The article deals with the interconnection between pragmatic and axiological dimensions of intellectual practices of contemporary university, practice of a university intellectual in conditions of contemporary university mission in Europe, in particular. The author analyzes the content of morally unacceptable in a university teacher activity within current symbolic production and exchange and criteria for their defining. Morally unacceptable is defined as the threshold created by conscience. Conscience of an intellectual outlines the measure which is impossible to overcome in any circumstances, disregarding any provocative factors. These factors are defined in the paper. Among external factors are: direction on public requests and underfunding of higher education. In practice these factors turn into the neglect of humanities component in education, demand on indulgent attitude of avaluation, redundancy of research component in education process, involvement of university teachers into educative services aggressive marketing campaigns and so on. Internal professional factors are conditioned by external tendencies and mean destruction of prestige of teaching, reduction of a role of a university teacher as an authoritative source of knowledge, experience and skillfulness at the ground of quick access to technically perfect sources of information. These factors change pragmatic and axiological core of the university symbolic capital where a demand to university teacher to be the source of authentic knowledge in teaching and shaping of social elite (technical, academic and artistic) was a traditional one. The paper defines that in such circumstances the role of conscience and moral choice of an intellectual is increased. It is conscience that can force a university intellectual to refuse unacceptable. The content of morally unacceptable is defined personally by everyone according to personal comprehension of the symbolic capital axiological core.
Read full abstract