Insect Venom Allergic Patients Research Articles

Immunological differences between insect venom-allergic patients with and without immunotherapy and asymptomatically sensitized subjects.

Currently available tests are unable to distinguish between asymptomatic sensitization and clinically relevant Hymenoptera venom allergy. A reliable serological marker to monitor venom immunotherapy (VIT) does also not exist. Our aim was to find reliable serological markers to predict tolerance to bee and vespid stings. We included 77 asymptomatically sensitized subjects, 85 allergic patients with acute systemic sting reactions, and 61 allergic patients currently treated with VIT. Levels of sIgE and sIgG4 to bee and vespid venom, rApi m 1, and rVes v 5 were measured immediately after allergic sting reactions or before sting challenges and 4 weeks later. All sting challenges were tolerated. The inhibitory activity was determined using BAT inhibition and ELIFAB assay. Median sIgG4 levels were 96-fold higher in VIT patients (P < .001) while sIgE/sIgG4 ratios were consistently lower (P < .001). The ELIFAB assay was paralleled by low sIgE/sIgG4 ratios in VIT patients, showing markedly higher allergen-blocking capacity (P < .001). An almost complete inhibition of the basophil response was seen in all patients treated with vespid venom, but not in those treated with bee venom. Four weeks after the sting, sIgE and sIgG4 levels were increased in allergic and asymptomatically sensitized patients, but not in VIT patients. Immunological responses after stings varied in bee and vespid venom-allergic patients. In patients under VIT, sIgE and sIgG4 remained completely stable after sting challenges. Monitoring VIT efficacy was only possible in vespid venom allergy, and the sIgG4 threshold for rVes v 5 had the highest sensitivity to confirm tolerance. The BAT inhibition test was the most reliable tool to confirm tolerance on an individual basis.

Effects of venom immunotherapy on serum level of CCL5/RANTES in patients with Hymenoptera venom allergy

Hymenoptera venoms are known to cause life-threatening IgE-mediated anaphylactic reactions in allergic individuals. Venom immunotherapy is a recommended treatment of insect allergy with still the mechanism not being completely understood. We decided to assess the serum CCL5/RANTES level in patients who experienced severe anaphylactic reaction to Hymenoptera venom and to find out changes in the course of immunotherapy. Twenty patients (9 men, 11 women, mean age: 31.91 ± 7.63 years) with history of anaphylactic reaction after insect sting were included into the study. Diagnosis was made according to sIgE and skin tests. All of them were enrolled into rush venom immunotherapy with bee or wasp venom extracts (Pharmalgen, ALK-Abello, Horsholm, Denmark). Serum levels of CCL5/RANTES were measured using a commercially available ELISA kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). CCL5/RANTES serum concentration are higher in insect venom allergic patients than in healthy controls (887.5 ± 322.77 versus 387.27 ± 85.11 pg/ml). Serum concentration of CCL5/RANTES in insect venom allergic patient was significantly reduced in the course of allergen immunotherapy already after 6 days of vaccination (887.5 ± 322.77 versus 567.32 ± 92.16 pg/ml). CCL5/RANTES serum doesn’t correlate with specific IgE. Chemokine CCL5/RANTES participates in allergic inflammation induced by Hymenoptera venom allergens. Specific immunotherapy reduces chemokine CCL5/RANTES serum level already after initial days of venom immunotherapy.

Evaluation of a Novel Rapid Test System for the Detection of Specific IgE to Hymenoptera Venoms

Background. The Allergy Lateral Flow Assay (ALFA) is a novel rapid assay for the detection of sIgE to allergens. The objective of this study is the evaluation of ALFA for the detection of sIgE to bee venom (BV) and wasp venom (WV) in insect venom allergic patients. Methods. Specific IgE to BV and WV was analyzed by ALFA, ALLERG-O-LIQ, and ImmunoCAP in 80 insect venom allergic patients and 60 control sera. Sensitivity and specificity of ALFA and correlation of ALFA and ImmunoCAP results were calculated. Results. The sensitivity/specificity of ALFA to the diagnosis was 100%/83% for BV and 82%/97% for WV. For insect venom allergic patients, the Spearman correlation coefficient for ALFA versus ImmunoCAP was 0.79 for BV and 0.80 for WV. However, significant differences in the negative control groups were observed. Conclusion. ALFA represents a simple, robust, and reliable tool for the rapid detection of sIgE to insect venoms.

Influence of Specific Immunotherapy on the Activity of Human T Lymphocyte Kv1.3 Voltage-Gated Potassium Channels in Insect Venom Allergic Patients

Kv1.3 channels play an important role in T lymphocytes function. CD4(+) and CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells are two broad categories of T cells that are critically involved in the immunoresponse to allergens and that are also a major target for allergen immunotherapy. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of venom immunotherapy (VIT) on the activity of Kv1.3. channels on noncultured subsets: CD4(+) and CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells of insect venom allergic patients. Eleven patients with allergic reactions to bee or wasp venoms participated in the study. The patients were provided VIT according to the ultrarush protocol. CD4(+) and CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells were isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of VIT-treated patients by an immunomagnetic method. We used the whole-cell patch clamp technique to investigate the whole potassium chord conductance (gK) of Kv1.3. channels in CD4(+) and CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells of venom-sensitive patients before and during the course of VIT. The conductance of Kv1.3. channels on CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells decreased during the course of VIT. On day 0 it was 0.054 ± 0.07 [nS], and on day 70 it was 0.008 ± 0.09 [nS] (P = 0.03). The observed decrease of the gK of the Kv1.3 channels in the subpopulation of activated T cells may contribute to T cell tolerance and functional unresponsiveness of these cells to allergen in the early stages of VIT.

Changes in gene expression caused by insect venom immunotherapy responsible for the long-term protection of insect venom–allergic patients

Insect venom immunotherapy (VIT) is the only causative treatment of insect venom allergy (IVA). The immunological mechanism(s) responsible for long-term protection achieved by VIT are largely unknown. A better understanding is relevant for improving the diagnosis, prediction of anaphylaxis, and monitoring and simplifying treatment of IVA. To find genes that are differentially expressed during the maintenance phase of VIT and after stopping, to get clues about the pathways involved in the long-term protective effect of immunotherapy. Whole genome gene expression analysis was performed on RNA samples from 50 patients treated with VIT and 43 healthy controls. Patients were divided into three groups: (1) before the start of VIT; (2) on maintenance phase of VIT for at least 3 years still receiving injections; and (3) after VIT. Of all 48,804 probes present in the array, 48,773 transcripts had sufficient data for further analysis. The list of genes that were differentially expressed (at least log2 FC > 2; P < .05 corrected for multiple testing) during the maintenance phase of VIT as well as after successful VIT contains 89 entities. The function of these genes affects cell signaling, cell differentiation, and ion transport. This study shows that a group of genes is differentially expressed both during and after VIT in comparison with gene expression in patients before VIT. Although the results of this study should be confirmed prospectively, the relevance of these findings is supported by the fact that they are related to putative mechanisms of immunotherapy.

Identification, Recombinant Expression, and Characterization of the 100 kDa High Molecular Weight Hymenoptera Venom Allergens Api m 5 and Ves v 3

Insect stings can cause life-threatening IgE-mediated anaphylactic reactions in venom-allergic patients. Although several compounds have already been described as venom allergens, prominent allergen candidates especially in the higher m.w. range have still remained elusive. Tandem mass spectrometry-based sequencing assigned a candidate gene to the most prominent putative high m.w. allergen Api m 5 (allergen C) in honeybee (Apis mellifera) venom and also allowed identification of its homologue Ves v 3 in yellow jacket (Vespula vulgaris) venom. Both proteins exhibit a pronounced sequence identity to human dipeptidyl peptidase IV or CD26. Reactivity of a human IgE mAb verified the presence of these proteins in the venoms. Both proteins were produced in insect cells and characterized for their enzymatic activity as well as their allergenic potential using sera and basophils from insect venom-allergic patients. Both Api m 5 and Ves v 3 were recognized by specific IgE of the majority of patients even in the absence of cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants. Serologic IgE reactivity closely matched activation of human basophils by Api m 5 or Ves v 3, thus underlining their relevance in functional assays. With Api m 5 and Ves v 3, a new pair of homologous allergens becomes available for future clinical applications in diagnosis and therapy that may also contribute to the understanding of molecular mechanisms of insect venoms. Moreover, the patient IgE reactivity together with the cellular activation demonstrates for the first time the relevance of high m.w. allergens in the context of hymenoptera venom allergy.

Basophil activation test in the diagnosis of insect venom allergies

Basophil activation test in the diagnosis of insect venom allergies

Immunotherapy improves health‐related quality of life of adult patients with dermal reactions following yellow jacket stings

In many European centers insect venom allergic patients with a reaction confined to the skin are only offered an epinephrine auto-injector and not venom immunotherapy (VIT). Previously we showed that VIT improves health-related quality of life (HRQL) of yellow jacket allergic patients with more than dermal reactions. To examine whether HRQL of dermal reactors is impaired and to examine the influence of VIT on HRQL in comparison with the EpiPen. Patients with solely dermal reactions were asked if they were willing to be randomized either to VIT or EpiPen, after receiving patient information. Before and 1 year after enrollment, patients completed the Vespid allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire (VQLQ), Burden of Treatment and Expectation of Outcome. Of 55 patients eligible for the study, 29 consented to randomization: 15 to VIT, 14 to EpiPen. The remaining 26 patients preferred to choose their treatment: 11 VIT and 15 EpiPen. The VQLQ score of patients randomized to VIT improved (mean change 0.83 (SD 0.87), in contrast to patients randomized to the EpiPen whose scores deteriorated (mean change -0.42 (SD 0.64), P < 0.0001), resulting in an overall difference of 1.25 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.63-1.87]. With a minimal important difference of 0.5 indicating a clinically significant improvement, VIT generated an number needed to treat (NNT) of 1.7. Dermal reactors did not consider VIT burdensome and rated this treatment as being superior to the EpiPen. VIT results in a clinically significant improvement of HRQL in most patients with reactions limited to the skin following yellow jacket stings. Prescription of an EpiPen in patients not choosing this treatment is associated with deterioration in HRQL and should therefore be avoided as definitive treatment in these patients.

Outcome survey of insect venom allergic patients with venom immunotherapy in a rural population

Hymenoptera venom anaphylaxis is a frightening event that affects physical and psychical functioning. Retrospective survey of 182 Hymenoptera venom allergic patients living in a rural area using a questionnaire targeting on patients' satisfaction during therapy, fear of anaphylactic recurrences and changes in lifestyle before and after venom immunotherapy (VIT). Additionally, patients' self-assessment of quality of life, daily outdoor time and re-sting rate were recorded. 146 patients returned the questionnaire (58.9% male, 41.1% female, 25.3% honey bee allergic, 67.8% wasp allergic, 41.1% re-sting rate, mean follow-up time 6.5 years). Measurement of the parameters fear, satisfaction and changes in lifestyle revealed a significant improvement after VIT. This correlated with the patients'self-assessment of quality of life,when 89.7% declared an improvement after VIT. Although the improvement was higher in patients with re-stings, also patients without re-stings clearly benefited from VIT. Interestingly, females were significantly more affected by Hymenoptera venom allergy than males,whereas both genders showed a similar improvement after VIT. Patients with Hymenoptera venom sting allergy significantly benefit from VIT in regard to both biological and psychological outcome. VIT should still be provided to all Hymenoptera venom allergic patients as standard of care.

Immunotherapeutic Targeting of Allergic Disease

The last decades have shown an increasing incidence of allergic illnesses such as rhinoconjunctivitis, with a prevalence of 20-30% in some industrialised parts of the world. The only treatment that may change the natural course of allergic disease is allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT), which has been shown to prevent the development of asthma in rhinitic patients and anaphylaxis in insect venom allergic patients. However, the risk-benefit ratio for subcutaneous immunotherapy has changed little from when it was first developed in 1911. Novel developments of adjuvants, and allergens as well as methods of administration, now offer improvements in both the efficacy and safety of SIT. This review describes and discusses these new developments in the context of the many recent advances in our understanding of the mechanisms by which immunotherapy appears to act.

Quality of life in insect venom allergic patients.

As re-sting rates and mortality in Hymenoptera allergy are generally low, health related quality of life is an important therapeutic target in the treatment of allergic patients. This review focuses on the impact of anaphylactic reactions and the effect of interventions in health related quality of life for Hymenoptera allergic patients. Anaphylactic reactions following insect stings can have a great impact on the quality of life of insect sting allergic patients. Venom immunotherapy, with information about the risks and benefits of the treatment, was shown to improve health related quality of life. There were no patients whose health related quality of life was so severely impaired that they did not improve with venom immunotherapy. Treatment with an Epipen (ALK-Abello, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands) resulted in a deterioration in health related quality of life. These findings suggest that patient education of these risks and benefits is as important as the treatment itself in order to achieve all the important therapeutic goals of venom immunotherapy. For most patients the Epipen is insufficient as definitive treatment from a quality of life point of view. Although the low mortality, morbidity and re-sting frequency in Hymenoptera allergic patients has led some authorities to conclude that many patients are treated unnecessarily, this conclusion is refuted by the fact that venom immunotherapy improves health related quality of life in the vast majority of patients receiving this treatment, even if they are not re-stung.

Epidemiology of Hymenoptera allergy.

Epidemiology and especially the natural history of Hymenoptera allergy form the background that is essential to improving the clinical management of insect venom allergic patients. This review focuses on the emergence of recent data which could help provide further enlightenment in this field. The latest data on the extent of the disease, the risk factors for sensitization and for local, systemic and fatal reactions after a hymenoptera sting are reviewed. The emerging problems concerning asymptomatic sensitization, the meaning of constitutively elevated tryptase serum levels and the persisting widespread poor awareness of available therapies in Hymenoptera allergic patients are particularly emphasized. The assessment of the risk for systemic reaction in skin-positive subjects with a negative case history, and the suggestion of the baseline serum tryptase level as a risk factor for reaction severity after a sting, are the most important clinical implications of the latest studies. The genetic and environmental factors involved in the persistence of venom specific immunoglobulin E after a sting and the factors which orient towards a systemic or a large local reaction after apparently the same sting remain open questions.

Bee-venom allergy in children: long-term predictive value of standardized challenge tests.

Venom immunotherapy (VIT) is able to protect insect venom-allergic patients against life-threatening sting reactions. Standardized sting challenges can be used as a diagnostic tool to check whether VIT is required. No data are available on the long-term predictive value of sting challenge tests. The purpose of this study was to investigate the long-term predictive value of sequential bee-sting challenges with respect to the ability to predict future sting reactions in bee-venom (BV) allergic children. Between 1988 and 1992, 92 BV-allergic children had been challenged with sequential bee stings at intervals of 2-6 weeks to determine the necessity of VIT. In 1996, all 92 families were followed-up using standardized telephone interviews. Until the follow-up, 61 children (66.3%) had experienced at least one natural bee sting. Based on the results of the initial challenge tests, 13 of the 61 patients had been started on VIT. Two of these 13 (15.4%) developed systemic reactions 1 year after VIT of 5 years, of which one was mild and one was severe. Among the 48 re-stung patients who were not treated with VIT, three children (6.3%) experienced mild systemic reactions, whereas 45 children reported no more than a local reaction. The long-term predictive value of sequential bee-sting challenge tests for systemic reactions in children not treated with VIT remained at a level of 93.8% (95% confidence interval: 82.8-98.7%) even over a period of more than 6 years. Based on this data, we conclude that sequential bee-sting challenges are a powerful tool to determine the necessity for VIT in BV-allergic children.

In-hospital sting challenge in insect venom-allergic patients after stopping venom immunotherapy

Immunotherapy (IT) in venom-allergic patients has been demonstrated to provide a highly efficient protection from severe reactions to a re-sting. It is not known whether this protection will persist after IT is stopped in patients with remaining venom sensitivity. In 25 adult patients with a previous severe systemic reaction to a Hymenoptera insect sting, 28 in-hospital sting challenges after stopping IT resulted in no systemic reactions. The mean duration of venom IT was 42.8 months (range. 36 to 83 months), and the mean time interval from the time IT was stopped until sting challenge was, in mean, 25.2 months (range, 12 to 36 months). The mean venom-specific IgE after stopping IT was 2.4 PRU/ml (range, 0 to 16.9 PRU/ml), at the day of sting challenge, 2.7 PRU/ml (range, 0 to 22 PRU/ml), and 2 weeks later, 2.4 PRU/ml (range, 0.02 to 27.8 PRU/ml). These changes in IgE were not significant. Venom-specific IgG concentration when IT was stopped was 64 PU/ml (range, 20 to 144 PU/ml), decreasing significantly to the day of sting challenge to 41.1 PU/ml (range, 13 to 84 PU/ml), and 2 weeks later, a significant increase to a mean of 53.5 PU/ml (range, 12 to 117 PU/ml) was found. Our results suggest that venom IT may be stopped after 3 years, regardless of the level of specific antibodies. To confirm this finding, a larger number of patients should be studied.