Relationships between forage availability and browsing of planted Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) by black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus columbianus) were studied between June, 1961, and February, 1964, in a 340-acre enclosure occupied by known numbers of deer. The study area, in the Tillamook Burn of northwest Oregon, was burned by three wildfires between 1933 and 1945 which destroyed virtually all conifers. Since 1945, much of the enclosure has been highly disturbed by salvage logging and subsequent erosion, and vegetation consists mainly of seral species of six plant communities. Overstory plant cover averaged 12 percent and understory cover 77 percent in the summer of 1963. Green weights of summer forage averaged about 2,600 lb/acre and forage available for the following winter about 640 lb/acre at the end of the growing season. By midwinter, weathering losses and deer utilization had greatly reduced this amount. Winter growth of herbaceous forage produced about 90 lb/ acre of green feed in March, and by May, forage was again abundant. Leaves of trailing blackberry (Rubus ursinus) were highly preferred forage during winter. Salal (Gaultheria shallon) ranked high but was limited in distribution and abundance. Red huckleberry (Vaccinium parvifolium) and cascara (Rhamnus purshiana) were preferred among common woody plants, but red alder (Alnus rubra), hazel (Corylus cornuta), and vine maple (Acer circinatum) were browsed only when green herbage was unavailable. Green herbage was highly important in winter and early spring. Leaves of forbs and woody plants supplied most summer forage and were utilized in all seasons when available. Planted Douglasfir seedlings ranked higher in preference than most common woody species. Browsing on Douglas fir began with the first snowfall and continued through the winter. It is evident that browsing of Douglas fir will continue until seedlings grow out of reach of deer, because this species is an important food source during winter when preferred green forage is least available. It has long been recognized that deer feed on Douglas fir but until the advent of intensive forest management, this browsing was of little consequence. Foresters have now learned that intensive browsing may result in poor survival and decreased height growth of tree seedlings. Economic losses attributed to browsing have focused attention on an age-old relationship since it is likely that deer have always fed upon seedlings when they had the opportunity. Continuing expansion of tree seeding and planting, and increasing awareness of reforestation failures have focused attention on deer damage in the Pacific Northwest (Lightfoot and Hines 1960, Homing 1962, Heacox and Lawrence 1962). 1 A contribution of the Division of Wildlife Research, Oregon State Game Commission, PittmanRobertson Project W-51-R, and Range Management, Oregon State University. 2 Present address: U. S. Forest Service, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Olympia, Washington. 542 Nearly all reports of damage indicate browsing takes place either during winter when forage supplies are low, or in spring and early summer when new growth on trees appears to be the most attractive forage available. In 1958, the Oregon State Game Commission, in cooperation with the Oregon State Board of Forestry, initiated the Cedar Creek Black-tailed Deer Study to investigate effects of browsing on Douglas fir planted to reforest the 340,000-acre Tillamook Burn in northwest Oregon (Oregon State Board of Forestry 1962). Progress in reforestation was slowed by a number of factors, including winter deer damage to Douglas-fir plantations (Kallander 1953, Lightfoot and Hines 1960). The present study, carried out as a thesis project in Range Management at Oregon State University, had three objectives: (1) to determine forage availability, This content downloaded from 157.55.39.186 on Sun, 09 Oct 2016 04:13:05 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms AVAILABLE FORAGE AND BROWSING OF DOUGLAS FIR * Crouch (2) to study forage utilization by a controlled number of deer, and (3) to identify factors influencing browsing on tree seedlings. The study was conducted over a 3year period from June, 1961, through June, 1964. I acknowledge the advice and assistance of Drs. D. W. Hedrick and C. E. Poulton of the Range Management Staff, and Dr. H. J. Rayner, W. C. Lightfoot, and W. W. Hines of the Oregon State Game Commission, Research Division. Special thanks are extended to Dr. Hedrick for guidance during the study and assistance in preparing this paper. Appreciation is also extended to Dr. W. H. Lawrence, Weyerhaeuser Co., Centralia, Washington, for help with manuscript revision.
Read full abstract