Communist writers have constantly stressed the role of education in the transformation of society. For Marx and Engels, it was through education that the worker could break free of the bondage that made him little more than an extension of the machine he tended. For Lenin, the school had to be transformed 'from an instrument of class dominance of the bourgeoisie . .. into an instrument of the communist restructuring of society' [1]. The processes whereby these precepts have been followed are particularly interesting when contrasted with the evolution of Western democracies. The legislation to engineer the changes considered necessary in Communist countries is generally justified on the grounds that the measures taken are for the collective good and that, initial conflicts notwithstanding, the interests of individuals will in time come to be in harmony with the interests of society as a whole. This process tends to be rejected in Western democracies on the grounds that the changes restrict the autonomy of individuals to an unacceptable degree: freedom from coercion is generally upheld as a fundamental constitutional principle. Now such concepts as the autonomy of the individual, on the one hand, or the 'comprehensive social system' in which collective interests are paramount, on the other, only begin to have meaning when they are analysed in their specific implications. Any organization of society must imply constraints on individual freedom. Education provides a useful context in which to study the communist and non-communist views of where the limits to such freedom should lie. As a specific example, the case of Germany is particularly appropriate, for the comparison is between two States making a fresh beginning after the Second World War, one on the basis of communist principles and one following the mainstream of development of Western democracy. When the aims of education are discussed in East Germany, the DDR, reference is often made to the 'socialist-humanist educational ideal' [2]. At the basis of this ideal is the view that the realization of a communist society is dependent on successful economic development through mastery of the 'scientific and technological revolution'. In accordance with the precept of Lenin, referred to earlier, the schools have been used as an instrument to this end, largely through the introduction of polytechnical education. As is well known, this has involved various elements including work experience designed to bridge the gap between theory and practice, between education and life. And beyond the polytechnical component alone, the curriculum of East