Integrated Care Plan Research Articles

North Carolina's six BH MCOs unite on foster care services plan

North Carolina's six behavioral health managed care organizations (MCOs) have launched the N.C. Child and Family Improvement Initiative as a collective first move to providing an alternative to a proposed statewide foster‐care services plan, the Winston‐Salem Journal reported on June 4. Although spokespersons for the MCOs provided few details last week about the initiative, they expect “the immediate improvements resulting from this partnership will be fully functional before the planned Dec. 1, 2022 launch of the North Carolina Department of Health's Behavioral Health and Intellectual/Developmental Disabilities Tailored Plans, an integrated care plan for people with serious behavioral health care needs, substance use disorder and/or disabilities. The MCOs said a primary goal of the initiative is to demonstrate their ability “to implement a statewide model to ensure seamless access to quality care for these children and families regardless of where they live in North Carolina. For those children with very complex behavioral health needs, often inclusive of intellectual/developmental disabilities needs, there are regularly challenges in securing needed treatment. Severe provider capacity issues and workforce shortages across the state have exacerbated these challenges.” The MCOs said their plan will address concern expressed by state legislators, county departments of social services, providers and families of service recipients.

Building the evidence base for integrated care planning: proof-of-concept analysis of a multi-sector integrated dataset in Estonia

The International Journal of Integrated Care (IJIC) is an online, open-access, peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles in the field of integrated care on a continuous basis.IJIC has an Impact Factor of 5.120 (2020 JCR, received in June 2021)The IJIC 20th Anniversary Issue was published in 2021.

Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment for community-dwelling, high-risk, frail, older people.

Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is a multidimensional interdisciplinary diagnostic process focused on determining an older person's medical, psychological and functional capability in order to develop a co-ordinated and integrated care plan. CGA is not limited simply to assessment, but also directs a holistic management plan for older people, which leads to tangible interventions. While there is established evidence that CGA reduces the likelihood of death and disability in acutely unwell older people, the effectiveness of CGA for community-dwelling, frail, older people at risk of poor health outcomes is less clear. To determine the effectiveness of CGA for community-dwelling, frail, older adults at risk of poor health outcomes in terms of mortality, nursing home admission, hospital admission, emergency department visits, serious adverse events, functional status, quality of life and resource use, when compared to usual care. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, three trials registers (WHO ICTRP, ClinicalTrials.gov and McMaster Aging Portal) and grey literature up to April 2020; we also checked reference lists and contacted study authors. We included randomised trials that compared CGA for community-dwelling, frail, older people at risk of poor healthcare outcomes to usual care in the community. Older people were defined as 'at risk' either by being frail or having another risk factor associated with poor health outcomes. Frailty was defined as a vulnerability to sudden health state changes triggered by relatively minor stressor events, placing the individual at risk of poor health outcomes, and was measured using objective screening tools. Primary outcomes of interest were death, nursing home admission, unplanned hospital admission, emergency department visits and serious adverse events. CGA was delivered by a team with specific gerontological training/expertise in the participant's home (domiciliary Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (dCGA)) or other sites such as a general practice or community clinic (community Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (cCGA)). Two review authors independently extracted study characteristics (methods, participants, intervention, outcomes, notes) using standardised data collection forms adapted from the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) data collection form. Two review authors independently assessed the risk of bias for each included study and used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence for outcomes of interest. We included 21 studies involving 7893 participants across 10 countries and four continents. Regarding selection bias, 12/21 studies used random sequence generation, while 9/21 used allocation concealment. In terms of performance bias, none of the studies were able to blind participants and personnel due to the nature of the intervention, while 14/21 had a blinded outcome assessment. Eighteen studies were at low risk of attrition bias, and risk of reporting bias was low in 7/21 studies. Fourteen studies were at low risk of bias in terms of differences of baseline characteristics. Three studies were at low risk of bias across all domains (accepting that it was not possible to blind participants and personnel to the intervention). CGA probably leads to little or no difference in mortality during a median follow-up of 12 months (risk ratio (RR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76 to 1.02; 18 studies, 7151 participants (adjusted for clustering); moderate-certainty evidence). CGA results in little or no difference in nursing home admissions during a median follow-up of 12 months (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.14; 13 studies, 4206 participants (adjusted for clustering); high-certainty evidence). CGA may decrease the risk of unplanned hospital admissions during a median follow-up of 14 months (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.99; 6 studies, 1716 participants (adjusted for clustering); low-certainty evidence). The effect of CGA on emergency department visits is uncertain and evidence was very low certainty (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.59; 3 studies, 873 participants (adjusted for clustering)). Only two studies (1380 participants; adjusted for clustering) reported serious adverse events (falls) with no impact on the risk; however, evidence was very low certainty (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.17). CGA had no impact on death or nursing home admission. There is low-certainty evidence that community-dwelling, frail, older people who undergo CGA may have a reduced risk of unplanned hospital admission. Further studies examining the effect of CGA on emergency department visits and change in function and quality of life using standardised assessments are required.

Living With a Telepresence Robot: Results From a Field-Trial

Population around Europe is getting older; many older adults would like to live independently in their homes as long as possible. Personalized integrated care plan strategies envisage the possibility of home care services for those people at risk of frailty. In this context, the robot could empower people to live independently. In the presented work, 20 frail older adults were asked to live with a telepresence robot (i.e., Double Robot), through which the formal caregiver could remotely visit them. A total of 284 days of field-test trial was evaluated with a proposed framework that explores several domains, including system reliability, maintainability, system acceptance, user attitude, and user experiences. At the end of the experimentation, the system was used for 4241 mins accomplishing 151 telepresence services, and the results underline optimal system reliability and high user experience. Based on the collected feedback, the proposed telepresence robot can be exploited into integrated care services. The evaluation of a system should envisage a complex, multidisciplinary, and holistic approach that may influence the success or failure of the robot's purpose if not properly analyzed during the evaluation and design phase.

Survey of Adult Patients With Vascular Anomalies Reveals Acute Need of Adult Hematologists-Oncologists to Enter the Field

Background: We have observed that adult patients with vascular anomalies often have limited access to specialists with expertise in vascular anomalies who can coordinate their care and prescribe medications, but evidence-supported statistics needed for advocacy efforts was not available. Methods: An anonymous survey was formulated for adult patients with vascular anomalies, in collaboration with patient advocacy groups. The survey included 50 questions with built-in logic and the entire project received Internal Board Review approval. Results: Two-hundred forty-nine surveys were completed and analyzed. Of the participants still receiving care from a pediatric provider, 97% had no plan for transitioning to an adult provider. Of those no longer able to receive care in a pediatric setting, 34% had abandoned searching for a physician willing to provide care and 45% had no consistent care provider for their vascular anomaly. Sixty percent were seeing providers who had no specific interest or training in VAs. Of all respondents, 35% were evaluated in the emergency room due to VA complications at least once in the past year (8% >3 times) and 28% were admitted to the hospital at least once in the past year due to the vascular anomaly (3% >3 times). Conclusion: We collected evidence-supported documentation that adults with vascular anomalies are not part of an integrated care plan. Adult trained hematology-oncologists are essential and needed to join the dermatology, surgical, and radiology interdisciplinary teams managing this cohort of patients.

Documenting plans for care: advance care directives and the 7-step pathway in the acute care context

BackgroundAdvance care planning involves the discussion and documentation of an individual’s values and preferences to guide their future healthcare should they lose capacity to make or communicate treatment decisions. Advance care planning can involve the individual’s completion of an Advance Care Directive (ACD), a legislated and common-law instrument which may include appointment of a substitute decision-maker and binding refusals of treatment. In South Australia, ACDs intersect in the acute-care context with the Resuscitation Plan 7-Step Pathway (7-SP), an integrated care plan written for and by clinicians, designed to organise and improve patients’ end-of-life care through the use of structured documentation. Here, we examine the perspectives of healthcare professionals (HCPs) within a hospital setting on the practical integration of ACDs and the 7-SP, exploring the perceived role, function, and value of each as they intersect to guide end-of-life care in an Australian hospital setting.MethodsQualitative data were collected via eight focus groups with a total of 74 HCPs (acute care, and oncology specialists; medical intern; general and emergency nurses; social workers) across two hospitals. Audio recordings were transcribed and thematically analysed.ResultsHCPs viewed ACDs as a potentially valuable means of promoting patient autonomy, but as rarely completed and poorly integrated into hospital systems. Conversely, the process and documentation of the 7-SP was perceived as providing clarity about clinicians’ responsibilities, and as a well-understood, integrated resource. Participants sometimes exhibited uncertainty around which document takes precedence if both were present. Sometimes, the routinisation of the 7-SP meant it was understood as the ‘only way’ to determine patient wishes and provide optimal end-of-life care. When this occurs, the perceived authority of ACDs, or of patients’ choice not to participate in end-of-life discussions, may be undermined.ConclusionsThe intersection of ACDs and the 7-SP appears problematic within acute care. Clinicians’ uncertainty as to whether an ACD or 7-SP takes precedence, and when it should do so, suggests a need for further clarity and training on the roles of these documents in guiding clinical practice, the legislative context within which specific documentation is embedded, and the dynamics associated with collaborative decision-making in end-of-life care.

The nurse-coordinated cardiac care bridge transitional care programme: a randomised clinical trial.

Backgroundafter hospitalisation for cardiac disease, older patients are at high risk of readmission and death.Objectivethe cardiac care bridge (CCB) transitional care programme evaluated the impact of combining case management, disease management and home-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on hospital readmission and mortality.Designsingle-blind, randomised clinical trial.Settingthe trial was conducted in six hospitals in the Netherlands between June 2017 and March 2020. Community-based nurses and physical therapists continued care post-discharge.Subjectscardiac patients ≥ 70 years were eligible if they were at high risk of functional loss or if they had had an unplanned hospital admission in the previous 6 months.Methodsthe intervention group received a comprehensive geriatric assessment-based integrated care plan, a face-to-face handover with the community nurse before discharge and follow-up home visits. The community nurse collaborated with a pharmacist and participants received home-based CR from a physical therapist. The primary composite outcome was first all-cause unplanned readmission or mortality at 6 months.Resultsin total, 306 participants were included. Mean age was 82.4 (standard deviation 6.3), 58% had heart failure and 92% were acutely hospitalised. 67% of the intervention key-elements were delivered. The composite outcome incidence was 54.2% (83/153) in the intervention group and 47.7% (73/153) in the control group (risk differences 6.5% [95% confidence intervals, CI −4.7 to 18%], risk ratios 1.14 [95% CI 0.91–1.42], P = 0.253). The study was discontinued prematurely due to implementation activities in usual care.Conclusionin high-risk older cardiac patients, the CCB programme did not reduce hospital readmission or mortality within 6 months.Trial registrationNetherlands Trial Register 6,316, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/6169

Does oral care knowledge amongst UK nurses effectively support people with intellectual disabilities across their lifespan?

Purpose Poor oral health can negatively impact on the overall health of an individual. Evidence highlights nurses' misgivings about providing oral care. Method Several articles were sourced across three clinical databases and four 'core' papers were critiqued using CASP. Findings A literature review identified two areas which require service improvement: 1) Co-presented oral care training should be delivered to staff teams, incorporating material which is developed in collaboration with allied health and social care professionals; 2) Dental teams should be included in the production of care plans for people with a learning disability. Conclusions Indications of ritualistic practice remain in UK nurses' approach to oral care. Daily issues faced by staff teams and the voices of people with a learning disability are under-represented. Training and integrated care planning could significantly improve oral health outcomes for people with a learning disability. Editor's note: 'Nurse' and 'nurses' refers to general (medical) nurses in this article rather than dental nurses.

Development and testing of the Geriatric Care Assessment Practices (G-CAP) survey

BackgroundWhile the Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) tool was designed to support comprehensive geriatric assessment in home care, it is more often used for service allocation and little is known about how point-of-care providers collect the information they need to plan and provide care. The purpose of this pilot study was to develop and test a survey to explore the geriatric care assessment practices of nurses, occupational therapists (OTs) and physiotherapists (PTs) in home care.MethodsLiterature review and expert consultation informed the development of the Geriatric Care Assessment Practices (G-CAP) survey—a 33 question, online, self-report tool exploring assessment and information-sharing methods, attitudes, knowledge, experience and demographic information. The survey was pilot tested at a single home care agency in Ontario, Canada (N = 27). Test-retest reliability (N = 20) and construct validity were explored.ResultsThe subscales of the G-CAP survey showed fair to good test-retest reliability within a population of interdisciplinary home care providers [ICC2 (A,1) (M ICC = 0.58) for continuous items; weighted kappa (M kappa = 0.63) for categorical items]. Statistically significant differences between OT, PT and nurse responses [M t = 3.0; M p = 0.01] and moderate correlations between predicted related items [M r = |0.39|] provide preliminary support for our hypotheses around survey construct validity in this population. Pilot participants indicated that they use their clinical judgment far more often than standardized assessment tools. Client input was indicated to be the most important source of information for goal-setting. Most pilot participants had heard of the RAI-HC; however, few used it. Pilot participants agreed they could use assessment information from others but also said they must conduct their own assessments and only sometimes share and rarely receive information from other providers.ConclusionsThe G-CAP survey shows promise as a measure of the geriatric care assessment practices of interdisciplinary home care providers. Findings from the survey have the potential to inform improvements to integrated care planning. Next steps include making adaptations to the G-CAP survey to further improve the reliability and validity of the tool and a broad administration of the survey in Ontario home care.

Challenges of co-design for integrated care planning

The International Journal of Integrated Care (IJIC) is an online, open-access, peer-reviewed scientific journal that publishes original articles in the field of integrated care on a continuous basis.IJIC has an Impact Factor of 5.120 (2020 JCR, received in June 2021)The IJIC 20th Anniversary Issue was published in 2021.

Designing Trials with Purpose: Pragmatic Clinical Trials of Nonpharmacological Approaches for Pain Management.

Pain is one of the most significant causes of morbidity and disability worldwide. The efficacy of several nonpharmacological approaches for pain management has been established, but significant gaps exist between this evidence and their limited availability and use in routine clinical practice. Questions remain about their effectiveness and how best to integrate them in usual care to optimize patient-centered outcomes. Pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs) may help address this gap. Informed by the Pragmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary (PRECIS-2), we sought to describe the key features of optimized PCTs of nonpharmacological approaches for the management of pain and common co-occurring conditions. To accomplish this objective, we searched the published literature on PCTs of nonpharmacological pain management approaches from 2010-2019 and applied the PRECIS-2 criteria. We discuss key PRECIS-2 domains of interest for designing and performing PCTs and cite specific examples from the published literature as potential models for future PCTs. We found 13 nonpharmacological PCTs. They were heterogeneous in size, recruitment, follow-up time, and location. The lessons learned from these studies led us to explicate key features of trials on the explanatory-pragmatic continuum across the PRECIS-2 domains that can be used by future investigators when designing their clinical trials of nonpharmacological approaches to pain management. We encourage the increased application of PCTs to produce timely and valuable results and products that will inform the development of safe and effective integrated pain care plans that optimize important patient-centered outcomes.

A Multidisciplinary, Community-Based Program to Reduce Unplanned Hospital Admissions

ObjectivesTo evaluate the effect of Hospital Admission Risk Program (HARP) on unplanned hospitalization, bed days, and mortality of enrolled individuals and to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of HARP. DesignA retrospective longitudinal analysis of hospital administrative data. InterventionIndividuals at risk of hospitalization were provided with multidisciplinary, community-based care support managed by care coordinators including integrated care planning, education, monitoring, service linkages, and general practitioner liaison over 6-9 months. Setting and ParticipantsIndividuals who were enrolled into 1 of 8 HARP chronic disease management programs between July 1, 2017, and June 30, 2018, at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia. MethodsHospital admissions between 18 months before and 18 months after HARP enrollment were analyzed. Total hospital costs were compared between 18 months before and 12 months after HARP enrollment. ResultsA total of 1553 individuals with a median age of 71 years (interquartile range 60-81), 63.4% males, were admitted to HARP. Both unplanned hospitalizations and bed days were reduced during the HARP intervention compared to within 3 months before enrollment in each of the HARP management programs. After the HARP intervention, cardiac coach, cardiac heart failure, chronic respiratory, diabetes comanagement, and medication management programs had higher hospitalizations and bed days than individuals’ baseline of at least 3 months before HARP enrollment. Individuals in cardiac heart failure and chronic respiratory management programs had a higher mortality rate than other HARP chronic disease management programs. Individuals in cardiac coach, diabetes comanagement, and medication management programs had lower hospital costs during the HARP intervention compared to within 3 months before HARP enrollment. Conclusions and ImplicationsHARP reduced unplanned hospitalization and bed days but did not return individuals’ hospital use to baseline before the intervention. The variations in mortality between HARP chronic disease management programs implies that condition-specific goals between programs is preferable.

Patient-centered care and the electronic health record: exploring functionality and gaps.

Healthcare systems have adopted electronic health records (EHRs) to support clinical care. Providing patient-centered care (PCC) is a goal of many healthcare systems. In this study, we sought to explore how existing EHR systems support PCC; defined as understanding the patient as a whole person, building relational connections between the clinician and patient, and supporting patients in health self-management. We assessed availability of EHR functions consistent with providing PCC including patient goals and preferences, integrated care plans, and contextual and patient-generated data. We surveyed and then interviewed technical representatives and expert clinical users of 6 leading EHR systems. Questions focused on the availability of specific data and functions related to PCC (for technical representatives) and the clinical usefulness of PCC functions (for clinicians) in their EHR. Technical representatives (n = 6) reported that patient communication preferences, personalized indications for medications, and end of life preferences were functions implemented across 6 systems. Clinician users (n = 10) reported moderate usefulness of PCC functions (medians of 2-4 on a 5-pointy -35t scale), suggesting the potential for improvement across systems. Interviews revealed that clinicians do not have a shared conception of PCC. In many cases, data needed to deliver PCC was available in the EHR only in unstructured form. Data systems and functionality to support PCC are under development in these EHRs. There are current gaps in PCC functionality in EHRs and opportunities to support the practice of PCC through EHR redesign.

Predictors of Metabolic Syndrome Among People Living with HIV in Gedeo-Zone, Southern-Ethiopia: A Case-Control Study.

BackgroundIntensive access to antiretroviral therapy improved the prognosis of HIV. As a result, a non-communicable disease risk marker known as metabolic syndrome (MS) has emerged. It is a public health issue in sub-Saharan Africa including Ethiopia. However, there is little literature on predictors of MS among people living with HIV (PLHIVs) in the study area context.PurposeTo identify predictors of metabolic syndrome among PLHIVs, Gedeo Zone, Southern-Ethiopia.MethodsHealth institutions-based unmatched case–control study was conducted. All HIV-infected adult persons who are receiving routine care in the randomly selected two hospitals and two health centers of the Gedeo zone, southern Ethiopia were involved in the study, conducted from December 29th, 2017, to January 22nd, 2019. PLHIVs diagnosed with MS using ATP III criteria were considered as a case, and subjects free of MS in the survey were enrolled as controls. Binary logistic regression was employed to identify predictors of MS.ResultsA total of 633 (139 cases and 494 controls) PLHIVs were included in the study. The multivariable analysis result found that age (AOR=1.09, 95% CI (1.05–1.12)); educational status being completed secondary school (AOR=0.22, 95% CI (0.02–0.42)); occupational status being of students (AOR=0.11, 95% CI (0.24–0.51)); wealth index being in the middle quintile (AOR=0.22, 95% CI (0.06–0.79)); ART status exposed to ART (AOR=3.07, 95% CI (1.37–6.89)); total physical activity state being physically active (AOR=0.36, 95% CI (0.16–0.79)), and engaged in low levels physical activity (AOR=3.83, 95% CI (1.46–10.05)) were the factors significantly associated with MS.ConclusionWhile education, occupation, wealth index, antiretroviral therapy status, total physical activity, and lower physical activity levels were concluded by the study as modifiable predictors of metabolic syndrome, age was found as a non-modifiable independent risk of metabolic syndrome. There is a need for an ongoing effort to realize an integrated care plan that addresses both the routine care and regular screening programs to reduce the risks associated with MS and its traits in these subjects.

Understanding integrated care at the frontline using organisational learning theory: A participatory evaluation of multi-professional teams in East London.

Integrated care has been proposed as an organising principle to address the challenges of the rising demand for care services and limited resources. There is limited understanding of the role of learning in integrated care systems. Organisational Learning (OL) theory in the guise of 'Learning Practice' can offer a lens to study service integration and reflect on some of the challenges faced by multi-professional teams in developing a learning culture. The study presents findings from two qualitative evaluations of integrated care initiatives in three East London boroughs, England, undertaken between 2017 and 2018. The evaluations employed a participatory approach, the researcher-in-residence model, to coproduce findings with frontline staff working in multi-professional teams in community care. Thematic analysis was undertaken using an adapted version of the 'Learning Practice' framework. The majority of learning in the teams was single loop i.e. learning was mainly reactive to issues that arise. Developing a learning culture in the three boroughs was hindered by the differences in the professional and organisational cultures of health and social care and challenges in developing effective structures for learning. Individual organisational priorities and pressures inhibited both the embedding of learning and effective integration of care services at the frontline. Currently, learning is not inherent in integrated care planning. The adoption of the principles of OL optimising learning opportunities, support of innovation, managed risk taking and capitalising on the will of staff to work in multidisciplinary teams might positively contribute to the development of service integration.

Development and Preliminary Evaluation of the Effects of an mHealth Web-Based Platform (HappyAir) on Adherence to a Maintenance Program After Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Randomized Controlled Trial.

BackgroundPulmonary rehabilitation is one of the main interventions to reduce the use of health resources, and it promotes a reduction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) costs. mHealth systems in COPD aim to improve adherence to maintenance programs after pulmonary rehabilitation by promoting the change in attitude and behavior necessary for patient involvement in the management of the disease.ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess the effects of an integrated care plan based on an mHealth web-based platform (HappyAir) on adherence to a 1-year maintenance program applied after pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients.MethodsCOPD patients from three hospitals were randomized to a control group or an intervention group (HappyAir group). Patients from both groups received an 8-week program of pulmonary rehabilitation and educational sessions about their illness. After completion of the process, only the HappyAir group completed an integrated care plan for 10 months, supervised by an mHealth system and therapeutic educator. The control group only underwent the scheduled check-ups. Adherence to the program was rated using a respiratory physiotherapy adherence self-report (CAP FISIO) questionnaire. Other variables analyzed were adherence to physical activity (Morisky-Green Test), quality of life (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test, St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire, and EuroQOL-5D), exercise capacity (6-Minute Walk Test), and lung function.ResultsIn total, 44 patients were recruited and randomized in the control group (n=24) and HappyAir group (n=20). Eight patients dropped out for various reasons. The CAP FISIO questionnaire results showed an improvement in adherence during follow-up period for the HappyAir group, which was statistically different compared with the control group at 12 months (56.1 [SD 4.0] vs 44.0 [SD 13.6]; P=.004) after pulmonary rehabilitation.ConclusionsmHealth systems designed for COPD patients improve adherence to maintenance programs as long as they are accompanied by disease awareness and patient involvement in management.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04479930; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04479930

Integrated health and care systems in England: can they help prevent disease?

ObjectivesOver the past 12 months, there has been increasing policy rhetoric regarding the role of the National Health Service (NHS) in preventing disease and improving population health. In particular, the...

Implementation of Daily Multidisciplinary Rounds on an Adult Inpatient Blood & Marrow Transplant Unit: Initial Observations and Future Plans

Topic Significance & Study Purpose/Background/Rationale Background: Caring for patients undergoing allogeneic transplantation can require coordination from a dozen or more clinical specialties. The complex nature of this care presents important challenges for teams, especially during rounding, where lack of coordination leads to delays in service for patients. In 2018, following the successful launch of an autologous transplant program, our team recognized the need for a more coordinated care model, leading us to consider multidisciplinary rounding. Purpose To describe initial observations following multidisciplinary rounding intervention in an adult inpatient allogenic transplant unit. Methods, Intervention, & Analysis Every day, multidisciplinary rounding was divided into two parts. During the first part (staff debriefing), staff from nursing, pharmacy, transplant physicians, infectious disease, intensivists, primary care, social work, transfusion services, case management, advanced practice providers, and clinical nutrition are briefed on the patient. During part two (rounding), members of multidisciplinary team would round on the patient. Findings & Interpretation Initial observations suggest that multidisciplinary rounding has allowed for the majority of requests for clinical services to be inputted simultaneously, reducing overall time-to-service for patients and improving care coordination. In addition, by ensuring staff from all relevant disciplines are present during rounding, staff report enhanced communication, leading to development of more integrated care plans, improved provider-to-provider communication, and better outcomes. Discussion & Implications Initial findings suggest that multidisciplinary rounding may be an effective model for coordinating care delivery and enhancing provider-to-provider communication in outpatient allogenic transplant patients. Formal evaluation of these observations, including development of an instrument to measure multidisciplinary rounding outcomes, is underway now.

Wounds and mental health care: system thinking

Purpose This paper considers how the quality of wound care delivered to people experiencing mental ill health can be improved at the system level in line with the global focus on improving population health. The purpose of this paper is to identify how the quality of wound care delivered to mental health care service users can be improved at a population level through system thinking informed by boundary theory. Design/methodology/approach This paper is a critical analysis of practice underpinned by systems thinking and boundary theory. Findings Tissue viability care and mental health care have different professional cultures and identities that are manifest in the way that they are organised and deliver care. If improvements in wound care-related outcomes at a population level are to be achieved, then it is important that the wound care needs of people experiencing mental ill health are addressed. Systems thinking and boundary theory provide a useful conceptual framework for informing quality improvement for people experiencing mental ill health at a population level. Integrated care plans are a useful mechanism for delivering comprehensive care that brings about wound healing and recovery from mental ill health. Social implications Integrated wound and mental health care plans transcend the professional boundaries that exist between tissue viability and mental health care services. Improvements in the quality and safety of care delivered to people with wounds who also utilise mental health services can be achieved through the use of integrated care plans. Health care policy and organisation need to meet the wound-related needs of people using mental health services. Originality/value There has been a focus on improving many aspects of wound care in line with the global focus on grand convergence in population health, but there has been very little emphasis on improving the wound-related outcomes of people that use mental health services. Systems thinking and boundary theory provide a useful framework for understanding how wound care for people experiencing mental ill health can be improved at a population level. Integrated care plans are a useful way of ensuring that safe high-quality wound care is consistently delivered to people experiencing mental ill health.

Identifying obesity-related multimorbidity combinations in the United States.

Interest in understanding the effects of multimorbidity on outcomes has increased in recent years. This paper presents the most common obesity-related groupings of multimorbidity in the United States. Using Cerner HealthFacts data, we applied the frequent pattern growth algorithm to identify prevalent multimorbidity groupings of 3 or more diseases (one being obesity) by race using a dataset of 574 172 patients with obesity from all over the United States. We set the minimum prevalence to 10% and identified groupings of ICD10-CM diagnoses that occur in our dataset at or above the minimum prevalence level. We provide binomial proportion confidence interval estimates to demonstrate the validity of the proportions. We performed g-test for independence to validate differences in prevalence by race. We found 18 multimorbidity combinations with prevalence higher than or equal to 10%. Our results indicate that there are multiple common multimorbidities groupings for patients with obesity. Each multimorbidity combination is composed of diseases from the following clinical categories: endocrine, nutritional and metabolic diseases; diseases of the circulatory system; diseases of the digestive system; diseases of the nervous system; and diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue. For each multimorbidity pattern, the prevalence was found to be significantly different by race according to the g-test with P-value < .001. Most frequent patterns include essential hypertension or disorder of lipid metabolism. This study identifies common groupings of multimorbidity. We believe our data can be useful for those developing integrated care plans, particularly for those serving diverse communities.