed therapyd92164+6.90.16 (0.01-0.81)+13.20.29 (0.10-0.68)aOS analysis after a median follow-up of 8.0 (range 0-9.8) years; bDifference (neratinib vs placebo); cStratified by randomization stratification factors; dDefined as ≥11 months of therapy or ended treatment due to disease recurrence (neratinib arm), and all randomized subjects (placebo arm); eHR+ and ≤1 year after prior trastuzumab; fResidual disease post-neoadjuvant therapy. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CNS-DFS, central nervous system disease-free survival; HR, hazard ratio; HR+, hormone receptor-positive; OS, overall survival; pCR, pathologic complete response. Citation Format: Frankie Ann Holmes, Debra Patt, Yvonne Manalo, Julie C Smith, Steven W Papish, Noa Efrat, Ana Arance, Bo Zhang, Deepa Lalla, Alvin Wong, Miguel Martin. Improved central nervous system outcomes in patients with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer who receive neratinib for the recommended duration: Findings from the phase 3 ExteNET trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-13-21.

Abstract P2-11-19: Estimating the long-term risk of recurrence in patients receiving HER2-targeted agents in HER2+ early-stage breast cancer (ESBC)

Abstract Background: The APHINITY, KATHERINE and ExteNET pivotal trials demonstrated the benefits of HER2-targeted agents for disease-free survival in HER2+ ESBC. However, heterogeneity in patient populations and study designs make assessment of treatment benefits challenging. The objective of this study was to project absolute treatment benefits over a standardized 10-year time horizon. Methods: An epidemiologic model was developed to simulate numbers of distant recurrences for 1000 patients with newly diagnosed HER2+ ESBC in the ExteNET, APHINITY and KATHERINE patient populations and select subgroups. ExteNET evaluated neratinib vs. placebo from 2009 to 2012. APHINITY evaluated pertuzumab + trastuzumab vs. placebo + trastuzumab + standard adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk patients without neoadjuvant therapy treated from 2011 to 2014. KATHERINE evaluated ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) vs. trastuzumab in patients without pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant therapy treated from 2013 to 2016. We used disease-free survival curves from each trial as model inputs to estimate the risk of distant recurrence and extrapolated these results to a standardized 10-year follow-up period. We assumed there were no further treatment benefits to prevention of recurrence beyond the follow-up period of the trial. Survival curve trends beyond each trial’s observation period were informed by the trastuzumab arm of the long-term HERA trial follow-up data. Model outputs were distant recurrences for the control arms for each study and the number of distant recurrences avoided from treatment. Results: Over a 10-year time horizon, treatment benefits ranged from 11 to 65 distant recurrences avoided. Treatment benefit differed according to baseline risk of the trial population and treatment effect, with higher-risk populations and greater treatment effect (e.g. KATHERINE trial) tending to yield greater absolute treatment benefit, with the exception of the ExteNET ITT population as changes in the treatment effect over time (non-proportional hazards) made modeling long-term results more complex. Absolute treatment benefits were similar for the intent-to-treat (ITT) group in the KATHERINE trial and the no pCR group in the ExteNET trial; and the ITT groups in the APHINITY and ExteNET trials. Refinement of model projections and inclusion of local recurrences in a more complex modeling structure are ongoing. Conclusions: Results of our simulation suggest that patients with HER2+ ESBC experience a range of reductions in distant recurrence from HER2-targeted agents, depending on baseline risk (pCR and hormone receptor status), and treatment effect. Epidemiologic modeling may be a useful method to estimate long-term outcomes and facilitate evaluation across disparate clinical trials. Table. Modeled benefits of HER2-targeted agents in a cohort of 1000 patients with HER2+ ESBC over a standardized 10-year timeframeSource data inputsModeled outputs (n=1000)Distant recurrences at 10 yearsClinical study characteristicsHazard ratio for distant recurrence from study1Baseline risk: Events in control armTreatment effect: Distant recurrences avoided from treatmentExteNET study (ITT)0.78 (0.60-1.01) at 5 years14318APHINITY study (ITT)0.76 (0.62-0.95) at 6 years10320ExteNET study (HR+; treated within 12 months of trastuzumab receipt)0.57 (0.39-0.83) at 5 years14727APHINITY study (HR+)0.78 (0.51-1.18) at 6 years26111KATHERINE study (no pCR, ITT)0.60 (0.45-0.79) at 3 years26464KATHERINE study (no pCR, HR+)0.57 (0.42-0.75) at 3 years223941ExteNET study (no pCR, HR+; treated within 12 months of trastuzumab receipt)0.61 (0.32-1.11) at 5 years265651Values in parentheses represent 95% confidence intervals. 2Hazard ratio not reported in clinical study publication. Estimated based on reported IDFS hazard ratio and proportion of distant to all invasive recurrences in ITT population. HR = hormone receptor; ITT = intent-to-treat; pCR = pathologic complete response. Citation Format: David L Veenstra, Nathaniel Hendrix, Chantal M Dolan, Kathryn A Fisher, Deepa Lalla, Nina Oestreicher, Adam Brufsky. Estimating the long-term risk of recurrence in patients receiving HER2-targeted agents in HER2+ early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-11-19.

Abstract PD10-05: Activity of atezolizumab (atezo) plus paclitaxel (pac) in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) according to Burstein molecular subtype: Analysis of the IMpassion131 trial

Abstract Background: In contrast to the IMpassion130 trial evaluating atezo + nab-pac [Schmid, NEJM 2018], the randomized phase 3 IMpassion131 trial (NCT03125902) did not demonstrate significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS; primary endpoint) and showed no improvement in overall survival (OS; secondary endpoint) with the addition of atezo to pac as first-line therapy for mTNBC in either the PD-L1+ or the intention-to-treat (ITT) population [Miles, Ann Oncol 2021]. In IMpassion130, enhanced PFS and OS improvement with atezo + nab-pac were seen in the basal-like immune-activated (BLIA) subtype, whereas potential resistance to atezo + nab-pac was observed in the luminal androgen receptor (LAR) subtype [Emens, ASCO 2021]. LAR may be more prevalent in Asian populations [Ding, Oncotarget 2019], which represented one-third of patients enrolled in IMpassion131 and could have influenced the overall result. PFS outcomes were numerically worse in Asian vs non-Asian subgroups in IMpassion131 [Miles, Ann Oncol 2021]. To investigate potential reasons for observing different effects in IMpassion130 and IMpassion131, we explored the prevalence and impact on clinical outcomes of TNBC molecular subtypes and race in IMpassion131. Patients and Methods: Patients with mTNBC (no prior systemic therapy or ≥12 months since [neo]adjuvant chemotherapy) were randomized 2:1 to atezolizumab 840 mg or placebo (days 1, 15), both with paclitaxel 90 mg/m2 (days 1, 8, 15), every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, stratified by tumor PD-L1 status, prior taxane, liver metastases, and geographic region. Molecular subtypes according to Burstein classification were determined by RNA sequencing (Illumina TruSeq RNA Access) of baseline tumor samples. Prevalence of Burstein molecular subtypes [Burstein, Clin Cancer Res 2015] was assessed in Asian (of whom 69% were enrolled in China) and non-Asian populations; clinical outcomes were assessed according to molecular subtype and race using Cox proportional hazards analysis. All analyses were performed using the final data cut-off (Sep 4, 2020; median follow-up duration: 14.4 months). Results: The biomarker-evaluable population (BEP; n=471) was representative of the ITT population (n=651) with respect to baseline characteristics and PFS hazard ratio (HR; 0.75 [95% CI 0.61-0.92] vs 0.81 [95% CI 0.68-0.96], respectively). Distribution of molecular subtypes in the BEP was: 30% BLIA, 41% basal-like immune suppressed (BLIS), 24% LAR, 5% mesenchymal (MES), similar to IMpassion130. Among the BLIA samples, 82% were PD-L1+ and 18% PD-L1-; corresponding percentages were 41% vs 59% for BLIS, 31% vs 69% for LAR, and 32% vs 68% for MES. Compared with non-Asian patients, the Asian subgroup (n=117) included more LAR (31% vs 22%) and fewer MES (1% vs 6%) samples; this was particularly pronounced in the cohort enrolled in China (n=79; 37% LAR, 0% MES). PFS was improved with atezo + pac in the BLIA subtype (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.45-0.97). None of the Burstein subgroups derived OS benefit from atezo + pac. Findings were similar irrespective of PD-L1 status. Direction of effect for PFS and OS favored the placebo + pac arm in the LAR Asian subgroup (n=30). Conclusion: In these exploratory analyses, the distribution of molecular subtypes and enhanced effect of atezo + pac in the BLIA subtype are consistent with findings from IMpassion130. The lack of improved efficacy with the combination of atezo + pac in the IMpassion131 trial cannot be explained by overrepresentation of a Burstein subtype less sensitive to atezo in the trial population. Citation Format: Fabrice André, Regula Deurloo, Aditi Qamra, David Cameron, Joseph Gligorov, Andreas Schneeweiss, Carlos Barrios, Binghe Xu, Ching-Wei Chang, Luciana Molinero, Shilpen Patel, Andrea Liptrot, Leilani Morales, David Miles, Joyce O’Shaughnessy. Activity of atezolizumab (atezo) plus paclitaxel (pac) in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) according to Burstein molecular subtype: Analysis of the IMpassion131 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD10-05.

Abstract P2-13-05: Central nervous system metastases as a site of first recurrence in adjuvant therapy trials of HER2+ early breast cancer (EBC)

Abstract Background: Among patients (pts) with HER2+ early breast cancer (EBC), the CNS continues to serve as a sanctuary for distant metastases following trastuzumab-based adjuvant treatment (von Minckwitz 2017, Piccart 2020, von Minckwitz 2019). Since the initial trastuzumab adjuvant trials, several other HER2-directed agents, including pertuzumab, lapatinib, ado-trastuzumab emtansine, and neratinib have been evaluated in EBC. We sought to describe the incidence of CNS metastases as a site of first recurrence in pts with HER2+ EBC who have received a HER2 directed agent, in order to evaluate whether there is any evidence of CNS prevention. Methods: A literature analysis was performed to identify controlled pivotal trials of HER2-directed adjuvant therapy in pts with HER2+ EBC and with or without prior neoadjuvant therapy. Data regarding CNS metastases as the first site of recurrence was extracted along with data from a meta-analysis of trastuzumab adjuvant trials. Due to differences in trial design, populations studied and differences in the use of neoadjuvant therapy, a descriptive summary of data is presented in lieu of statistical cross-trial comparisons. Results: Results from adjuvant trials of trastuzumab, lapatinib, neratinib, pertuzumab, and ado-trastuzumab emtansine in pts with HER2+ EBC (meta-analysis of trastuzumab trials, ALLTO, ExteNET, APHINITY and KATHERINE, respectively) are summarized (Table). In the trastuzumab adjuvant trials the incidence of CNS metastases was ~2.5% (Olson 2013). No pts had prior neoadjuvant therapy in APHINITY and neoadjuvant use was limited in ALLTO (8%). The addition of lapatinib, a reversible TKI, or pertuzumab, a HER2 monoclonal antibody, to trastuzumab had no impact on the incidence of CNS metastases. In the lapatinib and pertuzumab studies, the incidence of CNS metastases in all study groups was ~2%. The proportion of pts with CNS recurrence as a first site of metastasis among placebo pts in the ExteNET trial was similar to that reported in the other 3 trials (Table). Numerical improvements in the incidence of CNS as a site of first recurrence were seen in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population as well as in pts with hormone receptor positive (HR+) disease. The 5-year cumulative incidence of CNS metastases as a site of first recurrence in the ExteNET ITT population was 1.3% and in pts with HR+ disease who initiated neratinib ≤1 year post trastuzumab (HR+/≤1yr) was 0.7% (Table). The KATHERINE study, which enrolled higher risk patients, reported a higher incidence of CNS metastases as site of first recurrence, but without a reduction in the intervention arm (5.9% ado-trastuzumab emtansine and 4.3% trastuzumab). In a descriptive analysis of the subgroup of pts in ExteNET who were HR+/≤1yr and had residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy (n=295), the incidence of CNS metastases was 0.8% in the neratinib arm vs 3.6% in the placebo arm. Conclusions: The risk of developing a CNS metastasis as the site of first recurrence is generally low; however, it is higher in those with residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy. The ExteNET trial of neratinib is the only study to show a signal decrease in the incidence of CNS recurrence as the first site of relapse among HER2+ EBC pts. These data are consistent with other trials showing CNS activity with neratinib in the metastatic setting. CNS Recurrence as the First Site of Metastasis in Studies of Adjuvant Therapy in HER2+ EBCTrial and PopulationAnalysis TimepointNNeoadjuvant Population CNS Recurrence, %ComparatorTreatmentAdjuvant trast Meta-analysis1-9020N/A1.942.56ALLTO23 yr5190~822ExteNET3ITT5 yr284026%1.81.3HR+/≤1yr post trast.5 yr133427%2.10.7APHINITY4 node (+) or high-risk node ()3 yr480501.91.9No pCR Post Neoadjuvant TxKATHERINE5 high-risk3 yr1486N/A4.35.9ExteNET3 HR+/≤1yr post trast5 yr295N/A3.60.8HR+/≤1yr, hormone receptor positive with start of neratinib ≤1 year following trastuzumab adjuvant therapy; ITT, intent-to-treat; PLB, placebo; T-DM1, ado trastuzumab emtansine; trast, trastuzumab; pCR, pathologic complete responsea.Using all patients in the trials as a denominator1.Olson 2013; 2. Piccart-Gebhart 2015; 3. Chan 2021; 4. Von Minckwitz 2017; 5. Mamounas 2020 Citation Format: Nancy U Lin, Diana Lueftner, Adam M Brufsky, Sara M Tolaney, Michelle E Melisko, Frankie Ann Holmes, Ahmad Awada. Central nervous system metastases as a site of first recurrence in adjuvant therapy trials of HER2+ early breast cancer (EBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-13-05.

Final results of the CAVE trial in RAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab plus avelumab as rechallenge therapy: Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio predicts survival

BackgroundHigh neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a poor prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Here we provide final results of CAVE mCRC trial, of cetuximab plus avelumab rechallenge in chemo-refractory mCRC patients and investigated the predictive role of NLR. MethodsAll the 77 patients enrolled were included in the analysis. A cut-off of 3 was used to correlate baseline NLR with with overall survival (OS) and with progression free survival (PFS), in intention to treat (ITT) and in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) RAS/BRAF Wild Type (WT) patients. ResultsIn ITT population, NLR <3 (49%) group had median overall survival (mOS) of 17.8 months, vs. 8.9 months in NLR ≥ 3 group (51%) [HR 0.50, (CI 95% 0.3-0.8), P = .006]. Median progression free survival (mPFS) was 3.9 months in NLR <3 group and 3.5 months in NLR≥3 [HR 0.79, (CI 95% 0.5-1.24), P = .3]. In ctDNA RAS/BRAF WT population, mOS was 22 months in NLR <3 group (48%), vs. 8.9 months in NLR ≥3 group (52%), [HR 0.38, (CI 95% 0.19-0.75), P = .005]. A trend towards increased mPFS was observed in patients with NLR <3 versus NLR ≥3: 5.3 vs. 3.6 months [HR: 0.79, (CI 95% 0.44-1.4), P = .43]. In contrast, NLR did not correlate either with PFS or OS in ctDNA RAS/BRAF mutated patients. ConclusionIn the exploratory analysis of the CAVE mCRC trial, baseline NLR <3 significantly correlated with improved survival and may represent a potential predictive biomarker of cetuximab plus avelumab rechallenge activity in ctDNA RAS/BRAF WT patients, that must be confirmed in randomized studies.

Endoscopic sinus surgery with medical therapy versus medical therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial

Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is a common operation for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) when medical therapy alone is insufficient. No randomised controlled trials on the efficacy of ESS have been published. We aimed to assess the efficacy of ESS plus medical therapy versus medical therapy alone in patients with CRSwNP. We performed an open-label, multicentre, pragmatic, randomised, controlled trial in three tertiary care centres and 12 secondary care centres in 11 cities in the Netherlands (Almere, Amstelveen, Amsterdam, Blaricum, Den Haag, Deventer, Haarlem, Hoofddorp, Hoorn, Leiderdorp, and Rotterdam). Adults (aged ≥18 years) with CRSwNP and an indication for ESS were randomly assigned (1:1) using block randomisation (block sizes of six), stratified by study centre, to receive either ESS plus medical therapy or medical therapy. ESS was performed according to local practice, although anterior ethmoidectomy was mandatory. Medical therapy was prescribed at the patient's otorhinolaryngologist's discretion, and could be, but was not limited to, nasal corticosteroids, nasal rinsing, systemic corticosteroids, or systemic antibiotics. The primary outcome was disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at 12 months of follow up, measured with the validated Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22; where each item is scored from 0 to 5, where 0 indicated no problems and 5 indicates problems as bad as can be, with a total score of 0-110 points), and the minimal clinically important difference of the SNOT-22 is 9·0 points. Primary and safety analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis. The ITT population comprised all patients who were randomly assigned to treatment according to their randomisation group and without any protocol violation. This study is registered with the Netherlands Trial Register, NTR4978, and is ongoing. Between Feb 15, 2015, and Aug 27, 2019, 371 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 238 were eligible, willing to participate, and randomly assigned to ESS plus medical therapy (n=121) or medical therapy (n=117) and 234 were included in the baseline ITT population (n=118 ESS plus medical therapy; n=116 medical therapy). 142 (61%) of 234 patients at baseline were men and 92 (39%) were women, and the mean age was 50·4 years (SD 12·7). 206 participants were analysed at 12 months for the primary outcome (n=103 in the ESS plus medical therapy group; n=103 in the medical therapy group). At 12 months follow-up, the mean SNOT-22 score in the ESS plus medical therapy group was 27·9 (SD 20·2; n=103) and in the medical therapy group was 31·1 (20·4; n=103), with an adjusted mean difference of -4·9 (95% CI -9·4 to -0·4), favouring ESS plus medical therapy. Adverse events were similar between the groups. The most common adverse events were minor epistaxis or gastrointestinal problems. No treatment-related deaths occurred, but one patient died due to congestive heart failure. ESS plus medical therapy is more efficacious than medical therapy alone in patients with CRSwNP, although the minimal clinically important difference was not met. Long-term follow-up data are needed to determine whether the effect persists. The current results are a basis for further development of evidence-based guidelines. The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw).

Efficacy of prolonged-release fampridine versus placebo on walking ability, dynamic and static balance, physical impact of multiple sclerosis, and quality of life: an integrated analysis of MOBILE and ENHANCE.

Background:MOBILE and ENHANCE were similarly designed randomized trials of walking-impaired adults with relapsing-remitting or progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) who received placebo or 10 mg prolonged-release (PR)-fampridine twice daily for 24 weeks. Both studies showed sustained and clinically meaningful improvement in broad measures of walking and balance over 24 weeks of PR-fampridine treatment.Objective:To evaluate the functional benefits and safety of PR-fampridine versus placebo using a post hoc integrated efficacy analysis of MOBILE and ENHANCE data.Methods:Data from the intention-to-treat (ITT) populations of MOBILE and ENHANCE studies were pooled in a post hoc analysis based on the following outcome measures: 12-item MS Walking Scale (MSWS-12), Timed Up and Go (TUG) speed, Berg Balance Scale (BBS), MS Impact Scale physical impact subscale (MSIS-29 PHYS), EQ-5D utility index score, visual analogue scale (VAS), and adverse events. The primary analysis was the proportion of people with MS (PwMS) with a mean improvement in MSWS-12 score (⩾8 points) from baseline over 24 weeks. A subgroup analysis based on baseline characteristics was performed.Findings:In the ITT population (N = 765; PR-fampridine, n = 383; placebo, n = 382), a greater proportion of PR-fampridine–treated PwMS than placebo-treated PwMS achieved a clinically meaningful improvement in the MSWS-12 scale over 24 weeks (44.3% versus 33.0%; p < 0.001). PR-fampridine MSWS-12 responders demonstrated greater improvements from baseline in TUG speed, BBS score, MSIS-29 PHYS score, and EQ-5D utility index and VAS scores versus PR-fampridine MSWS-12 nonresponders and placebo. Subgroup analyses based on baseline characteristics showed consistency in the effects of PR-fampridine.Conclusion:The pooled analysis of MOBILE and ENHANCE confirms previous evidence that treatment with PR-fampridine results in clinically meaningful improvements in walking, mobility and balance, self-reported physical impact of MS, and quality of life and is effective across a broad range of PwMS.

A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Triple Therapy versus Non-bismuth based Quadruple Therapy for the Eradication of Helicobacter Pylori in Kuwait.

Introduction:Helicobacter pylori-induced chronic infection is associated with peptic ulcer, chronic gastritis, gastric cancer, and increasing antibiotic resistance. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of clarithromycin-based triple therapy and non-bismuth based quadruple therapy for eradicating H. pylori in patients with chronic gastritis in Kuwait.Methods:We enrolled a total of 603 treatment-naive dyspeptic patients with gastric biopsy-proven chronic gastritis secondary to H. pylori in a prospective, open-label, randomized study. Patients were randomized into two groups: a group received the standard triple therapy (omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin) for 14 days and a group received quadruple therapy (omeprazole, amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole) for 14 days. All patients were tested for the eradication of H. pylori by carbon-13 urea breath test 1 month after eradication therapy.Results:The overall eradication rate was 63.2%. The eradication rates in intention-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) population were 58.4% and 64.6%, respectively, in triple therapy group. In the quadruple therapy group, the eradication rates in ITT and PP population were 68.0% and 78.5%, respectively, with a statistically significant higher eradication rate in patients treated by quadruple therapy than the triple therapy (P < 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that treatment regimen was the only significant predictor for successful H. pylori eradication. The most common adverse events were abnormal taste, headache, dizziness, and abdominal pain.Conclusion:Non-bismuth based quadruple therapy is more effective than standard clarithromycin-based triple therapy for eradicating H. pylori in patients with chronic gastritis.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04617613

Efficacy and safety of delafloxacin, ceftaroline, ceftobiprole, and tigecycline for the empiric treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BackgroundThis review aimed to conduct an indirect comparison using a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the efficacy and safety of delafloxacin versus other single antibiotic regimens for the empiric treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections. MethodA systematic search with no start date restrictions was conducted. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess the quality of included RCTs. ResultsOf the 577 studies initially identified, nine RCTs were included in the review. The network meta-analysis showed that ceftaroline, ceftobiprole, delafloxacin and tigecycline had similar efficacy in the indirect comparisons [Ceftaroline Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.2, 95% Crl = 0.46–3.6), ceftobiprole (OR = 1.3, 95% Crl = 0.34–3.0) and tigecycline (OR = 0.96, 95% Crl = 0.30–2.9)]. However, the ranking plot for the intention to treat (ITT) population showed that delafloxacin had a probability of 80.8% to be ranked first followed by ceftobiprole (13.1%). The analysis of the overall adverse events showed that ceftaroline (OR = 0.88, 95% Crl = 0.65–1.2), ceftobiprole (OR = 1.1, 95% Crl = 0.69–2.0), delafloxacin (OR = 0.88, 95% Crl = 0.57–1.3) and tigecycline (OR = 1.4, 95% Crl = 0.88–2.2) had similar safety profiles. ConclusionDelafloxacin did not show any statistically significant differences when compared to ceftaroline, ceftobiprole, and tigecycline in terms of efficacy and safety. However, the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probability ranked delafloxacin as the first option for the ITT population.

Results of a single-arm pilot study of 32P microparticles in unresectable locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel or FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy

BackgroundUnresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is generally managed with chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, but prognosis is poor with a median survival of ∼13 months (or up to 19 months in some studies). We assessed a novel brachytherapy device, using phosphorous-32 (32P) microparticles, combined with standard-of-care chemotherapy.Patients and methodsIn this international, multicentre, single-arm, open-label pilot study, adult patients with histologically or cytologically proven unresectable LAPC received 32P microparticles, via endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle implantation, planned for week 4 of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy, per investigator’s choice. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability measured using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. The lead efficacy endpoint was local disease control rate at 16 weeks.ResultsFifty patients were enrolled and received chemotherapy [intention-to-treat (ITT) population]. Forty-two patients received 32P microparticle implantation [per protocol (PP) population]. A total of 1102 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in the ITT/safety population (956 PP), of which 167 (139 PP) were grade ≥3. In the PP population, 41 TEAEs in 16 (38.1%) patients were possibly or probably related to 32P microparticles or implantation procedure, including 8 grade ≥3 in 3 (7.1%) patients, compared with 609 TEAEs in 42 (100%) patients attributed to chemotherapy, including 67 grade ≥3 in 28 patients (66.7%). The local disease control rate at 16 weeks was 82.0% (95% confidence interval: 68.6% to 90.9%) (ITT) and 90.5% (95% confidence interval: 77.4% to 97.3%) (PP). Tumour volume, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels, and metabolic tumour response at week 12 improved significantly. Ten patients (20.0% ITT; 23.8% PP) had surgical resection and median overall survival was 15.2 and 15.5 months for ITT and PP populations, respectively.ConclusionsEndoscopic ultrasound-guided 32P microparticle implantation has an acceptable safety profile. This study also suggests clinically relevant benefits of combining 32P microparticles with standard-of-care systemic chemotherapy for patients with unresectable LAPC.

Intradiscal oxygen-ozone chemonucleolysis versus microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation radiculopathy: a non–inferiority randomized control trial

BACKGROUND CONTEXTLow back pain with or without radicular leg pain is an extremely common health condition significantly impacting patient's activities and quality of life. When conservative management fails, epidural injections providing only temporary relief, are frequently utilized. Intradiscal oxygen-ozone may offer an alternative to epidural injections and further reduce the need for microdiscectomy. PURPOSETo compare the non–inferiority treatment status and clinical outcomes of intradiscal oxygen-ozone with microdiscectomy in patients with refractory radicular leg pain due to single-level contained lumbar disc herniations. STUDY DESIGN / SETTINGMulticenter pilot prospective non–inferiority blocked randomized control trial conducted in three European hospital spine centers. PATIENT SAMPLEForty-nine patients (mean 40 years of age, 17 females/32 males) with a single-level contained lumbar disc herniation, radicular leg pain for more than six weeks, and resistant to medical management were randomized, 25 to intradiscal oxygen-ozone and 24 to microdiscectomy. 88% (43 of 49) received their assigned treatment and constituted the AS-Treated (AT) population. OUTCOME MEASURESPrimary outcome was overall 6-month improvement over baseline in leg pain. Other validated clinical outcomes, including back numerical rating pain scores (NRS), Roland Morris Disability Index (RMDI) and EQ-5D, were collected at baseline, 1 week, 1-, 3-, and 6-months. Procedural technical outcomes were recorded and adverse events were evaluated at all follow-up intervals. METHODSOxygen-ozone treatment performed as outpatient day surgeries, included a one-time intradiscal injection delivered at a concentration of 35±3 μg/cc of oxygen-ozone by a calibrated delivery system. Discectomies performed as open microdiscectomy inpatient surgeries, were without spinal instrumentation, and not as subtotal microdiscectomies. Primary analyses with a non–inferiority margin of -1.94-point difference in 6-month cumulative weighted mean leg pain NRS scores were conducted using As-Treated (AT) and Intent-to-Treat (ITT) populations. In post hoc analyses, differences between treatment groups in improvement over baseline were compared at each follow-up visit, using baseline leg pain as a covariate. RESULTSIn the primary analysis, the overall 6-month difference between treatment groups in leg pain improvement using the AT population was -0.31 (SE, 0.84) points in favor of microdiscectomy and using the ITT population, the difference was 0.32 (SE, 0.88) points in favor of oxygen-ozone. The difference between oxygen-ozone and microdiscectomy did not exceed the non–inferiority 95% confidence lower limit of treatment difference in either the AT (95% lower limit, -1.72) or ITT (95% lower limit, -1.13) populations. Both treatments resulted in rapid and statistically significant improvements over baseline in leg pain, back pain, RMDI, and EQ-5D that persisted in follow-up. Between group differences were not significant for any outcomes. During 6-month follow-up, 71% (17 of 24) of patients receiving oxygen-ozone, avoided microdiscectomy. The mean procedure time for oxygen-ozone was significantly faster than microdiscectomy by 58 minutes (p<.0010) and the mean discharge time from procedure was significantly shorter for the oxygen-ozone procedure (4.3±2.9 hours vs. 44.2±29.9 hours, p<.001). No major adverse events occurred in either treatment group. CONCLUSIONSIntradiscal oxygen-ozone chemonucleolysis for single-level lumbar disc herniations unresponsive to medical management, met the non–inferiority criteria to microdiscectomy on 6-month mean leg pain improvement. Both treatment groups achieved similar rapid significant clinical improvements that persisted and overall, 71% undergoing intradiscal oxygen-ozone were able to avoid surgery.

Efficacy of a Toothpaste Based on Microcrystalline Hydroxyapatite on Children with Hypersensitivity Caused by MIH: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Hypersensitivity is a frequent complaint in children with molar incisor hypomineralisation (MIH). This double-blind randomised controlled trial aimed to evaluate non-inferiority in hypersensitivity relief of a toothpaste containing microcrystalline hydroxyapatite compared to amine fluoride in children with MIH. Children were randomised into 2 groups: either hydroxyapatite (intervention) or amine fluoride toothpaste (control). The primary endpoint was pain sensation in response to tactile stimulus (Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale) 56 days after randomisation and analysed by mixed effects linear regression analysis. Non-inferiority was inferred if the upper limit of the one-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) of the difference between intervention and control group was below the non-inferiority margin of 1 in the ITT (intention-to-treat) and PP (per protocol) population. Twenty-one children were randomised and 14 children finished the study per protocol. In the ITT population, hydroxyapatite was non-inferior to amine fluoride (mean difference: -0.75 95%CI [-∞;0.49]). In the PP population, non-inferiority could not be shown (-0.62 [-∞;1.08]). Overall non-inferiority in hypersensitivity relief of a toothpaste containing hydroxyapatite compared to amine fluoride could not be shown. However, the hydroxyapatite group tended to be less hypersensitive in both populations. Attrition of the PP population due to the COVID-19 pandemic led to loss of statistical power.

Addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

One of the front treatment regimens used for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) is treatment with programmed death-1 (PD-1) or programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) blockade combine with chemotherapy. However, the results of such studies have been controversial. A systematic searched of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the proceedings of the last 5 years of several meetings until February 18, 2021. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS) of PD-L1-positive patients treated with PD1/PD-L1 blockade plus chemotherapy compare with chemotherapy. Overall, 4 studies that included a total of 3007 mTNBC patients were analyzed in this meta-analysis. PFS was significantly improved in the PD1/PD-L1 blockade plus chemotherapy group compared with the chemotherapy group in PD-L1-positive mTNBC patients (hazard ratios, (HR), 0.69; 95% CI, 0.59-0.80; P < .001), also in intention-to-treat (ITT) population (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.74-0.90; P < .001). However, no significant benefit in overall survival (OS) was observed regardless of PD-L1 status or ITT population. The immunotherapy plus chemotherapy has higher adverse events (AEs) compared with chemotherapy (all AEs, Odds ratios (ORs), 2.33; 95% CI, 1.50-3.62; P < .001; grade 3-5 AEs, OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.04-1.55; P = .019). This meta-analysis showed that the addition of PD1/PD-L1 blockade to chemotherapy improved PFS in PD-L1 positive mTNBC patients, also in the ITT population. However, no significant benefit in OS was observed in patients of PD-L1 positive or in the ITT population after adding PD1/PD-L1 blockade. We found a higher rate of AEs with the addition of PD1/PD-L1 blockers to chemotherapy.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PurposeSome studies have shown that Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have a favorable efficacy in advanced triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, but the results are controversial in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) stage. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety after NACT plus ICIs in early TNBC patients.MethodsAfter searching PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane library and several mainly oncology conferences up to 30 January 2021 systematically, and define randomized controlled trials (RCTs) exploring the efficacy and safety of programmed death protein-1/programmed cell death-Ligand 1(PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in TNBC patients. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) in intention-to-treat populations (ITT), and the secondary endpoints were event-free survival (EFS) and safety analysis in the ITT populations.ResultsSix RCTs (N = 2142) were included in our meta-analysis; NACT plus ICIs increased pCR rates compared with NACT in intention-to-treat (ITT) populations (OR: 1.91; 95% CI: 1.32–2.78, P < 0.001). The pCR rate also increased in both PD-L1 positive (OR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.26–2.16, P < 0.001) and PD-L1 negative patients (OR: 1.56; 95% CI: 1.04–2.33, P = 0.03), especially in PD-L1 positive patients. The benefit was also observed in nodal-positive populations (OR: 2.52; 95% CI: 1.69–3.77, P < 0.001) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance-status score (ECOG PS) 0 subgroup (OR: 1.90; 95% CI: 1.42–2.53, P < 0.001). Three RCTs (N = 1615) reported EFS and the results showed that adding PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors increased EFS (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.50–0.83, P = 0.0007) in ITT populations with a short follow-up time. In the safety analysis of 2205 patients with early TNBC from five eligible studies, NACT plus ICIs had a higher risk of grade 3–4 diarrhea (OR: 2.54; 95% CI: 1.21–5.32; P = 0.01), any grade of adverse effects(AEs)including vomiting (OR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.00–1.86; P = 0.05), hyperthyroidism (OR: 6.04; 95% CI: 2.39–15.29; P < 0.001), and hypothyroidism (OR: 5.04; 95% CI: 3.02–8.39; P < 0.001).ConclusionsPD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy can improve pCR rates and EFS, and with an increased incidence of some immune-related AEs compared with chemotherapy alone. NACT plus ICIs might be an option in patients with in PD-L1 positive and high-risk populations with positive nodal disease early TNBC.

Physical exercise and goal attainment after shunt surgery in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a randomised clinical trial

BackgroundRehabilitation in iNPH is suggested to be an important factor to improve patients’ functions but there are lack of clinical trials evaluating the effect of rehabilitation interventions after shunt surgery in iNPH. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of a physical exercise programme and goal attainment for patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) after surgery compared to a control group.MethodsThis was a dual centre randomised controlled trial with assessor blinding, intention-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analysis. Individuals diagnosed with iNPH scheduled to undergo shunt surgery at the Linköping University Hospital in Linköping and Sahlgrenska University Hospital in Gothenburg, Sweden were consecutively eligible for inclusion. Inclusion was conducted between January 2016 and June 2018. The patients were randomised 1:1 using sequentially numbered sealed envelopes to receive either written exercise information (control group) or written information and an additional supervised high-intensity, functional exercise programme (HIFE) executed twice weekly over 12 weeks (exercise group). Preoperatively, the patients set individual goals. The primary outcome was change from baseline in the total iNPH scale score at the post-intervention follow-up. Secondary outcomes were goal attainment, and change in the separate scores of gait, balance, neuropsychology and continence and in the total score after 6 months.ResultsIn total, 127 participants were randomised to the exercise group (n = 62) and to the control group (n = 65). In the ITT population (exercise group, n = 50; control group, n = 59), there were no between-group differences in the primary outcome, but the attrition rate in the exercise group was high. The exercise group improved more than the control group in the balance domain scores after 6 months. Post-intervention, the PP exercise population achieved their set goals to a greater extent than the controls.ConclusionsAn additional effect of the 12-week HIFE-programme on the overall improvement according to the iNPH-scale after shunt surgery in iNPH was not shown. This could be due to high attrition rate. However, the long-term effect on balance and higher goal achievement indicate beneficial influences of supervised physical exercise.Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02659111. Registered 20 January 2016, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02659111

Posterior left pericardiotomy for the prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: an adaptive, single-centre, single-blind, randomised, controlled trial

Atrial fibrillation is the most common complication after cardiac surgery and is associated with extended in-hospital stay and increased adverse outcomes, including death and stroke. Pericardial effusion is common after cardiac surgery and can trigger atrial fibrillation. We tested the hypothesis that posterior left pericardiotomy, a surgical manoeuvre that drains the pericardial space into the left pleural cavity, might reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. In this adaptive, randomised, controlled trial, we recruited adult patients (aged ≥18 years) undergoing elective interventions on the coronary arteries, aortic valve, or ascending aorta, or a combination of these, performed by members of the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery from Weill Cornell Medicine at the New York Presbyterian Hospital in New York, NY, USA. Patients were eligible if they had no history of atrial fibrillation or other arrhythmias or contraindications to the experimental intervention. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1), stratified by CHA2DS2-VASc score and using a mixed-block randomisation approach (block sizes of 4, 6, and 8), to posterior left pericardiotomy or no intervention. Patients and assessors were blinded to treatment assignment. Patients were followed up until 30 days after hospital discharge. The primary outcome was the incidence of atrial fibrillation during postoperative in-hospital stay, which was assessed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Safety was assessed in the as-treated population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02875405, and is now complete. Between Sept 18, 2017, and Aug 2, 2021, 3601 patients were screened and 420 were included and randomly assigned to the posterior left pericardiotomy group (n=212) or the no intervention group (n=208; ITT population). The median age was 61·0 years (IQR 53·0-70·0), 102 (24%) patients were female, and 318 (76%) were male, with a median CHA2DS2-VASc score of 2·0 (IQR 1·0-3·0). The two groups were balanced with respect to clinical and surgical characteristics. No patients were lost to follow-up and data completeness was 100%. Three patients in the posterior left pericardiotomy group did not receive the intervention. In the ITT population, the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation was significantly lower in the posterior left pericardiotomy group than in the no intervention group (37 [17%] of 212 vs 66 [32%] of 208 [p=0·0007]; odds ratio adjusted for the stratification variable 0·44 [95% CI 0·27-0·70; p=0·0005]). Two (1%) of 209 patients in the posterior left pericardiotomy group and one (<1%) of 211 in the no intervention group died within 30 days after hospital discharge. The incidence of postoperative pericardial effusion was lower in the posterior left pericardiotomy group than in the no intervention group (26 [12%] of 209 vs 45 [21%] of 211; relative risk 0·58 [95% CI 0·37-0·91]). Postoperative major adverse events occurred in six (3%) patients in the posterior left pericardiotomy group and in four (2%) in the no intervention group. No posterior left pericardiotomy related complications were seen. Posterior left pericardiotomy is highly effective in reducing the incidence of atrial fibrillation after surgery on the coronary arteries, aortic valve, or ascending aorta, or a combination of these without additional risk of postoperative complications. None.

Daratumumab (DARA) Plus Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (RVd) in Patients (Pts) with Transplant-Eligible Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM): Updated Analysis of Griffin after 24 Months of Maintenance

Daratumumab (DARA) Plus Lenalidomide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (RVd) in Patients (Pts) with Transplant-Eligible Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM): Updated Analysis of Griffin after 24 Months of Maintenance

Pevonedistat (PEV) + Azacitidine (AZA) Versus AZA Alone As First-Line Treatment for Patients with Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)/Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) or Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) with 20-30% Marrow Blasts: The Randomized Phase 3 PANTHER Trial (NCT03268954)

Pevonedistat (PEV) + Azacitidine (AZA) Versus AZA Alone As First-Line Treatment for Patients with Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)/Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML) or Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) with 20-30% Marrow Blasts: The Randomized Phase 3 PANTHER Trial (NCT03268954)