Ambulatory monitoring (AM) has been reported to have important prognostic value in patients with third degree congenital heart block (CHB). The purpose of this study was to compare clinical, electrocardiographic, exercise (Ex), and ambulatory monitoring variables in predicting outcome in patients with CHB. Multiple clinical (age, gender, race, associated congenital defects, symptoms), and electrocardiographic variables (rest heart rate [HR], QRS duration, atrial rate, resting arrhythmias) were analyzed for 40 patients with CHB but without a pacemaker. Exercise treadmill testing was performed in 17 patients and ambulatory monitoring in 21 patients. Events were defined as cardiac death (n = 2) and/or pacemaker insertion (n = 27). The median follow-up interval was 8 years. No clinical or rest electrocardiographic variables were associated with subsequent events, although there was a trend for the presence of symptoms and low resting HR (p = 0.07 for both). In contrast to ambulatory monitoring, exercise testing was significantly associated with events:Empty CellEventsNo EventsPEx Variables Peak HR99 ± 24135 ± 320.03 (Peak-rest) HR47 ± 2167 ± 170.18 Rate-pressure product16,100 ± 567023,450 ± 16400.03AM variables Average HR51 ± 1258 ± 17NS Minimum HR38 ± 545 ± 120.09 Maximum HR83 ± 2477 ± 17NS Clinical and rest electrocardiographic variables, by themselves, are not helpful in predicting outcome in pts with CHB. The addition of exercise testing is more closely associated with outcome than ambulatory monitoring in patients with CHB.
Read full abstract