You have accessJournal of UrologyUrodynamics/Incontinence/Female Urology: Incontinence - Evaluation & Therapy I1 Apr 20101523 THERAPY OF REFRACTORY POSTOPERATIVE URINARY STRESS INCONTINENCE BY THE USE OF AUTOLOGOUS SKELETAL MUSCLE-DERIVED CELLS (MDC) Christoph Eimer, Holger Gerullis, Roman Karig, Peter Goretzki, Albert Ramon, and Thomas Otto Christoph EimerChristoph Eimer Neuss, Germany More articles by this author , Holger GerullisHolger Gerullis Neuss, Germany More articles by this author , Roman KarigRoman Karig Neuss, Germany More articles by this author , Peter GoretzkiPeter Goretzki Neuss, Germany More articles by this author , Albert RamonAlbert Ramon Bad Aachen, Germany More articles by this author , and Thomas OttoThomas Otto Neuss, Germany More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.2367AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Urinary stress incontinence (USI) caused by morphological injury of the external urethral sphincter is refractory to conservative treatment. According to §4a of the German Pharmaceutical Law (AMG) we treated patients suffering from postoperative refractory grade III USI by transplantation of MDC. Patients were sent to our clinic from all parts of Germany. METHODS In general or local anaesthesia muscle tissue is extracted from the deltoid muscle (sample size 5x5mm, 2 samples/patient). The muscle tissue is converted into a primary cell culture separating individual cells and expanding them. Prior to the transplantation MDC are stored in physiological soda solution. Under visual guidance the cells are endoscopically injected into/around the lesion of the sphincter. RESULTS 222 men aged 70 years (56-81) from 32 different hospitals in Germany were included. 60% (132/222) of the patients were followed-up for at least 12 months after MDC transplantation- the time span necessary for sufficient evaluation of the transplantation process. The average time since iatrogenic sphincter injury was 43 months (12-192). After a medium of 59 days (16-122) following the muscle biopsy transplantation of MDC was performed. 11.18x106 (0.21-29.23x106) of MDC are transplanted. 11,3 % (9.5-13.1%) of these cells are identified immunocytochemically as satellite cells (positive for MyoD1, α-sarcomeric actin, α-smooth-muscle actin). Reversible AE′s grade I were observed in 11% of the patients (15/132). After a minimum follow-up of 12 months (12-61) 18 patients (13.6%) were completely continent, 51 patients (38,6%) showed improvement from grade III USI to grade I (less than 100ml/24h uncontrolled urine loss). The treatment effect can be observed 4,7 months (2-9) after transplantation of MDC and remains stable during follow-up. 63/132 (48%) patients have no change regarding grade III incontinence. Control cystoscopy showed a morphologically intact external sphincter in 15% (20/63) of the patients despite lacking improvement of USI. CONCLUSIONS Transplantation of MDC for the repair of iatrogenic damage of the external urinary sphincter and consecutive grade III USI is a safe procedure. In 52% (69/132) of the patients this method is efficient in distinctively reducing incontinence or even healing it. Disadvantages are the expenditure of time between treatment and efficacy of about 7 months, the cost situation, and the legal restrictions prohibiting us the initiation of GCP- conform clinical trials. © 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 183Issue 4SApril 2010Page: e587 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Christoph Eimer Neuss, Germany More articles by this author Holger Gerullis Neuss, Germany More articles by this author Roman Karig Neuss, Germany More articles by this author Peter Goretzki Neuss, Germany More articles by this author Albert Ramon Bad Aachen, Germany More articles by this author Thomas Otto Neuss, Germany More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract