You have accessJournal of UrologyBladder Cancer: Invasive VI1 Apr 2017PD62-11 PREDICTIVE ROLE OF EPITHELIAL TUMOR MARKER LEVEL ELEVATION AT FOLLOW-UP FOR TUMOR RECURRENCE AND ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES IN UROTHELIAL BLADDER CANCER Soroush T Bazargani, Hooman Djaladat, Anne Schuckman, Gus Miranda, Jie Cai, Sarmad Sadeghi, Tanya Dorff, David Quinn, and siamak Daneshmand Soroush T BazarganiSoroush T Bazargani More articles by this author , Hooman DjaladatHooman Djaladat More articles by this author , Anne SchuckmanAnne Schuckman More articles by this author , Gus MirandaGus Miranda More articles by this author , Jie CaiJie Cai More articles by this author , Sarmad SadeghiSarmad Sadeghi More articles by this author , Tanya DorffTanya Dorff More articles by this author , David QuinnDavid Quinn More articles by this author , and siamak Daneshmandsiamak Daneshmand More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.2783AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES We have previously reported that elevated pre-cystectomy serum levels of epithelial tumor markers (TM) and lack of TM response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAChT) are associated with worse oncological outcome in patients with invasive urothelial bladder cancer (UBC). Herein, we evaluate elevation of TM levels during follow-up and their predictive role in tumor recurrence. METHODS Under IRB approval, serum levels of Carbohydrate Antigen 125 (CA-125), Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) and Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) were prospectively measured in 409 patients with invasive UBC between August 2011 and August 2016. Excluded from the study were metastatic (13), palliative or inoperable (5) cases. Markers were measured at different time points during follow-up. RESULTS A total of 391 cystectomy patients were included in the study with median age of 71 years and 79% males. Pathology was organ-confined in 59% and NAChT was given in 35% of population. Elevated precystectomy level of any of the tumor markers (31% of patients) was independently associated with worse RFS (p<0.001; HR=2.81) and OS (p<0.001; HR=3.97). After completion of cystectomy, we were able to document normal serum marker levels from 288 cases, of whom 26 patients (9%) developed tumor marker relapse later during follow up. This subset showed significantly more clinical recurrences (89% in elevated vs. 12% in stable group, RR= 7.41), and death (24% vs. 7%, RR=3.4). Median time from tumor marker relapse to clinical recurrence was 46 days (IQR 0-179), and median time to mortality was 308 days (IQR 119-574). Details of tumor markers course in the 23 patients with marker relapse followed by clinical recurrence is shown in figure 1. Further Survival analysis using landmark time-point with log rank showed there is a significant difference in cancer-specific survival between the groups (median 284 vs 547 days; p=0.01) (Figure 2). CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this is the first pilot study showing predictive role of epithelial tumor marker for recurrence of invasive urothelial bladder cancer. Patients with marker relapse following cystectomy are at significant increased risk of recurrence and mortality. A larger, controlled study with longer follow up is needed to determine their role in predicting survival. © 2017FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 197Issue 4SApril 2017Page: e1197 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2017MetricsAuthor Information Soroush T Bazargani More articles by this author Hooman Djaladat More articles by this author Anne Schuckman More articles by this author Gus Miranda More articles by this author Jie Cai More articles by this author Sarmad Sadeghi More articles by this author Tanya Dorff More articles by this author David Quinn More articles by this author siamak Daneshmand More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...