To compare patient radiation exposure and procedure time for lumbar epidural steroid injections (ESIs) performed under CT-fluoroscopy (CTF) vs spiral CT-guidance. A retrospective cohort study of 767 consecutive lumbar ESIs performed between 2015-2023 using CTF vs spiral CT-guidance was conducted. Patient characteristics (age, sex, weight), procedural characteristics (injection level, type of ESI, trainee participation), and outcomes (patient radiation exposure, procedure time, pain relief, complications) were compared. Student's t and chi-squared tests were performed for statistical analysis. There were 240 CTF and 527 spiral CT-guided lumbar ESIs. There were no significant differences in patient demographics between groups. Radiation exposure for the CTF group was 37.2 ± 50.5mGy cm, compared to 251.1 ± 178.6mGy cm in the spiral CT group (p < 0.001). Procedure times were shorter in the CTF group (20.1 ± 6.1 vs 29.6 ± 12.9min, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in immediate post-procedure pain reduction in CTF vs spiral CT groups (p = 0.12). There were no intrathecal puncture complications in the CTF group and four in the spiral CT group. Subgroup analysis of attending-only and trainee-performed lumbar ESIs comparing CTF vs spiral-CT groups showed similar results as the primary analysis, with significant reductions in patient radiation (attending: 31.6 ± 40.7 vs 144.4 ± 97.4mGy cm; trainee: 40.7 ± 55.5 vs 264.5 ± 182.0mGy cm; both p < 0.001) and procedural time (attending: 18.3 ± 4.2 vs 24.4 ± 7.4min; trainee: 21.2 ± 6.8 vs 30.2 ± 12.4; both p < 0.001). Image-guided lumbar ESIs using CTF were associated with less patient radiation exposure and shorter procedure times without differences in pain relief when compared with spiral CT technique in our practice.
Read full abstract