Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion Research Articles

Dialysis for paediatric acute kidney injury in Cape Town, South Africa.

Dialysis is lifesaving for acute kidney injury (AKI), but access is poor in less resourced settings. A "peritoneal dialysis (PD) first" policy for paediatric AKI is more feasible than haemodialysis in low-resource settings. Retrospective review of modalities and outcomes of children dialysed acutely at Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital between 1998 and 2020. Of the 593 children with AKI who received dialysis, 463 (78.1%) received PD first. Median age was 9.0 (range 0.03-219.3; IQR 13.0-69.6) months; 57.6% were < 1year old. Weights ranged from 0.9 to 2.0kg (median 7.0kg, IQR 3.0-16.0kg); 38.6% were < 5kg. PD was used more in younger children compared to extracorporeal dialysis (ECD), with median ages 6.4 (IQR 0.9-30.4) vs. 73.9 (IQR 17.5-113.9) months, respectively (p = 0.001). PD was performed with Seldinger soft catheters (n = 480/578, 83%), predominantly inserted by paediatricians at the bedside (n = 412/490, 84.1%). Complications occurred in 127/560 (22.7%) children receiving PD. Overall, 314/542 (57.8%) children survived. Survival was significantly lower in neonates (< 1month old, 47.5%) and infants (1-12months old, 49.2%) compared with older children (> 1year old, 70.4%, p < 0.0001). Survival was superior in the ECD (75.4%) than in the PD group (55.6%, p = 0.002). "PD First for Paediatric AKI" is a valuable therapeutic approach for children with AKI. It is feasible in low-resourced settings where bedside PD catheter insertion can be safely taught and is an acceptable dialysis modality, especially in settings where children with AKI would otherwise not survive.

Laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion with omentopexy-sparing the omentum in children.

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis is an important modality of renal replacement therapy in children. Catheter dysfunction (commonly obstruction) is a major cause of morbidity and is a significant concern that hampers renal replacement therapy. As omentum is a significant cause of obstruction, some recommend routine omentectomy during insertion of the peritoneal dialysis catheter. Omentopexy rather than omentectomy has been described in adults to spare the omentum as it may be needed as a spare part in many conditions. Laparoscopic approach is commonly preferred as it provides global evaluation of the peritoneal space, proper location of the catheteral end in the pelvis and lesser morbidity due to inherent minimally invasive nature. The aim of this study is to present the technique of laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter placement in children with concurrent omentopexy. We retrospectively evaluated our patients who underwent laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheter with concomitant omentopexy or omentectomy. A total of 30 patients were enrolled who received either omentectomy (n = 18) or omentopexy (n = 12). Four catheters were lost in the omentopexy group (33%) and 3 in the omentectomy group (17%), but none were related to omental obstruction. Three out of 4 patients in the omentopexy group and 2 out of 3 patients in the omentectomy group had a previous abdominal operation as a potential cause of catheter loss. Previous history of abdominal surgery was present in 6 patients (50%) in the omentopexy group and 3 patients (17%) in the omentectomy group. As omentum was associated with catheter failure, omentectomy is commonly recommended. Alternatively, omentopexy can be preferred in children to spare an organ that may potentially be necessary for many surgical reconstructive procedures in the future. Laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter placement with concomitant omentopexy appears as a feasable and reproducible technique. Although the catheter loss seems to be higher in the omentopexy group, none was related with the omentopexy procedure and may be related to the higher rate of history of previous abdominal operations in this group.

Effects of comprehensive nursing interventions on wound pain in patients undergoing catheter insertion for peritoneal dialysis.

This study investigates the effects of comprehensive nursing interventions on wound pain in patients undergoing catheter insertion for peritoneal dialysis. Sixty patients who underwent catheter insertion for peritoneal dialysis from January 2021 to January 2023 at our hospital were selected as subjects and randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group using a random number table method. The control group received routine nursing care, while the experimental group was subjected to comprehensive nursing interventions. The study compared the impact of nursing measures on visual analogue scale (VAS), self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), self-rating depression scale (SDS) and nursing satisfaction between the two groups. The analysis revealed that on the third, fifth and seventh days post-intervention, the experimental group's wound VAS scores were significantly lower than those of the control group (p < 0.001). Furthermore, levels of anxiety and depression were markedly lower in the experimental group compared with the control group (p < 0.001). In addition, the nursing satisfaction rate was significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group (96.67% vs. 73.33%, p = 0.011). This study indicates that the application of comprehensive nursing interventions in patients undergoing catheter insertion for peritoneal dialysis is highly effective. It can alleviate wound pain and negative emotions to a certain extent, while also achieving high patient satisfaction, thus demonstrating significant clinical value.

Impact of Prior Abdominal Procedures on Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Outcomes: Findings From the North American Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Registry

A history of prior abdominal procedures may influence the likelihood of referral for peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter insertion. To guide clinical decision making in this population, this study examined the association between prior abdominal procedures and outcomes in patients undergoing PD catheter insertion. Retrospective cohort study. Adults undergoing their first PD catheter insertion between November 1, 2011 and November 1, 2020, at 11 institutions in Canada and the US participating in the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) North American Catheter Registry. Prior abdominal procedure(s), defined as any procedure that enters the peritoneal cavity. Primary outcome: time to the first of abandonment of the PD catheter, or interruption/termination of PD. rates of emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and procedures. Cumulative incidence curves were used to describe the risk over time and an adjusted Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the association between the exposure and primary outcome. Models for count data were used to estimate the associations between the exposure and secondary outcomes. A total of 855 patients met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-one percent had a history of a prior abdominal procedure and 20% experienced at least one PD catheter-related complication that led to the primary outcome. Prior abdominal procedures were not associated with an increased risk of the primary outcome [Adjusted HR 1.12 (95% CI 0.68-1.84)]. Upper abdominal procedures were associated with a higher adjusted hazard of the primary outcome, but there was no dose-response relationship concerning the number of procedures. There was no association between prior abdominal procedures and other secondary outcomes. Observational study and cohort limited to sample of patients felt to be potential candidates for PD catheter insertion. A history of prior abdominal procedure(s) does not appear to influence catheter outcomes following PD catheter insertion. Such a history should not be a contraindication to peritoneal dialysis.

Outcomes of Prophylactic Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion in Children Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The objective of this Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42022384192) registered systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine whether prophylactic peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter insertion at the time of pediatric cardiac surgery is associated with improved short-term outcomes. Databases search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library completed in April 2021 and updated October 2023. Two reviewers independently completed study selection, data extraction, and bias assessment. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies of children (≤ 18 yr) undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. We evaluated use of prophylactic PD catheter versus not. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, as well as secondary short-term outcomes. Pooled random-effect meta-analysis odds ratio with 95% CI are reported. Seventeen studies met inclusion criteria, including four RCTs. The non-PD catheter group received supportive care that included diuretics and late placement of PD catheters in the ICU. Most study populations included children younger than 1 year and weight less than 10 kg. Cardiac surgery was most commonly used for arterial switch operation. In-hospital mortality was reported in 13 studies; pooled analysis showed no association between prophylactic PD catheter placement and in-hospital mortality. There were mixed results for ICU length of stay and time to negative fluid balance, with some studies showing shortened duration associated with use of prophylactic PD catheter insertion and others showing no difference. Overall, the studies had high risk for bias, mainly due to small sample size and lack of generalizability. In this meta-analysis, we have failed to demonstrate an association between prophylactic PD catheter insertion in children and infants undergoing cardiac surgery and reduced in-hospital mortality. Other relevant short-term outcomes, including markers of fluid overload, require further study.

The Association of Intra-Abdominal Adhesions with Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter-Related Complications.

This study investigated the association of intra-abdominal adhesions with the risk of peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter complications. Individuals undergoing laparoscopic PD catheter insertion were prospectively enrolled from eight centers in Canada and the United States. Patients were grouped based on the presence of adhesions observed during catheter insertion. The primary outcome was the composite of PD never starting, termination of PD, or the need for an invasive procedure caused by flow restriction or abdominal pain. Seven hundred and fifty-eight individuals were enrolled, of whom 201 (27%) had adhesions during laparoscopic PD catheter insertion. The risk of the primary outcome occurred in 35 (17%) in the adhesion group compared with 58 (10%) in the no adhesion group (adjusted HR, 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05 to 2.55) within 6 months of insertion. Lower abdominal or pelvic adhesions had an adjusted HR of 1.80 (95% CI, 1.09 to 2.98) compared with the no adhesion group. Invasive procedures were required in 26 (13%) and 47 (8%) of the adhesion and no adhesion groups, respectively (unadjusted HR, 1.60: 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.47) within 6 months of insertion. The adjusted odds ratio for adhesions for women was 1.65 (95% CI, 1.12 to 2.41), for body mass index per 5 kg/m 2 was 1.16 (95% CI, 1.003 to 1.34), and for prior abdominal surgery was 8.34 (95% CI, 5.5 to 12.34). Common abnormalities found during invasive procedures included PD catheter tip migration, occlusion of the lumen with fibrin, omental wrapping, adherence to the bowel, and the development of new adhesions. People with intra-abdominal adhesions undergoing PD catheter insertion were at higher risk for abdominal pain or flow restriction preventing PD from starting, PD termination, or requiring an invasive procedure. However, most patients, with or without adhesions, did not experience complications, and most complications did not lead to the termination of PD therapy.

Complications of Peritoneal Dialysis Part I: Mechanical Complications.

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a form of kidney replacement therapy that offers flexibility and autonomy to patients with end stage kidney disease. It is associated with lower costs compared to hemodialysis in many countries. However, it can be associated with unexpected interruptions to, or discontinuation of therapy. Timely diagnosis and resolution are required to minimize preventable modality change to hemodialysis. This review covers mechanical complications, including leaks, PD hydrothorax, hernias, dialysate flow problems, PD-related pain, and changes in respiratory mechanics. Most mechanical complications occur early, either as a result of PD catheter insertion or the introduction of dialysate and consequent increased intraabdominal pressure. Late mechanical complications can also occur, and may require different treatment.

Peri vesical and retroperitoneal vascular injury following pd catheter insertion in a child: An unusual occurrence

Abstract Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an important modality of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in children in the acute setting. Despite the favorable outcomes of RRT, PD catheter insertions have various complications that may be related either to variations in procedural technique or infections. We report a case of a child with massive retroperitoneal and intra-abdominal bleeding secondary to injury to the inferior epigastric arterial arcade, near the urinary bladder following the insertion of a PD catheter.

One-year outcomes of percutaneous continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion by nephrologists: First experience from Sri Lanka

Introduction: Continuous ambulatory peritonealdialysis (CAPD) via a catheter placed in the peritoneum is an established mode of renal replacement therapy. CAPD catheters are placed using either percutaneous or surgical techniques. Percutaneous method is less invasive and avoids the need for general anaesthesia, surgical space, and expertise. This study was conducted to measure one-year outcomes of percutaneous CAPD catheter insertions performed by a nephrology team; the first experience from Sri Lanka.Methods: We retrospectively studied 96 patients in two centers, who underwent percutaneous CAPD catheter insertion over two years with a follow-up period of minimum one year. The catheter was placed using modified Seldinger technique under local anesthesia with ultrasound guidance.Results: Majority were males (78.1%) with a median age of 56 years. Most were on haemodialysis (HD) (85.4%) prior to CAPD catheter insertion. The commonest reason for opting for CAPD was to avoid hospital visits for HD (54.2%). During the follow-up of one year, 85.4% were free of complications. Frequent non-infectious complications were catheter removal (12.5%), visceral injury (4.2%), primary insertion failure (4.2%), and catheter dysfunction (2.1%). Pre-training peritonitis was found in 2.1% with an overall peritonitis rate of 0.4 episodes per patient a year. There was no significant association between catheter-related complications and gender (p=0.68), previous abdominal surgery (p=0.54), diabetes mellitus (p=0.84), and hypertension (p=0.46). One-year catheter survival was 92%.Discussion: One-year outcomes of percutaneous CAPD catheter insertion by nephrologists were efficacious and safe with low complication rates. Hence, CAPD catheter insertion by well-trained nephrologists should be encouraged. Further studies comparing percutaneous versus surgical catheter placement are warranted.

Laparoscopic vs open surgical insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheters: A propensity score-matched cohort study

BackgroudThe optimal peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheterization method remains under debated. To minimize catheter-related complications, we developed a novel modified low-position two-port laparoscopic technique, and evaluated the efficacy and safety of traditional open and advanced laparoscopic techniques. MethodsA total of 743 patients with uremia who underwent PD catheterization were retrospectively reviewed. For the placement of PD catheters, patients underwent low-position two-port laparoscopic surgery (Lap group) or traditional open surgery (open group). To minimize confounding bias, we performed a 1-to-2 propensity-score matching adjusted for the most clinically relevant potential confounders. The baseline characteristics, perioperative conditions, complications and outcomes were compared between the two groups. ResultsAfter propensity-score matching, a well-balanced cohort comprising 148 matched pairs were identified. In the matched analysis, patients in the Lap group showed significantly shorter operative time (43.0 ± 16.6 versus 81.6 ± 19.8 minutes, P < 0.001) and lower postoperative pain score within 24 hours (0.24 ± 0.62 versus 1.00 ± 1.41, P = 0.002). The incidence of catheter migration in the Lap group was significantly lower than those in the open group (0.7% versus 6.5%, P = 0.006), while other complications, such as catheter occlusion, omentum wrapping, dialysate leakage, bloody effluent, organ injury, hernia, hydrothorax, early tunnel infection and peritonitis, showed no difference (P > 0.05). The Lap group patients had a favorable catheter survival rate compared with group B (log rank, P = 0.032). ConclusionsOur low-position two-port laparoscopic technique is a safe, simple, and fast method that can minimize patient discomfort without additional cost and offers better catheter survival with minimal risk of migration.

Conscious sedation anesthesia using different doses of remifentanil combined with dexmedetomidine for peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation

Background Conscious sedation anesthesia (CSA) is an anesthetic method during peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation. However, lack of optimal CSA strategies for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This study aimed to evaluate the analgesic effects and safety of CSA using different doses of remifentanil combined with dexmedetomidine during peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion. Methods Patients who underwent peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter placement via open surgical incision were retrospectively analyzed and divided into three groups based on the tertile dose of remifentanil. The bispectral index (BIS) was used to monitor the depth of anesthesia. Data regarding clinical findings, the effects of anesthesia, and the incidence of drug-related adverse effects were collected. Results In total, 102 patients completed the surgery successfully and safely. The dose of remifentanil was 0.02–0.07 μg/kg/min, 0.08–0.13 μg/kg/min, and 0.14–0.20 μg/kg/min in Groups A, B, and C, respectively. Only seven patients reported mild pain during the surgery. No significant differences were observed among the numeric rating scale scores of the three groups (p > 0.05). Intraoperative hemodynamics were stable. The incidence of respiratory depression was 8.3%, 20.0%, and 41.9% in Groups A, B, and C, respectively (p < 0.01). The incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms in Group C (51.6%) was higher than that in Groups A and B (p < 0.05). Conclusion Low-dose remifentanil (0.02–0.07 μg/kg/min) combined with dexmedetomidine achieved satisfactory anesthetic effects with fewer adverse drug reactions during PD catheter implantation, indicating its potential for use in patients undergoing PD catheter placement.

The association between embedded catheter implantation and hospitalization costs for peritoneal dialysis initiation: a retrospective cohort study.

Compared with the conventional peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter insertion, embedding PD catheter implantation is one of the procedures for planned PD initiation. However, facilities where embedded PD catheter implantation is available are limited, and the impact of embedded PD catheter implantation on hospitalization cost and length of hospitalization is unknown. This retrospective single-center cohort study included 132 patients with PD initiation between 2005 and 2020. The patients were divided into two groups: 64 patients in the embedding group and 68 patients in the conventional insertion group. We created a multivariable generalized linear model (GLM) with the gamma family and log-link function to evaluate the association among catheter embedding, the duration and medical costs of hospitalization for PD initiation. We also evaluated the effect modification between age and catheter embedding. Catheter embedding (β coefficient - 0.13 [95% confidence interval - 0.21, - 0.05]) and age (per 10years 0.08 [0.03, 0.14]) were significantly associated with hospitalization costs. Catheter embedding (- 0.21 [- 0.32, - 0.10]) and age (0.11 [0.03, 0.19]) were also identified as factors significantly associated with length of hospitalization. The difference between the embedding group and the conventional insertion group in hospitalization costs for PD initiation (P for interaction = 0.060) and the length of hospitalization (P for interaction = 0.027) was larger in young-to-middle-aged patients than in elderly patients. Catheter embedding was associated with lower hospitalization cost and shorter length of hospitalization for PD initiation than conventional PD catheter insertion, especially in young-to-middle-aged patients.

The clinical implications of occult inguinal hernia identified during laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion.

Occult inguinal hernias predispose patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) to symptomatic inguinal hernia formation causing complications. We conducted a retrospective study to assess the usefulness of routine laparoscopic examination for occult inguinal hernia during PD catheter insertion and the risk profile of occult inguinal hernia according to hernia classification in patients with PD. This study included 79 patients who underwent initial laparoscopic PD catheter insertion between 2021 and 2022. An occult hernia was defined as an internal hernial sac of all sizes that was not detectable on physical examination. The European Hernia Society groin hernia classification was used to describe the hernia type. We investigated the association between event-free survival and occult inguinal hernias in patients undergoing PD. Occult inguinal hernias were diagnosed in 24 (32%) patients. Among these patients, 5 (21%) patients underwent metachronous repair. In patients with L2 occult hernias, the cumulative incidence rates of right and left symptomatic hernias within one year were 100% and 50%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that L2 occult hernias were associated with metachronous hernia repair. The L2 occult inguinal hernia during PD was associated with metachronous repair, suggesting the importance of routine examination of inguinal hernias during laparoscopic PD catheter insertion.

Inpatient peritoneal dialysis catheters placed across the United States during a 3-year period: Lessons learned from 15,000 patients

BackgroundPeritoneal dialysis is a popular option for patients with end-stage renal disease. A recent presidential executive order has incentivized in-home end-stage renal disease treatments, leading to an increase in peritoneal dialysis use. Guidelines exist for creating and maintaining peritoneal dialysis access without addressing the optimal technique. This study evaluates nationwide peritoneal dialysis catheter placement practices and their long-term outcomes. MethodsRetrospective cohort analysis of Nationwide Readmission Database from 2017 to 2019. Patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing inpatient peritoneal dialysis catheter placement were included. Six-month readmissions, mortality, and peritoneal dialysis catheter-specific outcome measures were assessed among survivors of admission, including catheter leakage, mechanical breakdown, displacement, revision or replacement, removal, exit site infections, intra-abdominal abscess, and sepsis. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed. ResultsIn the study, 14,863 patients with inpatient peritoneal dialysis catheter insertions were identified, of which 7,096 were analyzed (4,150 [59%] laparoscopic, 1,781 [25%] fluoroscopic, 1,165 [16%] open), 847 (12%) had major complications, 931 (13%) were readmitted, and 102 (1.4%) died within 6 months. Univariate analyses demonstrated that laparoscopy had higher mechanical complications, exit-site infections, catheter revision, and removal within 6 months, and fluoroscopy had higher sepsis and mortality. Multivariate analyses showed fluoroscopy was associated with intraabdominal abscess (adjusted odds ratio, 2.36; P = .025), laparoscopy with exit-site infections (adjusted odds ratio, 0.49; P = .005), and open surgery with catheter displacement (adjust odds ratio, 2.95; P = .021). ConclusionThis is the first large-scale study on inpatient peritoneal dialysis catheter placement outcomes in the United States. Fluoroscopic and open surgical placements are routinely performed, but laparoscopy remains the mainstay with fewer exit-site infections. Overall, peritoneal dialysis is a safe option, with 1 in 9 patients having an infectious or mechanical complication within 6 months. Furthermore, large-scale prospective studies are warranted to identify the optimal placement technique.

Modified Single Port Laparoscopic Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion - Initial Experience and Outcome from a Tertiary Care Centre

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are emerging as a major health related issues in developing countries. The increasing numbers require rapid adaptation of existing health-care policies. The number of patients requiring renal care is only bound to increase in coming years with the increasing incidence and prevalence of diabetes. Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) catheter placement is performed on end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. There is abundant literature regarding post-operative outcomes and re-operative rates following CAPD. We report our initial experience of modified single port laparoscopic technique of placing CAPD catheters using a single port through the Palmer’s point and discuss our surgical outcomes. Methods: This was a retrospective review (2019-2020) of patients undergoing CAPD catheter placement at SMVD Narayana Superspecialty Hospital. Outcome analysis focused on patient related outcomes, including early (&lt; 30 days) versus late (≥ 30 days) complication and re-operation rates. Results: A total of 30 patients with ESRD, (mean ASA score = 3.3) were included in the study who underwent modified single port laparoscopic (n = 30) CAPD catheter placement (mean follow-up = 180 days). The total complication rate with the procedure was 43%, with re-operation rate of 20%. CAPD catheter non-function occurred in 06 patients (20% of total). CAPD catheter migrations occurred in 03 patients (10% of total). CAPD catheter related infections occurred in 05 patients (16% of total), and 02 required re-operation; 03 patients were treated successfully with culture directed antibiotics. There were 2 deaths during the study period, one due to peritonitis and other due to underlying cardiac disease. There was no surgical mortality in the study group. Conclusion: Although CAPD catheter placement in patients with ESRD are technically un-complicated to accomplish, long term results suggest as many as one in three patients will struggle with some form of catheter malfunction or infection. Our modified technique and the results have led to changes in our CAPD catheter placement technique, as well as the post-operative patient care algorithm.

Poster 7 - Examining the impact of a double glove technique on infection rates of peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion sites

Poster 7 - Examining the impact of a double glove technique on infection rates of peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion sites

Catheter Event Rates in Medical Compared to Surgical Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion

How patient, center, and insertion technique factors interact needs to be understood when designing peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter insertion pathways. We undertook a prospective cohort study in 44 UK centers enrolling participants planned for first catheter insertion. Sequences of regressions were used to describe the associations linking patient and dialysis unit-level characteristics with catheter insertion technique and their impact on the occurrence of catheter-related events in the first year (catheter-related infection, hospitalization, and removal). Factors associated with catheter events were incorporated into a multistate model comparing the rates of catheter events between medical and surgical insertion alongside treatment modality transitions and mortality. Of 784 first catheter insertions, 466 (59%) had a catheter event in the first year and 61.2% of transitions onto hemodialysis (HD) were immediately preceded by a catheter event. Catheter malfunction was less but infection was more common with surgical compared with medical insertions. Participants at centers with fewer late presenters and more new dialysis patients starting PD, had a lower probability of a catheter event. Adjusting for these factors, the hazard ratio for a catheter event following insertion (medical vs. surgical) was 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43 to 1.13), and once established on PD 0.77 (0.62 to 0.96). Offering both medical and surgical techniques is associated with lower catheter event rates and keeps people on PD for longer.

Nephroscope-assisted single trocar peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion improves catheter survival compared with laparoscopic technique: Ten-year experience of a single-center

BackgroundAn ideal technique for peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter insertion should provide a long-term functioning catheter until permanent renal replacement therapy becomes available. We developed a technique using the nephroscope-assisted single-trocar approach in 2011. In this study, we report the outcomes, learning curve analysis and cost-effectiveness analysisof the nephroscopic approach compared with the traditional laparoscopic approach. MethodBetween January 2005 and December 2020, we retrospectively reviewed 511 patients who received PD catheter insertions using the laparoscopic or nephroscopic approach. We compared the baseline characteristics of the patients, surgical outcomes, and complications of the two groups. We further analyzed the nephroscopic group to determine the cost-effectiveness analysis, learning curve and the complication frequency between the learning and mastery periods of the nephroscopic approach. ResultsA total of 208 patients underwent laparoscopic PD catheter insertion, whereas 303 patients received nephroscopic surgery. The median catheter survival in the nephroscopic group is significantly longer (43.1 vs. 60.5 months, p = 0.019). The incidence of peritonitis (29.3% vs.20.8%, p = 0.035) and exit site infection (12.5% vs. 6.6%, p = 0.019) were significantly lower in the nephroscopic group. The cost-effectiveness analysis showed a medical expense reduction of 16000 USD annually by using the nephroscopic technique. There was no difference in the frequency of surgical complications between the learning and mastery phases when examining the learning curve analysis for the nephroscopic technique. ConclusionsCompared with the traditional laparoscopic approach, the nephroscopic technique effectively prolonged catheter survival and reduces health care cost by reducing infectious complications. The low complication rate during the learning phase of surgery makes the procedure safe for patients and surgeons.

Stratification of Risk Factors of Complications Associated with Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Placement.

Background: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a frequent method for renal replacement therapy in pediatric population. However, PD is associated with a high incidence of early and late complications. Thus, this study aims to evaluate the perioperative factors associated with these complications. Methods: Clinical records of patients who had peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDC) placement between January 2013 and June 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Sociodemographic and perioperative variables were recorded and analyzed. Results: A total of 92 patients required PDC insertion. Primary PDC failure occurred in 21.74% of cases, and 17.39% required reoperation. The most common complication was occlusion (13.04%), followed by leak (8.7%). Age younger than 1 year and weight less than 10 kg were significant risk factors for catheter dysfunction, reoperation, leak, PDC occlusion, hernia, and death. The open technique was associated with higher risks of operation, leak, and peritonitis than the laparoscopic technique. Placement of the catheter by the laparoscopic technique reduced the odds of occlusion by 38%. Conclusions: Patients younger than 1 year and weighing less than 10 kg have an increased risk of complications and death, regardless of the technique used. The most frequent complication is catheter failure; however, the laparoscopic technique appears to reduce this complication.

Transversus abdominis plane block versus local anesthetic infiltration for anesthetic effect in peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is commonly used in surgical practice for postoperative analgesia in abdominal surgery. However, numerous studies have demonstrated that TAP block is also suitable for intraoperative anesthesia of peritoneal dialysis catheter (PDC) insertion, although its efficacy and safety are still controversial. Local anesthetic infiltration (LAI) is currently the most general anesthesia strategy for PDC insertion. Consequently, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to identify which anesthesia strategy is better between TAP block and LAI. A systematic and comprehensive search was conducted on 5 databases, retrieving published and registered randomized controlled trials as of March 10, 2022, comparing the anesthesia effects of TAP block and LAI. The primary outcomes are the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score of patients at various time points in the surgery. The secondary outcomes are the VAS pain score at rest at 2 and 24 hours postoperatively, intraoperative rescue anesthesia, general anesthesia switching rate, and PD-related complications. There were 9 trials with 432 patients identified. TAP block was more effective than LAI at reducing intraoperative and postoperative VAS pain scores in patients. Compared to LAI, TAP block significantly reduces the dosage of anesthetics used to rescue anesthesia during surgery, the general anesthesia switching rate, and the incidence of postoperative PD-related complications in patients. Our systematic review and meta-analysis proved that TAP block could be used as the primary anesthetic technique for PDC insertion, with superior anesthetic effects to LAI.