Inpatient Rehabilitation Setting Research Articles

Bimanual Arm Trainer Versus Traditional Occupational Therapy Services in Upper Extremity Function.

Upper extremity (UE) dysfunction resulting from stroke significantly affects a person's ability to complete self-care activities, consequently diminishing functional independence. Effective interventions that improve UE function in persons with stroke are needed. To explore the effectiveness of the Bimanual Arm Trainer (BAT) compared with traditional occupational therapy treatment sessions (i.e., a control group) on improving UE function after acute ischemic stroke. Clinical trial, two-group, nonrandomized repeated-measures design. Inpatient rehabilitation facility. Twenty-seven persons with ischemic stroke and an Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) score ≤17. Minimum of three 10-min sessions on the BAT. ARAT, Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke (FMA-UE). Both the intervention and control groups showed significant improvement on the ARAT from evaluation to discharge (main effect of time: p = .02). There was no statistically significant main effect of group and no significant Time × Group interaction (p = .63). FMA-UE scores also improved significantly in the intervention group from evaluation to discharge (p < .001). FMA-UE scores were not available for the control group. Both the intervention and control groups demonstrated significant improvements in UE function from evaluation to discharge. There were no statistically significant differences between groups, indicating that the BAT results in similar improvements in UE function, as would be expected in traditional occupational therapy. Further research is warranted to examine additional BAT programs, use different outcome measures, and assess participants over a longer time span. Plain-Language Summary: The Bimanual Arm Trainer (BAT) is a novel device that can be used in occupational therapy to improve arm function among stroke patients. There is limited research on BAT's effectiveness in improving arm function among stroke patients. In an acute inpatient rehabilitation setting, we compared outcome scores of patients who received traditional occupational therapy services with those who also used the BAT. Both groups achieved significant improvements in arm function from evaluation to discharge. We found that the addition of the BAT interventions did not significantly affect the outcome measure scores for either group. We conclude that more research is needed to examine additional BAT programs, use different outcome measures, and assess participants over a longer period of time.

The Minimal assessment Protocol for Cerebral Stroke 2020 (PMIC2020): a multicenter feasibility study in post-stroke inpatient rehabilitation.

In 2008, a Working Group of the Italian Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (SIMFER) published the first minimum protocol for assessing stroke patients (PMIC) to define functional needs and outcomes. The recent PMIC revision (PMIC2020) introduces a document for all rehabilitation settings, incorporating updated measurement tools. The aim of this study was to investigate the PMIC2020 feasibility and administration time (AT) in post-stroke inpatients and to examine the influence of demographic and clinical variables on AT. Multicenter prospective observational study. Eight Italian rehabilitation centers for post-acute inpatients. Adult patients consecutively admitted to rehabilitation after ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke, reporting the first event or recurrence, with a modified Barthel Index (mBI)<75 points, without cognitive impairment and clinical instability. PMIC2020 was administered at admission (T0) and discharge (T1), recording AT of each section/ tool. A feasibility questionnaire was administered to assessors. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to investigate the effect of demographics and clinical variables on AT. One hundred fifty-one subjects were enrolled at T0 and 139 at T1; the mean±SD AT (seconds) was 1634±401 at T0 and 1087±360 at T1 (P<0.001). National Institute of Health-Stroke Scale and Mini-Mental State Examination required the highest AT. All but two scales had significantly lower AT at T1 (P<0.05). Severe disability (as measured by mBI) was associated with higher AT than either complete or minimal/absent disability. The feasibility questionnaire showed good PMIC2020 appraisal by assessors without relevant critical issues. PMIC2020 was feasible in post-acute inpatient rehabilitation settings. No relevant critical issue was raised by users. Even though more comprehensive than PMIC, PMIC2020 required only slightly more AT (27 minutes at T0 and 18 minutes at T1, on average); more AT was needed to assess patients with severe disability. The study has immediate transferability for the National Health Service, as PMIC2020 can be routinely implemented in clinical practice and research to assess stroke patients' needs and outcomes. The updated measures allow more immediate comparisons with international data on stroke rehabilitation. Future research should investigate the PMIC2020 feasibility in other rehabilitation settings and its relevance in predicting stroke rehabilitation needs and outcomes.

Significant pre-post effects on a patient-reported outcome measure in inpatient rehabilitation

Abstract Background We conducted a pilot study for the Swiss National Association for Quality Development in Hospitals and Clinics (ANQ) in the inpatient rehabilitation setting. The aim was to assess the suitability of a generic health-related quality of life patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) as an outcome quality indicator for public reporting across all rehabilitation domains on a national level. Methods In a multi-stage expert-based selection process, the PROMIS Global Health 10 was selected for piloting. We collected data from 29 rehabilitation clinics from April to December 2023. Mean T-scores and effect sizes were analysed across different rehabilitation domains. Patients’ need for assistance in completing the questionnaire was also assessed. Results A dataset of 2261 cases yielded a cleaned sample of 2083, with 1217 complete cases. Mean T-scores for physical health (PHS) and mental health (MHS) significantly differed (p &amp;lt; 0.001) at admission and discharge across all rehabilitation domains. The largest effects were observed in PHS for pulmonary (38.9(7.3); 46.0(7.6); dz = 0.95) and cardiologic rehabilitation (41.7(7.4); 47.9(7.2); dz = 0.85), and in MHS for internal medicine (44.1(6.9); 49.1(5.6); dz = 0.80) and psychosomatic rehabilitation (36.0(7.2); 45.2(8.2); dz = 1.19), while the smallest effects were noted in PHS for paraplegia (36.3(7.2); 39.8(7.2); dz = 0.50) and in MHS for the musculoskeletal rehabilitation domain (46.2(7.9); 48.7(7.4); dz = 0.33). Of all complete cases, 40.5% needed assistance in filling in the PROM and support needs were distributed unequally across rehabilitation domains, ranging from 10.0% in psychosomatic to 70.3% in geriatric rehabilitation. Conclusions The study presents a nuanced understanding of HRQOL across various rehabilitation domains, with notable effects observed across all domains, alongside significant assistance needs. Key messages • PROMIS-GH10 shows significant pre-post effects on physical and mental health in Swiss inpatient rehabilitation, with notable effects observed across all domains. • Observable barriers in implementation are evident due to substantial assistance requirements.

Learning to direct one's care: barriers and facilitators reported by people with tetraplegia.

Qualitative analysis of focus group data. Identifying barriers to and facilitators of learning to direct one's own care as a person with tetraplegia due to spinal cord injury (SCI). Community, in New Jersey and Georgia, USA. Three focus groups of veterans and civilians with SCI, involving 26 people with chronic (≥1 year) tetraplegia due to SCI who provided direction to caregivers on a daily basis. Content analysis was used to identify barriers and facilitators. Challenges to learning to direct one's care included: (1) lack of acceptance of lasting effects of SCI; (2) not yet understanding one's body post-SCI; (3) embarrassment; (4) being overwhelmed with information; (5) differences between the inpatient rehabilitation setting and the "real world"; (6) lack of capable and willing assistants; and (7) hesitance to criticize caregivers. Factors that helped participants become successful directors of care included: (1) experience living with SCI; (2) being observant; (3) communicating effectively; (4) developing confidence to advocate for one's own needs; (5) learning when to "let go" and when to speak up; and (6) learning from peers. Direction of care is a complex skill that is developed over time, and requires awareness of one's needs and preferences, self-confidence, and strong communication skills. Rehabilitation clinicians' efforts to prepare people with SCI to direct their own care effectively should cultivate awareness of one's body, identify strategies for communicating successfully with caregivers, and provide opportunities for practice of care direction skills and discussion with experienced peers.

Balance and Walking Speed Outcomes in Individuals Receiving Inpatient Rehabilitation for Acute Cerebellar Stroke.

Cerebellar strokes account for only 2-3% of all strokes occurring annually in the United States but represent a disproportionally higher share of morbidity and mortality. Evidence examining the effect of inpatient rehabilitation on functional outcomes following a cerebellar stroke is limited. This study aimed to examine the effects of inpatient rehabilitation on balance and walking speed in individuals with cerebellar stroke. A secondary purpose of this study was to examine the length of inpatient rehabilitation stay of the included patients. A retrospective analysis was conducted using review of patient records during their inpatient rehabilitation stay from January 2021 to February 2022 at a large hospital system in the southeast United States. Balance and gait outcomes were examined on admission and discharge from inpatient rehabilitation that included physical therapy interventions. A paired t-test examined for changes in outcomes from admission to discharge. Pearson correlation examined for the association between length of stay and outcomes. A total of 15 records were reviewed. There were significant improvements in the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke (PASS), and the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) (p's < 0.01) from admission to discharge with large effect sizes (range d = 0.70-1.67) following inpatient rehabilitation. The average length of stay was 12.67 days (SD = 6.5) and the mean total hours of combined occupational, physical, and speech therapy was 27.33 (SD = 6.52) h. There was a moderate association between length of stay and PASS (r = 0.525, p = 0.04) and BBS (r = 0.546, p = 0.04) outcomes. Patients who underwent inpatient rehabilitation following acute cerebellar strokes demonstrated improvements in balance and gait speed. Study results could assist clinicians designing interventions for patients with cerebellar strokes in the inpatient rehabilitation setting.

Efficacy of continuous passive motion compared to physiotherapy in rehabilitation after total knee replacement: a prospective randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.

Successful total knee replacement (TKR) heavily depends on postoperative rehabilitation. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of continuous passive motion (CPM) partially replacing group physiotherapy in an inpatient rehabilitation setting in order to contribute to the lack of physiotherapists in patients' care. Adult patients after TKR were included. A prospective randomized controlled two-center trial was conducted across inpatient rehabilitation facilities in Germany. Participants were randomly assigned to CPM or group physiotherapy. In addition, all participants received the same standard rehabilitation program. Primary outcome was the Staffelstein Score, and secondary outcome measures included Oxford Knee Score, range of motion (ROM), pain, and return to work. Non-inferiority margin for Staffelstein Score was set at ±5% of maximum scores based on previous collected data. Results indicate no significant differences between CPM and physiotherapy groups in the Staffelstein Score (CPM: 94 ± 10 points; group physiotherapy: 92 ± 10 points; P > 0.05), ROM, or pain management at discharge from rehabilitation facility. This study underscores the potential of CPM as a valuable component of TKR rehabilitation, providing comparable outcomes to traditional physiotherapy. However, individualized physiotherapy remains integral to optimizing long-term success. Future research should explore extended follow-up periods and diverse patient populations to further elucidate CPM's role in TKR rehabilitation.

Effectiveness and feasibility of a penicillin allergy delabeling program in the postacute inpatient rehabilitation setting.

Effectiveness and feasibility of a penicillin allergy delabeling program in the postacute inpatient rehabilitation setting.

Predictive utility of self-efficacy in early stroke rehabilitation

ABSTRACT Introduction A biopsychosocial approach entailing person-centered factors provides valuable insight to post-stroke rehabilitation potential. The consideration of an individual’s belief in their capabilities, known as self-efficacy, may prove especially informative in the inpatient rehabilitation setting where motor learning often occurs. Objective To assess the predictive utility of self-efficacy in functional independence status change during inpatient rehabilitation. Methods Individuals with stroke admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) completed an assessment battery near IRF admission and discharge involving motor assessments, participant-reported self-efficacy (Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire), and functional independence status evaluation (sum of self-care and mobility Quality Indicators (QI) from the IRF-Patient Assessment Instrument). Linear regression was performed to determine the predictive performance of self-efficacy on QI change during IRF stay while accounting for age, time post-stroke, and IRF length of stay. Regression procedures were repeated for separate subgroups based on initial motor impairment level. Results Thirty individuals with stroke (14 females, age = 67.0 ± 9.80 years, 10.4 ± 3.46 days post-stroke) were enrolled. Self-efficacy at IRF admission explained a significant percentage of variance in QI Change for the cohort (R2 = 30.7%, p = .001) and for the moderate to severe motor impairment subgroup (n = 12; R2 = 49.9%, p = .010). After accounting for confounders, self-efficacy remained a significant predictor for the cohort (n = 30) model. Discussion Findings generated from this work support the predictive utility of self-efficacy in early post-stroke motor recovery. The inclusion of self-efficacy in a multi-faceted evaluation framework may therefore optimize rehabilitation outcomes by providing therapists with additional knowledge to better tailor an individual’s care.

B - 43 Utility of the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) as a Measure of Functional Recovery across the TBI Rehabilitation Continuum

Abstract Objective To evaluate the utility of the AM-PAC (Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care) for functional assessment of patients with Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) across inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation settings. We evaluated (1) Longitudinal changes (1-year) in cognitive and physical recovery patterns across the rehabilitation continuum (2) Concurrent validity of AM-PAC as compared to traditional measures. Method A prospective repeated measures cohort study of adults with TBI (n = 186), where 87 participants received inpatient rehabilitation (IR), and 99 participants received outpatient cognitive rehabilitation (CR). Functional recovery was assessed at IR admission, discharge, 6 months and 1 year, and at admission/discharge from CR for post-acute participants. Functional measures included AM-PAC-Basic Mobility (BM), Daily Activities (DA), and Applied Cognitive (AC) domains, Neuropsychological Assessment Battery (NAB), Texas Functional Living Scale (TFLS), Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective (PART-O), and Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI-4: self-awareness). Results The AMPAC was sensitive to changes throughout the care continuum, demonstrating medium effect sizes across all three functional domains. Notably, AMPAC scores showed greater change compared to traditional tools (90% and 68% confidence levels). Additionally, analysis of Minimum Detectable Change thresholds demonstrated significant improvements, across settings and within moderate/severe TBI (p &amp;lt; 0.05), followed by predictably smaller gains in the mild TBI population (p &amp;lt; 0.05), underscoring the clinical relevance of these findings. Conclusions Results demonstrate that the AM-PAC is a practical, valid and sensitive scale responsive to longitudinal ecological and functional change in TBI. Analysis confirms the effectiveness of functional assessments, particularly emphasizing strengths of the AMPAC.

A clinical protocol for the diagnosis of delirium after stroke in the post-acute setting: The “post-acute stroke delirium assessment” study

Post-stroke delirium (PSD) is an important complication to identify in the inpatient rehabilitation setting due to its negative impact on rehabilitation outcomes. Delirium diagnosis is challenging and is rendered more so in the presence of post-stroke language and cognitive impairments. As delirium is a clinical diagnosis, the majority of PSD studies use a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)–based “expert clinical diagnosis” as the reference standard. However, a diagnostic protocol is rarely defined, which undermines transparency, interrater reliability, and reproducibility in delirium research. This report describes the clinical diagnostic protocol for the “Post-Acute Stroke Delirium Assessment” study, a quality improvement initiative to be conducted in adult stroke rehabilitation inpatients at a tertiary academic hospital. The main study goals are to explore how delirium features present in this patient group and to use this information to create a new screening tool specific for PSD in inpatient rehabilitation. This protocol evaluates 16 delirium features, including those encompassed by the DSM, fifth edition, text revision as well as other features absent from the DSM, and delineates how to determine whether each feature is “present, absent, or unable to assess.” This protocol may also be valuable in informing delirium diagnosis in other patient groups with or without neurological deficits.

The new hospital discharge form for inpatient rehabilitation in Italy: a step forward to promote the role of rehabilitation in the healthcare system.

In Italy, longstanding limitations in the existing reporting system of the inpatient rehabilitation activities have been reported. The Hospital Discharge form (HDF) primarily uses ICD codes that inadequately capture the functional status and rehabilitation needs of patients, impacting equity of care and service evaluation. Therefore, the Italian Ministry of Health (IMH) launched an initiative aimed at developing a new reporting system to be specifically adopted in the inpatient rehabilitation setting. A working group (WG), lead by representatives of IMH, was established in 2019. It included members of scientific societies and professional associations in rehabilitation, administrators, policy makers, and other experts. Representatives of the Associations of Patients and Families were also consulted. The WG submitted the new version of the HDF to the political decision makers in early 2020. It includes detailed data on patients' functional levels before and after rehabilitation, and the complexity of clinical conditions. In using the ICD codes, priority is given to functional diagnoses. In 2023, after a period of interruption due to the COVID-19 pandemic, a Ministry of Health Decree sanctioned the adoption of the new reporting system nationwide after a one-year trial period, starting on January 2024. The new HDF is expected to improve data collection, reduce local and regional disparities, allow better comparison of the performances of the structures, and ultimately enhance the quality and outcomes of rehabilitation care across the country. The Italian Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (SIMFER) gave an important contribution in the development of the system.

Disparities in Physical Therapy Outcomes Based on Race and Ethnicity: A Scoping Review.

This scoping review synthesizes and summarizes the evidence on racial and ethnic disparities in outcomes after physical therapist treatment. Four databases from 2001 through 2021 were searched for articles reporting physical therapy outcomes across racial and ethnic groups. The Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework was adapted for this scoping review. Two reviewers screened the abstracts, and 5 reviewers screened full texts for inclusion. Five reviewers extracted information including study design, diagnoses, setting, outcomes reported, the domains the outcomes measured, and racial and ethnic groups included. To identify disparities, summarized differences in outcomes (better, worse, no difference) for each racial and ethnic group compared to White patients were calculated. Of 1511 abstracts screened, 65 met inclusion criteria, 57 of which were observational designs. All 65 articles included non-Hispanic White patients as the reference group. A majority of the physical therapy outcomes reported by race were for Black patients and/or Hispanic or Latino patients, whereas outcomes for Asian, American Indian, Alaskan Native, and/or Native Hawaiians or Pacific Islander patients were reported infrequently. Most articles reported disparities in health outcomes for patients in the inpatient rehabilitation setting (n = 48) and for adults (n = 59) with neurologic diagnoses (n = 36). Compared to White patients, worse outcomes were reported more frequently for all marginalized racial and ethnic groups after physical therapy, with the exception of marginalized groups having the same or better outcomes for successful post-rehabilitation community discharge. Gaps remain in understanding outcome disparities beyond older adult and neurologic populations as well as for musculoskeletal diagnoses frequently treated by physical therapists. The presence of racial and ethnic disparities in physical therapy outcomes should motivate physical therapists to understand the mechanisms underlying disparities and focus on social and structural drivers of health inequity in their clinical decision-making.

Occupational therapy practice for post-acute COVID-19 inpatients requiring rehabilitation.

COVID-19 caused significant occupational disruption to people's life roles, with some people requiring an inpatient rehabilitation admission. Occupational therapists assessed and treated these patients using previous knowledge of similar conditions due to limited specificity in available guidelines to inform practice. The aim of this study was to investigate current practice with post-acute COVID-19 (PAC) patients within an inpatient rehabilitation setting in Australia, to better understand the role and impact of occupational therapy. A mixed-method study was conducted, including electronic medical record audits (October 2021 October 2022) and descriptive patient interviews at a large metropolitan subacute service. Descriptive statistics and qualitative analysis were used to summarise and interpret data. No involvement. A total of 24 patient electronic medical records were audited, and 10 patient interviews were completed. Three overarching categories were identified within the 685 occasions of occupational therapy service audited-occupational engagement, education provision and discharge planning. Patients identified the value of occupational therapy by reflecting on their lived experiences of engaging with occupational therapists and associated changes in occupational performance between COVID-19 diagnoses and discharge home. Occupational therapists possess a unique skill set that directly addresses the occupational needs and priorities of PAC patients. This study adds to the growing body of evidence supporting the contribution of occupational therapy to the management of COVID-19; however, further research is needed to develop evidence-based practice resources and advocate for system changes that improve quality of life for COVID-19 patients. During the COVID-19 pandemic, a lot of people got very sick. Some of these people needed more time and support to get better. Occupational therapists were important during this time because they helped these people to do their daily activities again. Because there were not many resources on how to do this, we looked into what occupational therapists were doing to help these people. We looked at patient hospital files and also talked to them to understand this better. We found that occupational therapists focused on three main areas: helping patients do activities that were important to them, teaching them about COVID-19 and helping them plan to leave the hospital. This study shows that occupational therapists are skilled at helping people with COVID-19. But more research is needed to make resources and also help with changing the healthcare system to further help people get better from COVID-19.

Service Evaluation of a Boxercise Programme in an Inpatient Rehabilitation Setting

Service Evaluation of a Boxercise Programme in an Inpatient Rehabilitation Setting

'On-Demand' snack service in a rehabilitation setting: Impact on satisfaction,intake, waste and costs.

To evaluate an 'On-Demand' snack service in a rehabilitation setting for satisfaction, intake, waste and cost. In September 2021, a trial of an 'On-Demand' snack service was conducted on two general rehabilitation wards in a purpose-built rehabilitation hospital. A retrospective comparison of pre-implementation, 1-month and 8-month post-implementation audit data was used to evaluate staff and patient satisfaction, nutritional intake, waste and cost (labour and food). Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were performed for intake quantitative data and content analysis was conducted for qualitative data. A total of 26 responses from staff and 34 from patients were received. Staff reported higher overall satisfaction with the 'tea-trolley' service (50% vs. 32%; χ2 6.815 [2]; p < 0.05). Patient satisfaction ratings of the original 'tea-trolley' system were higher than the 'On-Demand' snacks system (96% vs. 59%; χ2 41.60 [2]; p < 0.0001). Median daily intake from snack food and drinks was maintained (938 kJ and 6 g protein vs. 925 kJ and 6 g protein) and waste (23.3% vs. 20.9%; p < 0.05) decreased with the 'On-Demand' service. Cost of ordered food was similar ($778.15 'tea-trolley' vs. $746.1 'On-Demand'), however cost of waste ($179.47 'tea-trolley' vs. $128.7 'On-Demand') and labour ($1650.46 'tea-trolley' vs. $926.44 'On-Demand') reduced by 28% and 44%, respectively, with the 'On-Demand' snack service. Implementing an 'On-Demand' snack service in the general inpatient rehabilitation setting resulted in reductions in food waste, foodservice staff labour and waste costs, while intake was maintained. Patient and staff satisfaction decreased warranting further investigation into appropriate implementation methods.

Staff perceptions of patient-peer relationships in a female inpatient neuropsychiatric rehabilitation setting

Staff perceptions of patient-peer relationships in a female inpatient neuropsychiatric rehabilitation setting

Designing an occupation-based group intervention for adult inpatient rehabilitation: Partnering with clinicians and patients using a nominal group technique design.

Occupation-based interventions use engagement in a person's daily activities to achieve change. There is growing research into the use of occupation-based group interventions in the inpatient rehabilitation setting. It remains unclear whether occupation-based groups offer comparable outcomes to occupation-based interventions delivered individually; this research will precede a clinical trial aimed at comparing these two approaches for improving occupational performance outcomes. This study details the process of co-designing the intervention. Partnering with clinicians and patients in the design of healthcare interventions can promote patient-centred care, enhance uptake, and improve applicability and sustainability of the intervention to that setting. A modified nominal group technique (NGT) design was applied to facilitate two meetings and an electronic survey with an expert panel of clinicians and patients. Twelve participants (n = 4 occupational therapists, n = 1 registered nurse, n = 1 physiotherapist, n = 1 occupational therapy assistant, n = 1 occupational therapy manager, and n = 4 patients) were purposively recruited. A modified approach to the technique's four stages was used: silent generation, round robin, clarification, and voting. Consensus was set at >50%. Qualitative data from group discussions were analysed thematically. All participants agreed the intervention should include patient-centred, goal-directed, practice of daily activities, including breakfast and lunch preparation, domestic tasks, and laundry. Other components that were agreed included where the groups could run, group size, eligibility criteria, and frequency. Key themes from clinicians included needing a goal-directed intervention, focused on progressing towards hospital discharge; time and resource requirements were also discussed. Patients emphasised the importance of building social connections, opportunity to engage in meaningful activity, and the importance of linking participation to patient goals. Through collaboration with clinicians and patients, an occupation-based group intervention considering the available evidence, alongside clinical, experiential, and contextual sources of knowledge was developed; this resulted in an evidence-based, patient-centred, and contextually relevant intervention.

Patients’ perceptions of participating in self-directed activities outside supervised occupational and physiotherapy within inpatient and home-based rehabilitation settings: a qualitative study

Purpose To investigate patients’ perceptions of participating in self-directed activities, outside supervised occupational and physiotherapy, within rehabilitation settings. Methods Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 16 patients and in three instances, their carers, from three health services in Victoria, Australia, two offering inpatient and one offering home-based rehabilitation care. A thematic analysis was performed using a framework approach. Results Themes identified included the role of the clinicians in encouraging patients and instilling confidence, giving feedback and “just being there”; considerations in program delivery, including different formats, support from peers and relatives, and program familiarity and flexibility; patients’ different intrinsic driving and limiting forces, including following orders, seeing results, desiring autonomy and having an “inner athlete”; and the environment, including functional activities, space, equipment, time and availability. Conclusions Patients and their carers reported positive experiences of participating in self-directed therapy programs within rehabilitation settings, with programs perceived as beneficial in optimising recovery. Patients reported a range of driving and limiting factors in relation to completing self-directed activities. Understanding these factors, relating to the patient, their environment and other people, is critical for clinicians so that they can modify their delivery accordingly, ensuring uptake and sustained implementation of self-directed activities in rehabilitation care.

Idle-Time Exercise: Promoting More-Involved arm use in the Inpatient Rehabilitation Setting after Stroke

Idle-Time Exercise: Promoting More-Involved arm use in the Inpatient Rehabilitation Setting after Stroke

Functional Dry Needling in the Inpatient Rehabilitation Setting: A Feasibility Study and Implementation Review

Functional Dry Needling in the Inpatient Rehabilitation Setting: A Feasibility Study and Implementation Review