Abstract Background/Introduction Recent guidelines and randomised controlled trials have proposed less frequent use of invasive strategies for patients with stable chest pain, and demonstrated the non-inferiority of an initial medical management strategy. However, the impact of these updates on clinical practice in the United Kingdom has not been previously reported. Purpose We aimed to identify if recent guidelines and literature have changed the management of patients being referred for stress echocardiography to assess inducible ischaemia in a real-world, multi-centre national healthcare system, and determine if this has significantly impacted patient outcomes. Methods Patients were recruited to the EVAREST/BSE-NSTEP prospective cohort study between 2015 and 2023 across the UK as part of two phases (phase 1: Mar 2015-Sep 2020; phase 2: Oct 2020-Sep 2023). Patient demographics, and stress echocardiogram procedural details were collected by study team members at each participating hospital, and 1 year medical outcome data was collected via the Data Access Request Service from NHS England. Patient management decisions and outcomes including referral for invasive coronary angiography, mortality, and cardiovascular events were compared between recruitment phases using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard ratios. Results 5,082 participants were included in this analysis of patient management and outcomes (2,613 in phase 1, and 2,469 in phase 2), with a consistent age, sex, and BMI between recruitment cohorts. There was a higher rate of smoking and hypercholesterolaemia in phase 2 participants, but a decrease in hypertension and peripheral vascular disease (Table 1). There was a decrease in referral rate for invasive angiography for participants with a positive stress echocardiogram in phase 2 (p<0.05; Fig. 1B). Overall, participants in phase 2 had a higher rate of mortality (p<0.01) than those in phase 1, but there was no difference in cardiac event rate between phases (Fig. 1C-F). These results remained consistent after adjusting for covariates, with a reduced hazard ratio for invasive angiography in phase 2 participants who had a positive stress echocardiogram (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.66-0.92, p<0.01). Additionally, phase 2 participants had an increased hazard ratio for mortality (HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.05-3.55, p<0.05), but no significant increase in risk of cardiac event (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.43-1.12, p=0.13). Conclusions Since 2020, participants are being less frequently referred for invasive coronary angiography after stress echocardiography possibly in favour of an initial medical management strategy. However, this reduction in referral to coronary angiography does not appear to have a negative impact on patient health as measured by cardiac event rate.
Read full abstract