We compared the results of staging by a second circumferential transurethral resection and/or transperineal needle biopsy in 42 patients with stage A prostatic adenocarcinoma on initial transurethral resection (defined as tumor of low grade, Gleason sum 2 to 4, and low volume, less than 5 per cent of the specimen or less than 3 foci). Transurethral resection only was done in 16 patients, transperineal needle biopsy only in 2 and both procedures in 24. In the 24 patients who underwent both procedures residual carcinoma was identified by transurethral resection in 6 and confirmed by transperineal needle biopsy in only 1.Thirty-two patients (76 per cent) had no residual carcinoma. Of the 10 patients (24 per cent) with residual carcinoma 5 underwent radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy, 1 had interstitial irradiation with pelvic lymphadenectomy and 1 had pelvic lymphadenectomy only. No lymphatic metastases were detected; persistent carcinoma confined to the prostate was noted in all 5 patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy and 3 of these tumors were upstaged because of higher grade and/or volume.We conclude that residual carcinoma cannot be assessed accurately with transperineal needle biopsy, whereas transurethral resection staging enabled us to define a substantial number of our patients (24 per cent) with persistent disease. Importantly, upstaging by either low volume/high grade or high volume carcinoma was identified in 3 patients at the time of radical prostatectomy. However, the true stage and prognosis of those patients with persistent low volume and low grade prostatic carcinoma remain to be determined.