The support of the tensor product decomposition of integrable irreducible highest weight representations of a symmetrizable Kac-Moody Lie algebra g \mathfrak {g} defines a semigroup of triples of weights. Namely, given λ \lambda in the set P + P_+ of dominant integral weights, V ( λ ) V(\lambda ) denotes the irreducible representation of g \mathfrak {g} with highest weight λ \lambda . We are interested in the tensor semigroup Γ N ( g ) ≔ { ( λ 1 , λ 2 , μ ) ∈ P + 3 | V ( μ ) ⊂ V ( λ 1 ) ⊗ V ( λ 2 ) } , \begin{equation*} \Gamma _{\mathbb {N}}(\mathfrak {g})≔\{(\lambda _1,\lambda _2,\mu )\in P_{+}^3\,|\, V(\mu )\subset V(\lambda _1)\otimes V(\lambda _2)\}, \end{equation*} and in the tensor cone Γ ( g ) \Gamma (\mathfrak {g}) it generates: Γ ( g ) ≔ { ( λ 1 , λ 2 , μ ) ∈ P + , Q 3 | ∃ N ≥ 1 V ( N μ ) ⊂ V ( N λ 1 ) ⊗ V ( N λ 2 ) } . \begin{equation*} \Gamma (\mathfrak {g})≔\{(\lambda _1,\lambda _2,\mu )\in P_{+,{\mathbb {Q}}}^3\,|\,\exists N\geq 1 \quad V(N\mu )\subset V(N\lambda _1)\otimes V(N\lambda _2)\}. \end{equation*} Here, P + , Q P_{+,{\mathbb {Q}}} denotes the rational convex cone generated by P + P_+ . In the special case when g \mathfrak {g} is a finite-dimensional semisimple Lie algebra, the tensor semigroup is known to be finitely generated and hence the tensor cone to be convex polyhedral. Moreover, the cone Γ ( g ) \Gamma (\mathfrak {g}) is described in Belkale and Kumar [Invent. Math. 166 (2006), pp. 185–228] by an explicit finite list of inequalities. In general, Γ ( g ) \Gamma (\mathfrak {g}) is neither polyhedral, nor closed. In this article we describe the closure of Γ ( g ) \Gamma (\mathfrak {g}) by an explicit countable family of linear inequalities for any untwisted affine Lie algebra, which is the most important class of infinite-dimensional Kac-Moody algebra. This solves a Brown-Kumar’s conjecture in this case (see Brown and Kumar [Math. Ann. 360 (2014), pp. 901–936]). The difference between the tensor cone and the tensor semigroup is measured by the saturation factors. Namely, a positive integer d d is called a saturation factor, if V ( N λ 1 ) ⊗ V ( N λ 2 ) V(N\lambda _1)\otimes V(N\lambda _2) contains V ( N μ ) V(N\mu ) for some positive integer N N then V ( d λ 1 ) ⊗ V ( d λ 2 ) V(d\lambda _1)\otimes V(d\lambda _2) contains V ( d μ ) V(d\mu ) , assuming that μ − λ 1 − λ 2 \mu -\lambda _1-\lambda _2 belongs to the root lattice. For g = s l n \mathfrak {g}={\mathfrak {sl}}_n , the famous Knutson-Tao theorem asserts that d = 1 d=1 is a saturation factor (see Knutson and Tao [J. Amer. Math. Soc. 12 (1999), pp. 1055–1090]). More generally, for any simple Lie algebra, explicit saturation factors are known. In the Kac-Moody case, Γ N ( g ) \Gamma _{\mathbb {N}}(\mathfrak {g}) is not necessarily finitely generated and hence the existence of such a factor is unclear a priori. Here, we obtain explicit saturation factors for any affine Kac-Moody Lie algebra. For example, in type A ~ n \tilde A_n , we prove that any integer d ≥ 2 d\geq 2 is a saturation factor, generalizing the case A ~ 1 \tilde A_1 shown in Brown and Kumar [Math. Ann. 360 (2014), pp. 901–936].
Read full abstract
Jan 1, 2022
Guodong Hua 
Open Access