Initial Injection Rate Research Articles

Combustion improvement for reducing exhaust emissions in IDI diesel engine

Means for reducing PM from a swirl chamber type diesel engine were examined and the mechanisms of the PM reduction were investigated using both a multi-cylinder and an optically accessible single-cylinder engine. The following points were clarified. (1) At light load, suppression of initial injection rate reduces PM, because of both the change of ignition point to reduce SOF, and the retarded flowout of dense soot from the swirl chamber to reduce smoke. (2) Over medium load, the main cause of the exhaust smoke is hard spray-wall impingement which leads to both fuel adhesion on the wall and the stagnation of rich fuel-air mixture.

Influence of the Diameter of Single-Hole Nozzles on the Performance of a Diesel Engine Driven by Emulsified Fuel.

By using a single-hole nozzle and by changing the hole diameters to 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, and 0.7mm, the injection rates and the atomizing properties of emulsified fuel were clarified, and the investigation on the engine performance was carried out in comparison with the throttle nozzle. As a result, it was found that when emulsified fuel was used, the specific fuel consumption was affected largely by the injection rate rather than the atomizing properties of fuel. That is, when the initial injection rate was too large (nozzle hole diameter is large) or too small (nozzle hole diameter is small), the improvement of specific fuel consumption as compared with gas oil was unobtainable. The cause was mainly due to the increase of cooling loss. Accordingly, for an engine to be used we must consider the optimum injection rate and nozzle diameter, and in the present experiment, the nozzle diameter of 0.6mm was the best.

Underground Storage and Retrieval of Fresh Water from Brackish-Water Aquifer: ABSTRACT

In 1967, the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the City of Norfolk, Virginia, began a study concerning the injection of fresh water into a confined aquifer containing brackish water. The objectives of the study were (1) to determine whether the host formation would physically accept large volumes of fresh water, (2) to determine the degree of mixing of the injected fresh water with the saline water, and (3) to determine the percentage of recoverable potable water after long periods of storage. During late 1971 and early 1972, three injection and withdrawal tests were carried out. In test 1, fresh water was injected at a rate of 400 gpm (gallons per minute). The specific capacity of the well decreased from an initial value of 15.4 to 9.3 gpm/ft of drawdown at the end of 260 minutes of injection. In test 2, the initial injection rate of 400 gpm decreased to 215 gpm after 7,900 minutes of injection. The specific capacity dropped from 14.2 to 3.7 gpm/ft during the same time interval. Test 3 began with the aquifer accepting water at a maximum rate of 290 gpm, and the injection rate fell to 100 gpm within 150 minutes and continued to decline to a low of 70 gpm after approximately 1,300 minutes. The specific capacity decreased from an initial value of 3.7 to 0.93 gpm/ft at the end of the test. Specific capacities during the withdrawal phases dropped from 19.7 gpm/ft at the beginning of test 1 to 6.7 gpm/ft at the end of test 3. All attempts at redevelopment of the injection well failed to improve the specific capacity. Current-meter surveys conducted during injection and withdrawal pumping indicated that the reduction in flow rate and specific capacities was due to a uniform reduction in permeability of all contributing zones in the aquifer rather than to a complete shut-off of flow from selected parts of the aquifer. All of the hydraulic data collected during the three tests indicated that a physical change of the formation materials had occurred. Specifically, it was felt that the uniform loss of specific capacity of the contributing zones was due to clay dispersion, a phenomenon well known to the petroleum industry. Chemical data collected during the three tests indicated that the sodium-rich clays also were involved in cation exchange. As fresh water was being injected, calcium and magnesium replaced sodium on the clays. During withdrawals, a reversible reaction occurred as the sodium concentration in the mixed fresh and formation water increased. The net effect of the replacement of sodium with calcium and magnesium was to decrease very slightly the tendency of the clays to disperse during the injection of fresh water. The cation exchange activity during both the injection and withdrawal phases had little to do with clay dispersion, which is more nearly a physical than chemical characteristic. However, the exchange activity noted during all three tests did indicate that the clays would readily respond to chemical treatment for the purposes of decreasing or eliminating clay dispersion. Subsequently, a preflush of 3,000 gal of 0.2 N calcium chloride solution was injected in front of the fresh water in injection test 4. The initial specific capacity was 4.3 gpm/ft compared with the ending injection specific capacity of 0.93 gpm/ft in test 3. By redevelopment pumping during injection, the specific capacity was improved to a high of 5.3 gpm/ft. After 4 million gal of water had been injected, an additional 3,000 gal of 0.4 N calcium chloride solution was added to the formation. The injection specific capacity increased to a high of 7.12 gpm/ft. The injection specific capacity fell off with time because only the area around the bore hole was treated to prevent clay dispersion. The data from test 4 indicated a maximum injection rate could be maintained by injecting for periods of 1,200 and 1,400 minutes, then withdrawing water for 30 minutes to remove from the aquifer any sand and clay particles that were clogging the injection zones. A total of 20 million gal of fresh water was injected in test 4. The water was left in the aquifer for about 6 weeks before beginning the withdrawal phase. It had been determined from the first three injection tests that about 85% of the injection water could be recovered End_Page 1592------------------------------ and remain within the drinking standards of the U.S. Public Health Service. End_of_Article - Last_Page 1593------------

Injection Rates - The Effect of Mobility Ratio, Area Swept, and Pattern

Abstract A method is presented for calculating approximate injection rates in secondary recovery operations. The method can he applied to cases of unequal fluid mobilities, irregular well patterns and boundary patterns. The steady-state pressure distributions for the four flood patterns reported by Muskat and for five additional patterns reveal that most of the difference in pressure between the injection and producing wells occurs in regions around the wells which can adequately he described as regions of radial flow. This leads to a method of calculating injectivity by approximating the flood pattern with radial flow elements (or a combination of radial- and linear-flow elements for some patterns such as the direct line drive). Irregular and boundary patterns can also be approximated by radial and linear elements. Each of these elements can be described by radial- and linear-flow equations and the results combined as series flow resistances to give an approximate equation for the initial injection rate. The mobility ratio does not affect the initial rate; therefore, if the well pattern is one of those regular patterns for which theoretical rate equations have been derived for unity mobility ratio, the approximate initial rate equation can be improved by adjusting it to match the theoretical equation. The available theoretical rate equations are listed, including five new cases. As the flood progresses, the injectivity changes because in general the flood front will divide the pattern into areas of different fluid mobilities. Simple shapes can be assumed for the flood front so that both areas can be divided into radial- and linear-flow elements. Radial- and linear-flow equations are applied to these elements to account for the change in flow resistance behind the front. To calculate injection rates after breakthrough, it is necessary to know the sweep efficiency at breakthrough. Areal sweep data are available in the literature for a number of patterns, and sufficiently accurate breakthrough sweep efficiency can be estimated from these data if it is not otherwise available.