e15038 Background: Tumour tissue is the primary substrate for molecular testing in advanced NSCLC. However, obtaining sufficient tissue samples from biopsy for molecular testing can often be challenging. Flushing fluid of post-bronchoscopic biopsy, which contains tumor-derived DNA, may serve as a supplement for genotyping. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and precision of detecting gene alterations in flushing fluid samples and evaluate their clinical potential. Methods: Flushing fluid, matched tissue (TIS), and whole blood were prospectively collected from 25 patients with stage III-IV NSCLC between June 2022 and December 2023. Ten milliliters of flushing fluid and whole blood were used to prepare flushing fluid supernatant (FFS) and plasma (PLA), respectively. Capture-based targeted sequencing of TIS, FFS and PLA samples was performed using a universal oncology panel. Results: In this cohort of 25 patients, there was a male predominance (22 out of 25) and the mean age was 60.2 years. The majority of patients were diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma (23 out of 25), and smokers outnumbered non-smokers (16 out of 25). Furthermore, 18 out of 25 patients presented with metastatic disease at diagnosis. The performance of three sample types regarding key quality control indices was evaluated first. FFS exhibited a maximum allelic fraction similar to TIS, while PLA showed a significantly lower than TIS and FFS. Subsequently, we compared the positive detection rates, with TIS, FFS, and PLA achieving respective rates of 100%, 96%, and 80%. A total of 495 mutation events were detected from the three samples (FFP:209, FFS:196, PLA:90), Among these, 161 were concordant between TIS and FFS samples, and 72 were concordant between TIS and PLA samples. The sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of detecting eight established driver alterations in NSCLC were compared using TIS as the gold standard with the two liquid biopsies. FFS demonstrated superior sensitivity and PPV compared to PLA (80.5% vs. 56.1%, 97% vs. 88.5%) and showed equivalent performance for EGFR mutation. Furthermore, estimates of tumor mutational burden (TMB) based on TIS and FFS were highly correlated (Pearson r= 0.97). Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that FFS performs comparably to matched TIS and superiorly to PLA for genotyping advanced NSCLC. FFS emerges as a valuable specimen source, especially in patients with insufficient tumor tissue.
Read full abstract