Intellectual Property Protection Issues Research Articles

Unlocking the potential of university-industry collaborations in African higher education: A comprehensive examination of agricultural faculties

This paper delves into integrating industry perspectives into Sub-Saharan African agricultural education, exploring collaboration challenges and benefits. It comprehensively analyses factors influencing university-industry collaboration in the region where literature is scarce, as well as the related strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. The study draws insights from case studies of eight universities in Eastern, Western, and Northern regions of Africa. Key findings include effective management, stakeholder engagement, and the N-tuple Helix Model, crucial for successful university-industry collaboration that offers many benefits, including improved student employability, technology transfer, innovative research, and industry-aligned curriculum development. However, university-industry collaboration also faces several challenges, such as reduced funding, industry reluctance, and intellectual property protection issues. The study highlights the need for a multifaceted approach to fostering successful university-industry collaboration in African universities, considering institutional, stakeholder, relationship, and output factors. Tailoring strategies to unique contexts and priorities is essential for building sustainable and mutually beneficial partnerships.

Новые вызовы в применении технологий искусственного интеллекта: нарушение прав на товарные знаки на платформах электронной коммерции

The article explores new challenges associated with the use of artificial intelligence technologies in the context of trademark infringement on e-commerce platforms. In the modern digital world, where ecommerce is growing rapidly, issues of intellectual property protection, including trademark rights, are becoming especially relevant. Various scenarios in which trademark violations on e-commerce platforms are possible are analyzed, and how artificial intelligence technologies can be used to identify and prevent such violations are considered. The possibilities of trademark recognition and classification using machine learning algorithms and neural networks are being investigated. The problems associated with false positive and false negative results when using artificial intelligence in this context are discussed. Recommendations and principles are proposed for the development of effective trademark protection systems on ecommerce platforms that will take these issues into account and ensure fairness and compliance with legislation. The importance of the development and application of artificial intelligence technologies to combat trademark violations on e-commerce platforms is emphasized, the importance of developing these technologies taking into account special challenges and requirements in this area, in order to ensure the protection of intellectual property rights and support fair competition in the online environment is emphasized.

Intellectual Property Protection Issues and Solutions in Cross-Border Big Data Streams

Abstract This paper utilizes the hierarchical analysis method to create an intellectual property protection index model to measure the level and hierarchy of intellectual property protection from the judicial, administrative, and social perspectives and proposes solutions accordingly. From the standpoint of time series prediction, the deep learning theory time series is applied to fully explore the time series characteristics of the flow and a comprehensive assessment of the development status of online intellectual property protection from 2019-2024 is made. According to the findings, pornographic content is the most serious IPR infringement problem in cross-border big data flows, accounting for approximately 38% of all violations. Cases concerning domain name infringement show a gradual upward trend from 2014-2023. The automatic fulfillment index in the judicial protection index is the lowest, at 2.3, and it is important to strengthen this aspect in the future. The overall index of 75.6 in 2019 to 90.1 in 2023 indicates that the trend of intellectual property protection in China is generally positive.

To the question reform of the state system of legal protection of intellectual property in Ukraine

The article highlights the current state of intellectual property protection in Ukraine. It is emphasized that in accordance with the provisions of Art. 41 of the Constitution of Ukraine, everyone has the right to own, use and dispose of their property, the results of their intellectual and creative activities. Article 55 of the Constitution of Ukraine stipulates and guarantees everyone the use of all national types of legal protection, protection of rights and freedoms in court. According to the second part of Art. 124 of the Basic Law, the jurisdiction of the courts extends to any legal disputes and all legal relations arising in the state. In addition to the guaranteed constitutional right to judicial protection of intellectual property rights, the norms of special legislation in the field of intellectual property determine the legal basis for the protection of violated rights.
 In connection with the reform of the state system of legal protection of intellectual property, the Concept of reforming the state system of legal protection of intellectual property in Ukraine, approved by the order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine dated June 1, 2016 No. 402-r, was analyzed, which states that the state system of legal protection of intellectual property property implements the state system of legal protection of intellectual property, and also draws attention to the imperfect and inert system of state management of intellectual property, which has led to the absence of significant changes in the adaptation of the legislative framework to modern economic and political conditions (the fight against patent trolling, Internet piracy, satisfaction needs of the IT industry, military industry), as well as the National Strategy for the Development of Intellectual Property in Ukraine for the period until 2020, where a two-level structure of the state system has been created instead of a three-level structure. Separate provisions of the legislation, the norms of which guarantee the protection of intellectual property rights, as well as special laws and by-laws defining the reformation and functioning of the state system of legal protection of intellectual property, are considered. Attention is drawn to the fact that today the state system of intellectual property protection in Ukraine has an extensive system of state authorities that ensure the protection and protection of the violated subjective rights of copyright holders. The existing problematic issues of intellectual property protection are analyzed and the author’s proposals for improving the state of protection and protection of intellectual property rights in Ukraine are formulated.

To the question reform of the state system of legal protection of intellectual property in Ukraine

The article highlights the current state of intellectual property protection in Ukraine. It is emphasized that in accordance with the provisions of Art. 41 of the Constitution of Ukraine, everyone has the right to own, use and dispose of their property, the results of their intellectual and creative activities. Article 55 of the Constitution of Ukraine stipulates and guarantees everyone the use of all national types of legal protection, protection of rights and freedoms in court. According to the second part of Art. 124 of the Basic Law, the jurisdiction of the courts extends to any legal disputes and all legal relations arising in the state. In addition to the guaranteed constitutional right to judicial protection of intellectual property rights, the norms of special legislation in the field of intellectual property determine the legal basis for the protection of violated rights.
 In connection with the reform of the state system of legal protection of intellectual property, the Concept of reforming the state system of legal protection of intellectual property in Ukraine, approved by the order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine dated June 1, 2016 No. 402-r, was analyzed, which states that the state system of legal protection of intellectual property property implements the state system of legal protection of intellectual property, and also draws attention to the imperfect and inert system of state management of intellectual property, which has led to the absence of significant changes in the adaptation of the legislative framework to modern economic and political conditions (the fight against patent trolling, Internet piracy, satisfaction needs of the IT industry, military industry), as well as the National Strategy for the Development of Intellectual Property in Ukraine for the period until 2020, where a two-level structure of the state system has been created instead of a three-level structure. Separate provisions of the legislation, the norms of which guarantee the protection of intellectual property rights, as well as special laws and by-laws defining the reformation and functioning of the state system of legal protection of intellectual property, are considered. Attention is drawn to the fact that today the state system of intellectual property protection in Ukraine has an extensive system of state authorities that ensure the protection and protection of the violated subjective rights of copyright holders. The existing problematic issues of intellectual property protection are analyzed and the author’s proposals for improving the state of protection and protection of intellectual property rights in Ukraine are formulated.

License Agreements used in Distribution of Machine Learning Software Packages

Recently, consideration of the issues of legal regulation of artificial intelligence has become increasingly relevant. Most legal works are devoted to the study of responsibility of a legal personality that arises or does not arise from activities involving the use of artificial intelligence. However, for developers of the relevant software, the issue of intellectual property protection, namely, exclusive rights to computer programs, is more interesting. In particular, the types of licenses under which open source software products (such as MIT, GPL, BSD, Apach), their main characteristics, disadvantages and advantages are of interest. Of particular interest is the legal regulation of such license agreements in the context of cross-border turnover of software packages, as well as the existence of the open source concept. In addition, in order to dive deeper into the subject area of the study, the paper discusses basic concepts from the theory of machine learning.

The Role of Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Protection in Investment in China and Southeast Asia

This article aims to explore the relationship and impact of technology transfer and intellectual property protection in Chinese investment within Southeast Asia. Against the backdrop of increasing globalization and cross-border collaboration, technology transfer has gained significant attention as a crucial means to promote innovation and international investment. However, the issue of intellectual property protection in the process of technology transfer has also raised widespread concerns. This study first provides an overview of the relevant theories and concepts related to technology transfer and intellectual property protection. Subsequently, it focuses on analyzing the challenges and opportunities faced by Chinese companies in their investments in Southeast Asia. Factors such as cultural differences, legal environments, and the uncertainty of intellectual property protection pose challenges to technology transfer. Nonetheless, technology transfer also presents opportunities for Chinese companies, including entry into new markets, accelerated innovation cycles, and enhanced competitiveness. In order to address challenges and leverage opportunities, companies need to formulate effective intellectual property protection strategies, underscore the importance of contracts and agreements, and strengthen international collaboration and cooperative innovation. Furthermore, the study points out in its future outlook that intelligent technology transfer and digital platforms will shape future developments. Exploration in emerging technological domains will bring forth new possibilities for technological collaboration. Governments play a pivotal role in this landscape, requiring strengthened establishment and enforcement of laws and regulations, promotion of talent development and exchange, and the advancement of sustainable development and social responsibility. Through the exploration of these issues, this research aims to provide valuable insights for the field of technology transfer and intellectual property protection, fostering the development of cross-border collaboration and innovation.

TRANSFORMATION OF BRAND MANAGEMENT TASKS IN THE CONTEXT OF EXPANSION OF TRADING PLATFORMS

The rapid growth of electronic trading platforms (aggregators and marketplaces) has caused a significant transformation of the market of goods, works and services. At the same time, the new opportunities and amenities that sellers have, as well as the reduction of current costs when using marketplace trading platforms, have a reverse side. Among the emerging problems are the market dictate and the rigid framework of interaction used by these digital platforms, the need to address issues of intellectual property protection, as well as a significant limitation of the possibility of strengthening your own brand and partial loss of communication with end customers. The solution to these problems is possible either by adapting to the hegemony of marketplaces according to the umbrella scheme, which, ultimately, is expressed in the loss of identity, or through the use of an integrated approach in marketing policy that differentiates sales activities.

WTO체제하에서 강력한 지식재산권의 보호에 관한 연구

Purpose : This paper examines how The U.S has led to global intervention in the issue of intellectual property protection and proposes a multilateral approach to the demand for a strong level of intellectual property protection. Research design, data and methodology : This paper examines the WTO agreement specially Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights(TRIPS) and analyzes the relevant articles, the developing history of the United States relating IP regime and IPR protection modes. Results : When emerging economies such as China, Brazil, and India become strong and innovative countries, and these countries reflect the US IPR system as it is in creating their intellectual property systems, it may eventually lead to a dilemma. Conclusions : A lot of effort is still needed for WTO member states, except for developed countries, to meet the high-level IPR protection and implementation system that the US insists on. Therefore, it would be most exemplary if the current TRIPS improvement could escape the dilemma of focusing on strong IPR protection and implementation.

CURRENT PROBLEMS OF THE LEGAL PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. PART I. ON THE PRELIMINARY CHARACTER OF THE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE CANCELLATION OF THE REGISTRATION OF AN INDUSTRIAL DESIGN IN CLAIMS FOR INFRINGEMENT

In 2022, two interpretive court cases started in Bulgaria on intellectual property protection issues. Although IP cases do not account for a significant share of the overall workload of the courts, there has been an increase in IPR litigation, which is sufficient to set up conflicting court practices. In this and the next article, we propose answers to the questions referred to in the two interpretative cases. The first question concerns the preliminary character of the proceedings for cancellation of the registration of an industrial design in cases of infringement of the same design, and the second concerns the determination of the number of administrative infringements in cases of public performance of a recording infringing copyrights of a work of music under the Act on Copyright and Related Rights. The two articles have been prepared based on the sent opinions on the respective interpretive cases.

The Protection and Countermeasures of University's Intellectual Property Rights Among Industry-University-Research (IUR) Cooperation

With the continuous development of Chinese industry-university-research (IUR)cooperation at present, the issue of intellectual property protection in universities has become a key issue of concern to the country and various universities. This paper will take Guangdong large bay area in China, for example, focus on Guangdong large bay area cooperation of intellectual property protection, combined with the national policy of university intellectual property protection laws and the large bay area university regulation of its cooperation, explore Guangdong large bay area cooperation on the protection of intellectual property rights, to the national and university cooperation on the protection of university intellectual property puts forward constructive Suggestions.

Intellectual Property Protection in Outer Space: Conflict in Theory and Application in Practice

The granting of intellectual property protection to space activities plays a significant role in promoting the sustainable development of space commercialization. However, the international intellectual property treaties have not explicitly stated in their provisions the issue of intellectual property protection in outer space, neither the provisions of the five outer space treaties explicitly address the legal issue. Such legal uncertainty may discourage States and non-governmental entities from actively participating in commercial space activities. One concerned rationale resulting in such legal status is the territoriality conflict in theory between the legal regimes of outer space and intellectual property. This article purports to illustrate territoriality conflict in theory between legal regimes of outer space and intellectual property. It then moves to argue that the conflict is proved to be a problem that exists purely in legal theory rather than legal practice because the legal value of Article VIII of the Outer Space Treaty elaborately reconciled the territoriality conflict in theory and offers a self-contained mechanism that would allow guaranteed levels of intellectual property protection in outer space. This mechanism employs space objects as a connecting factor to link space activities with the existing laws of the State of registry to realize the purpose of intellectual property protection in outer space.

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT OF ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT ON THE BASIS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

The article proves that effective resource management of an industrial enterprise using intellectual resources is a key element of its development strategy, regardless of its size and market position. Enterprises for which intellectual property rights are a valuable asset should pay special attention to building a system of strategic management of them. This requires taking into account the issue of intellectual property protection in many management processes, the proper distribution of tasks and the creation of organizational structures, procedures, regulations and contracts, the determination of budgets and the provision of professional staff and tools. The analysis of existing publications made it possible to conclude that strategic development management is a scientifically based influence of top management on the socio-economic development of the enterprise, which ensures sustainable growth of the results of the commercial activity of the enterprise. It has been proven that the formation of a management system for the development of enterprises requires the presence of interconnected subsystems. A number of components of the industrial enterprise development management system based on intellectual property are proposed. It is recommended to determine the basic development strategy depending on the type of market behavior model of the enterprise, which largely depends on the level (estimation) of the external potential of the enterprise: high potential corresponds to an offensive model of enterprise behavior, low potential corresponds to a defensive market behavior model.
 It was determined that the strategic tasks of intellectual property are: protection from competition: the presence of a patent provides the enterprise with a monopoly position in its target market for a sufficiently long period of time (up to 20 years); additional protection: some patents are not developed for the purpose of direct commercialization; avoidance of commercial (market) disputes: enterprises have the opportunity to commercialize their technologies for a long time without existing threats of abuse of their intellectual property rights by competitors; foundations for commercial alliances: finding business partners for a given business activity is much easier when the company has a competitive patent portfolio at its disposal.

Економіко-правові засади захисту інтелектуальної власності: український та європейський досвід

The article is devoted to the identification and substantiation of economic and legal foundations of the system of intellectual property protection from the standpoint of the formation of domestic and European experience. The current stage of development of the world raises the issue of intellectual property protection in the context of ensuring economic development and increasing their attractiveness for international cooperation. Approaches to the definition of «intellectual property», objects of intellectual property and industrial property and their classification are widely covered in the scientific literature. It is determined that the object of intellectual property is an intangible result of intellectual activity, recorded on a tangible medium, and gives its author the exclusive ownership of this result, which is acquired, exercised and protected in accordance with applicable law. Given the importance of intellectual property for the development of countries, intellectual property law was formed as a separate sub-branch of civil law. It is established that the protection and defense of intellectual property is possible provided that the relevant legal framework. Modern legislation in the field of intellectual property includes the Constitution, Codes and Laws of Ukraine, Decrees of the President of Ukraine and Resolutions and orders of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, current standards in the field of intellectual property, departmental regulations, international treaties and agreements in the field of intellectual property. The institutional basis of the state system of legal protection of intellectual property is a number of specialized institutions with defined tasks and functions. The strategic tasks of the state on the development and protection of intellectual property in Ukraine are performed by the National Intellectual Property Office. Modern processes of reforming the system of intellectual property protection are associated with the process of European integration and implementation of the provisions of the Association Agreement between Ukraine and the EU.

Efficient and Secure Decision Tree Classification for Cloud-Assisted Online Diagnosis Services

Decision tree classification has become a prevailing technique for online diagnosis services. By outsourcing computation intensive tasks to a cloud server, cloud-assisted online diagnosis services are better ways for cases that the storage and computation requirements exceed the capability of medical institutions. With privacy concerns as well as intellectual property protection issues, the valuable diagnosis classifier and the sensitive user data should be protected against the cloud server. In this paper, we identify a work-flow for cloud-assisted online diagnosis services. We propose an efficient and secure decision tree classification scheme in the proposed work-flow. Specifically, the medical institution transforms a locally pre-trained decision tree classifier to a decision table, and later uses searchable symmetric encryption to encrypt the decision table. Then, the encrypted table is outsourced to the cloud server, and a user can submit encrypted physiological features to the cloud server and obtain an encrypted diagnosis prediction back. We provide formal security proofs to demonstrate that our scheme protects the confidentiality of the decision tree classifier and the user's data. The performance analysis shows that our scheme achieves faster-than-linear classification speed. Experimental evaluations show that our scheme requires several micro-seconds to process a diagnosis request in the tested datasets.

It's About Time: Temporal Management in Feature‐Based Product Line Engineering

ABSTRACTFeature‐based product line engineering employs the PLE factory concept in which all development occurs for any product line product. Any organization employing this paradigm in a contract‐based (as opposed to a mass market) context must answer the question: Who pays for the work inside the factory that may benefit multiple contracts? The answer can be surprisingly complex, involving security, regulatory compliance, and intellectual property protection issues of both the PLE organization and its customers. This article offers a method for answering this question by establishing processes to create charge numbers to which everyone working in the PLE factory can charge their effort. These processes must connect the funding supply to the funding consumption in a way that is fair, equitable, and compliant with applicable rules and regulations.

SOME ISSUES ON PROTECTION OF NATIONAL INTERESTS CONCEMING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN THE PROCESS OF EURO-ATLANTIC INTEGRATION

Some issues of protection of national interests concerning intellectual property in the process of Euro-Atlantic integration are considered, in particular features of protection of intellectual property in the implementation of international military-technical cooperationof Ukraine, depending on the specifics of this activity. The legislation of Ukraine regulating activities related to military-technical cooperation is analyzed. The importance of intellectual property protection at all stages of military-technical cooperation and the need to improve the legislation on the regulation of intellectual property protection in the defense sphere are outlined.The Constitution and major legislative acts of Ukraine in the field of national security and defense have clearly defined the strategic course for achieving NATO membership. However, to achieve this strategic goal requires persistence and political will, as well as an understanding of the various tactical issues that need to be resolved along the way.New members are being trained in the process of performing the NATO Membership Action Plan. On the long-term path of Euro-Atlantic integration, Ukraine has developed an annual NATO-Ukraine national program. Traditionally, the Annual National Program is structurally constructed by analogy with a typical Membership Action Plan andincludes almost all areas of reformation and modernization of Ukraine.In particular, great attention is paid to reforming and comprehensive support of Ukraine's security and defense sector. It includes a wide range of measures to maintain combat capabilities, modernize and upgrade weapons and military equipment, reform and develop the defense-industrial complex of Ukraine, implement the government qualityassurance system of defense products, revitalize the scientific and military-technical cooperation. Even measures to ensure gender equality in the security and defense sector of Ukraine are being envisaged.It is stated that defense and technical cooperation with NATO will be focused, in particular, on the use of the best modern world technologies. However, the issues of intellectual property protection of all entities and protection of national interests in this field are not considered at all, although almost all the envisaged measures cannot be implementedwithout the use of intellectual property rights.In our view, intellectual property issues should be decided in conjunction with other issues. However, in order to determine the position of the state and development of appropriate proposals and recommendations for securing national interests in intellectual property in the process of Euro-Atlantic integration, it is appropriate to consider these issuesin the following areas: legal cooperation between Ukraine and NATO;scientific cooperation; military-technical cooperation.

Theoretical Territoriality Paradox for the Intellectual Property Protection in Outer Space and Its Regulatory Approach for Reconciliation

The sustainable development of outer space demands the protection of intellectual property in outer space. However, it worth noting that the intellectual property international treaties have not explicitly regulated in their provisions the issue of intellectual property protection in outer space, neither the provisions of the five outer space treaties explicitly address the legal issue. One suspicious rationale resulting in this legal status is the theoretical territoriality paradox between the legal regimes of outer space and intellectual property. This article aims to unveil the theoretical territoriality paradox by comparing the two legal regimes of outer space and intellectual property. It then moves to argue that the paradox is proved to be a theoretical problem since the legal value of Article VIII of the Outer Space Treaty elaborately reconcile the theoretical paradox and practically provides a self-contained mechanism that would permit guaranteed levels of intellectual property rights protection in outer space.

Ochrona własności intelektualnej i jej praktyczne zastosowanie w polskich przedsiębiorstwach typu start-up

Przedmiot badań: Przedmiotem badań w niniejszym artykule jest kwestia ochrony własności intelektualnej wśród twórców polskich start-upów. Problem ten jest o tyle istotny, że jakiekolwiek zaniedbania i zaniechania na tym obszarze mogą okazać się destrukcyjne dla nowo powstających przedsiębiorstw. Bez względu na to, którą z form ochrony danych start-up zamierza wybrać, istotne jest, aby nastąpiło to możliwie najszybciej, szczególnie gdy mowa o wnioskach patentowych. Opóź­nienia przeważnie okazują się kosztowne, a nawet mogą skutkować utratą projektu lub wynalazku na rzecz innego podmiotu. Brak tradycji działań prewencyjnych powoduje, że start-upy stają się jedną z najsłabiej chronionych grup przedsiębiorstw działających na rynku.
 Cel badawczy: Celem badań było ustalenie, jaki poziom świadomości prezentują twórcy start--upów w kwestii wagi ochrony praw autorskich. Czy ich wiedza jest wystarczająca, aby ochronić przedsiębiorstwo przed ewentualnymi konsekwencjami, które wynikać mogą np. z braku ochrony patentowej. Wreszcie, należało również ustalić, czy twórcy start-upów korzystają z usług dorad­czych w zakresie ochrony praw autorskich.
 Metoda badawcza: W badaniu posłużono się ankietą telefoniczną, dobierając populację docelową według głównego kryterium, jakim było funkcjonowanie firmy na rynku nie dłużej niż 5 lat. Numery telefoniczne respondentów pozyskano z oficjalnych stron internetowych przedsiębiorstw. Uzyskane w ten sposób dane zostały opracowane i zinterpretowane, a samo badanie poprzedzone zostało analizą dostępnej dokumentacji przedsiębiorstw, których reprezentanci uczestniczyli w sondażu. Łącznie udział w badaniu wzięło 81 osób, a proces gromadzenia danych trwał pięć dni.
 Wyniki: Badanie przeprowadzone wśród twórców polskich start-upów pokazuje dość wyraźnie, że z różnych względów nie traktują oni problemu własności intelektualnej priorytetowo, a co za tym idzie – narażają swoje przedsiębiorstwa na zupełnie niepotrzebne ryzyko. Konieczne wydają się więc zatem działania mające na celu podniesienie poziomu świadomości przedsiębiorców. Oznacza to w praktyce między innymi konieczność większej aktywności doradców biznesowych biegłych również w kwestiach związanych z prawem autorskim. Rola usług doradczych na tym etapie rozwoju przedsiębiorstwa bywa bowiem nader często niedoceniana.

National interests concerning intellectual property in the european integration process

The process of adaptation of Ukrainian legislation to EU legislation and its influence on national interests is con­sidered. The legislation of Ukraine concerning the regulation of issues of intellectual property protection in the implementation of international scientific and technical co­operation is analyzed. The necessity of improvement of the legislation on protection of national interests is indicated.The winding path that Ukraine was walking through to Europe eventually led to a straight line. However, there are many obstacles on this straight line that Ukraine needs to overcome to join the community of democratic European states. One of these obstacles is the discrepancy of our legislation with European standards, including in the area of intellectual property.However, when implementing the legislative reform in the field of intellectual property, one should proceed from the understanding that the national interests should be in the center of attention.Since the objects of intellectual property rights are created mainly in the course of scientific and scientific and technical activities, this is the area where it is necessary to ensure their proper protection, especially during the international scientific and technical cooperationIntellectual property protection during the international cooperation should be en­sured, first and foremost, by bilateral agreements on this issue, which should be en­tered into with the initiation of cooperation in any sphere, as well as agreements on the protection of classified information. These agreements should define the basic principles for the conclusion of contracts (contracts) and be aimed at mutual protec­tion of information, prevention of violation of rights to the results of intellectual activ­ity when used in cooperation.Since the interstate agreements on intellectual property protection are absent, so at the level of direct participants in international scientific and technical cooperation, in concluding agreements on cooperation, in most cases, there is no harmonization of the order of protection and distribution of rights for intellectual property rights ob­jects created by each of the parties.Therefore, when adapting the legislation in accordance with European norms, it is necessary to introduce appropriate measures to prevent and avoid the above-men­tioned errors and violations in international scientific and technical cooperation and to protect both the interests and rights of scientists and authors of intellectual prop­erty rights objects and national interests concerning intellectual property.