Background High perceived threat of an injury is associated with poor post-injury health outcomes. The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) can be used to gauge the level of perceived threat of an injury, however, its psychometric properties have not been tested in people with extremity injuries. Methods We used an observational, cross-sectional study design. Eighty-one adults at least six months post isolated extremity injury completed the BIPQ and measures of psychological distress, disability, somatic symptom burden, and general self-efficacy. To determine test-retest reliability, a subset (n = 42) re-completed the BIPQ. Exploratory factor analysis was used to test the factor structure. Results The BIPQ had adequate face validity. The factor analysis indicated the BIPQ is unidimensional (measuring perceived threat of the injury) with good internal consistency (McDonald’s Omega = 0.91). Five items had strong factor loadings while three items loaded poorly. Most BIPQ items showed moderate-strong positive relationships with disability, psychological distress, and somatic symptom burden, however, three items had weak associations. The BIPQ had good test-retest reliability [intra-class coefficient = 0.89 (95%CI: 0.81, 0.94)] and agreement. These findings should be interpreted with caution and may not generalise to other injured cohorts. Conclusion There is preliminary support for the BIPQ as a valid and reliable measure of perceived injury threat in adults with chronic isolated extremity injuries.
Read full abstract