Introduction: In the wake of TTM2 many clinicians have replaced therapeutic hypothermia using a cooling device with fever avoidance (sometimes without a cooling device) in post-cardiac arrest patients. Given this and the adverse effects of fever, we aimed to establish the incidence of post arrest fever (Tmax ≥38oC) when a cooling device was not used and impact on outcome. Methods: A retrospective chart review of adult cardiac arrest survivors admitted to the ICUs in the Mount Sinai Health System in 2021 was conducted. Patients who had traumatic arrests, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), hypo- or hyperthermia prior to arrest, death within 72 hours, and those aged ≥90 years were excluded. Patients were stratified by cooling device vs no cooling device. Univariate and multivariable statistics were computed, and endpoints examined included Tmax of ≥38oC within 48h of admission and discharged alive (vs deceased). Results: 364 patients were screened, 170 excluded, and 194 analyzed. In univariate analysis, patients who were younger (median (IQR) 60 (53-67) vs 66 (56-75) years, p=0.014), status-post out-of-hospital arrest (77.1% vs 39.2%, p< 0.001), and with a longer ROSC time (16.5 (10-34.5) vs 8 (3-15) min, p< 0.0001) were more likely to receive a cooling device. Patients without a cooling device were more likely to reach Tmax ≥38oC (37.1% vs 13.5%, p< 0.001); however, those with a cooling device were less likely to be discharged alive (28.7% vs 55.3%, p< 0.001). In multivariable analyses controlling for variables such as age, arrest location, initial arrest rhythm, and ROSC time, lack of cooling device was consistently an independent predictor of Tmax ≥38oC. Further, lower peak temperature at 48h emerged in some multivariable models as an independent predictor of being discharged alive. At the same time, however, lack of cooling device was a consistent independent predictor of being discharged alive. Lower ROSC time and greater GCS were associated with being discharged alive in some models. Conclusions: Cooling devices appeared to be associated with fever prevention but used in patients who ultimately did poorly. Moreso than use of a cooling device, achieving fever avoidance (however that may be obtained) may be more important for prognosis.
Read full abstract