Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion Research Articles

POS-593 ISN SISTER RENAL CENTRES PROGRAMME: ESTABLISHING AND SUSTAINING TUNNELLED VENOUS DIALYSIS LINE PLACEMENT IN PORT HARCOURT, NIGERIA

Under the auspices of the International Society of Nephrology Sisters Renal Centres programme, Renal centres from Port Harcourt, Nigeria and Salford UK have maintained collaboration in various aspects of kidney care. A key issue in sustaining dialysis care in a lower middle income economy is access for haemodialysis (HD). Before this project all HD access was via temporary femoral vein lines inserted for a single dialysis session. Pre-visit video conferencing provided educational and planning opportunities in the delivery of peritoneal dialysis for acute kidney injury (AKI). A Nigerian kidney doctor in training visited the UK centre to gain first-hand experience of line insertion techniques. An initial visit to the sister hospital was undertaken by UK nephrologists with special interests in dialysis and interventional nephrology. A pop-up dialysis access workshop was undertaken in the dialysis unit over 3 days for junior and senior doctors and members of the multi-disciplinary team: Didactic teaching on dialysis access methods Small group teaching on the basics of HD, PD and prescriptions Simple and sustainable training tools for basic surgical procedures, HD and PD catheter insertion and Seldinger technique Dialysis access ultrasound training with volunteers examining abdominal anatomy and vascular access imaging Hands on training with simple access phantoms, made from accessible materials for ongoing practice. Tunnelled haemodialysis line insertion was achieved by local and visiting nephrologists, unique to the dialysis centre which normally relies on temporary femoral venous access. All three patients achieved successful permanent venous line access without complication. The local nephrologist was able to place catheters with the visiting interventional nephrologist closely supervising. The procedures were recorded to allow analysis and reflection on the procedures. Since the 4 lines have been successfully inserted by the local nephrologist. This has been supported with ongoing video and telephone links. This has allowed continued updates on technique, difficulties and complications. One episode of local exit site bleeding was encountered and managed with follow up calls and advice. Covid 19 has precluded the planned follow up visits. This has highlighted the issues of keeping colleagues up to date and maintaining skills when practice is significantly altered. The collaboration is investing in more robust internet communication to facilitate teaching and mentorship while planning the next part of the project to establish a peritoneal dialysis programme. Significant gains have been made on our journey to establishing long term HD vascular access for the dialysis patients in Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, despite the major obstacles faced.

#58: Improving the Peritoneal Dialysis Program in a Pediatric hospital in Honduras Using Six Sigma Methodology

Abstract Background Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is the most common method of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in pediatric patients in Honduras. It has improved survival and quality of life. Unfortunately, there are complications associated with the use of PD catheters, 85% of which, are of infectious origin. These infections carry a high burden of morbidity and mortality, lengthen hospital stays, and increase costs and are a motive for transfer to hemodialysis. Hospital María Especialidades Pediátricas (HMEP) is a pediatric hospital caring for patients with chronic kidney disease in Honduras, PD has been offered as a method for RRT since September 2014. Methods In HMEP, monitoring of PD infection rates through active surveillance began December 1, 2017, as the first step (define and measure) toward the improvement of the PD Program based on Six Sigma methodology. A case of peritonitis was diagnosed when at least 2 of the following 3 criteria were met: (1) Clinical signs or symptoms of peritonitis (cloudy effluent or abdominal pain with fever or vomiting); (2) Altered peritoneal fluid cell count (after a dwell time of 2 hours: a WBC above 100 cells/mm3 in an uncentrifuged sample, with at least 50% neutrophils; or any WBC count with at least 50% neutrophils if the dwell time was less than 2 hours); (3) Positive peritoneal fluid culture. Patient data, risk factors for infection, causative organisms, and event outcomes were recorded. We present the main results of the analysis phase of all peritonitis cases using descriptive statistics. Results From December 1, 2017, through November 30, 2019, 79 patients required PD, representing 8931 catheter-days; and 30 peritonitis episodes occurred among 28 individuals (35%). The peritonitis rate during the 2-year surveillance period was 1.2 infections per patient-years (ideally: <0.67). Twenty-seven (90%) of cases were classified as healthcare associated since these patients underwent PD 3 times a week in the hospital and the catheter was only manipulated by medical staff; the other patients received dialysis at home. The median time from catheter placement to the event was 27 days (5–383 days). All patients had clinical signs or symptoms of peritonitis. Peritoneal fluid cell count results were available for 29 infections, all of which reported altered results. Peritoneal fluid cultures were positive in only 12 events (40%); 6 (50%) reported Gram-negative organisms, 5 (41%) reported Gram-positive and 1 reported Aspergillus spp. Nonfermentative Gram-negative bacteria (Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter lwoffii) were the most common organisms identified; Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most common Gram-positive. Ten events (33%) required removal and replacement of the catheter due to the infection, 6 (20%) required permanent transfer to hemodialysis; 2 (7.1%) patients experienced a relapse. Two (7.1%) died due to infection. Conclusions Implementing Six Sigma methodology allowed us to improve our PD Program by objectively quantifying the magnitude of the problem and identifying risk factors. This supported the infection prevention and control team with the implementation and improvement of preventive measures: change in hand hygiene products (from triclosan to chlorhexidine), increasing hand hygiene compliance, improving connection/disconnection procedure, PD catheter insertion, and maintenance, empowerment of caregivers.

Rectus abdominis muscle thickness as a predictor of peritoneal catheter dysfunction in emergency-start peritoneal dialysis patients.

Percutaneous insertion of a peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDc) is an alternative to open surgical techniques, and the anatomical characteristics of the abdominal wall may predict PDc dysfunction. We evaluated the role of rectus abdominis muscle (RAM) thickness as a predictor of PDc dysfunction. A prospective cohort of emergency-start PD patients (EmPD) who had their first percutaneous PDc insertion were included. PDc failure was defined as the removal of a PDc due to mechanical failure within the first 30 PD fluid exchanges. Clinical variables were recorded. The skin to parietal peritoneum depth and RAM thickness were determined by abdominal ultrasound. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were developed to test associations between clinical parameters and PDc dysfunction. Over 6 months, 119 patients underwent PDc insertion; 73 (61.3%) were males, with a mean age of 46.0±17.8 years. The mean skin-to-peritoneum depth was 2.5±1.0 cm, the RAM thickness was 0.91±0.3 cm, and catheter implantation was successful in 116 (97.4%) patients. Insertion failed in 3 (2.5%) cases, and 30 (25.8%) patients presented with catheter dysfunction. Univariate analysis indicated that RAM thickness ≥1.0cm, skin-to-peritoneum depth >2.88cm, abdominal waist >92.5cm, and skin-to-RAM fascia distance >2.3cm were associated with PDc dysfunction; in multivariate logistic regression analysis, only greater RAM thickness remained a significant predictor (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.38 - 1.88, p<0.001). In EmPD patients, RAM thickness is associated with PDc dysfunction and could aid in identifying patients at risk for PDc dysfunction in emergency settings. Additional adequately powered studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Acute Medical (bedside) Peritoneal Dialysis catheter insertion in Intensive Therapy Unit setting, an overlooked Renal Replacement Therapy option, A Case Study

A 56-year-old woman with a background of long-standing type II diabetes and chronic kidney disease presented to hospital with fevers, cough and shortness of breath. She had been self-isolating due to COVID-19 a week prior to admission. Her admission resulted in a long stay in intensive care unit with acute kidney injury. Due to her hypercoagulability state, multiple attempts of haemodialysis and filtration failed resulting in the first attempt of bedside (non-fluoroscopic guided) insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheter in an ITU setting in the region of Essex. We note that usually in an ITU setting, haemodialysis is commonly used. Our case therefore serves as an important reminder that peritoneal dialysis (PD) can serve a significant value for patients with acute kidney injury when haemodialysis cannot help in.

Study of early complications associated with peritoneal dialysis catheters: an analysis of the New Zealand Peritoneal Dialysis Registry data

Early peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDC)-related complications are frequent and make an important contribution to long-term PD survival. We aimed to analyse the incidence and specific causes of early PDC-related complications. This study was conducted from January 2001 to December 2012, utilising the New Zealand PD Registry (NZPDR) data. The objectives of this study were to analyse the incidence and causes of PDC-related complications within 4weeks and 3months of insertion. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to analyse any demographic or clinical risk factors of early PDC-related complications. Of the 2573 PDC insertions during this period, majority 88% were surgically inserted. The number of complication within 4weeks ranged from minimum of 20% to a maximum of 34% annually, with infections and flow dysfunctions leading the causes. There has been a minor drop in the infection rates from 19 to 16% (p = 0.21), and flow dysfunction from 12 to 9% (p = 0.16), from 2001 to 2012. A reduced odds of early complication was noted in elderly individuals above 60years age, with odds ratio of (OR) of 0.73 (95% CI 0.53-0.99), while as higher odds of early complications were recorded in female gender, OR 1.41 (95% CI 1.06-1.88). Of the 10% of patients who failed to initiate PD within 90days, flow dysfunction contributed to 32%, followed by infectious and surgical causes in 16% and 15%, respectively. The median time from insertion of PDC to initiation of PD was 17days (interquartile range of 14-24days) CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in PDC insertion techniques and reduction in infection rates may result in improvements in long-term PD technique survival.

Comparative Study of Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Versus Open Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion at a Tertiary Care Centre

Comparative Study of Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Versus Open Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion at a Tertiary Care Centre

Barriers to and constraints of acute peritoneal dialysis in acute kidney injury: A nationwide survey.

This national survey of barriers to and constraints of acute peritoneal dialysis (aPD) in acute kidney injury (AKI) was performed by distributing an online questionnaire to all medical directors of public dialysis units registered with the Nephrology Society of Thailand during September-November 2019. One hundred and thirteen adult facilities responded to the survey covering 75 from 76 provinces (99%) of Thailand. aPD was performed in 66 centres (58%). In facilities where aPD practice was available, the utilization rate was relatively low (<10 cases/year) and limited to specific conditions, including HIV seropositive patients, previous receiving dialysis education and plan and difficult vascular access creation. Only 9% of facilities performed aPD routinely, but interestingly all such units permitted bedside catheter insertion by the nephrologists or internists. The major constraints placed on aPD practice were PD catheter insertion competency, timely catheter insertion support and the medical supporting team's knowledge/competency deficits. aPD for AKI is underutilized in Thailand and limited by the inability to undertake timely PD catheter insertion and knowledge and competency deficits.

Clinical benefits of routine examination and synchronous repair of occult inguinal hernia during laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion: a single-center experience

PurposeOccult inguinal hernias (IH) predispose peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients to the symptomatic IH formation after starting PD, which may cause complications. We conducted a retrospective study to assess the benefit/risk profile of routine laparoscopic examination for occult IH (RLEOH) with a synchronous repair in patients receiving PD catheter placement.Methods432 patients were enrolled in this study. Patients with an internal hernia sac at all sizes were deemed to have occult IH. We retrospectively reviewed data including demographic characteristics and operative details. We also measured incidence rates of symptomatic IH, metachronous IH repair, and catheter survival over a follow-up period after starting PD.ResultsThese patients were classified into the RLEOH group (n = 365) and the non-RLEOH group (n = 67). The RLEOH group was subdivided into occult IH with a synchronous repair (n = 17; the subgroup A), no occult IH (n = 339; the subgroup B), and occult IH without a synchronous repair (n = 9; the subgroup C). The incidence rates of symptomatic IH developed after staring PD in subgroups A, B, and C were 0, 5.6, and 22.2%, respectively, whereas that in the non-RLEOH group was 13.4%. The RLEOH group had a reduced hazard ratio for metachronous IH repair compared with the non-RLEOH group (HR = 0.426; 95% CI 0.195–0.930, p = 0.032). None of our patients suffered from herniorrhaphy-related complications.ConclusionRLEOH with a synchronous repair during PD catheter insertion confers clinical benefits in reducing the risk of developing IH after starting PD and the need for a metachronous repair. This is a safe and reasonable approach.

ISPD guidelines for peritoneal dialysis in acute kidney injury: 2020 Update (paediatrics).

1.1 Peritoneal dialysis is a suitable renal replacement therapy modality for treatment of acute kidney injury in children. (1C)2. Access and fluid delivery for acute PD in children.2.1 We recommend a Tenckhoff catheter inserted by a surgeon in the operating theatre as the optimal choice for PD access. (1B) (optimal)2.2 Insertion of a PD catheter with an insertion kit and using Seldinger technique is an acceptable alternative. (1C) (optimal)2.3 Interventional radiological placement of PD catheters combining ultrasound and fluoroscopy is an acceptable alternative. (1D) (optimal)2.4 Rigid catheters placed using a stylet should only be used when soft Seldinger catheters are not available, with the duration of use limited to <3 days to minimize the risk of complications. (1C) (minimum standard)2.5 Improvised PD catheters should only be used when no standard PD access is available. (practice point) (minimum standard)2.6 We recommend the use of prophylactic antibiotics prior to PD catheter insertion. (1B) (optimal)2.7 A closed delivery system with a Y connection should be used. (1A) (optimal) A system utilizing buretrols to measure fill and drainage volumes should be used when performing manual PD in small children. (practice point) (optimal)2.8 In resource limited settings, an open system with spiking of bags may be used; however, this should be designed to limit the number of potential sites for contamination and ensure precise measurement of fill and drainage volumes. (practice point) (minimum standard)2.9 Automated peritoneal dialysis is suitable for the management of paediatric AKI, except in neonates for whom fill volumes are too small for currently available machines. (1D)3. Peritoneal dialysis solutions for acute PD in children3.1 The composition of the acute peritoneal dialysis solution should include dextrose in a concentration designed to achieve the target ultrafiltration. (practice point)3.2 Once potassium levels in the serum fall below 4 mmol/l, potassium should be added to dialysate using sterile technique. (practice point) (optimal) If no facilities exist to measure the serum potassium, consideration should be given for the empiric addition of potassium to the dialysis solution after 12 h of continuous PD to achieve a dialysate concentration of 3-4 mmol/l. (practice point) (minimum standard)3.3 Serum concentrations of electrolytes should be measured 12 hourly for the first 24 h and daily once stable. (practice point) (optimal) In resource poor settings, sodium and potassium should be measured daily, if practical. (practice point) (minimum standard)3.4 In the setting of hepatic dysfunction, hemodynamic instability and persistent/worsening metabolic acidosis, it is preferable to use bicarbonate containing solutions. (1D) (optimal) Where these solutions are not available, the use of lactate containing solutions is an alternative. (2D) (minimum standard)3.5 Commercially prepared dialysis solutions should be used. (1C) (optimal) However, where resources do not permit this, locally prepared fluids may be used with careful observation of sterile preparation procedures and patient outcomes (e.g. rate of peritonitis). (1C) (minimum standard)4. Prescription of acute PD in paediatric patients4.1 The initial fill volume should be limited to 10-20 ml/kg to minimize the risk of dialysate leakage; a gradual increase in the volume to approximately 30-40 ml/kg (800-1100 ml/m2) may occur as tolerated by the patient. (practice point)4.2 The initial exchange duration, including inflow, dwell and drain times, should generally be every 60-90 min; gradual prolongation of the dwell time can occur as fluid and solute removal targets are achieved. In neonates and small infants, the cycle duration may need to be reduced to achieve adequate ultrafiltration. (practice point)4.3 Close monitoring of total fluid intake and output is mandatory with a goal to achieve and maintain normotension and euvolemia. (1B)4.4 Acute PD should be continuous throughout the full 24-h period for the initial 1-3 days of therapy. (1C)4.5 Close monitoring of drug dosages and levels, where available, should be conducted when providing acute PD. (practice point)5. Continuous flow peritoneal dialysis (CFPD)5.1 Continuous flow peritoneal dialysis can be considered as a PD treatment option when an increase in solute clearance and ultrafiltration is desired but cannot be achieved with standard acute PD. Therapy with this technique should be considered experimental since experience with the therapy is limited. (practice point) 5.2 Continuous flow peritoneal dialysis can be considered for dialysis therapy in children with AKI when the use of only very small fill volumes is preferred (e.g. children with high ventilator pressures). (practice point).

From "feeling" to "seeing": modification of the percutaneous peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion with an optical puncture system.

Blind insertion limits the application of percutaneous peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter placement. In this study, we first described the use of an optical puncture system in the PD catheter insertion, and investigated the feasibility and advantages of this modified technique. This retrospective study included 65 patients with chronic kidney disease stage 5 (CKD5) who received ultrasound-guided percutaneous PD catheter insertion with or without optical puncture system assistance between June 2018 and July 2019. The patients' characteristics as well as the surgical outcomes and complications were compared between the modified group and the routine percutaneous insertion group. Twenty-five patients underwent optical puncture system assistant insertion, whereas 40 patients received routine percutaneous insertion. More patients had previous abdominal surgical histories in the modified group than those in the routine group (24.0% vs. 5.0%, p = 0.047). The time of accessing to the abdominal cavity was significantly shorter in the modified group (median [IQR]; 1.1min [0.8-1.3] vs. 5.0min [4.0-6.0]; p < 0.001). Meanwhile, the time of the whole procedure was also significantly shorter in the modified group (median [IQR]; 26.0min [25.0-29.0] vs. 33.0min [29.0-35.0]; p < 0.001). None of the patient in the modified group, while two patients (5.0%) in the routine group converted to open procedure. There were no significant differences in the short and long postoperative complications between the two groups. The operation of ultrasound-guided PD catheter placement with the optical puncture system is easy, safe, fast and accurate, whereby the PD catheter can be implanted percutaneously and visually under local anesthesia with minimal procedure-related complications. The visible puncture of the optical puncture system may facilitate ultrasound-guided percutaneous PD catheter insertion in patients with obesity and previous abdominal surgeries.

Interventional nephrology: A review of literature

Interventional nephrology (IN) is one of the prominent nephrology fields that mainly copes with the diagnosis and treatment of patients with renal failure by using special techniques, such as ultrasonography of kidneys, performance of kidney biopsy, insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheters, tunneled dialysis catheters, and maintenance of vascular access for patients receiving hemodialysis. The IN also deals with performing percutaneous endovascular procedures to maintain arteriovenous fistulas or grafts that are functional in patients with renal failure. When performed by a variety of experts, all these procedures resulted in delays in diagnosis and treatment. This led to the formation of a team of nephrologists who started performing these procedures themselves. They opened training centers and provided training to other nephrologists. Excellent results were obtained when these procedures were performed by nephrologists. The IN has ensured to provide renal care with effectiveness, safety, and reduced costs. There is a need to develop awareness among the people, so that these procedures can be performed in an outpatient setting with lower costs. Nephrologists should get adequate training to develop necessary skills to provide standard renal care.

Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion by Nephrologist Using Minilaparotomy: Do Survival and Complications Vary in Obese?

Introduction:Peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDC) placement for chronic kidney disease (CKD) amongst overweight and obese patients is difficult owing to deeper operating field. Literature being discordant on survival and complications in this patient subset, we attempted to analyse this research question in Indian population.Materials and Methods:We retrospectively analysed PDC inserted by nephrologist using surgical minilaparotomy for survivals and complications amongst 'overweight and obese' cohort ('O') at two tertiary care government hospitals in India, and compared results with normo-weight cohort ('N'), with 12−36 months follow-up.Results:245 PDCs were inserted by surgical minilaparotomy and 'N' to 'O' ratio was 169:76. 'O' group were more rural residing (P = 0.003) and post-abdominal surgery (P = 0.008) patients. The 1, 2, and 3-year death censored catheter survival rate was 98.6%, 95.8%, and 88.2% respectively in 'O' group, and 97.6%, 94.5% and 91.8% in 'N' group respectively (P = 0.52). Patient survival (P = 0.63), mechanical complications (P = 0.09) and infective complications (P = 0.93) were comparable despite technically challenging surgery in 'O' group. Refractory peritonitis related PDC removal was comparable (P = 0.54). Prior haemodialysis or catheter related blood stream infections or diabetes were non-contributory to results.Conclusions:Catheter survival and patient survival amongst obese and overweight CAPD patients was non-inferior to normal weight patients. Mechanical, and infective complications were comparable despite technically challenging abdominal terrain in 'O' group. The overall CAPD performance was good amongst obese and overweight.

Surgical Outcomes of Pediatric Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Function in a Referral Center

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is used in children with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) for renal replacement therapy. However, it can be associated with the risk of post-surgical complications. The objectives of this study were to report our experience with the placement of PD catheters for 14 years and to assess the incidence of PD malfunction and other PD-related complications, including the effect of adopting minimally invasive techniques for catheter placement. The objectives of this study were to report our experience with placement of PD catheters for 14-year period and to assess the incidence of PD-related complications and the effect of adopting minimally invasive techniques for catheter placement. It is a retrospective cohort study at the department of pediatric surgery and pediatric nephrology, dialysis, and transplant in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. We reviewed the records of all children who had PD catheter placements between 2005 and 2019. The data included demographics, the surgical technique, the performance of omentectomy, duration of PD catheter, and complication rates. Sixty-five patients had PD catheter insertion during the study period; 16 (24.6%) of them were placed in other institutions then referred to us. Thirty-five patients had no complications. Omentectomy during the first procedure was performed in 53 patients (81.54%). Early dialysate leaking occurred in six patients (9.3%); none were treated with surgical revisions. Four leaks resolved spontaneously, and hemodialysis (HD) was needed in two patients. The median PD catheter duration was 29 months (25th-75th percentiles: 21-41). Sixteen patients required revision (24.62%), and mortality occurred in five patients (7.69%). PD is a safe option in children with ESRD. Open placement with omentectomy in a specialized center could reduce leakage,help to start dialysis early, and decrease the conversion to HD.

Percutaneous Versus Surgical Insertion of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background:Home-based peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an alternative to facility-based hemodialysis and has lower costs and greater freedom for patients with kidney failure. For a patient to undergo PD, a safe and reliable method of accessing the peritoneum is needed. However, different catheter insertion techniques may affect patient health outcomes.Objective:To compare the risk of infectious and mechanical complications between surgical (open and laparoscopic) PD catheter insertion and percutaneous catheter insertion.Design:Systematic review and meta-analysis.Setting:We searched for observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in CENTRAL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, and SCOPUS from inception until June 2018. Data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers based on a preformed template.Patients:Adult (aged 18+) patients with kidney failure who underwent a PD catheter insertion procedure.Measurements:We analyzed leak, malfunction, and bleed as early complications (occurring within 1 month of catheter insertion). Infectious complications (exit-site infections, tunnel infections, and peritonitis) were presented as both early complications and with the longest duration of follow-up.Methods:Random effects meta-analyses with the generic inverse variance method to estimate pooled rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals. We quantified heterogeneity by using the I2 statistic for inconsistency and assessed heterogeneity using the χ2 test. Sensitivity analysis was performed by removing studies at high risk of bias as measured with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.Results:Twenty-four studies (22 observational, 2 RCTs) with 3108 patients and 3777 catheter insertions were selected. Data from 2 studies were unable to be extracted and were qualitatively assessed. In the remaining 22 studies, percutaneous insertion was associated with a lower risk of both exit-site infections (risk ratio [RR] = 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.24-0.53, I2 = 0%) and peritonitis (RR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.36-0.77, I2 = 3%) within 1 month of the procedure. There was no difference in mechanical complication rates between the 2 techniques.Limitations:Lack of consistency in the time periods for the various outcomes reported, risk of bias concerns with respect to population comparability, and the inability to analyze individual component causes of primary nonfunction (catheter obstruction, catheter migration, and leak).Conclusions:Our meta-analysis suggests differences in early infectious complications in favor of percutaneous insertion and no significant differences in mechanical complications compared with surgical insertion. These findings have implications on the direction of PD programs in terms of maximizing operating room resources.

Maintaining the Uptake of Peritoneal Dialysis During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Research Letter.

Background:Due to inherent challenges in maintaining physical distancing in hemodialysis units, the Canadian Society of Nephrology has recommended peritoneal dialysis as the preferred modality for patients requiring maintenance dialysis during the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, pursuing peritoneal dialysis is not without risk due to the requirement for in-person contact during catheter insertion and training, and there is a paucity of data regarding the experience of peritoneal dialysis during the early phases of the pandemic.Objective:To examine the incidence and outcomes of peritoneal dialysis between March 17 and June 01, 2020 compared to the same time period in preceding years.Design:Retrospective observational study.Setting:British Columbia, Canada. After the pandemic was declared on March 17, 2020, patients continued to be trained in peritoneal dialysis. In an effort to limit time spent in hospital, patients were preferentially trained in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, training times were truncated for some patients, and peritoneal dialysis catheters were inserted by a physician at the bedside whenever feasible.Patients:All patients aged >18 years who started chronic maintenance dialysis during the period March 17 to June 01 in the years 2018 to 2020 inclusive. The time period was extended to include the years 2010 to 2020 inclusive to evaluate longer term trends in dialysis incidence.Measurements:A provincial clinical information system was used to capture the date of commencing dialysis, dialysis modality, and complications including peritonitis. Overall uptake of peritoneal dialysis included new starts and transitions to peritoneal dialysis from in-center hemodialysis during the observation period.Methods:The incidence of dialysis during the specified time period, overall and by modality, was calculated per million population using census figures for the population at risk. Patients were followed for a minimum of 30 days from the start of peritoneal dialysis to capture episodes of peritonitis and COVID-19.Results:A total of 211 patients started maintenance dialysis between March 17 and June 01, 2020. The incidence dialysis rate (41.3 per million population) was lower than that expected based on the 10-year trend from 2010 to 2019 inclusive (expected rate 45.7 per million population, 95% confidence interval 41.7 to 50.1). A total of 93 patients started peritoneal dialysis, including 32 patients who transitioned from in-center hemodialysis, contributing to a higher overall uptake of peritoneal dialysis compared to preceding years. The incidence rate for peritoneal dialysis of 18.2 per million population was higher than that expected (16.3 per million population, 95% confidence interval 14.0 to 19.0). Half of patients (48%) underwent a bedside peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion by a physician. During 30 days of follow-up, 2 (2.2%) patients experienced peritonitis and no patients were diagnosed with COVID-19.Limitations:Results are short term and generalizable only to regions with similarly low community rates of transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.Conclusions:These preliminary findings indicate that peritoneal dialysis can be safely started and perhaps expanded as a means of mitigating the anticipated surge in in-center hemodialysis during the COVID-19 pandemic. Important contributors to the uptake of peritoneal dialysis in British Columbia were bedside catheter insertions and expediting transitions from in-center hemodialysis to peritoneal dialysis.

Assessment of complications and short-term outcomes of percutaneous peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion by conventional or modified Seldinger technique

Objective To explore the efficacy and short-term complications of a modified technique to percutaneously insert a peritoneal dialysis catheter. Methods We reviewed the outcomes of 94 patients who underwent peritoneal dialysis catheterization between October 2017 and April 2020. Of these, 47 cases were placed by a conventional Seldinger technique, whereas 47 cases were placed by a modified technique based on the Seldinger method. The success rates of the catheter insertion and three-month postoperative complications were compared between these two groups. Results The catheter insertion success rates were comparable between the two groups: 93.6% in the conventional technique group and 97.9% in the modified technique group (p = 0.307). The incidence of postoperative catheter migration was lower using the modified technique (4.3%) than the conventional technique (18.3%) (p = 0.037). None of the patients in the modified technique group had postoperative dialysate leakage, whereas this occurred in 9.0% of patients in the conventional technique group (p = 0.036). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of postoperative bleeding, infection, or visceral damage between the two groups. Conclusions The modified Seldinger technique for percutaneous peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion reduced the short-term postoperative complications of catheter migration and dialysate leakage, with a comparable successful catheter insertion rate compared with the conventional Seldinger technique.

ISPD guidelines for peritoneal dialysis in acute kidney injury: 2020 update (adults)

(1) Peritoneal dialysis (PD) should be considered a suitable modality for treatment of acute kidney injury (AKI) in all settings (1B). (2.1) Flexible peritoneal catheters should be used where resources and expertise exist (1B) (optimal).(2.2) Rigid catheters and improvised catheters using nasogastric tubes and other cavity drainage catheters may be used in resource-poor environments where they may still be life-saving (1C) (minimum standard).(2.3) We recommend catheters should be tunnelled to reduce peritonitis and peri-catheter leak (practice point).(2.4) We recommend that the method of catheter implantation should be based on patient factors and locally available skills (1C).(2.5) PD catheter implantation by appropriately trained nephrologists in patients without contraindications is safe and functional results equate to those inserted surgically (1B).(2.6) Nephrologists should receive training and be permitted to insert PD catheters to ensure timely dialysis in the emergency setting (practice point). (2.7) We recommend, when available, percutaneous catheter insertion by a nephrologist should include assessment with ultrasonography (2C).(2.8) Insertion of PD catheter should take place under complete aseptic conditions using sterile technique (practice point).(2.9) We recommend the use of prophylactic antibiotics prior to PD catheter implantation (1B).(2.10) A closed delivery system with a Y connection should be used (1A) (optimal). In resource poor areas, spiking of bags and makeshift connections may be necessary and can be considered (minimum standard).(2.11) The use of automated or manual PD exchanges are acceptable and this will be dependent on local availability and practices (practice point). (3.1) In patients who are critically ill, especially those with significant liver dysfunction and marked elevation of lactate levels, bicarbonate containing solutions should be used (1B) (optimal). Where these solutions are not available, the use of lactate containing solutions is an alternative (practice point) (minimum standard).(3.2) Commercially prepared solutions should be used (optimal). However, where resources do not permit this, then locally prepared fluids may be life-saving and with careful observation of sterile preparation procedure, peritonitis rates are not increased (1C) (minimum standard).(3.3) Once potassium levels in the serum fall below 4 mmol/L, potassium should be added to dialysate (using strict sterile technique to prevent infection) or alternatively oral or intravenous potassium should be given to maintain potassium levels at 4 mmol/L or above (1C).(3.4) Potassium levels should be measured daily (optimal). Where these facilities do not exist, we recommend that after 24 h of successful dialysis, one consider adding potassium chloride to achieve a concentration of 4 mmol/L in the dialysate (minimum standard) (practice point). (4.1) Targeting a weekly K t/V urea of 3.5 provides outcomes comparable to that of daily HD in critically ill patients; targeting higher doses does not improve outcomes (1B). This dose may not be necessary for most patients with AKI and targeting a weekly K t/V of 2.2 has been shown to be equivalent to higher doses (1B). Tidal automated PD (APD) using 25 L with 70% tidal volume per 24 h shows equivalent survival to continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration with an effluent dose of 23 mL/kg/h (1C).(4.2) Cycle times should be dictated by the clinical circumstances. Short cycle times (1-2 h) are likely to more rapidly correct uraemia, hyperkalaemia, fluid overload and/or metabolic acidosis; however, they may be increased to 4-6 hourly once the above are controlled to reduce costs and facilitate clearance of larger sized solutes (2C).(4.3) The concentration of dextrose should be increased and cycle time reduced to 2 hourly when fluid overload is evident. Once the patient is euvolemic, the dextrose concentration and cycle time should be adjusted to ensure a neutral fluid balance (1C).(4.4) Where resources permit, creatinine, urea, potassium and bicarbonate levels should be measured daily; 24 h K t/V urea and creatinine clearance measurement is recommended to assess adequacy when clinically indicated (practice point).(4.5) Interruption of dialysis should be considered once the patient is passing >1 L of urine/24 h and there is a spontaneous reduction in creatinine (practice point).

A Simple and Safe Technique for Intraoperative Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion in Neonates

A Simple and Safe Technique for Intraoperative Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion in Neonates

The efficacy and safety of a novel method of peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion from the McBurney point

BackgroundCatheter dysfunction, especially omental wrapping, is a serious complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD). Although catheter implantation at a lower site was reported to prevent omental wrapping, this method could induce insufficient drainage of the PD solution and cause pain or a persistent desire to defecate, when the intraperitoneal catheter is of insufficient length or when its tip is in direct contact with the pelvic floor, respectively. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of a novel PD catheter insertion method of approaching from the McBurney point, from the outer side of the abdomen.MethodsThis retrospective study included 23 patients with end-stage renal disease who were started on PD from January 2017 to July 2018 at Ashikaga Red Cross Hospital, Tochigi, Japan. Among them, 16 patients underwent a PD catheter insertion using a conventional method, whereas 7 patients underwent a novel method of approaching from the McBurney point. Infectious and mechanical complications were evaluated until August 2020.ResultsThere were 18 men and 5 women, with a mean age of 63.1 ± 13.6 years. All patients were followed up postoperatively for a mean duration of 27.2 ± 13.4 months. No patient experienced omental wrapping, insufficient drainage of the PD solution, and pain or persistent desire to defecate in both groups. Both the incidence of infectious and mechanical complications (times per patient-year) were not statistically different between patients undergoing a conventional and a novel PD catheter insertion (0.18 vs. 0.24; p = 0.79 and 0.03 vs. 0.16; p = 0.16, respectively).ConclusionsThis novel method of PD catheter insertion from the McBurney point was safe, caused less discomfort, and was effective in preventing catheter dysfunction.

Video-Assisted Peritoneal Dialysis Placement in COVID-19 Patients

Video-Assisted Peritoneal Dialysis Placement in COVID-19 Patients