Statin Initiation Research Articles

Statin initiation and risk of incident kidney disease in patients with diabetes.

The role of statin therapy in the development of kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) remains uncertain. We aimed to determine the relationships between statin initiation and kidney outcomes in patients with type 2 DM. Through a new-user design, we conducted a multicentre retrospective cohort study using the China Renal Data System database (which includes inpatient and outpatient data from 19 urban academic centres across China). We included patients with type 2 DM who were aged 40 years or older and admitted to hospital between Jan. 1, 2000, and May 26, 2021, and excluded those with pre-existing chronic kidney disease and those who were already on statins or without follow-up at an affiliated outpatient clinic within 90 days after discharge. The primary exposure was initiation of a statin. The primary outcome was the development of diabetic kidney disease (DKD), defined as a composite of the occurrence of kidney dysfunction (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and > 25% decline from baseline) and proteinuria (a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio ≥ 30 mg/g and > 50% increase from baseline), sustained for at least 90 days; secondary outcomes included development of kidney function decline (a sustained > 40% decline in eGFR). We used Cox proportional hazards regression to evaluate the relationships between statin initiation and kidney outcomes, as well as to conduct subgroup analyses according to patient characteristics, presence or absence of dyslipidemia, and pattern of dyslipidemia. For statin initiators, we explored the association between different levels of lipid control and outcomes. We conducted analyses using propensity overlap weighting to balance the participant characteristics. Among 7272 statin initiators and 12 586 noninitiators in the weighted cohort, statin initiation was associated with lower risks of incident DKD (hazard ratio [HR] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-0.83) and kidney function decline (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.44-0.81). We obtained similar results to the primary analyses for participants with differing patterns of dyslipidemia, those prescribed different statins, and after stratification according to participant characteristics. Among statin initiators, those with intensive control of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (< 1.8 mmol/L) had a lower risk of incident DKD (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32-0.81) than those with inadequate lipid control (LDL-C ≥ 3.4 mmol/L). For patients with type 2 DM admitted to and followed up in academic centres, statin initiation was associated with a lower risk of kidney disease development, particularly in those with intensive control of LDL-C. These findings suggest that statin initiation may be an effective and reasonable approach for preventing kidney disease in patients with type 2 DM.

Differences in treatment strategies for LDL-cholesterol reduction in a university lipid clinic vs. standard care apart from the use of PCSK9 inhibitors

Lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) is insufficient despite clear guideline recommendations. Lipid clinics have specialized in patients with dyslipidemia, but the magnitude and reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in lipid clinics has not yet been studied in depth. To assess LDL-C reduction in very high-risk CVD patients achieved in a lipid clinic through different forms of LLT in comparison to standard care without the initiation of PSCK9 inhibitors. Data from 96 lipid clinic patients were analyzed retrospectively and compared to 84 standard care patients. Very high-risk patients were defined according to the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Different combinations of LLT focusing on statins and ezetimibe were investigated. Achievement of LDL-C treatment goals according to ESC guidelines as well as LDL-C reduction were assessed. Baseline and follow-up data of 180 very high-risk CVD patients (mean age 67.7 (±9.8) y; 60.6% male) were used. Achievement of the LDL-C goal in lipid clinic patients increased significantly from 14.6% at baseline to 41.7% at the latest visit (p<0.001) while standard care patients improved from 21.4% to 33.3% (p=0.08). The largest relative LDL-C reduction via an adjustment in LLT was achieved by initiation of high-intensity statins (50.8 ± 4.9%, n=5, p < 0.05). Treatment in a lipid clinic leads to a superior LDL-C goal achievement in very high-risk CVD patients as compared to standard care with the highest reduction under LLT with high-intensity statins and ezetimibe. Referral algorithms have to be established for high-risk patients.

Impact of cognitive ability in early adult life on image-based primary prevention of cardiovascular disease on among men aged 40-60 years

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Swedish Research Council Region Västerbotten. Introduction Low early life cognitive ability is associated with high risk of CVD morbidity and mortality, and non-adherence to secondary prevention. A beneficial effect of an intervention with pictorial presentation of subclinical atherosclerosis based on ultrasonography, given to healthy participants and their physicians, resulting in lower risk of CVD after three years of follow-up, compared to only CVD risk factor assessment, was previously shown, as well as considerably higher increase of dispensing of statins. These effects were irrespective of participants’ educational level. Purpose To assess the impact of early life cognitive ability on this intervention during adult life, aiming at primary prevention av CVD, on SCORE 2 and self-reported statin medication during three years. Methods Study population: Male participants in a pragmatic RCT N=1545 (SCORE2, control 797 and intervention 748), after exclusion of men with statins at baseline N=1275 (665 and 610, respectively). Variable of interest: Cognitive ability at age 18-19 years, from the psychological testing of the Swedish Conscripts, as a modifier of the intervention. The mean of four subtests ranging from 1-9 was used. Outcome variables: SCORE2 and self-reported use of statin treatment, initiated after base-line, after three years Statistical methods: ANCOVA with SCORE2 at 3-year follow-up as dependent variable, and intervention arm, including an interaction between intervention arm and early cognitive ability, as independent variables, as well as adjustment for baseline SCORE2. Logistic regression with self-reported initiation of statin treatment as dependent variable, and intervention arm, including an interaction between intervention with early cognitive ability as independent variables. Results At baseline, there were no differences between the groups in SCORE2 and self-reported use of statins. At 3-year follow-up, mean SCORE2 for the control group and the intervention group was 7.9 and 7.7, respectively. The proportion of participants on statin treatment at 3year FU was 9.8% and 21.1%, respectively. The average treatment effect during the three years (no interaction with early cognitive ability assumed) on SCORE2 was B= -0.31 (95% CI: [-0.56, -0.05], p = 0.019) and for statin initiation OR= 2.45 (95 CI: [1.75, 3.47], p &amp;lt;0.001). However, no significant interactions between intervention effect and early cognitive ability was found for SCORE2 (p= 0.60) nor for initiation of statins (p= 0.17). Conclusions No heterogeneity in intervention effect due to early cognitive ability was seen. Thus, visual presentation of subclinical atherosclerosis given to healthy participants’ and their physicians demonstrated similar effect on the 10-year risk of CVD and on self-reported use of statins irrespective of early life cognitive ability. More prescriptions of statins, higher adherence to recommended statin treatment and lifestyle modifications may contribute to the intervention effects.

The Prevalent New-user Design for Studies With no Active Comparator: The Example of Statins and Cancer.

Observational studies evaluating the effect of a drug versus "non-use" are challenging, mainly when defining cohort entry for non-users. The approach using successive monthly cohorts to emulate the randomized trial can be perceived as somewhat opaque and complex. Alternatively, the prevalent new-user design can provide a potentially simpler more transparent emulation. This design is illustrated in the context of statins and cancer incidence. We used the Clinical Practice Research Datalink to identify a cohort of subjects with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level <5 mmol/L. We used a prevalent new-user design, matching each statin initiator to a non-user from the same time-based exposure set on time-conditional propensity scores with all subjects followed for 10 years for cancer incidence. We estimated the hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) of cancer incidence with statin use versus non-use using a Cox proportional hazards model, and the results were compared with those using the method of successive monthly cohorts. The study cohort included 182,073 statin initiators and 182,073 matched non-users. The hazard ratio of any cancer after statin initiation versus non-use was 1.01 (95% CI = 0.98, 1.04), compared with 1.04 (95% CI = 1.02, 1.06) under the successive monthly cohorts approach. We estimated similar effects for specific cancers. Using the prevalent new-user design to emulate a randomized trial when compared to "non-use" led to results comparable with the more complex successive monthly cohorts approach. The prevalent new-user design emulates the trial in a potentially more intuitive and palpable manner, providing simpler data presentations in line with those portrayed in a classical trial while producing comparable results.

Effect of SLCO1B1 c.521T>C polymorphism on the lipid response to statins in people living with HIV on a boosted protease inhibitor-containing regimen.

We previously observed that some individuals on HIV boosted protease inhibitor-containing regimen do not achieve their lipid targets despite elevated statin concentrations. This study evaluated whether the common single polymorphism c.521T>C in SLCO1B1, associated with reduced statin uptake in the liver, could explain this observation. People living with HIV in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study were eligible if they were on a boosted protease inhibitor concomitantly with a statin for at least 6 months and if their SLCO1B1 genotype was available. Furthermore, their lipids had to be documented before and after the introduction of the statin. The statin efficacy was defined as % change in total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and triglycerides levels after statin initiation compared to pretreatment levels. Lipid response was adjusted for differences in potency and dose between statins. In total, 88 people living with HIV were included, of whom 58, 28 and 2 carried the SLCO1B1 TT, TC and CC genotypes, respectively. The change in lipid levels after statin initiation tended to be lower in carriers of the polymorphism although the difference was not statistically significant (TT vs. TC/CC: total cholesterol: -11.7 vs. -4.8%; low-density lipoprotein- cholesterol: -20.6 vs. -7.4%; high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol: 1.6 vs. 0%; triglycerides: -11.5 vs. -7.9%). In the multiple linear regression, change in total cholesterol was inversely correlated with the total cholesterol level prestatin treatment (coefficient -6.60, 95% confidence interval: -9.63 to -3.56, P < .001). The lipid-lowering effect of statins tended to be attenuated by SLCO1B1 polymorphism and progressively declined as total cholesterol under the boosted protease inhibitor treatment decreased.

Safety Net Program to Improve Statin Initiation Among Adults With High Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

Despite their effectiveness in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and cardiovascular disease risk, high-intensity statins are underutilized among adults with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥190 mg/dL. This study determined whether a safety net program (SureNet) facilitating medication and laboratory test orders improved statin initiation and laboratory test completions after (SureNet period: April 2019-September 2021) and before implementation (pre-SureNet period: January 2016-September 2018). Kaiser Permanente Southern California members aged 20-60 years with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥190 mg/dL and no statin use in previous 2-6 months were included in this retrospective cohort study. Statin orders within 14 days and statin fills, laboratory test completions, and improved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol within 180 days of the high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (pre-SureNet) or outreach (SureNet period) were compared. Analyses were conducted in 2022. Overall, 3,534 and 3,555 adults were eligible for statin initiation during the pre-SureNet and SureNet periods, respectively. Overall, 759 (21.5%) and 976 (27.5%) had a statin approved by their physician during pre-SureNet and SureNet periods, respectively (p<0.001). After multivariable adjustment for demographics and clinical characteristics, adults during the SureNet period had a higher likelihood of receiving a statin order (prevalence ratio=1.36, 95% CI=1.25, 1.48), filling their statin (prevalence ratio=1.32, 95% CI=1.26, 1.38), completing their laboratories (prevalence ratio=1.41, 95% CI=1.26, 1.58), and improving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (prevalence ratio=1.21, 95% CI=1.07, 1.37) than in pre-Surenet period. The SureNet program was able to improve prescription orders, fills, laboratory test completions, and lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Optimizing both physician adherence to treatment guidelines; and patient adherence to the program may improve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering.

Statin persistence and adherence among older initiators: A nationwide cohort study using the national health insurance claims database in Japan.

This study clarifies the reality of persistence and adherence to statins in older Japanese people who initiated statin use and compares it between primary and secondary prevention cohorts. The nationwide study using the national claims database targeted statin initiators aged ≥55 years from FY2014 to FY2017 in Japan. Persistence and adherence to statins were analyzed overall and according to subgroups based on sex, age stratum, and prevention cohorts. Permissible gap of median days that statins were supplied per prescription to an individual was employed. Persistence rates were estimated as Kaplan-Meier estimates. Poor adherence during persistence was evaluated and defined as <0.8 of the proportion of days covered. Of 3 675 949 initiators, approximately 80% initiated statin use with strong variants. The persistence rate at 1 year was 0.61. Poor adherence to statins during persistence was 8.0% in all patients and this value gradually improved with increasing age. Persistence rate and adherence were lower for the primary prevention cohort than for the secondary prevention cohort, and a notable sex difference was observed for the secondary prevention cohort, which was lower in females but was almost never and slightly observed in the primary prevention cohorts without and with high-risk factors, respectively. Many statin initiators discontinued statins shortly following statin initiation but adherence while on statin therapy was good. Attentively watching older patients not to discontinue statins and listening to their reasons for discontinuation are required, especially for initiators in primary prevention and females in secondary prevention.

Prevalence of Statin Use and Predictors of Statin Initiation Among Patients with Alcohol-Related Cirrhosis - A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study.

Statins reportedly increase the survival of patients with cirrhosis due to alcohol-related liver disease (ALD cirrhosis), but this association might be confounded by socioeconomic status. We examined the prevalence of statin use and socioeconomic and demographic predictors of statin initiation and discontinuation among patients with ALD cirrhosis. Using Danish nationwide healthcare registries, we examined statin use among patients diagnosed with ALD cirrhosis in 1997-2018. We computed the prevalence of statin use and incidence of statin initiation and discontinuation, and we used multivariable Cox regression to identify predictors of statin initiation and discontinuation. We identified 28,260 patients with ALD cirrhosis in 1997-2018. During this period, the prevalence of statin use rose sharply, reaching 19.0% in late 2018. Among patients diagnosed with ALD cirrhosis after 2010, 16.9% were using statins when they were diagnosed with cirrhosis. Among the patients who did not use statins initially, those with lower educational attainment were more likely to begin taking them than those with higher attainment. Also, cohabiting patients were more likely to begin than patients who lived alone, and employed patients were more likely to begin compared to patients outside the labour force. Among current statin users, unemployment predicted statin discontinuation. The use of statins has become increasingly prevalent among Danish patients with ALD cirrhosis, reaching 19.0% in 2018. Employment, cohabitation, and a short education predicted statin initiation after ALD cirrhosis diagnosis, and unemployment predicted statin discontinuation. Overall, statin use was not a marker of a high socioeconomic status.

318 Optimizing the Identification and Prediction of Statin Intolerance to Improve Statin Adherence Using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Aim1: To develop a natural language processing (NLP) algorithm to effectively identify statin associated muscle symptoms (SAMS) in patients’electronic health records (EHRs). Aim2: To develop a machine learning model based on clinical features within EHRs that predict the likelihood of SAMS occurrences. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: A retrospective cohort of adult patients initiated on statins within the Minnesota Fairview Healthcare System EHRs from 2010 to 2020 will be analyzed. NLP-PIER (Patient Information Extraction for Research) platform will be used to search and identify patients who developed SAMS after statin initiation. Manual annotation of clinical notes will be completed to validate the accuracy of identified SAMS cases. Then, a selection of clinical features within the EHRs will be input as predictors for machine learning algorithms development. Select machine learning classifiers will be deployed to generate models for the prediction of SAMS and the best-performing model will be selected based on model performance. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The expected outcomes include generation of a fine-tuned NLP algorithm that can rigorously identify SAMS occurrences within EHRs. Further, we anticipate having a practical risk model that accurately predicts patients’risks of developing SAMS when taking statins. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The positive and translational impact of our research will be to equip healthcare providers with such informatics tools to improve statin adherence, ultimately promoting patient optimal health and outcomes by maximizing the tolerance and thus realizing the therapeutic benefits of statins.

Cardiovascular Disease Risk Estimation for Transgender and Gender-Diverse Patients: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Baseline Data From the LITE Plus Cohort Study

Approximately 2% of the U.S. population identifies as transgender, and transgender people experience disproportionate rates of cardiovascular disease mortality. However, widely used cardiovascular disease risk estimators have not been validated in this population. This study sought to determine the impact on statin therapy recommendations using 3 different approaches to operationalizing sex in the American Health Association/American College of Cardiology Pooled Cohort Equation Risk Estimator. This is a cross-sectional analysis of baseline clinical data from LITE Plus, a prospective cohort study of Black and/or Latina transgender women with HIV. Data were collected from October 2020 to June 2022 and used to calculate Pooled Cohort Equation scores. The 102 participants had a mean age of 43 years. A total of 88% were Black, and 18% were Latina. A total of 79% were taking gender-affirming hormones. The average Pooled Cohort Equation risk score was 6% when sex assigned at birth was used and statins would be recommended for the 31% with Pooled Cohort Equation >7.5%. The average risk score was 4%, and 18% met the criteria for statin initiation when current gender was used; the mean risk score was 5%, and 22% met the criteria for statin initiation when current hormone therapy was used. Average Pooled Cohort Equation risk scores vary substantially depending on the approach to operationalizing the sex variable, suggesting that widely used cardiovascular risk estimators may be unreliable predictors of cardiovascular disease risk in transgender populations. Collection of sex, gender, and hormone use in longitudinal studies of cardiovascular health is needed to address this important limitation of current risk estimators.

High-throughput screening for prescribing cascades among real world statin initiators.

Statins are among the most prevalent medications prescribed and associated with adverse events that may prompt additional treatment (i.e., a prescribing cascade). No comprehensive assessment of statin-related prescribing cascades has been performed to our knowledge. We utilized sequence symmetry analysis to iteratively screen prescribing sequences of all therapeutic classes ("marker" classes) based on Level 4 Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical codes among adult statin initiators, using IBM Marketscan commercial and Medicare supplemental claims databases (2005-2019). Order of initiation and secular trend-adjusted sequence ratios were calculated for each statin-marker class dyad, among marker class initiators ±90 days of statin initiation. Among signals classified as prescribing cascades, we calculated naturalistic number needed to harm (NNTH) within 1 year as the inverse of the excess risk among exposed. We identified 2 265 519 statin initiators (mean ± SD age, 56.4 ± 12.0 years; 48.7% women; 7.5% with cardiovascular disease). Simvastatin (34.4% of statin initiators) and atorvastatin (33.9%) were the most commonly initiated statins. We identified 160 significant statin-marker class dyad signals, of which 35.6% (n=57) were classified as potential prescribing cascades. Of the top 25 strongest signals (lowest NNTH), 12 were classified as potential prescribing cascades, including osmotically acting laxatives (NNTH, 44, 95% CI 43-46), opioids + non-opioid combination analgesics (81, 95% CI 74-91), and first-generation cephalosporins (204, 95% CI 175-246). Using high-throughput sequence symmetry analysis screening, we identified previously known prescribing cascades as well as potentially new prescribing cascades based on known and unknown statin-related adverse events.

A191 NONALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE AND LIVER FIBROSIS INCREASE CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES

Abstract Background Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is strongly associated with cardiovascular disease in the general population. Both NAFLD and cardiovascular diseases seem more frequent in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Purpose We aimed to assess the effect of NAFLD and associated liver fibrosis on the cardiovascular risk in people with IBD. Method We prospectively included IBD patients undergoing a routine screening program for NAFLD by transient elastography (TE) with associated controlled attenuation parameter (CAP). NAFLD and significant liver fibrosis were defined as CAP &amp;gt;275 dB/m and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by TE ≥8 kPa, respectively. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with liver fibrosis was defined as Fibroscan-aspartate aminotransferase (AST) score (FAST) &amp;gt;0.35. Cardiovascular risk was assessed with the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk estimator proposed by the American Heart Association and computed from age, sex, race, lipid pattern, blood pressure, diabetes treatment and smoking. Based on the American Heart Association guidelines, the 10-year cardiovascular risk by ASCVD was categorized as low if &amp;lt;5%, borderline if 5%–7.4%, intermediate if 7.5%–19.9% and high if ≥20% or if previous cardiovascular event.Predictors of intermediate-high cardiovascular risk were investigated by multivariable logistic regression analysis. Result(s) We included 405 patients with IBD (54% female; mean age 45+15 years; mean BMI 26+5 Kg/m; 31% with ulcerative colitis; 7% with diabetes; 14% with hypertension). Overall, 278 (68%), 23 (6%), 47 (12%) and 57 (14%) were categorized as at low, borderline, intermediate and high ASCVD risk, respectively. NAFLD and significant liver fibrosis were found in 129 (32%) and 35 (9%) patients, respectively. NASH with fibrosis was found in 11 (3%) patients. Patients with NAFLD and with significant liver fibrosis diagnosed by TE with CAP had higher proportion of intermediate-high ASCVD risk category (see Figure). These findings were confirmed also in young IBD patients &amp;lt;55 years old with NAFLD. No difference in ASCVD risk was detected for FAST score. After adjusting for IBD disease activity, significant liver fibrosis and BMI, predictors of intermediate-high ASCVD risk were NAFLD (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.56–5.68), IBD duration (aOR 1.55 per 10 years, 95% CI 1.22–1.97), and ulcerative colitis (aOR 2.32, 95% CI 1.35–3.98). Only 30% of IBD patients classified as intermediate-high ASCVD risk were on statin treatment, with no difference between patients with and without NAFLD. Image Conclusion(s) NAFLD increases cardiovascular risk, independently of age, IBD-related factors and BMI. A potential implication of our finding is the targeted cardiovascular assessment in IBD patients with NAFLD and appropriate initiation of statin, particularly if they have longer IBD duration and ulcerative colitis. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below CAG Disclosure of Interest None Declared

A34 NONALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE AND LIVER FIBROSIS INCREASE CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES

Abstract Background Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is strongly associated with cardiovascular disease in the general population. Both NAFLD and cardiovascular diseases seem more frequent in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Purpose We aimed to assess the effect of NAFLD and associated liver fibrosis on the cardiovascular risk in people with IBD. Method We prospectively included IBD patients undergoing a routine screening program for NAFLD by transient elastography (TE) with associated controlled attenuation parameter (CAP). NAFLD and significant liver fibrosis were defined as CAP &amp;gt;275 dB/m and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by TE ≥8 kPa, respectively. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with liver fibrosis was defined as Fibroscan-aspartate aminotransferase (AST) score (FAST) &amp;gt;0.35. Cardiovascular risk was assessed with the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk estimator proposed by the American Heart Association and computed from age, sex, race, lipid pattern, blood pressure, diabetes treatment and smoking. Based on the American Heart Association guidelines, the 10-year cardiovascular risk by ASCVD was categorized as low if &amp;lt;5%, borderline if 5%–7.4%, intermediate if 7.5%–19.9% and high if ≥20% or if previous cardiovascular event.Predictors of intermediate-high cardiovascular risk were investigated by multivariable logistic regression analysis. Result(s) We included 405 patients with IBD (54% female; mean age 45+15 years; mean BMI 26+5 Kg/m2; 31% with ulcerative colitis; 7% with diabetes; 14% with hypertension). Overall, 278 (68%), 23 (6%), 47 (12%) and 57 (14%) were categorized as at low, borderline, intermediate and high ASCVD risk, respectively. NAFLD and significant liver fibrosis were found in 129 (32%) and 35 (9%) patients, respectively. NASH with fibrosis was found in 11 (3%) patients. Patients with NAFLD and with significant liver fibrosis diagnosed by TE with CAP had higher proportion of intermediate-high ASCVD risk category (see Figure). These findings were confirmed also in young IBD patients &amp;lt;55 years old with NAFLD. No difference in ASCVD risk was detected for FAST score. After adjusting for IBD disease activity, significant liver fibrosis and BMI, predictors of intermediate-high ASCVD risk were NAFLD (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.56–5.68), IBD duration (aOR 1.55 per 10 years, 95% CI 1.22–1.97), and ulcerative colitis (aOR 2.32, 95% CI 1.35–3.98). Only 30% of IBD patients classified as intermediate-high ASCVD risk were on statin treatment, with no difference between patients with and without NAFLD. Image Conclusion(s) NAFLD increases cardiovascular risk, independently of age, IBD-related factors and BMI. A potential deliverable of our finding is the targeted cardiovascular assessment in IBD patients with NAFLD and appropriate initiation of statin, particularly if they have longer IBD duration and ulcerative colitis. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below None Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Pharmacy student involvement in population health management of statin quality measures

AbstractBackgroundPharmacists have demonstrated their value in population health management (PHM). With appropriate training, advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) students are also well positioned to participate in PHM.MethodsAt Providence Medical Foundation, a PHM workflow was remodeled to be more standardized and incorporate APPE students into the statin quality measure improvement process. This was driven by institutional goals for quality improvement in patient care and creating a better experiential teaching opportunity. APPE students underwent three training sessions and completed clinical review of patient charts, determined statin eligibility, and completed patient outreach. Rates of statin initiation and student feedback were collected. The rates of statins initiated or declined with this new workflow were retrospectively compared to a previous year's workflow, which was pharmacist‐led.InterventionReview pharmacy student involvement with PHM, including statin initiation rates for quality measure improvement as well as student feedback and learning.ResultsAmong the 543 patients included in the remodeled workflow, students started statins for 75 (13.8%) patients while 114 (21%) patients declined statins. Among the 829 patients included in the previous year's traditional workflow, pharmacists started statins for 102 (12.3%) patients while 167 (20.1%) patients declined statins. There was no statistically significant difference in rates of statins started (odds ratio [OR] 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63–1.22; p = 0.41) and statins declined (OR 0.95; CI 0.72–1.25; p = 0.73) between the two groups. Student feedback on this activity was positive with self‐reported improvement in confidence, clinical knowledge, and communication skills.ConclusionsIncorporating pharmacy students into PHM was a valuable learning experience for students and effective for initiating statins to assist with quality measures. Students can be an asset to the team in PHM and help ease resource shortages.

Abstract P432: Statin Initiation for Primary Prevention and Dose Intensity According to Age in the Women’s Health Initiative

Introduction: Over 50% of US adults older than 75 live free of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and diabetes (DM), yet data on incident statin use among this population are lacking. Our objective was to assess statin initiation by age among the Women’s Health Initiative cohort free of ASCVD and DM at baseline (1993). Hypothesis: Statin initiation is higher at older ages and differs by race/ethnicity. Methods: Exclusions were statin use at baseline, known ASCVD, DM, and no follow-up after baseline. Self-reported medication use was assessed in 1996 and 2008. Specific statin and dose prescribed at the time of initiation were identified using National Drug Codes and determined statin intensity, defined by the ACC/AHA guidelines. We estimated the adjusted association between age group (&lt;65, 65-74, and ≥75) and statin initiation and assessed for heterogeneity by race/ethnicity. We also assessed statin dose at the time of initiation. Results: Over 12 years of follow-up, 27% of 99,631 women free of ASCVD and DM at baseline initiated a statin; initiation was lower with older age (Table). This association remained after adjustment for ASCVD risk factors and did not differ by race/ethnicity (p for interaction &gt;0.5). Moderate intensity dose was most common at statin initiation overall, and moderate and high intensity dose were both lower with older age. Conclusion: Of women free of ASCVD and DM, women older than 75 were least likely to start a statin and most likely to start low intensity statin therapy at initiation than younger women. We identified a potential clinical gap for investigation: whether lower overall use of statins and lower intensity statin therapy among older women are associated with preventable ASCVD.

Abstract P448: Trends and Predictors of Statin Initiation Among Veterans With Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Introduction: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), defined as LDL-C ≥190mg/dL, is a strong cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor. The AHA/ACC guidelines recommend high intensity statins for primary prevention irrespective of global risk assessment. We sought to characterize trends and predictors of statin initiation among Veterans with FH in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Methods: Inclusion criteria consisted of care at the VHA (2002-2014), age ≥21 years, baseline LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL, no prevalent CVD, no prior statin use, and statin initiation within 90 days of LDL-C measurement. We defined baseline LDL-C in quartiles: Q1=190-195, Q2=196-202, Q3=203-215, and Q4 &gt;215 (mg/dL). Statin intensity was defined as average intensity over one year following baseline LDL-C measurement. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to determine the odds of any statin initiation and high intensity statin initiation. Results: Over 12 years, 165,110 Veterans (age=52.9±11.9, men=91%; white race=74%) were included. Statins were initiated in 88,878 patients (overall 54%, 62% in 2014). Overall, 29,533 Veterans were on high intensity statins (overall 33%, 20% in 2002, 50% in 2014). In multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models, significant predictors of statin initiation were age, white race, diabetes hypertension, smoking, baseline LDL-C, and recent calendar year. Among those initiated on high intensity statins, the same predictors were significant; however, African Americans were more likely to be started on a high intensity statin (Table). Conclusions: Among Veterans with FH, the odds of statin initiation are higher among older, Caucasian, hypertensive, diabetic, and smoking veterans. The odds of statin prescription have increased over time with a higher proportion receiving high intensity statins more recently. These data reflect the VHA changes in clinical practice concordant with ACC/AHA guidelines.

Abstract P367: Automated Outreach to Improve Statin Initiation and Follow-Up of Lipid Panels Among Patients With High LDL-C

Background: Despite their effectiveness in reducing low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, high-intensity statins are underutilized among patients with LDL-C ≥ 190 mg/dL. We aimed to determine if a patient outreach program (KP Sure Net) automating high-intensity statin orders and lipid panels improved statin initiation and lab completions. Methods: Kaiser Permanente Southern California adults 20-60 years of age with LDL-C ≥ 190 mg/dL and no recent statin use were compared pre- (January 2016-September 2018, n=3,534) and post- (April 2019-July 2021, n=3,555) program implementation to examine statin prescriptions and fills, lab completions, and improved LDL-C (&lt;190 mg/dL) at 6 months. Using Poisson regression with robust variance, we calculated relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association of program implementation with statin prescriptions, fills, lab completions, and improved LDL-C, separately, adjusting for sociodemographics, insurance, comorbidity burden, and non-statin medication use. Results: Among adults identified during pre- and post-implementation, 759 (21.5%) and 976 (27.5%), respectively, received a statin prescription. Adults with a prescription post- versus pre-implementation were more likely to be younger, identify as Black or Asian ethnicity, be English-speaking and have higher income, but were similar by sex, education, insurance, and comorbidity burden. (Table) After multivariable adjustment, adults post- versus pre-implementation had a higher likelihood of receiving a statin prescription (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.25, 1.48), filling their statin (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.26, 1.38), completing their lipid panel (RR 1.60, 95% CI 1.44, 1.78), and improving LDL-C (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.20, 1.53). Conclusion: Automating statin orders and lipid panels for high-risk adults improved prescription rates, fills and LDL-C. Understanding facilitators and barriers to adherence is an important next step in improving patients’ health.

Abstract 91: Early Stroke Recurrence Is Not Reduced By Early Statin Initiation In The Point Trial Population

Objective: To discern effects of early statin treatment on early stroke recurrence in the POINT trial. Background: Benefits of statin therapy in reducing risk of ischemic stroke over the long-term are well-established, but the immediate effects of statin therapy on early stroke recurrence after an initial ischemic event are less clear. Design/Methods: In secondary analysis of the data of the Platelet Oriented Inhibition in New TIA and Minor Ischemic Stroke (POINT) trial, we evaluated the effects of statins on early stroke recurrence within 7 days of randomization using Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. We separately compared the effects in subgroups of subjects on and not on statins prior to the index event. Results: In the POINT trial, most recurrences of ischemic stroke were early, with 175 occurring within 7 days of trial entry, and only 105 occurring over the remainder of the 90 day trial. Overall, 39% were on statin treatment at time of enrollment which increased to 79% by 7 days post-index event. In Cox proportional hazard analysis for stroke recurrence over the 7 day period after index stroke or TIA, statin administration showed no significant effect in subjects not on statin at baseline (Adjusted p=0.34). In contrast, statin use prior to enrollment was associated with decreased hazard of early stroke recurrence (Adjusted H.R. 0.31, p=0.001). Conclusion: In the POINT trial population of patients with minor ischemic stroke or TIA, prior treatment with statins was associated with decreased risk of early stroke recurrence within 7 days following index stroke or TIA. There was no effect of initiating statin treatment in reducing risk of early stroke recurrence.

Heart failure (MYHF) registry: shedding light on lipid profiles and in-hospital outcome of heart failure patients

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Novartis Corporation Sdn Bhd Background Heart failure is a debilitating disease associated with multiple comorbidities and poor prognosis. Dyslipidemia, is the top 5 most common comorbidities, including HF patients. Nonetheless, the lipid profiles in HF population is scarcely available and poorly understood. Purpose This report aimed to describe the lipid profiles and in-hospital outcome of hospitalized HF patients. Methods MYHF registry is a prospective, observational study of symptomatic HF patients (NYHA II-IV) hospitalized in 18 tertiary care centers in Malaysia over a period of 3 years starting in 2019. Lipid profiles will be described, and in-hospital outcome will be analyzed using univariate and multivariate models. Results In MYHF registry, 1 out of 2 hospitalized HF patients (55.7%) had ischemic heart disease, significantly higher in patients with HFrEF and HFmrEF, as compared to HFpEF (p&amp;lt;0.001). Similarly, 1 in 2 (46.6%) patients had dyslipidemia as comorbidity but was comparable across EF subgroups (p=0.365). Statin utilization at discharge increased by 20% from admission (from 62.2% to 74.6%), indicating that hospitalization provides good opportunity for statin initiation in indicated HF patients. At admission, the mean total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL, and TG levels were 4.30 mmol/L (SD 1.66), 2.62 mmol/L (SD 1.34), 1.05 (SD 0.46), and 1.37 (SD 1.08), respectively. Of those with measured LDL-C level, only 31.4% achieved LDL-C goal of &amp;lt;1.8 mmol/L and 39.8% of patients had LDL-C ≥2.6 mmol/L. With univariate analysis, patients with LDL-C goal of ≥ 1.8 mmol/L had lesser risk of in-hospital mortality [OR 0.42 (0.21,0.86), p-value = 0.018], indicating LDL-C paradox. Further analysis with multivariate model revealed that patients with LDL-C goal of ≥ or &amp;lt; 1.8 mmol/L did not differ in in-hospital mortality outcome (p-value = NS). Conclusion Dyslipidemia is highly common in general population and in HF patients. With statin therapy, only 31.4% achieved LDL-C &amp;lt; 1.8 mmol/L at admission. The finding highlights the unmet need for combination lipid lowering therapies to get patient to LDL-C target goal. Hospitalization also provided good opportunity of statin therapy initiation. The knowledge gained will be crucial for guiding management of HF patients with common comorbidity like dyslipidemia.

Pragmatic and Early Usage of Statin in Patients with Diabetes for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

Background: An early initiation of statins in the diabetes population helps in prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, there is a paucity of data on its use in young Indian patients with diabetes. This survey report aimed to provide opinion-based recommendations for pragmatic usage of statin in diabetes population of India. Material and Methods: Discussion and virtual survey (a questionnaire of 18 questions) was conducted at 16 round table meetings (RTMs) which included participation of health-care practitioners (HCPs) from India. On the basis of their opinions and discussion, general recommendations about early usage of statins in diabetes for prevention of ASCVD were derived. Results: Out of 261 HCPs participated, 56.1% recommended initiating statins in patients aged 41–50 years irrespective of their total/low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Among people with diabetes aged between 20 and 39 years, 38.9% of HCPs considered LDL-C &gt;100 mg/dL and 77% of HCPs considered history of ASCVD as a risk factor for early statin initiation. Overall, 98.9% of HCPs agreed that early initiation of statin in people with diabetes and ASCVD risk factors will help reduce ASCVD. The majority of HCPs recommended initiating moderate-intensity (51.2%) and low-intensity (43.8%) statins and assess every 3 months for tolerance and compliance in people with diabetes (aged 20–39 years) and additional ASCVD risk factors. The use of rosuvastatin (78.5% of HCPs) was preferred for early initiation in people with diabetes. Majority of HCPs agreed (57.3%) or strongly agreed (36.2%) that rosuvastatin has more clinical utility compared to other statins due to better LDL-C-lowering effect and other pleiotropic effects. Physician's inertia limits the effective use of statins among young adults with diabetes (55.8%), and 65.8% of HCPs recommended screening of people with diabetes for additional ASCVD risk factors. Conclusion: The participating HCPs opined that early initiation of statin therapy in people with diabetes and ASCVD risk factors will help reduce ASCVD. Rosuvastatin is mostly recommended for early initiation of statin therapy among the diabetes population for prevention of ASCVD. There is a necessity of using a proactive approach to screen for additional ASCVD risk factors in young individuals with diabetes and further increase the awareness about benefits of initiating statin therapy from an early stage.